When faced with this:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
Chuckles jumped in after the first question was answered... so he knew
this one:
Question 1: What is the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was
talking about?
Ans: "The shape of the wound."
So naturally, I asked him the second question, even though he only
IMPLIED that he accepted the first answer...
Question 2: What was the shape of the wound?
And Chuckles refuses to answer.
So here's the current results:
Chickenshit - 2 answers.
Chuckles - 0 answers.
Such AMAZING cowardice!!!
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:53:51 -0700, Ben Holmes <Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
When faced with this:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
Chuckles jumped in after the first question was answered... so he knew >this one:
Question 1: What is the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was >talking about?
Ans: "The shape of the wound."
So naturally, I asked him the second question, even though he only
IMPLIED that he accepted the first answer...
Question 2: What was the shape of the wound?
And Chuckles refuses to answer.
So here's the current results:
Chickenshit - 2 answers.
Chuckles - 0 answers.
Such AMAZING cowardice!!!Chuckles has clearly decided that he doesn't want any more spanking,
so he's simply run away... probably hiding in a corner with Corbutt
and Huckster...
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:12:55?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:53:51 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
When faced with this:Chuckles has clearly decided that he doesn't want any more spanking,
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
Chuckles jumped in after the first question was answered... so he knew >>>this one:
Question 1: What is the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was >>>talking about?
Ans: "The shape of the wound."
So naturally, I asked him the second question, even though he only >>>IMPLIED that he accepted the first answer...
Question 2: What was the shape of the wound?
And Chuckles refuses to answer.
So here's the current results:
Chickenshit - 2 answers.
Chuckles - 0 answers.
Such AMAZING cowardice!!!
so he's simply run away... probably hiding in a corner with Corbutt
and Huckster...
Wasn't this addressed at the other thread?
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:12:55?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:53:51 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
When faced with this:Chuckles has clearly decided that he doesn't want any more spanking,
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
Chuckles jumped in after the first question was answered... so he knew >>>this one:
Question 1: What is the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was >>>talking about?
Ans: "The shape of the wound."
So naturally, I asked him the second question, even though he only >>>IMPLIED that he accepted the first answer...
Question 2: What was the shape of the wound?
And Chuckles refuses to answer.
So here's the current results:
Chickenshit - 2 answers.
Chuckles - 0 answers.
Such AMAZING cowardice!!!
so he's simply run away... probably hiding in a corner with Corbutt
and Huckster...
Wasn't this addressed at the other thread?
No.
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 1:13:17?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:12:55?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:53:51 -0700, Ben Holmes
<Ad...@ConspiracyJFKForum.com> wrote:
When faced with this:Chuckles has clearly decided that he doesn't want any more spanking,
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>>>that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>>>Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>>>had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>>>“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>>>nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>>>having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
Chuckles jumped in after the first question was answered... so he knew >>>>>this one:
Question 1: What is the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was >>>>>talking about?
Ans: "The shape of the wound."
So naturally, I asked him the second question, even though he only >>>>>IMPLIED that he accepted the first answer...
Question 2: What was the shape of the wound?
And Chuckles refuses to answer.
So here's the current results:
Chickenshit - 2 answers.
Chuckles - 0 answers.
Such AMAZING cowardice!!!
so he's simply run away... probably hiding in a corner with Corbutt
and Huckster...
Wasn't this addressed at the other thread?
No.
It wasn't...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 103:33:27 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,074 |