Gil, could you apply your keen analytical mind to this case and determine who killed these children?
https://www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-mother-her-3-children-153805970.html
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 9:41:18 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
Gil, could you apply your keen analytical mind to this case and determine who killed these children?
https://www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-mother-her-3-children-153805970.htmlWow. What a terrible story. We live in a broken world.
Chief of Police Gil Jesus in little Verdigris Oklahoma would be absolutely perplexed right now, scratching his head and shrugging his shoulders.
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 9:41:18 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
Gil, could you apply your keen analytical mind to this case and determine who killed these children?
https://www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-mother-her-3-children-153805970.htmlWow. What a terrible story. We live in a broken world.
Chief of Police Gil Jesus in little Verdigris Oklahoma would be absolutely perplexed right now, scratching his head and shrugging his shoulders.
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 6:45:05 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 9:41:18 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
Gil, could you apply your keen analytical mind to this case and determine who killed these children?
https://www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-mother-her-3-children-153805970.htmlWow. What a terrible story. We live in a broken world.
Chief of Police Gil Jesus in little Verdigris Oklahoma would be absolutely perplexed right now, scratching his head and shrugging his shoulders.
Well, he'd be waiting to for the Soviet Union to finish it's
investigation on the matter, then go with what they said.
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:42:49 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He'd also start a website. And a YouTube channel.You know you're getting under the trolls' skin when they post stupid shit about you.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
He'd also start a website. And a YouTube channel.
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:21:35 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.He was never a criminal defendant, stupid. Ruby ended the chance of an Oswald trial. You know this.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.There is no criminal case, stupid. Stop living in the past. Oswald is historically guilty. You agree. It's why you post here. It's why you post your YouTube videos. It's why you have a website.
Evidence with no chain of custody....in your opinion, a lonely senior citizen with an internet connection.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.He's not on trial, stupid. We don't try dead people accused of murder.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.You are lost. We know he wasn't found guilty of murder by a jury. We get it, so stop talking about some mythical trial that didn't occur. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK HAPPENED THAT DAY...HISTORICALLY.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
How many shots? From what locations? Which conspiracy theories about the assassination get it wrong?
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 9:21:35?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
Gil has just exonerated:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:21:35?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 11:49:38?AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:21:35?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:He was never a criminal defendant, stupid. Ruby ended the chance of an Oswald trial. You know this.
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not. >> There is no criminal case, stupid. Stop living in the past. Oswald is historically guilty. You agree. It's why you post here. It's why you post your YouTube videos. It's why you have a website....in your opinion, a lonely senior citizen with an internet connection.
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
You are lost. We know he wasn't found guilty of murder by a jury. We get it, so stop talking about some mythical trial that didn't occur. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK HAPPENED THAT DAY...HISTORICALLY.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case. >> He's not on trial, stupid. We don't try dead people accused of murder.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
How many shots? From what locations? Which conspiracy theories about the assassination get it wrong?
The following seems to sum up Gil's beliefs:
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 9:41:18 AM UTC-5, Bud wrote:
Gil, could you apply your keen analytical mind to this case and determine who killed these children?
https://www.aol.com/news/oklahoma-mother-her-3-children-153805970.htmlWow. What a terrible story. We live in a broken world.
Chief of Police Gil Jesus in little Verdigris Oklahoma would be absolutely perplexed right now, scratching his head and shrugging his shoulders.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 11:49:38 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 8:21:35 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.He was never a criminal defendant, stupid. Ruby ended the chance of an Oswald trial. You know this.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.There is no criminal case, stupid. Stop living in the past. Oswald is historically guilty. You agree. It's why you post here. It's why you post your YouTube videos. It's why you have a website.
Evidence with no chain of custody....in your opinion, a lonely senior citizen with an internet connection.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence. There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.He's not on trial, stupid. We don't try dead people accused of murder.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.You are lost. We know he wasn't found guilty of murder by a jury. We get it, so stop talking about some mythical trial that didn't occur. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK HAPPENED THAT DAY...HISTORICALLY.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
How many shots? From what locations? Which conspiracy theories about the assassination get it wrong?The following seems to sum up Gil's beliefs:
Oswald did not kill JFK
Oswald is identified as the assassin by historical references.
A person should not be identified as a murderer unless they have been convicted.
Historical references should be changed so that Oswald is not named as the assassin.
Historical references should state no one killed JFK because no one has been convicted...and
never will be.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not.
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 06:21:33 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.interested in the truth?
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not. Don't you just love it when believers prove that they aren't
They make **NO** effort to understand what you're posting...
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 11:42:49 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He'd also start a website. And a YouTube channel.You know you're getting under the trolls' skin when they post stupid shit about you.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
You have it backwards. We make fun of you because you keep posting stupid shit
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:21:39 AM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
You have it backwards. We make fun of you because you keep posting stupid shitNo Jerry, you make fun of people because you're an asshole.
An asshole is a person whose only purpose in life is to give the world a lot of shit. Because that's what assholes do.
And that's what you people do. Therefore, by definition, you're all a bunch of assholes.
The only stupid postings are your comments and I'll put my evidence up against your stupid comments any day of the week.
You don't post evidence, Gil. You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I've
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time. Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:41:08 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You don't post evidence, Gil. You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I'veHow can you lie so much ?
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time. Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
Do you ever tell the truth ?
How can one "cancel" the official version if it's the truth ?
I post evidence.
You're problem is that you can't accept the fact that there is evidence in the official record that questions Oswald's guilt.
You can't deal with that.
And you come in here every day and get your ass kicked by documents, testimony and videos of witnesses in their own words.
Then you justify your beliefs by trying to put the burden of proof on me.
That I somehow am obligated to name the shooters. Like that would convince you.
Like I've told that nitwit Brian Doyle a hundred times, my research doesn't involve "solving" the case.
There are plenty of theories out there, but I don't pay much attention ot them.
My research is an EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD.
I can't tell you who killed Kennedy, but I can tell you who DIDN'T kill Kennedy and why.
And you can find my research here:
www.gil-jesus.com
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:12:19?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:21:39?AM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
You have it backwards. We make fun of you because you keep posting stupid shitNo Jerry, you make fun of people because you're an asshole.
An asshole is a person whose only purpose in life is to give the world a lot of shit. Because that's what assholes do.
And that's what you people do. Therefore, by definition, you're all a bunch of assholes.
The only stupid postings are your comments and I'll put my evidence up against your stupid comments any day of the week.
You don't post evidence, Gil.
You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I've
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time.
Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 7:10:41?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:41:08?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You don't post evidence, Gil. You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I'veHow can you lie so much ?
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time. Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
Do you ever tell the truth ?
How can one "cancel" the official version if it's the truth ?
I post evidence.
Your evidence is nothing more than your excuses to dismiss evidence.
You're problem is that you can't accept the fact that there is evidence in the official record that questions Oswald's guilt.
You can't deal with that.
You're problem is you can't accept the evidence that clearly shows Oswald killed JFK and JDT.
You can't deal with that.
And you come in here every day and get your ass kicked by documents, testimony and videos of witnesses in their own words.
Then you justify your beliefs by trying to put the burden of proof on me.
You mean the burden of showing that someone other than Oswald killed JFK?
That I somehow am obligated to name the shooters. Like that would convince you.
If you're going to claim somebody other than Oswald killed JFK, it would be nice if you could
produce evidence of that.
Like I've told that nitwit Brian Doyle a hundred times, my research doesn't involve "solving" the case.
There are plenty of theories out there, but I don't pay much attention ot them.
If you expect to convince people that Oswald didn't kill JFK, you need some evidence that
somebody else did. Obviously, you don't have any.
My research is an EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD.
I can't tell you who killed Kennedy, but I can tell you who DIDN'T kill Kennedy and why.
And you can find my research here:
www.gil-jesus.com
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 02:41:05 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:12:19?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:21:39?AM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote: >> > You have it backwards. We make fun of you because you keep posting stupid shit
No Jerry, you make fun of people because you're an asshole.
An asshole is a person whose only purpose in life is to give the world a lot of shit. Because that's what assholes do.
And that's what you people do. Therefore, by definition, you're all a bunch of assholes.
The only stupid postings are your comments and I'll put my evidence up against your stupid comments any day of the week.
You don't post evidence, Gil.You can't convince people with wacky lies, Corbutt.
By *this* standard, the WCR never referenced any evidence.
You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I'veI posted it, and YOU RAN EVERY SINGLE TIME. Just as you'll run this
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time.
time.
The dozens of witnesses who pointed to the GK is EXACTLY the evidence
you demand - yet you pretend it's never been posted.
And can't answer it.
Your whole approach isYou cannot convince people with lies.
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
When are you going to learn
this?
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:41:08 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You don't post evidence, Gil. You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I've
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time. Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
How can you lie so much ?
Do you ever tell the truth ?
How can one "cancel" the official version if it's the truth ?
I post evidence.
You're problem is that you can't accept the fact that there is evidence in the official record that questions Oswald's guilt.
You can't deal with that.
And you come in here every day and get your ass kicked by documents, testimony and videos of witnesses in their own words.
Then you justify your beliefs by trying to put the burden of proof on me.
That I somehow am obligated to name the shooters. Like that would convince you.
Like I've told that nitwit Brian Doyle a hundred times, my research doesn't involve "solving" the case.
There are plenty of theories out there, but I don't pay much attention ot them.
My research is an EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD.
I can't tell you who killed Kennedy, but I can tell you who DIDN'T kill Kennedy and why.
And you can find my research here:
www.gil-jesus.com
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 6:10:41?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:41:08?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
You don't post evidence, Gil. You dismiss the evidence because it all points to Oswald. I've
challenged you on numerous occasions to produce even a single piece of evidence that anyone
except Oswald took part in the crime and you have balked every time. Your whole approach is
one of cancellation because the evidence we have doesn't fit what you want to believe.
How can you lie so much ?
Do you ever tell the truth ?
How can one "cancel" the official version if it's the truth ?
He's saying that you "cancel" the evidence.
I post evidence.
Evidence...
You're problem is that you can't accept the fact that there is evidence in the official record that questions Oswald's guilt.
You can't deal with that.
And you come in here every day and get your ass kicked by documents, testimony and videos of witnesses in their own words.
Then you justify your beliefs by trying to put the burden of proof on me.
Ah, but the burden of proof is on you...
That I somehow am obligated to name the shooters. Like that would convince you.
Aren't you at least obligated to be held to the same standards to those whose work you criticize?
Like I've told that nitwit Brian Doyle a hundred times, my research doesn't involve "solving" the case.
There are plenty of theories out there, but I don't pay much attention ot them.
My research is an EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE AGAINST OSWALD.
I can't tell you who killed Kennedy, but I can tell you who DIDN'T kill Kennedy and why.
Basically, you're alleging that on 11/22/63...
And you can find my research here:
www.gil-jesus.com
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:21:39 AM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
You have it backwards. We make fun of you because you keep posting stupid shitNo Jerry, you make fun of people because you're an asshole.
An asshole is a person whose only purpose in life is to give the world a lot of shit. Because that's what assholes do.
And that's what you people do. Therefore, by definition, you're all a bunch of assholes.
The only stupid postings are your comments and I'll put my evidence up against your stupid comments any day of the week.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 9:21:35?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:58:37?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
You have taken the position that the lack of a trial makes it impossible to ascertain guilt, have you not?No I've taken the position that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/f7509c1cdc169d03.jpg
Which is a trial standard that can`t be achieved without a trial.
The validity of this case has plenty of doubt, whether you like it or not. >>
Evidence with no chain of custody.
Evidence that hasn't been identified.
Evidence that wasn't secured.
Crime scenes that weren't secured.
Unfair police lineups.
Witnesses ignored.
Witnesses threatened and harrassed.
Judicial procedure abandonned.
Constitutional rights violated.
The case is rife with police corruption and mishandling of evidence.
There is much more than a reasonble doubt of Oswald's guilt in this case.
Now go sit in the corner and STFU.
If I want any shit out of you, I'll squeeze your head.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 111:18:00 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,948 |
