The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:46:55 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Correct.
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
See also:
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57753#relPageId=117
Sawyer Exhibit B has the gunman as 5 foot 6, 165 lbs armed with a 30 caliber rifle. ( 21 H 398 )
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_398-_-five-feet-six.jpg
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well, that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
this himself?
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
The rifle, the shells at the window, and the recovered bullets establish that the gunman was in
the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:26:30 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
The rifle, the shells at the window, and the recovered bullets establish that the gunman was inNo shit, Sherlock.
the building.
What's that got to do with Sawyer's broadcast ?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
Who saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man ranfrom the TSBD carrying a rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:from the TSBD carrying a rifle.
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man ran
Sky, the lying Warren Report noted that the 12:45 broadcast of the description of a man, white, slender, weighing 165, about 5'10' tall, in his early thirties
omitted any mention of the 30-30 rifle or it being a Winchester, which were also part of the broadcast.
They must have just forgot.
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:46:55 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.So does that give veracity to Buell Frazier's claim of seeing a man putting a rifle in a trunk?...
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:46:55 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.So does that give veracity to Buell Frazier's claim of seeing a man putting a rifle in a trunk?...
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man ranWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man ranWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man running
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:44:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:46:55 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Correct.
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
See also: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57753#relPageId=117
Sawyer Exhibit B has the gunman as 5 foot 6, 165 lbs armed with a 30 caliber rifle. ( 21 H 398 )
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_398-_-five-feet-six.jpgThis sort of datum must be repeated often to counter the lies of the Nutters.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:57:54 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:44:45 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:46:55 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Correct.
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
See also: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=57753#relPageId=117
Sawyer Exhibit B has the gunman as 5 foot 6, 165 lbs armed with a 30 caliber rifle. ( 21 H 398 )
Yes, you should look at the wrong things, and look at them incorrectly. How else can I feel superior?https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_398-_-five-feet-six.jpgThis sort of datum must be repeated often to counter the lies of the Nutters.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building.
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the building.
From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:08:23 PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man
Sky, the lying Warren Report noted that the 12:45 broadcast of the description of a man, white, slender, weighing 165, about 5'10' tall, in his early thirties
omitted any mention of the 30-30 rifle or it being a Winchester, which were also part of the broadcast.
They must have just forgot.Yes. They knew exactly what they were doing. At least some of them did.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a manWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a manWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, aWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Probably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, aWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Probably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, aWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Probably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:17:12 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
Yes, you should look at the wrong things, and look at them incorrectly. How else can I feel superior?There's no trick feeling superior to you, moron.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness,Who saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to deny theProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's car, as
There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, aWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to deny theProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's car, as
There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/
All you are showing is that you are desperate to see one, by looking at the wrong things incorrectly.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to deny theProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's car,
There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, aWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
Probably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron,
and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins,who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to deny the obvious fact that there was a conspiracy.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:27:05 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
All you are showing is that you are desperate to see one, by looking at the wrong things incorrectly.We look at official documents, testimony and exhibits.
Many of those are corroborated.
Now you're claiming they're wrong ?
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to deny theProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.Since the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessPretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky theory.
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's car,
There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/Because YOU'RE looking at the wrong thing.
You're looking at somebody's website instead of official pages.
Idiot.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to denySince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's
There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording
and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to denySince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's
There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:38:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to denySince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's
between 19:04 and 20:47. odellm23 does include a transcript of the first Sawyer transmission, but he allows that part about it being unknown whether the suspect was in the building to play without a transcript. Typical Nutter.There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.You can hear the recording hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERqlKEZxIrc
This was posted by odellm23, some mad Nutter who posted a few times to one of the newsgroups, and refused to post portions of the recording he said he had but which I could not find anywhere else, a typical Nutter. The relevant portions are spoken
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:38:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to denySince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's
between 19:04 and 20:47. odellm23 does include a transcript of the first Sawyer transmission, but he allows that part about it being unknown whether the suspect was in the building to play without a transcript. Typical Nutter.There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.You can hear the recording hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERqlKEZxIrc
This was posted by odellm23, some mad Nutter who posted a few times to one of the newsgroups, and refused to post portions of the recording he said he had but which I could not find anywhere else, a typical Nutter. The relevant portions are spoken
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:38:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to thisWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility to denySince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer's
between 19:04 and 20:47. odellm23 does include a transcript of the first Sawyer transmission, but he allows that part about it being unknown whether the suspect was in the building to play without a transcript. Typical Nutter.There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.You can hear the recording hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERqlKEZxIrc
This was posted by odellm23, some mad Nutter who posted a few times to one of the newsgroups, and refused to post portions of the recording he said he had but which I could not find anywhere else, a typical Nutter. The relevant portions are spoken
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:53:03 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:suspect ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:38:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
this witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According toWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
s car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility toSince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer'
between 19:04 and 20:47. odellm23 does include a transcript of the first Sawyer transmission, but he allows that part about it being unknown whether the suspect was in the building to play without a transcript. Typical Nutter.There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.You can hear the recording hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERqlKEZxIrc
This was posted by odellm23, some mad Nutter who posted a few times to one of the newsgroups, and refused to post portions of the recording he said he had but which I could not find anywhere else, a typical Nutter. The relevant portions are spoken
If you can't hear anything and you need to read, the McAdams transcript does have the part where Sawyer says that it is unknown whether the suspect was in the building. At least it is in the version I downloaded.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:53:03 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:suspect ever having been in the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:38:41 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:32:47 AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:44:19 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:23:32 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 2:37:56 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:39:38 PM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7:25:23 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 3:02:13 PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:42:28 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:17:23 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:54:48 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
this witness, a man ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According toWho saw a man with a rifle outside the building?Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?Yes. There's no room for reasonable doubt here. The broadcast description was of a suspect seen with a rifle outside of the building. That means at least two rifles. That means conspiracy.
theory.Pretty much what I thought. There is no person who is known to said they saw a man runningYou're ridiculous. You think Inspector Sawyer was reporting "rumors" on the police radio? "We have a rumor here that a suspect with a rifle, 5' 9" 165 lbs left the building carrying a rifle." You'll say anything to defend your wacky
from the building with a rifle. The DPD radio report was nothing more than a rumor. Had
someone actually told a cop first hand they saw a man with a rifle running from the TSBD, that
person would have been held as a material witness. There's no way a cop is going to let such a
person leave without even identifying that person. They didn't do that with Brennan and they
certainly wouldn't have done that with a person who said they saw a man with a rifle running
from the building.
s car, as we can see in the photography. Amos Euins, who was also in the car, said that a construction worker had told an "old policeman," presumably Sawyer, about a suspect fleeing the scene. But you will come up with any unreasonable possibility toSince the alleged witness can't be named, it seems a probable explanation that no witnessProbably conflated. There was a witness to someone running out the back.
ever reported it and therefore, it would have been nothing more than a rumor. Sometimes
rumors get started when someone overhears something and misinterprets what he hears.
Then he repeats it and somebody else repeats it. We have no idea how many people this
rumor passed through before it got to Sawyers ears. We have no idea how badly the original
information got mangled in the mean time.
Note the Fritz believed the rifle was still on the 6th floor, and this was borne out by the discovery of the assassination rifle.There were two rifles, you fucking moron, and one of them was taken away by a man, 5'9", 165 lbs., about 30 years old, and his description was given out on the radio by Inspector Sawyer who had just talked to a construction worker in Sawyer'
between 19:04 and 20:47. odellm23 does include a transcript of the first Sawyer transmission, but he allows that part about it being unknown whether the suspect was in the building to play without a transcript. Typical Nutter.There are a lot of different transcripts of the police tapes. I`m not seeing this here...There is no evidence of someone taking a rifle from the building in the immediate aftermath.You're full of shit, Nutter Retard. Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle. That is evidence, even if your delusional mind cannot accept it. Fucktard.
There are no first person accounts of someone seeing such a thing. A hearsay radio report is
not evidence. We don't know how many ears that alleged report had passed through before
Sawyer heard it an there is no reason to give it any credibility. Since CTs have no real evidence
of a conspiracy, this is the kind of nonsense they grasp at.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/dpdtapes/The McAdams transcript slipped over that...for some reason. But you can hear it on the recording and see it in a transcript the Warren Commission used. Also, the Warren Commission has Sawyer read that in his testimony, so you can see it there.
Mr. SAWYER. "The wanted person in this is a slender white male about 30, 5 feet 10, 165, carrying what looks to be a 30-30 or some type of Winchester."
Mr. BELIN. Then the statement is made from the home office, "It was a rifle?"
Mr. SAWYER. I answered, "Yes, a rifle."
Mr. BELIN. Then the reply to you, "Any clothing description?"
Mr. SAWYER. "Current witness can't remember that."
But then the Warren Commission skips over the part where Sawyer says it is not known if the suspect had been in the building, very conveniently. Listen to the recording and you can hear what they did not write down for you.You can hear the recording hear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERqlKEZxIrc
This was posted by odellm23, some mad Nutter who posted a few times to one of the newsgroups, and refused to post portions of the recording he said he had but which I could not find anywhere else, a typical Nutter. The relevant portions are spoken
You wrote this...
"Inspector Sawyer reported on the radio that a suspect had been seen fleeing the building with a rifle."
Exactly where on the video you linked to can I hear this?
Who saw a man with a rifle outside the building?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:from the TSBD carrying a rifle.
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man ran
Sky, the lying Warren Report noted that the 12:45 broadcast of the description of a man, white, slender, weighing 165, about 5'10' tall, in his early thirties
omitted any mention of the 30-30 rifle or it being a Winchester, which were also part of the broadcast.
They must have just forgot.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:10:57?PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:08:23?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>> > According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man
Sky, the lying Warren Report noted that the 12:45 broadcast of the description of a man, white, slender, weighing 165, about 5'10' tall, in his early thirtiesYes. They knew exactly what they were doing. At least some of them did.
omitted any mention of the 30-30 rifle or it being a Winchester, which were also part of the broadcast.
They must have just forgot.
Explain what "they" were doing.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well, that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
this himself?
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 4:26:03 PM UTC-7, recip...@gmail.com wrote:the depository TAKING INFORMATION FROM WITNESSES. No wonder they called him JH "Dummy up, dummy" Sawyer....
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Sawyer was outstanding at dummying up. He testified that he was so busy processing witnesses that he didn't have time to take down any information. An apparent lie. Deputy Sheriff Sweatt reported that very weekend that Sawyer was indeed out front of
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 04:47:24 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:33:45?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 7:27:05?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
All you are showing is that you are desperate to see one, by looking at the wrong things incorrectly.We look at official documents, testimony and exhibits.
Many of those are corroborated.
Now you're claiming they're wrong ?
I`m claiming you look at the wrong things, and look at those wrong things incorrectly.And, since this is an uncited empty claim,
we know from *YOU* that
it's a lie.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:17:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Yes, you should look at the wrong things, and look at them incorrectly. How else can I feel superior?
Doesn't matter what you "feel."
The facts remain.
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:22:23 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 6:29:05?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>> On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03?PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55?AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>>>> The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.
It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in thehttps://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzWYour argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that >>>> Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say >>>> this himself?
Logical fallacy deleted.Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif >>
Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:24:41 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>ran from the TSBD carrying a rifle.
wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:10:57?PM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:08:23?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:30:28?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
According to the DPD, this was the witness, somehow unknown to the DPD, who gave Sawyer the description which Sawyer transmitted on his police radio. It is not my fault that the DPD do not know the witness's name. According to this witness, a man
Sky, the lying Warren Report noted that the 12:45 broadcast of the description of a man, white, slender, weighing 165, about 5'10' tall, in his early thirtiesYes. They knew exactly what they were doing. At least some of them did.
omitted any mention of the 30-30 rifle or it being a Winchester, which were also part of the broadcast.
They must have just forgot.
Explain what "they" were doing.
Lying.
But you knew that.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 1:13:50?PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:the depository TAKING INFORMATION FROM WITNESSES. No wonder they called him JH "Dummy up, dummy" Sawyer....
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 4:26:03?PM UTC-7, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55?AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>>> The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Sawyer was outstanding at dummying up. He testified that he was so busy processing witnesses that he didn't have time to take down any information. An apparent lie. Deputy Sheriff Sweatt reported that very weekend that Sawyer was indeed out front of
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzWYour argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well, >>> that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
Who called him that, besides you, of course?
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 2:15:14 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
Sawyer also broadcasted that the man was "carrying" the rifle. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol21_392.jpg
Her admitted that during his testimony. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WC_Vol6_321-sawyer.gif
Does Jerry think he was carrying the rifle around inside the building ?
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:15:14 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
If the supposed rifle-carrying man was running from the building, then he would have been in the building in the first place....unless you want to believe that someone was taking pot shots at JFK through the crowd while standing in front of thebuilding. Sawyer would then have known that the man had indeed been in the building and therefore would not have said that he didn't know whether or not the guy had been in the building.
Of course, if you want to claim that a rifle-armed suspect had been on the ground outside the TSBD, you need to explain how everyone else in the multitude of spectators totally missed seeing him running around outside with his rifle.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:34:47 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:15:14 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in the
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
building. Sawyer would then have known that the man had indeed been in the building and therefore would not have said that he didn't know whether or not the guy had been in the building.If the supposed rifle-carrying man was running from the building, then he would have been in the building in the first place....unless you want to believe that someone was taking pot shots at JFK through the crowd while standing in front of the
Of course, if you want to claim that a rifle-armed suspect had been on the ground outside the TSBD, you need to explain how everyone else in the multitude of spectators totally missed seeing him running around outside with his rifle.It wasn't me, but Sawyer who said that it wasn't known if the man with the rifle had been in the building. Get out your Ouiga board and argue with Inspector Sawyer.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:14:19 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:34:47 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:15:14 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say this himself?
building. Sawyer would then have known that the man had indeed been in the building and therefore would not have said that he didn't know whether or not the guy had been in the building.If the supposed rifle-carrying man was running from the building, then he would have been in the building in the first place....unless you want to believe that someone was taking pot shots at JFK through the crowd while standing in front of the
I didn't say it was you. I pointed out that, using the same Sawyer quote you did and using the same logic you did, he could not have been describingOf course, if you want to claim that a rifle-armed suspect had been on the ground outside the TSBD, you need to explain how everyone else in the multitude of spectators totally missed seeing him running around outside with his rifle.It wasn't me, but Sawyer who said that it wasn't known if the man with the rifle had been in the building. Get out your Ouiga board and argue with Inspector Sawyer.
a man running from the TSBD with a rifle.
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 7:09:36 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:the building. From the horse's mouth in real time, the man seen with a rifle was outside of the building.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:14:19 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 6:34:47 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:15:14 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:26:03 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:55 AM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:It also "revolves around" what Sawyer said on the radio, that it wasn't known if the man had ever been in the building. If it was Brennan seeing Oswald in the window, then there would have been no question about the suspect ever having been in
The description of the Elm Street suspect was a man with a gun seen running from the building. It was not a description of a man seen in a window.Your argument revolves around what Shanklin said that Drain said that
https://postimg.cc/HjMRPBzW
Batchelor said that Sawyer said....a month and a half after the fact. Well,
that and a healthy dollop of wishful thinking. Where does Sawyer say
this himself?
building. Sawyer would then have known that the man had indeed been in the building and therefore would not have said that he didn't know whether or not the guy had been in the building.If the supposed rifle-carrying man was running from the building, then he would have been in the building in the first place....unless you want to believe that someone was taking pot shots at JFK through the crowd while standing in front of the
You did not use any logic. You simply used bullshit to try to confuse the matter.I didn't say it was you. I pointed out that, using the same Sawyer quote youOf course, if you want to claim that a rifle-armed suspect had been on the ground outside the TSBD, you need to explain how everyone else in the multitude of spectators totally missed seeing him running around outside with his rifle.It wasn't me, but Sawyer who said that it wasn't known if the man with the rifle had been in the building. Get out your Ouiga board and argue with Inspector Sawyer.
did and using the same logic you did, he could not have been describing
a man running from the TSBD with a rifle.
Sawyer reported a witness seeing a suspect with a rifle running from the building and that it was unknown whether that suspect had been inside the building.
What you think it means to any theory you think I have is irrelevant.
It is evidence of a second rifle which may have been used inside the building or outside the building.
I think that most likely is the rifle used by Junior Jarman on the 5th floor which was dropped out onto the shipping dock roof and retrieved by Harry
Weatherford. Probably Weatherford then handed it down to another man, perhaps John Franklin Elrod, who was already outside of the building. But
I really don't know. The relevance here is that it means conspiracy.
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 6:42:57 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
It is evidence of a second rifle which may have been used inside the building or outside the building.It is only evidence of the telephone game being played. If someone was running around outside of the TSBD with a rifle immediately after the assassination, many people would have seen it .
On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:46:24 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 6:42:57 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
Of course. This is so obvious it is a wonder these people needed it pointed out to them. ItIt is evidence of a second rifle which may have been used inside the building or outside the building.It is only evidence of the telephone game being played. If someone was running around outside of the TSBD with a rifle immediately after the assassination, many people would have seen it .
was the reason Oswald left his rifle behind. It was a damning piece of evidence but it would
have been even more damning if he tried to leave the TSBD with it.
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 6:54:24 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:46:24 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 6:42:57 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
What's obvious is that the Lone Nutters are a tribe of morons.Of course. This is so obvious it is a wonder these people needed it pointed out to them. ItIt is evidence of a second rifle which may have been used inside the building or outside the building.It is only evidence of the telephone game being played. If someone was running around outside of the TSBD with a rifle immediately after the assassination, many people would have seen it .
was the reason Oswald left his rifle behind. It was a damning piece of evidence but it would
have been even more damning if he tried to leave the TSBD with it.
On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:46:24 PM UTC-4, recip...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 6:42:57 PM UTC-5, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
Of course. This is so obvious it is a wonder these people needed it pointed out to them. ItIt is evidence of a second rifle which may have been used inside the building or outside the building.It is only evidence of the telephone game being played. If someone was running around outside of the TSBD with a rifle immediately after the assassination, many people would have seen it .
was the reason Oswald left his rifle behind.
It was a damning piece of evidence but it would
have been even more damning if he tried to leave the TSBD with it.
We all figured out who killed JFK many years ago. You still seem to be stumped. If we're morons
where do you fall?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 120:22:55 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,423 |
