1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: Another Joke: Commission Exhibit 35

    From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Thu Aug 3 03:02:06 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 5:40:15 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    Listed as, "an envelope from E. Dzhuganyan addressed to Marina Oswald, dated postmarked April 20, 1962"

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0091b.htm

    Then there's Commission exhibit 51, "A letter from Aunt Valya and Uncle Illya to Marina Oswald dated January 24, 1963."

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0105b.htm

    Or Commission Exhibit 84, "an unused envelope".

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0145b.htm

    And there's so many more.

    Can any of you lone nutters tell us what the fuck these have to do with the assassination of JFK ?

    Can any of you nutcases tell us what the evidentiary value is on these items that warrant them being accepted as a Commission Exhibits ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Thu Aug 3 03:10:34 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 5:40:15 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    Listed as, "an envelope from E. Dzhuganyan addressed to Marina Oswald, dated postmarked April 20, 1962"

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0091b.htm

    Then there's Commission exhibit 51, "A letter from Aunt Valya and Uncle Illya to Marina Oswald dated January 24, 1963."

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0105b.htm

    Or Commission Exhibit 84, "an unused envelope".

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0145b.htm

    And there's so many more.

    Can any of you lone nutters tell us what the fuck these have to do with the assassination of JFK ?

    Can any of you nutcases tell us what the evidentiary value is on these items that warrant them being accepted as a Commission Exhibits ?

    We can learn nothing about a conspiracy to kill JFK from the above. There is no evidence provided of a conspiracy and no conspiracy ideas are offered or advanced. Just more of the same "whataboutism".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 3 02:40:13 2023
    Listed as, "an envelope from E. Dzhuganyan addressed to Marina Oswald, dated postmarked April 20, 1962"

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0091b.htm

    Then there's Commission exhibit 51, "A letter from Aunt Valya and Uncle Illya to Marina Oswald dated January 24, 1963."

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0105b.htm

    Or Commission Exhibit 84, "an unused envelope".

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0145b.htm

    And there's so many more.

    Can any of you lone nutters tell us what the fuck these have to do with the assassination of JFK ?

    Can any of you nutcases tell us what the evidentiary value is on these items that warrant them being accepted as a Commission Exhibits ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Thu Aug 3 03:25:01 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 5:40:15 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    Listed as, "an envelope from E. Dzhuganyan addressed to Marina Oswald, dated postmarked April 20, 1962"

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0091b.htm

    Then there's Commission exhibit 51, "A letter from Aunt Valya and Uncle Illya to Marina Oswald dated January 24, 1963."

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0105b.htm

    Or Commission Exhibit 84, "an unused envelope".

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0145b.htm

    And there's so many more.

    Can any of you lone nutters tell us what the fuck these have to do with the assassination of JFK ?

    Can any of you nutcases tell us what the evidentiary value is on these items that warrant them being accepted as a Commission Exhibits ?

    Where in the 888 page report are any of these mentioned? The 26 volumes of exhibits and
    testimony is all raw data. It contains everything that was gathered whether relevant or not.
    It was the job of the Warren Commission investigators to sift through all of that and determine
    what was and was not probative and base their findings on what was determined to be probative.
    Had the WC discarded these items and made no mention of them, you would be whining that
    they were destroying evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Thu Aug 3 06:13:48 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 6:25:03 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    The 26 volumes of exhibits and
    testimony is all raw data. It contains everything that was gathered whether relevant or not.
    It was the job of the Warren Commission investigators to sift through all of that and determine
    what was and was not probative and base their findings on what was determined to be probative.
    Had the WC discarded these items and made no mention of them, you would be whining that
    they were destroying evidence.

    Wrong as usual. The 26 volumes are EVIDENCE from which the Report was based. The RAW data was designated as Commission Documents, not Commission Exhibits. The Commission Exhibits were part of the evidence.
    That's why THEY were published and the Documents were not.

    God, you really don't know WTF you're talking about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 3 07:00:28 2023
    On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 03:10:34 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 5:40:15?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    Listed as, "an envelope from E. Dzhuganyan addressed to Marina Oswald, dated postmarked April 20, 1962"

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0091b.htm

    Then there's Commission exhibit 51, "A letter from Aunt Valya and Uncle Illya to Marina Oswald dated January 24, 1963."

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0105b.htm

    Or Commission Exhibit 84, "an unused envelope".

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/html/WH_Vol16_0145b.htm

    And there's so many more.

    Can any of you lone nutters tell us what the fuck these have to do with the assassination of JFK ?

    Can any of you nutcases tell us what the evidentiary value is on these items that warrant them being accepted as a Commission Exhibits ?

    We can learn nothing about a conspiracy to kill JFK from the
    above. There is no evidence provided of a conspiracy and no conspiracy
    ideas are offered or advanced. Just more of the same "whataboutism".

    Curiously, you posted no evidence. no citations, no documents, no
    testimony, no exhibits, no witness videos.

    Only comments. We gain nothing from the above.

    Which makes who exactly the fool?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)