https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
I didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
I didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.More important that giving all these examples, is the fact that not a *SINGLE* believer has *EVER* publicly acknowledged these known
instances of eyewitness intimidation - let alone explain them.
Cowardice or dishonesty... you decide.
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.I didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Explain it right here. What is the concept?
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:56:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Explain it right here. What is the concept?Witness intimidation is a Federal crime, whether it is done by a
defendant or by the prosecution.
Among the examples of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 Witness Intimidation are:
Offering a bribe to a witness.
Making threats to a witness or their family with physical harm or
property damage.
Asking a witness to not provide testimony, or to testify in a specific
way.
Preventing a witness from attending a court hearing, or any legal
proceeding
Federal witness intimidation is punishable by up to 20 years in
federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
Witness intimidation can take many forms and can include any action
that falls into the following categories:
Physical Force: Using any type of physical force to keep a witness
from testifying is prohibited, and commonly results in felony charges. Confinement is considered a use of force.
Corrupt Persuasion: Prohibited behavior includes persuading a witness
to change their testimony, and blackmailing or bribing a witness and attempts to keep a witness from testifying. ( 1 )
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED to address the eyewitness intimidation. So
he's constantly trying to change the topic.
What he absolutely CANNOT do, is refute the examples of eyewitness intimidation given by Gil or myself.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
Watch folks, as Chickenshit runs again...
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Bud is scared shitless of links.https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
He's afraid to click on them.
The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Bud is scared shitless of links. He's afraid to click on them.https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 3:43:00 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Bud is scared shitless of links. He's afraid to click on them.https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.There's nothing wrong with using a link to back up a point you are making. It's when people
use links in lieu of making a point that reveals weakness. Usually that is done when someone
can't articulate a cogent argument and instead post a link and claim that the point is made
somewhere within the link. They use links as a crutch for their inability to articulate.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 2:03:12 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:56:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Explain it right here. What is the concept?Witness intimidation is a Federal crime, whether it is done by a
defendant or by the prosecution.
Among the examples of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 Witness Intimidation are:
Offering a bribe to a witness.
Making threats to a witness or their family with physical harm or
property damage.
Asking a witness to not provide testimony, or to testify in a specific way.
Preventing a witness from attending a court hearing, or any legal proceeding
Federal witness intimidation is punishable by up to 20 years in
federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
Witness intimidation can take many forms and can include any action
that falls into the following categories:
Physical Force: Using any type of physical force to keep a witness
from testifying is prohibited, and commonly results in felony charges. Confinement is considered a use of force.
Corrupt Persuasion: Prohibited behavior includes persuading a witness
to change their testimony, and blackmailing or bribing a witness and attempts to keep a witness from testifying. ( 1 )
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED to address the eyewitness intimidation. So
he's constantly trying to change the topic.
What he absolutely CANNOT do, is refute the examples of eyewitness intimidation given by Gil or myself.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
Watch folks, as Chickenshit runs again...I`m not going anywhere, I`m still examining your idea.
Now select the things from above list and apply them to each of your supposed examples of witness intimidation. Put up what you have and make your case. Be a man for a change.
fredag den 28. juli 2023 kl. 20.14.11 UTC+2 skrev Bud:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 2:03:12 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:56:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Explain it right here. What is the concept?Witness intimidation is a Federal crime, whether it is done by a defendant or by the prosecution.
Among the examples of 18 U.S. Code § 1512 Witness Intimidation are:
Offering a bribe to a witness.
Making threats to a witness or their family with physical harm or property damage.
Asking a witness to not provide testimony, or to testify in a specific way.
Preventing a witness from attending a court hearing, or any legal proceeding
Federal witness intimidation is punishable by up to 20 years in
federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
Witness intimidation can take many forms and can include any action
that falls into the following categories:
Physical Force: Using any type of physical force to keep a witness
from testifying is prohibited, and commonly results in felony charges. Confinement is considered a use of force.
Corrupt Persuasion: Prohibited behavior includes persuading a witness
to change their testimony, and blackmailing or bribing a witness and attempts to keep a witness from testifying. ( 1 )
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED to address the eyewitness intimidation. So
he's constantly trying to change the topic.
What he absolutely CANNOT do, is refute the examples of eyewitness intimidation given by Gil or myself.
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
Watch folks, as Chickenshit runs again...I`m not going anywhere, I`m still examining your idea.
Now select the things from above list and apply them to each of your supposed examples of witness intimidation. Put up what you have and make your case. Be a man for a change.Man, did Ben shoot himself in the foot on that one. Had he just stuck to his usual vague innuendo, his inner conspiracy universe would've been a lot safer.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 3:43:00?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Bud is scared shitless of links. He's afraid to click on them.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.
There's nothing wrong with using a link to back up a point you are making. It's when people
use links in lieu of making a point that reveals weakness.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 12:59:30?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil JesusI didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
What is it worth...
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:26:19 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 12:59:30?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil JesusI didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not >>> *ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
What is it worth...
For you to run from the facts?
Nothing at all. No-one expects truth from a coward.
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:11:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting?It doesn't have to be a connection in order to intimidate someone.
It all depends on what the person being intimidated feels. Did he feel there was a connection ? YES.
And he testified to that fact. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0224b.htm
Add to it that some man tried to pick up his 10 year old daughter ( 11 H 441 )
an screwed with the exterior light on his house ( 11 H 442 ).....
And that's all that was needed for him to change his testimony.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:11:47?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting?
It doesn't have to be a connection in order to intimidate someone.
It all depends on what the person being intimidated feels. Did he feel there was a connection ? YES.
And he testified to that fact. >https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0224b.htm
Add to it that some man tried to pick up his 10 year old daughter ( 11 H 441 ) >an screwed with the exterior light on his house ( 11 H 442 ).....
And that's all that was needed for him to change his testimony.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:46:42?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:11:47?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting? >> It doesn't have to be a connection in order to intimidate someone.It all depends on what the person being intimidated feels. Did he feel there was a connection ? YES.
And he testified to that fact.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0224b.htm
Add to it that some man tried to pick up his 10 year old daughter ( 11 H 441 )
an screwed with the exterior light on his house ( 11 H 442 ).....
And that's all that was needed for him to change his testimony.
So there was no witness tampering by the FBI.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.I didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked.
Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 11:59:30?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil JesusI didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not
*ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/pdf/WH25_CE_2589.pdf
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Oswald was already dead and there were already enough witnesses to the Tippit murder.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked.
Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
So there was no witness tampering by the FBI.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:53:22?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
So there was no witness tampering by the FBI.
I'm sorry, did I say that Warren Reynolds was intimdiated by the FBI ?
I only used him as an example of intimidation, I don't believe I ever said the FBI was involved.
Try to keep up.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 12:53:38 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 3:43:00?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Bud is scared shitless of links.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17?PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
Logical fallacy deleted.He's afraid to click on them.
Logical fallacy deleted.The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of addressing the proven eyewitness
intimidation.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:11:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting?It doesn't have to be a connection in order to intimidate someone.
It all depends on what the person being intimidated feels. Did he feel there was a connection ? YES.
And he testified to that fact. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0224b.htm
Add to it that some man tried to pick up his 10 year old daughter ( 11 H 441 )
an screwed with the exterior light on his house ( 11 H 442 ).....
And that's all that was needed for him to change his testimony.
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire DarrelIt's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:46:40 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 11:11:47?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Is it a fact that Warren`s being shot was connected to the Tippit shooting?
It doesn't have to be a connection in order to intimidate someone.
It all depends on what the person being intimidated feels. Did he feel there was a connection ? YES.
And he testified to that fact. >https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh11/html/WC_Vol11_0224b.htm
Add to it that some man tried to pick up his 10 year old daughter ( 11 H 441 )
an screwed with the exterior light on his house ( 11 H 442 ).....
And that's all that was needed for him to change his testimony.But it's not enough to convince a believer that any official
intimidation of witnesses ever happened.
It would take some connection to the "guilt" of Oswald to do that.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:44:59?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:You're joking, right Gil?
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?
Presuming that Chuckles knows *ANYTHING* about this case is clearly
unsupportable - he refuses to say what happened on 11/22/63 -
https://www.onthisday.com/date/1963/november/22
and
indeed claims not to have a scenario at all.
Asking if he knew the evidence that proves him a fool is quite hopeful
of you, Gil...
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?You're joking, right Gil?
Presuming that Chuckles knows *ANYTHING* about this case is clearly unsupportable - he refuses to say what happened on 11/2/63 -
indeed claims not to have a scenario at all.
Asking if he knew the evidence that proves him a fool is quite hopeful
of you, Gil...
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:44:59 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:38:18 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?You're joking, right Gil?
Presuming that Chuckles knows *ANYTHING* about this case is clearly unsupportable - he refuses to say what happened on 11/2/63 -https://www.onthisday.com/date/1963/november/2
and
indeed claims not to have a scenario at all.
Asking if he knew the evidence that proves him a fool is quite hopeful
of you, Gil...
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19?PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.You. Constantly. For decades.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
So if no conspiracy, one of the possibilities you're are hinting at is that Oswald acted alone and somebody--you're not sure who--was "intimidating" some minor bit player in the saga named Warren Reynolds to provide a stronger identification of thealready dead Oswald?
You can't be serious.
Do you ever stop and take a breath and just reflect on how stupid some of this stuff is?
was traveling on business and had just filled up the tank on his rental car and was in grabbing a snack, too. We chatted for about thirty minutes, totally blown away by the incredible coincidence of it all. What are the odds?Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?Fun with numbers.
The odds of him getting shot, or anything else happening the day after giving a statement to the FBI, is one in three hundred sixty-five, Gil. That's how many days there are in a non-leap year.
I was filling up a rental car with gas about a thousand miles from my home in Minnesota where I live and ran into the little convenience store to get a coffee and bumped into one of my oldest friends from childhood in Chicago, where he still lives. He
Life is weird, Gil.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 4:20:03 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:already dead Oswald?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It is the purpose of this forum. But they really have very little in favor of conspiracy. The "back and to the left" argument for a frontal shot. The "a lot of people thought the shots came from the knoll" argument. After that they are about spent.It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.You. Constantly. For decades.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
So if no conspiracy, one of the possibilities you're are hinting at is that Oswald acted alone and somebody--you're not sure who--was "intimidating" some minor bit player in the saga named Warren Reynolds to provide a stronger identification of the
He was traveling on business and had just filled up the tank on his rental car and was in grabbing a snack, too. We chatted for about thirty minutes, totally blown away by the incredible coincidence of it all. What are the odds?You can't be serious.
Do you ever stop and take a breath and just reflect on how stupid some of this stuff is?It`s hard to even see how it can make sense. They unscrewed Reynold`s lightbulb so he would make a more positive ID in Oswald? How does Reynolds know that making a positive identification isn`t the exact opposite of what they wanted from him?
What works is going to Reynolds and saying "Unless you strongly assert it was Oswald you saw we will kill your dog." How does he know what they want from him by just doing random bad things to him?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?Fun with numbers.
The odds of him getting shot, or anything else happening the day after giving a statement to the FBI, is one in three hundred sixty-five, Gil. That's how many days there are in a non-leap year.
I was filling up a rental car with gas about a thousand miles from my home in Minnesota where I live and ran into the little convenience store to get a coffee and bumped into one of my oldest friends from childhood in Chicago, where he still lives.
I can`t come up with anything even close to that in my life. I can`t even think of any extraordinary coincidence that I ever personally experienced. But if something like this did happen to me, my innate paranoia would kick in (which is really just anevolved survival trait). Like my father used to say "Just because you are paranoid doesn`t mean they aren`t out to get you".
Case in point, there was a group of eco-terrorists years ago that were burning down certain businesses. They got away with it for years, but then the authorities got one to turn informant. They wired him and then had him have a "chance encounter" withone of the main members who he hadn`t had contact with for awhile. They then talked about "old times", including the crimes they committed together. This was enough to charge the ringleader.
Life is weird, Gil.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 3:55:12 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:already dead Oswald?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 4:20:03 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It is the purpose of this forum. But they really have very little in favor of conspiracy. The "back and to the left" argument for a frontal shot. The "a lot of people thought the shots came from the knoll" argument. After that they are about spent.It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.You. Constantly. For decades.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
So if no conspiracy, one of the possibilities you're are hinting at is that Oswald acted alone and somebody--you're not sure who--was "intimidating" some minor bit player in the saga named Warren Reynolds to provide a stronger identification of the
He was traveling on business and had just filled up the tank on his rental car and was in grabbing a snack, too. We chatted for about thirty minutes, totally blown away by the incredible coincidence of it all. What are the odds?You can't be serious.
Do you ever stop and take a breath and just reflect on how stupid some of this stuff is?It`s hard to even see how it can make sense. They unscrewed Reynold`s lightbulb so he would make a more positive ID in Oswald? How does Reynolds know that making a positive identification isn`t the exact opposite of what they wanted from him?
What works is going to Reynolds and saying "Unless you strongly assert it was Oswald you saw we will kill your dog." How does he know what they want from him by just doing random bad things to him?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?Fun with numbers.
The odds of him getting shot, or anything else happening the day after giving a statement to the FBI, is one in three hundred sixty-five, Gil. That's how many days there are in a non-leap year.
I was filling up a rental car with gas about a thousand miles from my home in Minnesota where I live and ran into the little convenience store to get a coffee and bumped into one of my oldest friends from childhood in Chicago, where he still lives.
an evolved survival trait). Like my father used to say "Just because you are paranoid doesn`t mean they aren`t out to get you".I can`t come up with anything even close to that in my life. I can`t even think of any extraordinary coincidence that I ever personally experienced. But if something like this did happen to me, my innate paranoia would kick in (which is really just
History (and life) is full of these types of coincidences and oddities. They are what they are. WW1 turned on the chance encounter Gavrilo Princip had with the car Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a passenger in. Before the fatal shooting, Princip hadmissed his chance, along with some fellow would-be assassins, to kill Ferdinand when a grenade thrown at the motorcade by a Princip co-conspirator caused Ferdinand's driver to speed up and past Princip. He wandered to a nearby restaurant. Minutes later,
One of the many problems JFK Truthers have is that THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. Everything happens by design, there is no such thing as happenstance. The mind boggles at all of the little things that didn't happen on 11/22/63 which would've derailedOswald's attempt.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 3:55:12 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:already dead Oswald?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 4:20:03 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It is the purpose of this forum. But they really have very little in favor of conspiracy. The "back and to the left" argument for a frontal shot. The "a lot of people thought the shots came from the knoll" argument. After that they are about spent.It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.You. Constantly. For decades.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
So if no conspiracy, one of the possibilities you're are hinting at is that Oswald acted alone and somebody--you're not sure who--was "intimidating" some minor bit player in the saga named Warren Reynolds to provide a stronger identification of the
He was traveling on business and had just filled up the tank on his rental car and was in grabbing a snack, too. We chatted for about thirty minutes, totally blown away by the incredible coincidence of it all. What are the odds?You can't be serious.
Do you ever stop and take a breath and just reflect on how stupid some of this stuff is?It`s hard to even see how it can make sense. They unscrewed Reynold`s lightbulb so he would make a more positive ID in Oswald? How does Reynolds know that making a positive identification isn`t the exact opposite of what they wanted from him?
What works is going to Reynolds and saying "Unless you strongly assert it was Oswald you saw we will kill your dog." How does he know what they want from him by just doing random bad things to him?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?Fun with numbers.
The odds of him getting shot, or anything else happening the day after giving a statement to the FBI, is one in three hundred sixty-five, Gil. That's how many days there are in a non-leap year.
I was filling up a rental car with gas about a thousand miles from my home in Minnesota where I live and ran into the little convenience store to get a coffee and bumped into one of my oldest friends from childhood in Chicago, where he still lives.
an evolved survival trait). Like my father used to say "Just because you are paranoid doesn`t mean they aren`t out to get you".I can`t come up with anything even close to that in my life. I can`t even think of any extraordinary coincidence that I ever personally experienced. But if something like this did happen to me, my innate paranoia would kick in (which is really just
History (and life) is full of these types of coincidences and oddities. They are what they are. WW1 turned on the chance encounter Gavrilo Princip had with the car Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a passenger in. Before the fatal shooting, Princip hadmissed his chance, along with some fellow would-be assassins, to kill Ferdinand when a grenade thrown at the motorcade by a Princip co-conspirator caused Ferdinand's driver to speed up and past Princip. He wandered to a nearby restaurant. Minutes later,
One of the many problems JFK Truthers have is that THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. Everything happens by design, there is no such thing as happenstance. The mind boggles at all of the little things that didn't happen on 11/22/63 which would've derailedOswald's attempt.
More important that giving all these examples, is the fact that not a *SINGLE* believer has *EVER* publicly acknowledged these known
instances of eyewitness intimidation - let alone explain them.
Cowardice or dishonesty... you decide.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:22:48 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth's
More important that giving all these examples, is the fact that not a *SINGLE* believer has *EVER* publicly acknowledged these known
instances of eyewitness intimidation - let alone explain them.
Cowardice or dishonesty... you decide.
It's funny. My dog is wrong and she gets spanked and she doesn't do it again.
These idiots come here every day, make statements that are wrong, get spanked with the evidence and come back tomorrow for more.
Is my dog smarter than these morons ?
I used to try to give them the benefit of the doubt, that they were just mistaken.
But these people flat out lie. I know because they not only lie about the evidence, they even lie about what I say.
Their refusal to look at my evidence proves how close-minded they are. You would think that they'd at least look at it to tear it apart, but
they won't even do that. They know that I use official records in my essays and they're scared shitless of the truth.
They don't know and they don't WANT to know.
The prosecution's case against Oswald was a illusion. And they were fooled. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHzOOMdhAhE
It's obvious to anyone except the feeble-minded Lone Nutters that in this case, witnesses were threatened, harrassed, and intimidated.
Their statements were altered.
And the proof of it all is right here: https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
At least one witness testified he signed an affidavit stating his choice from the police lineups before he even saw the lineup.
These tactics are not used in a normal criminal investigation.
They're not used by the prosecution in collecting evidence and they're not used by the defense because to use such tactics is illegal
and any evidence collected from them is inadmissable in court.
These tactics were used against witnesses, not suspects, mind you, WITNESSES.
But to the Lone Nutter, ignorance is bliss. As the line goes in the Wizard of Oz, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
The great and powerful Warren Commission has spoken
.
Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth's
inhabitants, I'm not surprised you believe you are spanking the LNs. Every time you make an
argument, it gets shot down like a clay pigeon.
On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 6:18:11?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth's
inhabitants, I'm not surprised you believe you are spanking the LNs. Every time you make an
argument, it gets shot down like a clay pigeon.
As one who has been repeatedly spanked by me, I'm not surprised that you deny it.
You come in here and cry every day.
WAAAAAA.........you're looking at the wrong things.
WAAAAAA.........you're making excuses.
WAAAAAA.........what about this, what about that.
WAAAAAA.........you don't provide evidence.
Now it's WAAAAAAA........you haven't spanked anyone.
Let me refresh your memory.
You claimed that Lt. Day didn't dust the rifle at the scene.
I proved that was wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7uLMSs4KQ
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:38:47?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:characteristics as Oswald's revolver.
This is a short summation of the forensic evidence at the scene of the murders of JFK and Tippit.
1. Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There is a clear paper trail and photographs establishing his ownership of the rifle.
ANS. Clear paper trail ? The shipping documents the FBI provided had neither the serial number of the rifle ( C 2766 ) nor the number of the carton it was in ( 3376 ) on them.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside520-1.jpg >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside170.jpg >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/rupp-1.jpg
2. His palm print was on the underside of the barrel and fibers matching the shirt he wore were on the butt plate of the rifle.
ANS. But the FBI said that when they examined the rifle on the day after the assassination, there was no palm print. ( 4 H 24 ) The FBI agent who travelled with the rifle from Dallas to Washington, Vincent Drain, was never called to testify. Why not ?
4. Three spent shells were found at the window were the witnesses placed the shooter and they were positively matched to Oswald ( sic ) to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Those shells were found by Dallas Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney. Did he ever identify them as the shells he found ?
5. The only two bullets recovered from the shooting also were matched to Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Could one of those be the famous "stretcher bullet" which the four people who handled it couldn't identify ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol24_412.jpg
6. Oswald's fingerprints were found on top of the boxes that had been stacked to form a rifle rest and were oriented as they would be if Oswald were facing down Elm St.
ANS. How did Oswald lift those cartons from the top ?
7. A bag large enough to hold the disassembled rifle was found near the window with Oswald's finger and palm print and.....
ANS. How do you know the bag was on the sixth floor ? Was it photographed in place ?
Here's the crime scene photo. Where is it ? >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ce729.jpg
8...... fibers matching the blanket Oswald had used to store his rifle.
ANS. Were those fibers identified as having come from the blanket in the Paine garage ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WC_Vol4_88-stombaugh.gif
9. In the case of the Tippit murder, the .38 Special bullets had been fired from a gun with a slightly larger diameter barrel that prevented consistent enough markings to positive match them to any firearm. However, the bullets had the same twist
ANS. You don't match bullets by primary characteristics ( grooves and twists ) any more than you match fingerprint because it's a whorl, a loop or an arch.
You match them from individual characterisitics. The individual characteristics are the "fingerprint".
10. Two different makes of bullets were recovered from Tippit's body and Oswald had those same two makes of bullets in his possession when arrested a little more than a half hour later.
ANS. Those cartridges were allegedly found on Oswald outside the lineup room for the 4:05pm lineup.
But Oswald was searched twice before those cartridges were found and there was nothing in his pockets.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/105-82555-Sec-78-pg-14-1.png >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/image003.png
So here we have two different Dallas policemen, one a detective and the other a uniformed officer, who searched suspect Oswald prior to the escort by Sims, Boyd and Hall to the lineup room and both reported that Oswald’s pockets were empty.
11. Four shells were recovered from the place where the Tippit shooter was seen dumping them and those shells were positively matched to Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Were those shells ever identified by the witnesses who found them ? >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/discovery.png
You didn't answer one question I asked.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15?PM, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.
FACT: neither witness said anything about the package being 38 inches nor did they identify CE 142 as the package Oswald had that morning.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 12:33:20?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Gil is speculating as to why Oswald went to Irving. He has no evidence to back up his
speculation.
FACT: All my evidence is shown here, complete with official documents and testimony :
https://gil-jesus.com/the-real-reason-oswald-went-to-irving-on-11-21/
YOU ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
You lie about the evidence and you lie that I don't produce evidence when you know it's all on my website:
www.gil-jesus.com
Every time you come in here and attack me and post your comments and avoid citing sources, you add to MY credibility, not yours.
Because I can back up everything I say with sources, can you ?
So far you haven't.
Consider yourself spanked again.
Now you can cry.
On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 5:19:20?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:22:48?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
More important that giving all these examples, is the fact that not a
*SINGLE* believer has *EVER* publicly acknowledged these known
instances of eyewitness intimidation - let alone explain them.
Cowardice or dishonesty... you decide.
It's funny. My dog is wrong and she gets spanked and she doesn't do it again.
These idiots come here every day, make statements that are wrong, get spanked with the evidence and come back tomorrow for more.
Is my dog smarter than these morons ?
I used to try to give them the benefit of the doubt, that they were just mistaken.
But these people flat out lie. I know because they not only lie about the evidence, they even lie about what I say.
Their refusal to look at my evidence proves how close-minded they are. You would think that they'd at least look at it to tear it apart, but
they won't even do that. They know that I use official records in my essays and they're scared shitless of the truth.
They don't know and they don't WANT to know.
The prosecution's case against Oswald was a illusion. And they were fooled. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHzOOMdhAhE
It's obvious to anyone except the feeble-minded Lone Nutters that in this case, witnesses were threatened, harrassed, and intimidated.
Their statements were altered.
And the proof of it all is right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
At least one witness testified he signed an affidavit stating his choice from the police lineups before he even saw the lineup.
These tactics are not used in a normal criminal investigation.
They're not used by the prosecution in collecting evidence and they're not used by the defense because to use such tactics is illegal
and any evidence collected from them is inadmissable in court.
These tactics were used against witnesses, not suspects, mind you, WITNESSES.
But to the Lone Nutter, ignorance is bliss. As the line goes in the Wizard of Oz, "pay no attention to that man behind the curtain".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
The great and powerful Warren Commission has spoken
.
Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth's
inhabitants, I'm not surprised you believe you are spanking the LNs. Every time you make an
argument, it gets shot down like a clay pigeon. You then move on and start another thread
and start the process all over again. You don't present evidence, Gil. You make arguments
which in most cases are excuses to dismiss evidence, and pretty lame excuses. The funniest
part of all this is you think you are accomplishing something with this nonsense of yours. At
most a few dozen people read it and nobody is swayed one way or another by your arguments.
You aren't moving the needle of public opinion one iota and contrary to what you seem to be
hoping for, there isn't going to be another investigation into the assassination. Every such
investigation has concluded that Oswald was the assassin although the HSCA wrongfully
concluded there was likely a second gunman. That's where things stand now. All the history
books identify Oswald as the assassin while mentioning that there is a widespread belief
that he had accomplices. Nothing is going to change that. Almost everyone, regardless of
their beliefs have moved on from the assassination. It's a non-issue. IOW, you're wasting
your time. The LNs here are wasting their time pointing this out to you assclowns but the
difference is, we know it. We do it for amusement only.
On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 6:18:11 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth'sAs one who has been repeatedly spanked by me, I'm not surprised that you deny it.
inhabitants, I'm not surprised you believe you are spanking the LNs. Every time you make an
argument, it gets shot down like a clay pigeon.
You come in here and cry every day.
WAAAAAA.........you're looking at the wrong things.
WAAAAAA.........you're making excuses.
WAAAAAA.........what about this, what about that.
WAAAAAA.........you don't provide evidence.
Now it's WAAAAAAA........you haven't spanked anyone.
Let me refresh your memory.
You claimed that Lt. Day didn't dust the rifle at the scene.
I proved that was wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7uLMSs4KQ
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:38:47 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
This is a short summation of the forensic evidence at the scene of the murders of JFK and Tippit.
1. Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There is a clear paper trail and photographs establishing his ownership of the rifle.
ANS. Clear paper trail ? The shipping documents the FBI provided had neither the serial number of the rifle ( C 2766 ) nor the number of the carton it was in ( 3376 ) on them.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside520-1.jpg https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside170.jpg https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/rupp-1.jpg
2. His palm print was on the underside of the barrel and fibers matching the shirt he wore were on the butt plate of the rifle.
ANS. But the FBI said that when they examined the rifle on the day after the assassination, there was no palm print.
( 4 H 24 ) The FBI agent who travelled with the rifle from Dallas to Washington, Vincent Drain, was never called to testify.
Why not ?
4. Three spent shells were found at the window were the witnesses placed the shooter and they were positively matched to Oswald ( sic ) to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Those shells were found by Dallas Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney. Did he ever identify them as the shells he found ?
5. The only two bullets recovered from the shooting also were matched to Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Could one of those be the famous "stretcher bullet" which the four people who handled it couldn't identify ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol24_412.jpg
6. Oswald's fingerprints were found on top of the boxes that had been stacked to form a rifle rest and were oriented as they would be if Oswald were facing down Elm St.
ANS. How did Oswald lift those cartons from the top ?
7. A bag large enough to hold the disassembled rifle was found near the window with Oswald's finger and palm print and.....
ANS. How do you know the bag was on the sixth floor ? Was it photographed in place ?
Here's the crime scene photo. Where is it ? https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ce729.jpg
8...... fibers matching the blanket Oswald had used to store his rifle.
ANS. Were those fibers identified as having come from the blanket in the Paine garage ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WC_Vol4_88-stombaugh.gif
9. In the case of the Tippit murder, the .38 Special bullets had been fired from a gun with a slightly larger diameter barrel that prevented consistent enough markings to positive match them to any firearm. However, the bullets had the same twistcharacteristics as Oswald's revolver.
ANS. You don't match bullets by primary characteristics ( grooves and twists ) any more than you match fingerprint because it's a whorl, a loop or an arch.
You match them from individual characterisitics. The individual characteristics are the "fingerprint".
10. Two different makes of bullets were recovered from Tippit's body and Oswald had those same two makes of bullets in his possession when arrested a little more than a half hour later.
ANS. Those cartridges were allegedly found on Oswald outside the lineup room for the 4:05pm lineup.
But Oswald was searched twice before those cartridges were found and there was nothing in his pockets.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/105-82555-Sec-78-pg-14-1.png
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/image003.png
So here we have two different Dallas policemen, one a detective and the other a uniformed officer, who searched suspect Oswald prior to the escort by Sims, Boyd and Hall to the lineup room and both reported that Oswald’s pockets were empty.
11. Four shells were recovered from the place where the Tippit shooter was seen dumping them and those shells were positively matched to Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Were those shells ever identified by the witnesses who found them ? https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/discovery.png
You didn't answer one question I asked.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15 PM, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.
FACT: neither witness said anything about the package being 38 inches nor did they identify CE 142 as the package Oswald had that morning.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 12:33:20 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Gil is speculating as to why Oswald went to Irving. He has no evidence to back up his
speculation.
FACT: All my evidence is shown here, complete with official documents and testimony :
https://gil-jesus.com/the-real-reason-oswald-went-to-irving-on-11-21/
YOU ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
You lie about the evidence and you lie that I don't produce evidence when you know it's all on my website:
www.gil-jesus.com
Every time you come in here and attack me and post your comments and avoid citing sources, you add to MY credibility, not yours.
Because I can back up everything I say with sources, can you ?
So far you haven't.
Consider yourself spanked again.
Now you can cry.
On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 8:00:10?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 6:18:11?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Given you seem to live in an alternate universe with a different reality than most of earth'sAs one who has been repeatedly spanked by me, I'm not surprised that you deny it.
inhabitants, I'm not surprised you believe you are spanking the LNs. Every time you make an
argument, it gets shot down like a clay pigeon.
You come in here and cry every day.
Gil, you've never been able to raise a pimple on my ass and you never will. Your when you do
cite evidence rather than simply making illogical arguments, your analysis of it is FUBAR.
WAAAAAA.........you're looking at the wrong things.Jesus, you have to go back over 10 fucking years to bring up a mistake I made and acknowledged.
WAAAAAA.........you're making excuses.
WAAAAAA.........what about this, what about that.
WAAAAAA.........you don't provide evidence.
Now it's WAAAAAAA........you haven't spanked anyone.
Let me refresh your memory.
You claimed that Lt. Day didn't dust the rifle at the scene.
I proved that was wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RV7uLMSs4KQ
Just how fucking desperate are you?
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:38:47?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:A fine example of your FUBAR analysis.
This is a short summation of the forensic evidence at the scene of the murders of JFK and Tippit.
1. Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There is a clear paper trail and photographs establishing his ownership of the rifle.
ANS. Clear paper trail ? The shipping documents the FBI provided had neither the serial number of the rifle ( C 2766 ) nor the number of the carton it was in ( 3376 ) on them.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside520-1.jpg
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside170.jpg
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/rupp-1.jpg
2. His palm print was on the underside of the barrel and fibers matching the shirt he wore were on the butt plate of the rifle.
ANS. But the FBI said that when they examined the rifle on the day after the assassination, there was no palm print.
How many times are you going to feign ignorance on this. How many times do you want it
explained to you. Day LIFTED the print off the barrel. That's why it was no longer there when
the FBI got the rifle. Day forwarded the lifted print to the FBI for analysis and they determined
it belonged to Oswald.
( 4 H 24 ) The FBI agent who travelled with the rifle from Dallas to Washington, Vincent Drain, was never called to testify.
Why not ?
A better question would be why.
4. Three spent shells were found at the window were the witnesses placed the shooter and they were positively matched to Oswald ( sic ) to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Those shells were found by Dallas Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney. Did he ever identify them as the shells he found ?
5. The only two bullets recovered from the shooting also were matched to Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Could one of those be the famous "stretcher bullet" which the four people who handled it couldn't identify ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol24_412.jpg
You conveniently ignore ...
6. Oswald's fingerprints were found on top of the boxes that had been stacked to form a rifle rest and were oriented as they would be if Oswald were facing down Elm St.
ANS. How did Oswald lift those cartons from the top ?
Why would you think the fingerprints were left there when he lifted the boxes. Why would you
discount the probability that they were left there as he was facing down Elm St. either before or
immediately after the shooting?
7. A bag large enough to hold the disassembled rifle was found near the window with Oswald's finger and palm print and.....
ANS. How do you know the bag was on the sixth floor ? Was it photographed in place ?
Here's the crime scene photo. Where is it ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ce729.jpg
8...... fibers matching the blanket Oswald had used to store his rifle.
ANS. Were those fibers identified as having come from the blanket in the Paine garage ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WC_Vol4_88-stombaugh.gif
Fiber evidence cannot be positively matched the way fingerprints or ballistic markings can be.
Fibers could come from an identical source. It would be a remarkable coincidence if the fibers
in Oswald's bag happened to be an exact match to the fibers from the blanket he stored his rifle
in. Any sane person would look at that evidence and conclude the fibers came from Oswald's
rifle blanket. Here is where Gil's inability to rationally analyze the evidence betrays him.
characteristics as Oswald's revolver.9. In the case of the Tippit murder, the .38 Special bullets had been fired from a gun with a slightly larger diameter barrel that prevented consistent enough markings to positive match them to any firearm. However, the bullets had the same twist
ANS. You don't match bullets by primary characteristics ( grooves and twists ) any more than you match fingerprint because it's a whorl, a loop or an arch.
You match them from individual characterisitics. The individual characteristics are the "fingerprint".
10. Two different makes of bullets were recovered from Tippit's body and Oswald had those same two makes of bullets in his possession when arrested a little more than a half hour later.
ANS. Those cartridges were allegedly found on Oswald outside the lineup room for the 4:05pm lineup.
Here's where Gil accuses the DPD of planting those cartridges without a scrap of evidence they
did so.
But Oswald was searched twice before those cartridges were found and there was nothing in his pockets.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/105-82555-Sec-78-pg-14-1.png
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/image003.png
So here we have two different Dallas policemen, one a detective and the other a uniformed officer, who searched suspect Oswald prior to the escort by Sims, Boyd and Hall to the lineup room and both reported that Oswald’s pockets were empty.
Of course Gil ignores...
11. Four shells were recovered from the place where the Tippit shooter was seen dumping them and those shells were positively matched to Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.
ANS. Were those shells ever identified by the witnesses who found them ?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/discovery.png
How the hell would the witnesses who found the shells positively identify them?
You didn't answer one question I asked.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15?PM, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.
FACT: neither witness said anything about the package being 38 inches nor did they identify CE 142 as the package Oswald had that morning.
The bag Oswald brought into the TSBD with his prints on it was measured at 38 inches. That
trumps the guesstimate by Randle and Frazier.
On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 12:33:20?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Gil is speculating as to why Oswald went to Irving. He has no evidence to back up his
speculation.
FACT: All my evidence is shown here, complete with official documents and testimony :
https://gil-jesus.com/the-real-reason-oswald-went-to-irving-on-11-21/
It's your analysis ...
YOU ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
You lie about the evidence and you lie that I don't produce evidence when you know it's all on my website:
The evidence you cite doesn't establish what you claim it does. Your claims are not evidence.
They are your analysis and that is what is FUBAR.
www.gil-jesus.com
Every time you come in here and attack me and post your comments and avoid citing sources, you add to MY credibility, not yours.
You have no credibility, Gil.
Because I can back up everything I say with sources, can you ?
So far you haven't.
I'm not the one claiming conspiracy.
Consider yourself spanked again.
Now you can cry.
First time I ever got spanked...
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 3:55:12 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:already dead Oswald?
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 4:20:03 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 1:38:19 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 2:13:41 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Tough to understand why the "conspirators" would focus on a minor piece in the overall story like Warren Reynolds and target him for elimination. Even harder to understand why your conspiracy would hire Darrel
Garner (or hire anyone else for that matter as Garner was released) to shoot him with a .22 firearm.
It is the purpose of this forum. But they really have very little in favor of conspiracy. The "back and to the left" argument for a frontal shot. The "a lot of people thought the shots came from the knoll" argument. After that they are about spent.It's hard for you to understand how 2+2=4.You. Constantly. For decades.
This is a thread about witness intimidation and tampering.
Who said anything about a conspiracy ?
So if no conspiracy, one of the possibilities you're are hinting at is that Oswald acted alone and somebody--you're not sure who--was "intimidating" some minor bit player in the saga named Warren Reynolds to provide a stronger identification of the
He was traveling on business and had just filled up the tank on his rental car and was in grabbing a snack, too. We chatted for about thirty minutes, totally blown away by the incredible coincidence of it all. What are the odds?You can't be serious.
Do you ever stop and take a breath and just reflect on how stupid some of this stuff is?It`s hard to even see how it can make sense. They unscrewed Reynold`s lightbulb so he would make a more positive ID in Oswald? How does Reynolds know that making a positive identification isn`t the exact opposite of what they wanted from him?
What works is going to Reynolds and saying "Unless you strongly assert it was Oswald you saw we will kill your dog." How does he know what they want from him by just doing random bad things to him?
Reynolds testified that he believed the shooting was connected with his encounter with "Oswald".
"It would be fair to think that somebody shot me on account of they thought I knew something or had some connection with Lee Oswald." ( 11 H 438 )
Coincidently, he was shot on January 23, 1964, ( 11 H 437 ) the day after he gave a statement to the FBI.
https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh25/html/WC_Vol25_0381a.htm
But you knew that, didn't you ?Fun with numbers.
The odds of him getting shot, or anything else happening the day after giving a statement to the FBI, is one in three hundred sixty-five, Gil. That's how many days there are in a non-leap year.
I was filling up a rental car with gas about a thousand miles from my home in Minnesota where I live and ran into the little convenience store to get a coffee and bumped into one of my oldest friends from childhood in Chicago, where he still lives.
an evolved survival trait). Like my father used to say "Just because you are paranoid doesn`t mean they aren`t out to get you".I can`t come up with anything even close to that in my life. I can`t even think of any extraordinary coincidence that I ever personally experienced. But if something like this did happen to me, my innate paranoia would kick in (which is really just
History (and life) is full of these types of coincidences and oddities. They are what they are. WW1 turned on the chance encounter Gavrilo Princip had with the car Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a passenger in. Before the fatal shooting, Princip hadmissed his chance, along with some fellow would-be assassins, to kill Ferdinand when a grenade thrown at the motorcade by a Princip co-conspirator caused Ferdinand's driver to speed up and past Princip. He wandered to a nearby restaurant. Minutes later,
One of the many problems JFK Truthers have is that THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES. Everything happens by design, there is no such thing as happenstance. The mind boggles at all of the little things that didn't happen on 11/22/63 which would've derailedOswald's attempt.
with one of the main members who he hadn`t had contact with for awhile. They then talked about "old times", including the crimes they committed together. This was enough to charge the ringleader.Case in point, there was a group of eco-terrorists years ago that were burning down certain businesses. They got away with it for years, but then the authorities got one to turn informant. They wired him and then had him have a "chance encounter"
Life is weird, Gil.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 3:43:00 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:56:12 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:50:41 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 1:32:17 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:Explain it right here. What is the concept?
You can`t even say what the concept "eyewitness intimidation" is, or what it entails.It's all explained right here:
Bud is scared shitless of links. He's afraid to click on them.https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
The answers to all of your questions are right here:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
If you're afraid of the link, then shut the fuck up.There's nothing wrong with using a link to back up a point you are making. It's when people
use links in lieu of making a point that reveals weakness. Usually that is done when someone
can't articulate a cogent argument and instead post a link and claim that the point is made
somewhere within the link. They use links as a crutch for their inability to articulate.
On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 10:00:40?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 10:26:19 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 12:59:30?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 9:49:31?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT), Gil JesusI didn't even mention the case of Warren Reynolds, who was shot in the head in the basement of his brother's used car lot
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1652/evidence-witness-intimidation-tampering
I've spoke about the KNOWN eyewitness intimidation for years, and not >>>>> *ONE SINGLE BELIEVER* has ever publicly acknowledged these facts,
refuted me, or explained it.
They can't.
the day after he told the FBI that, " he would definitely hesitate to identify Oswald as the individual" he followed. ( 25 H 731 )
No one was ever charged in that shooting. A suspect was arrested and then released.
They wanted him to know the guy was still out there.
Not only was Reynolds being targeted, his family and his property it seems was being targeted as well.
Less than a month after his shooting, a man tried to lure his 10 year old daughter into his car with the promise of candy. ( 11 H 441 )
Someone also unscrewed the light bulb in his porch light so it wouldn't go on when he threw the switch. ( ibid. pg. 442 )
The porch light was rendered useless during any attack on his property after dark .
Five months later he testified that he identified Oswald ,"in my mind" after seeing him on televison and in the newspapers.
Such an identification is not considered positive.
He never came forward to identify Oswald officially until his Warren Commission testimony.
The harrassment worked. Reynolds changed his mind and went on the record as identifying Oswald.
What is it worth...
For you to run from the facts?
Nothing at all. No-one expects truth from a coward.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 108:55:45 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,710 |
