"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy
would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John
Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With my responses...)
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problem
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transited
JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that no
such transit ever occurred.
But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors have misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly
the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.
This diagram: https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING*
with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's
recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which
never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking the OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.
Bugliosi has failed with #1.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:34:34 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With my responses...)
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problemNo bullet found in the body shows the bullet transited.
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transited JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that noYou refuse to give any.
such transit ever occurred.
But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors have misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly
the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.
This diagram: https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR: https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING* with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.Look at Ben pretending he is making arguments without actually making any real supported arguments. I guess just saying things is just as good.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking the OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.More hot air. Ben says a lot, he shows nothing.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 5:00:25?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:34:34?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With myNo bullet found in the body shows the bullet transited.
responses...)
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy
would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John
Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problem
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transitedYou refuse to give any.
JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that no
such transit ever occurred.
But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors haveLook at Ben pretending he is making arguments without actually making any real supported arguments. I guess just saying things is just as good.
misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly
the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.
This diagram:
https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR:
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING*
with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's
recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which
never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking theMore hot air. Ben says a lot, he shows nothing.
OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.
As long as I have read his nonsense, all has ever done is fling shit on the wall and see if he can
get any of it to stick. So far, none of it has. This is another reason why I don't even bother to read
it anymore.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:28:42 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 5:00:25?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:34:34?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With my >>> responses...)No bullet found in the body shows the bullet transited.
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy >>>> would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John >>>> Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problem
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transited >>> JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that noYou refuse to give any.
such transit ever occurred.
But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors have >>> misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly >>> the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.Look at Ben pretending he is making arguments without actually making any real supported arguments. I guess just saying things is just as good.
This diagram:
https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR:
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING* >>> with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's
recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which >>> never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking the >>> OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.More hot air. Ben says a lot, he shows nothing.
As long as I have read his nonsense, all has ever done is fling shit on the wall and see if he canAnd yet, you keep responding to others responding to the posts you
get any of it to stick. So far, none of it has. This is another reason why I don't even bother to read
it anymore.
think is nonsense.
Actions speak louder than words...
And empty unsupported claims are lies... according to Chickenshit.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:34:34?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With my
responses...)
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy
would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John
Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problem
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
No bullet found in the body shows the bullet transited.
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transited
JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that no
such transit ever occurred.
You refuse to give any.
But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors have
misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly
the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.
This diagram:
https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR:
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING*
with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's
recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which
never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking the
OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.
Bugliosi has failed with #1.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:00:23 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:34:34?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Bugliosi provides his arguments for the Single Bullet Theory: (With my
responses...)
"1. Perhaps the biggest argument the anti-single-bullet-theory
advocates make is that the alignment of Kennedy's and Connally's
bodies to each other was such that any bullet passing through Kennedy >> > would have had to make a right turn in midair to go on and hit John
Connally - thus, the 'magic bullet' of conspiracy lore. ..." Pg 458
This might be Bugliosi's opinion... but I think the problem
*first*begins with demonstrating transit - there's very little
evidence thata bullet transited JFK's body.
No bullet found in the body shows the bullet transited.That is a logical fallacy... can you name it?
Indeed, *NO* believer has ever demonstrated that ANY bullet transited
JFK's body - or publicly acknowledged that there's EVIDENCE that no
such transit ever occurred.
You refuse to give any.Lies can't convince people, Chickenshit.
Logical fallacy deleted.But to deal with Bugliosi's point - tis true that some CT authors have
misrepresented Connally's position relative to JFK, but this is hardly
the nail in the coffin that Bugliosi believes it to be.
This diagram:
https://throughtheoswaldwindow.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/SBT-768x536.jpg
Is indeed FAR more accurate that this official evidence taken by the
WCR:
https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/the-bullet-that-hit-john-f-kennedy-in-the-head-removed-a-large-of-picture-id615320510
But David Von Penis will simply run away - because he **CANNOT**
defend Bugliosi from critical review.
Every attempt to demonstrate an SBT has multiple problems, *BEGINNING*
with the lack of any demonstrated transit, moving on to the FBI's
recreation and Chaney's observations, and then on to the Z-film, which
never shows the alignment believers need for an SBT.
And, lest I forget, the complete IMPOSSIBLITY of any SBT striking the
OUTSIDE of Connally's wrist first.
Bugliosi has failed with #1.
Chickenshit has failed too...
Reasoning isn`t a fallacy.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:52:39 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,854 |
