On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 11:24:01 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
He has repeatedly refused to answer this simple "yes/no" question:
I explained things to you. You don`t like the explanation I gave.
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Loaded question that assume the issue in dispute is resolved by a yes or no answer.
He *can't* answer it...
You won`t look at the issue correctly, and I can`t make you.
Bugliosi went on to explain how the oval shape spoke strongly that the bullet hit something. How the HSCA thought the same thing. He made the case. Speak against the case he made.
the truth would prove Bugliosi mistaken, at
best... and given his intellect, more likely a blatant liar.
And Chickenshit can't refute that.
So he runs.
You make this posts and they only show your dishonesty, nothing more.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)