Leslie Sharp has an annoying inability to coherently express the point she's trying to make with her evidence...She might be a good researcher but you would never know it from what she posts...She's failing her own research by being unable tocoherently explain in writing what her evidence proves...She has a scatter-brained style where she puts out parts of research in raw form but fails to explain what exactly that research is proving or what it shows...I assume she's a typical woman and
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:48:33 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:coherently explain in writing what her evidence proves...She has a scatter-brained style where she puts out parts of research in raw form but fails to explain what exactly that research is proving or what it shows...I assume she's a typical woman and
Leslie Sharp has an annoying inability to coherently express the point she's trying to make with her evidence...She might be a good researcher but you would never know it from what she posts...She's failing her own research by being unable to
Bit sexist, Brian. But in reality all conspiracy folk do this, these issues are resolved in their own minds so they think they are a given that is universally known and accepted.that provide her a unique vantage point from which to observe the Military-Industrial Complex. In the mid-90s she paused to take stock and determined that she would help unriddle the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a commitment fulfilled in
But I was so bored that I looked up Leslie Sharp, and was rewarded with a "you can`t make this shit up" moment.
"Leslie Sharp
Leslie Sharp is a freelance researcher and writer working from Santa Fe and Dallas. Born in the Texas Panhandle, she has lived in fifteen cities across the US and the Republic of Ireland in pursuit of a marketing career in luxury hotels and resorts
https://www.jfkhistorical.com/blog
"...luxury hotels and resorts that provide her a unique vantage point from which to observe the Military-Industrial Complex."
"Waiter, there`s a spy in my drink."
Leslie Sharp has an annoying inability to coherently express the point she's trying to make with her evidence...She might be a good researcher but you would never know it from what she posts...She's failing her own research by being unable tocoherently explain in writing what her evidence proves...She has a scatter-brained style where she puts out parts of research in raw form but fails to explain what exactly that research is proving or what it shows...I assume she's a typical woman and
Why is every one of your posts an attack on another person ?
You post:
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You claim to have done your own research, but have no proof of it.
What you DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and insults.
A person can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from your posts.
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:21:21 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
appears like you are guilty of what they are accusing you of and were therefore moderated appropriately...All that is really happening here is Gil has found a cut & paste excuse he can post every time he's unable to answer my responses and he can use itWhy is every one of your posts an attack on another person ?
You post:
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You claim to have done your own research, but have no proof of it.
What you DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and insults.This is what the clique does when they can't answer your points...They go after you with false accusations of research methodology failure and accuse you of what they are guilty of...It pays when you have a dirty moderator like Gordon because then it
A person can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from your posts.
You can go back to the original Education Forum thread in 2016 and see that the usual alpha wolves attacked my attempt to simply do Peer Review on Davidson's enhancement that clearly showed Sarah Stanton looking back at you from Prayer Man's face...Theclique that Gil exploits is a group that is capable of taking the image of Sarah Stanton's face, clearly visible on Prayer Man, and turning it in to the presenter of that condemning evidence being a "Shit-Poster who was given chance after chance to stop
What Gil is doing above is dog-whistling to the clique that somehow I am not fit to post amongst the research community due to lack of skill...Gil knows exactly what he is doing and the reason he's doing it at this moment is because he is aware he hasbadly failed to answer my evidence and arguments...Gordon and the Prayer Man people did the same thing in the original 2016 thread...They hijacked the thread and falsely accused me of failing research rigor...Like Gil, they did that because they were
If I were allowed to post on the Education Forum by the criminals who censored me I would point-out that any obtaining of the original Wiegman Film would show that once Davidson's digital enhancement process were applied to it that Sarah Stanton's face,as seen in Davidson, would be exactly reproduced from it...The identical repeating of Davidson's enhancement from the original Wiegman Film would prove on a scientific basis that Stanton's face was a real and existing thing on the original Wiegman
I have every right to criticize Leslie Sharp's style...I think she is undermining her own case by failing to articulate it clearly...
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:48:33 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:coherently explain in writing what her evidence proves...She has a scatter-brained style where she puts out parts of research in raw form but fails to explain what exactly that research is proving or what it shows...I assume she's a typical woman and
Leslie Sharp has an annoying inability to coherently express the point she's trying to make with her evidence...She might be a good researcher but you would never know it from what she posts...She's failing her own research by being unable to
Bit sexist, Brian. But in reality all conspiracy folk do this, these issues are resolved in their own minds so they think they are a given that is universally known and accepted.that provide her a unique vantage point from which to observe the Military-Industrial Complex. In the mid-90s she paused to take stock and determined that she would help unriddle the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a commitment fulfilled in
But I was so bored that I looked up Leslie Sharp, and was rewarded with a "you can`t make this shit up" moment.
"Leslie Sharp
Leslie Sharp is a freelance researcher and writer working from Santa Fe and Dallas. Born in the Texas Panhandle, she has lived in fifteen cities across the US and the Republic of Ireland in pursuit of a marketing career in luxury hotels and resorts
https://www.jfkhistorical.com/blog
"...luxury hotels and resorts that provide her a unique vantage point from which to observe the Military-Industrial Complex."
"Waiter, there`s a spy in my drink."
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 8:23:25 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:48:33 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:03:45 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 8:23:25 AM UTC+10, Bud wrote:Unlike the A-List line-up at ROKC...
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:48:33 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
The Skorzeny theory may have some merit put only in the context of CIA going out and getting plausible accomplices involved like Israel for instance...With CIA still being the Sponsor and in control...
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:48:33?PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:coherently explain in writing what her evidence proves...She has a scatter-brained style where she puts out parts of research in raw form but fails to explain what exactly that research is proving or what it shows...I assume she's a typical woman and
Leslie Sharp has an annoying inability to coherently express the point she's trying to make with her evidence...She might be a good researcher but you would never know it from what she posts...She's failing her own research by being unable to
Why is every one of your posts an attack on another person ?
You post:
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You claim to have done your own research, but have no proof of it.
What you DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and insults.
A person can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from your posts.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:03:45 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 1:27:14 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 12:03:45 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:Kamp wrote about Sharp:
" She still does NOT get it.
Even when it is spelled out for her! "
That's because Leslie knows that Oswald being on the front steps doesn't make sense according to common sense and the known control of Oswald in the months prior...Sharp knows it is bullshit...And she knows the Prayer Man cult's explanations are alsomake-it-up-as-they-go-along bullshit...
The Prayer Man people make up the weak excuse that Oswald was free to roam in order to keep him from being suspicious but it is obvious to anyone with intelligence and common sense that the Prayer Man people are just making that up in order to getaround the obvious...They say that the conspiracy was not set in stone and originally intended to involve other conspirators in order to frame the Russians and Cubans...But the Prayer Man people ignore that I have uncovered evidence of Mrs Reid clearing
You can't be credible if you ignore evidence...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 120:33:29 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,210 |
Messages: | 5,334,424 |