3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.What was the shape of the wound?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>>>> that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>>>> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicatingThe shape of the wound.
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I
was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>>>>>> that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>>>>>> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>>>>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound isThe shape of the wound.
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>>>>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>>>>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>>>>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,The shape of the wound.
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded >>>> by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:04:05?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>>>> that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>>>> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I
was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
Fringe reset...
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicatingThe shape of the wound.
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded >>>>>> by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:04:05?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicatingThe shape of the wound.
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I
was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
Fringe reset...
If Chuckles wants to play the game, **HE'LL** have to answer.
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:25:36?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:04:05?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence >>>>>>>> proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating >>>>>>>> that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck >>>>>>>> Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet >>>>>>>> had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound isThe shape of the wound.
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed >>>>>>>> “through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble >>>>>>>> or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he >>>>>>>> was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was >>>>>>>> nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the >>>>>>>> north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without >>>>>>>> having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It >>>>>>>> would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I
was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
Fringe reset...
If Chuckles wants to play the game, **HE'LL** have to answer.
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:25:36?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:04:05?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,The shape of the wound.
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I >>>> was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
Fringe reset...
If Chuckles wants to play the game, **HE'LL** have to answer.
Still no answer from Chuckles...
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. CharlesThe shape of the wound.
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded >>>>>> by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,The shape of the wound.
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded >>>>>>>> by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:36:14?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:25:36?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:18:22 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:04:05?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:01:46?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> 3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles >>>>>>>>>> Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital, >>>>>>>>>> described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicatingThe shape of the wound.
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before >>>>>>>>>> striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid >>>>>>>>>> shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or >>>>>>>>>> glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory >>>>>>>>>> advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no >>>>>>>>>> bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit >>>>>>>>>> something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or >>>>>>>>>> its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a >>>>>>>>>> bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the >>>>>>>>>> line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally >>>>>>>>>> bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have >>>>>>>>>> ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start >>>>>>>>>> yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about >>>>>>>>>> 100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back >>>>>>>>>> wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is >>>>>>>>>> the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Descriptions of the wound are in the first paragraph...
You'll have to argue with Chickenshit over that. His claim is that I >>>>>> was "selective(ly) quoting."
So Chuckles... what was the shape of the wound?
Fringe reset...
If Chuckles wants to play the game, **HE'LL** have to answer.
Still no answer from Chuckles...
If you don't know, don't be embarrassed, just admit you can't answer.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidenceThe shape of the wound.
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded >>>>>>>>>> by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:Non-answers deleted.
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
Here's the quesition that Chickenshit will refuse to answer: What is
the "virtually conclusive evidence" that Bugs was talking about?
The shape of the wound.
What was the shape of the wound?
Oval...
Getting closer...
So according to Bugliosi,
it was this "oval" shape that was "virtually
conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
You may give as long an answer as you want, as long as it's preceded
by a definitive "yes," or "no."
Quote Bugliosi's answer to support your response...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Non answer deleted. So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval"
shape that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. Drs. Charles
Gregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on toSo, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA),
it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Did Bugliosi...
All true. The HSCA...Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.” >>>
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Did Bugliosi...
Nothing Bugliosi did...
Still no...Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 2:20:27?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. >>>>>
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:10:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 2:20:27?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 3:21:23?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:10:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 2:20:27?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on toOn Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval. >>>>>>>
explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape >>>>>> that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.”
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:23:22 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 3:21:23?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:10:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 2:20:27?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 11:10:48?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:42:13?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:33:33 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:11:20?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:02:03 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 7:00:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:31 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:40:35?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:33:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:35:03?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:19:30?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 5:01:59?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:48:50 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:43:57?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 4:01:46?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 2:45:31?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
3. Another fact that, all by itself, is virtually conclusive evidence
proving the single-bullet theory is that the entrance wound in
Governor Connally’s back was not circular, but oval.
This is called the topic sentence. Buglisoi will them go on to >>>>>>> explain how the oval nature of the wound supports the SBT.
So, according to Buglisoi (sic), it was this "oval" shape that
was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Drs. CharlesGregory and Robert Shaw, who attended Connally at Parkland Hospital,
described the wound as “linear” and “elliptical” in shape, indicating
that the bullet was out of alignment with its trajectory just before
striking Connally’s body. The HSCA said that a factor which
“significantly” influenced its conclusion that the bullet that struck
Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy “was the ovoid
shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet
had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An ovoid wound is
characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or
glanced off an intervening object…The forensic pathology panel’s
conclusions were consistent with the so-called single bullet theory
advanced by the Warren Commission,” to wit, that one bullet had passed
“through both President Kennedy and Governor Connally.”
All true. The HSCA...
Has nothing to do with this topic.
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape >>>>>> that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
So, according to Bugliosi (Not the HSCA), it was this "oval" shape
that was "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
My firearms expert at the London trial, Monty Lutz, told me that “no
bullet traveling at 2,000 feet per second is going to start to tumble
or yaw on its own until around 200 yards. When Connally was struck he
was around 60 yards from the window, so the bullet had to have hit
something before it hit him, and other than Kennedy’s body, there was
nothing between the sixth-floor window and him. Not the oak tree, or
its leaves. Nothing.” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It has to be emphasized that at the time Connally was struck by a
bullet (somewhere between Z frames 210 and 222),* the oak tree to the
north of Elm close to the Depository Building was no longer in the
line of fire from the sniper’s nest to Connally’s body.
So Kennedy’s body was the only intervening object that the Connally
bullet could have first hit. HSCA physical scientist Larry M.
Sturdivan told the committee that the Carcano bullet was a “very
stable bullet, perhaps one of the most stable bullets that we have
ever done experimentation with.” He said that it would only start
yawing—and then very little, “perhaps less than a degree”—at “about
100 meters” (about 110 yards) and “if it had struck [Connally] without
having previously encountered another object, it [Connally’s back
wound] would never have been elongated. This bullet is too stable. It
would have had to be a nice round hole.”
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 109:38:27 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,727 |