1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Lt. Day Said The Bag He Recovered Was FOUR Feet Long...

    From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 24 01:42:06 2023
    ...and two feet long folded in half. But the bag in evidence is 38 inches. Hmm... Apparently nobody in this case could use a tape measure.

    https://postimg.cc/rDbLFSq6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 24 03:45:28 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 4:42:08 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    ...and two feet long folded in half. But the bag in evidence is 38 inches. Hmm... Apparently nobody in this case could use a tape measure.

    https://postimg.cc/rDbLFSq6

    It just shows how easy it is to misjudge the length of something by a foot. When a tape measure
    was used, the bag was 38 inches.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Mon Jul 24 05:51:11 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 6:45:30 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    It just shows how easy it is to misjudge the length of something by a foot. When a tape measure
    was used, the bag was 38 inches.

    And yet neither of the witnesses positively identified the CE 142 bag as the bag they saw that morning.
    Even if they had the length wrong, you would have thought that they would remember that it was pieced together with tape.
    But alas, no evidence that Oswald brought a 38 inch package to work that morning.
    <snicker>
    SMH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Mon Jul 24 08:14:00 2023
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:51:12 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 6:45:30 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    It just shows how easy it is to misjudge the length of something by a foot. When a tape measure
    was used, the bag was 38 inches.
    And yet neither of the witnesses positively identified the CE 142 bag as the bag they saw that morning.

    We don't need the witnesses to positively identify the bag. The bag has Oswald's fingerprints
    on it which positively identifies it as the bag Oswald brought into the TSBD.

    Even if they had the length wrong, you would have thought that they would remember that it was pieced together with tape.

    You must think people are normally observant of details which would seem very unimportant
    at the time they saw them.

    But alas, no evidence that Oswald brought a 38 inch package to work that morning.
    <snicker>

    No evidence? A 38 inch bag with Oswald's prints on it is not evidence Oswald brought a 38
    inch bag into the TSBD. It's a good thing we have a sleuth like Gil on this case to point out these
    things to us.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Jul 24 09:16:56 2023
    On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:51:12?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 6:45:30?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    It just shows how easy it is to misjudge the length of something by a foot. When a tape measure
    was used, the bag was 38 inches.
    And yet neither of the witnesses positively identified the CE 142 bag as the bag they saw that morning.

    We don't need the witnesses to positively identify the bag. The bag has Oswald's fingerprints
    on it which positively identifies it as the bag Oswald brought into the TSBD.


    Logical fallacy.

    Those fingerprints show no such thing.


    Even if they had the length wrong, you would have thought that they would remember that it was pieced together with tape.

    You must think people are normally observant of details which would seem very unimportant
    at the time they saw them.


    Your speculation doesn't trump the evidence.


    But alas, no evidence that Oswald brought a 38 inch package to work that morning.
    <snicker>

    No evidence?


    You can't cite any...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)