On Sunday, August 6, 2023 at 2:16:09 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
Jake wrote:
" As an American architect, allow me to say; any primary source individual who would refer to the small corridor space outside of the lunchroom on the 2nd floor as a "vestibule" is willfully ignorant and possessing of an ulterior motive having to do
with relocating an encounter that occurred on the First Floor in a vestibule, to a fictional one supposedly occurring on the Second Floor.
I say "willfully ignorant" because to have the vocabulary to use the word implies a level of intelligence that would necessarily understand the meaning of the word. "
Because the ROKC Forum exists in the shadow of Greg Parker's censorship it is actually Jake Sykes who isn't aware that there is a blueprint of the enclosure over the 2nd Floor Lunch Room entryway that has "Vestibule" written as the description of that
architectural feature...This is a real and find-able thing that shows how full of shit ROKC is and how their claims are mostly built on false assumption and pompous wording...This of course will not stop James Gordon from giving the Prayer Man floor to
Roger Odisio over on the Education Forum...Or Jim D from praising ROKC...The other ROKC members will not mention this to Sykes even though they are aware of it...
If Jake were a credible researcher he would realize that Harry Holmes said "Vestibule" because he heard Oswald say it...Oswald probably heard it from Truly because Truly was the manager who was in charge of the construction of the 2nd Floor Lunch Room
enclosure a year before Oswald was employed...If Sykes were a credible architect he would realize the enclosure itself fits the architectural definition of "Vestibule" to a T and that the Lobby was never referred to from any source as being called "
Vestibule"...
It is this sort of rubbish research upon which Greg Parker's Prayer Man theory got traction...Parker is keeping this obvious explanation from his website with selective censorship...As is James Gordon...
There are people who will pretend that the dictionary was consulted by every witness for every word they spoke. But people misuse words all the time. For example, I recently misapplied the word "satchel." But that does not mean that I was talking about
what the dictionary says is a satchel. The dictionary does not make it so.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)