• The perspective of a real reporter who was in the motorcade when the sh

    From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 24 20:13:04 2023
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza
    remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were
    four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't
    all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads
    as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Tue Jul 25 06:39:20 2023
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza
    remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were
    four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't >all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots >came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads
    as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any >evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes >Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?

    You've offered opinion. You've offered speculation. Ironically, since
    you can't name a *SINGLE* eyewitness you believe, you offer a witness.

    Gil and I offer evidence.

    You lose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to chuckschuyler123@gmail.com on Tue Jul 25 08:00:58 2023
    On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chuckschuyler123@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:39:24?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza >>>remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were >>>four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't >>>all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots >>>came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads >>>as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any >>>evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes >>>Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?
    You've offered opinion. You've offered speculation. Ironically, since
    you can't name a *SINGLE* eyewitness you believe, you offer a witness.

    Gil and I offer evidence.

    Evidence that some people did something?


    No, evidence of what happened that day. Are you a moron?


    What happened that day?


    Follow the evidence... pay attention to what the eyewitnesses said.
    Stop being stupid.


    You lose.


    You still lost.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Jul 25 07:52:52 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:39:24 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza >remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were >four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't >all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots >came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads >as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any >evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes >Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?
    You've offered opinion. You've offered speculation. Ironically, since
    you can't name a *SINGLE* eyewitness you believe, you offer a witness.

    Gil and I offer evidence.

    Evidence that some people did something?

    What happened that day?

    You lose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Jul 25 10:32:53 2023
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:01:01 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:39:24?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza >>>remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were >>>four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't
    all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots
    came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads >>>as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any >>>evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes
    Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?
    You've offered opinion. You've offered speculation. Ironically, since
    you can't name a *SINGLE* eyewitness you believe, you offer a witness.

    Gil and I offer evidence.

    Evidence that some people did something?
    No, evidence of what happened that day.

    What? Be specific.

    Are you a moron?


    What happened that day?


    Follow the evidence... pay attention to what the eyewitnesses said.
    Stop being stupid.


    You lose.


    You still lost.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 3 07:00:28 2023
    On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirslick@fast.net>
    wrote:

    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 11:01:01?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
    <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 8:39:24?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:13:04 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/he-was-there-when-jfk-was-shot-and-he-s-over-the-conspiracy-theories/ar-AA1eivrz?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=43ab1d3b4ca147a08da206520bd611af&ei=26

    He heard three shots. Most of the people who were in Dealey Plaza >>>>>remembered hearing three shots. Some heard two. Some thought there were >>>>>four. The consensus was there were three, right from the start. They didn't
    all agree where the shots came from. But three shots is what they heard. Three shells were found where the shooter was seen firing from. His rifle
    was a short distance away. It's not hard to figure out that all three shots
    came from that one location.

    The reporter who was there heard those three shots. He tracked down leads >>>>>as did his colleagues. They found no evidence of any other shots nor any >>>>>evidence the prime suspect had any accomplices. After 60 years he believes >>>>>Oswald acted alone. Why would he believe otherwise?
    You've offered opinion. You've offered speculation. Ironically, since
    you can't name a *SINGLE* eyewitness you believe, you offer a witness. >>>>
    Gil and I offer evidence.

    Evidence that some people did something?

    No, evidence of what happened that day.

    Logical fallacy deleted.

    Are you a moron?


    What happened that day?


    Follow the evidence... pay attention to what the eyewitnesses said.
    Stop being stupid.


    You lose.


    You still lost.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)