1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Yellowpanties Lies About The Evidence In This Case

    From Bud@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 15 09:04:02 2023
    Ben Holmes wrote...

    "That makes JFK's at *least* as 'oval' as the entry wound that Connally sustained: (1.5 x .8mm)"

    Ben is claiming to *know* the size of the wound Connally sustained.

    But he won`t be able top produce anyone who measured the wound.

    So unless he knows some way to gather this information without measuring, he simply lied.

    (Absurd on the face of it that a near mortally wounded gunshot victim would be brought to a hospital and they would take time to measure the wounds.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 15 10:06:38 2023
    On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    Ben Holmes wrote...

    "That makes JFK's at *least* as 'oval' as the entry wound that Connally
    sustained: (1.5 x .8mm)"

    Ben is claiming to *know* the size of the wound Connally sustained.

    But he won`t be able top produce anyone who measured the wound.

    So unless he knows some way to gather this information without measuring, he simply lied.

    (Absurd on the face of it that a near mortally wounded gunshot victim would be brought to a hospital and they would take time to measure the wounds.)


    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Aug 15 10:31:35 2023
    On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 1:06:39 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:
    Ben Holmes wrote...

    "That makes JFK's at *least* as 'oval' as the entry wound that Connally
    sustained: (1.5 x .8mm)"

    Ben is claiming to *know* the size of the wound Connally sustained.

    But he won`t be able top produce anyone who measured the wound.

    So unless he knows some way to gather this information without measuring, he simply lied.

    (Absurd on the face of it that a near mortally wounded gunshot victim would be brought to a hospital and they would take time to measure the wounds.)
    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Predictable troll response.

    Ben didn`t even try to justify the lie he told. If Ben has the truth on his side why does he lie so much?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 15 10:41:26 2023
    On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 1:06:39?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 09:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
    wrote:
    Ben Holmes wrote...

    "That makes JFK's at *least* as 'oval' as the entry wound that Connally >>>sustained: (1.5 x .8mm)"

    Ben is claiming to *know* the size of the wound Connally sustained.

    But he won`t be able top produce anyone who measured the wound.

    So unless he knows some way to gather this information without measuring, he simply lied.

    (Absurd on the face of it that a near mortally wounded gunshot victim would be brought to a hospital and they would take time to measure the wounds.)
    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Predictable troll response.

    Ben didn`t even try to justify the lie he told. If Ben has the truth on his side why does he lie so much?

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)