It might have been more appropriate to title this thread "How Gil's mind malfunctions", but let's go with what we have.
Carolyn Arnold gave two documented versions of what she saw on the day
of the assassination, in an FBI report four days after the assassination and her signed affidavit four months after the assassination. There were a couple
differences in the two documents. In the FBI report, she said she might have seen Oswald inside the front entrance after she and her co-workers had
gone outside shortly before 12:15. In the affidavit, she stated she left the building at 12:25 and made no mention of seeing Oswald before the shooting and made it a point to say she didn't see him at the time the shots were fired.
There is a mundane explanation for these discrepancies. That explanation is that at the time, Arnold would have had no reason to make a mental note as to the exact time she left the building, nor would it have seemed the least bit important to her that she might have seen Oswald near the front entrance.
When people don't notice things in the present, it's unlikely they are going to
have a clear memory of them later on whether that would be four days later or four months later.
But that explanation is far too mundane for Gil. He treats the differences in
the two accounts as evidence the FBI doctored Arnold's first statement. He has them changing the time she might have seen Oswald because he wants
to believe Oswald was still near the front door as late as 12:25, even though
Arnold's signed statement didn't say she saw Oswald at that time. The question Gil never bothers to ask himself is this. If the FBI was going to manipulate Arnold's statement, why would they change the time of the sighting? Why wouldn't they just leave that part out altogether? It seems to me if they were trying to frame Oswald, they wouldn't want anything on the record that indicated he was anywhere on the first floor at any time after 12:00.
Gil, by his own admission, is acting as Oswald's defense counsel, not an objective seeker of the truth. As such, he is going to treat every minor discrepancy in eyewitness accounts as evidence that the entire law enforcement apparatus, the DPD, the sheriff's department, the FBI, and the Secret Service all immediately went into cover up mode and decided to frame poor little Lee Harvey Oswald for the crime of the century. They had no interest whatsoever finding the actual perpetrator(s) of the assassination nor the killing of a Dallas police officer. Gil never bothers to explain why they
would do such a thing and how every last one of them, with the notable exception of Roger Craig, agreed to go along with the cover up.
It might have been more appropriate to title this thread "How Gil's mind malfunctions", but let's go with what we have.
Carolyn Arnold gave two documented versions of what she saw on the day
of the assassination, in an FBI report four days after the assassination and her signed affidavit four months after the assassination. There were a couple
differences in the two documents. In the FBI report, she said she might have seen Oswald inside the front entrance after she and her co-workers had
gone outside shortly before 12:15. In the affidavit, she stated she left the building at 12:25 and made no mention of seeing Oswald before the shooting and made it a point to say she didn't see him at the time the shots were fired.
There is a mundane explanation for these discrepancies. That explanation is that at the time, Arnold would have had no reason to make a mental note as to the exact time she left the building, nor would it have seemed the least bit important to her that she might have seen Oswald near the front entrance.
When people don't notice things in the present, it's unlikely they are going to
have a clear memory of them later on whether that would be four days later or four months later.
But that explanation is far too mundane for Gil. He treats the differences in
the two accounts as evidence the FBI doctored Arnold's first statement. He has them changing the time she might have seen Oswald because he wants
to believe Oswald was still near the front door as late as 12:25, even though
Arnold's signed statement didn't say she saw Oswald at that time. The question Gil never bothers to ask himself is this. If the FBI was going to manipulate Arnold's statement, why would they change the time of the sighting? Why wouldn't they just leave that part out altogether? It seems to me if they were trying to frame Oswald, they wouldn't want anything on the record that indicated he was anywhere on the first floor at any time after 12:00.
Gil, by his own admission, is acting as Oswald's defense counsel, not an objective seeker of the truth. As such, he is going to treat every minor discrepancy in eyewitness accounts as evidence that the entire law enforcement apparatus, the DPD, the sheriff's department, the FBI, and the Secret Service all immediately went into cover up mode and decided to frame poor little Lee Harvey Oswald for the crime of the century. They had no interest whatsoever finding the actual perpetrator(s) of the assassination nor the killing of a Dallas police officer. Gil never bothers to explain why they
would do such a thing and how every last one of them, with the notable exception of Roger Craig, agreed to go along with the cover up.
It might have been more appropriate to title this thread "How Gil's mind >malfunctions", but let's go with what we have.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:15:37 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Gil is giving too many opportunities to Lone Nutter trolls like Corbett because of his research stupidity...
As to Carolyn Arnold - the only thing that can be said about her is she was a dangerous witness whose testimony FBI radically altered in order to remove her witnessing of Oswald in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room during the assassination...
FBI did similar bastardization of the evidence with Sarah Stanton, Jack Dougherty, and Victoria Adams...
Gil is dumb enough to back FBI's lies against those witnesses and defend it like a High School idiot and the rest of the phony so-called "Conspiracy" community doesn't say a word...
Ah! I see Corbutt has learned the Huckster trick of word vomit...
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:24:46?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Ah! I see Corbutt has learned the Huckster trick of word vomit...
The asshole thinks he's a psychiatrist. LOL
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:24:46 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Ah! I see Corbutt has learned the Huckster trick of word vomit...The asshole thinks he's a psychiatrist. LOL
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 12:11:26?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 11:24:46?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Ah! I see Corbutt has learned the Huckster trick of word vomit...The asshole thinks he's a psychiatrist. LOL
I guess...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 115:35:26 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,132 |