Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
which exonerates themselves. Historians know that they must toe the line if they want the paycheck. Executives who control high-capitalization organizations know they need to toe the line to keep the money coming. Nobody with privilege wants to riskIsn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.The trick being employed by Chuckie is pretending that "History" really is something other than what the rulers declare to be true. The winners write the history, and JFK's murderers won and wrote the history, or paid the people who wrote the history,
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:39:35 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:rendered through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was
which exonerates themselves. Historians know that they must toe the line if they want the paycheck. Executives who control high-capitalization organizations know they need to toe the line to keep the money coming. Nobody with privilege wants to riskIsn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.The trick being employed by Chuckie is pretending that "History" really is something other than what the rulers declare to be true. The winners write the history, and JFK's murderers won and wrote the history, or paid the people who wrote the history,
Since you can't even tell us who these murderers were, how do you know they won and wrote
the history to their liking?
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
Since you don't give a fuck, why do you want me to tell you?
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:39:35 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:rendered through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was
which exonerates themselves. Historians know that they must toe the line if they want the paycheck. Executives who control high-capitalization organizations know they need to toe the line to keep the money coming. Nobody with privilege wants to riskIsn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.The trick being employed by Chuckie is pretending that "History" really is something other than what the rulers declare to be true. The winners write the history, and JFK's murderers won and wrote the history, or paid the people who wrote the history,
Since you can't even tell us who these murderers were
the history to their liking?
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.I do not agree because there's no such thing as being "historically guilty". History does not convict people. Judges and juries do.
This is a phrase Chucky the Clown made up because he can't deal with the evidence that casts doubt on Oswald's guilt.
This is his safe place. "He gulty because history says he is".
Bullshit.
History said these 19 people convicted by Dallas DA Henry Wade were guilty too,
but their convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:51:02 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
Since you don't give a fuck, why do you want me to tell you?Corbett is addicted to this newsgroup.
He can't NOT respond to a post. He HAS to respond. He has no choice.
This is his only outlet for socialization. He has no life.
When one of us doesn't post for a few days, like an addict dying for a fix, he has to post about it.
And he's not the only one.
When they start threads, it's usually about other posters, not about the evidence.
They're losers and they know it.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 8:48:32 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
Since you can't even tell us who these murderers wereFritz was part of the conspiracy so he can be considered a murderer, even though he didn't do any shooting or stabbing. Same goes for Bonnie Ray Williams.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 8:48:32 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
Your posts are really getting comical, Don.Since you can't even tell us who these murderers wereFritz was part of the conspiracy so he can be considered a murderer, even though he didn't do any shooting or stabbing. Same goes for Bonnie Ray Williams.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 9:25:22 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 8:48:32 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
You wanted to be told who the murderers were. Though I guess the technical term for Fritz & Williams would be co-conspirators. Consider yourself told, weasel...Your posts are really getting comical, Don.Since you can't even tell us who these murderers wereFritz was part of the conspiracy so he can be considered a murderer, even though he didn't do any shooting or stabbing. Same goes for Bonnie Ray Williams.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
I do not agree
because there's no such thing as being "historically guilty".
History does not convict people. Judges and juries do.
This is a phrase Chucky the Clown made up because he can't deal with the evidence that casts doubt on Oswald's guilt.
This is his safe place. "He gulty because history says he is".
Bullshit.
History said these 19 people convicted by Dallas DA Henry Wade were guilty too,
but their convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Chucky's a fucking idiot.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:unmanned drone or something.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
I do not agreeBy virtue of posting here, setting up your YouTube channel and website, you do agree he's historically guilty, but you disagree with the verdict of history. If you agreed history got it right, most likely you wouldn't be posting here, correct?
because there's no such thing as being "historically guilty".Nonsense.
Did Mohammad Atta fly an airplane into one of the Twin Towers on 9/11? He never had a trial. Some people (like the wacky Professor, James Fetzer) don't even think airliners flew into the towers. They think a military plane hit them, or that it was an
Did John Wilkes Booth kill Lincoln? Did he have a trial?our nation's official history."
Guilty, historically. Game, set. match.
History does not convict people. Judges and juries do.I covered this and acknowledge this. I wrote, "We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of
conclusion and seek to CHANGE it.This is a phrase Chucky the Clown made up because he can't deal with the evidence that casts doubt on Oswald's guilt.Evidence that leads you to believe what, specifically?
This is his safe place. "He gulty because history says he is".
Bullshit.
History said these 19 people convicted by Dallas DA Henry Wade were guilty too,
but their convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Chucky's a fucking idiot.Chucky nailed your ass to the wall and pointed out an uncomfortable truth, whether you realize it or not. YOU AGREE Oswald is historically (not criminally) guilty of a double murder on 11/22/63. You post here because you DISAGREE with this historical
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 6:15:26 PM UTC+1, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 10:53:31 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
unmanned drone or something.I do not agreeBy virtue of posting here, setting up your YouTube channel and website, you do agree he's historically guilty, but you disagree with the verdict of history. If you agreed history got it right, most likely you wouldn't be posting here, correct?
because there's no such thing as being "historically guilty".Nonsense.
Did Mohammad Atta fly an airplane into one of the Twin Towers on 9/11? He never had a trial. Some people (like the wacky Professor, James Fetzer) don't even think airliners flew into the towers. They think a military plane hit them, or that it was an
of our nation's official history."Did John Wilkes Booth kill Lincoln? Did he have a trial?
Guilty, historically. Game, set. match.
History does not convict people. Judges and juries do.I covered this and acknowledge this. I wrote, "We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict
conclusion and seek to CHANGE it.This is a phrase Chucky the Clown made up because he can't deal with the evidence that casts doubt on Oswald's guilt.Evidence that leads you to believe what, specifically?
This is his safe place. "He gulty because history says he is".
Bullshit.
History said these 19 people convicted by Dallas DA Henry Wade were guilty too,
but their convictions were overturned on DNA evidence.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
Chucky's a fucking idiot.Chucky nailed your ass to the wall and pointed out an uncomfortable truth, whether you realize it or not. YOU AGREE Oswald is historically (not criminally) guilty of a double murder on 11/22/63. You post here because you DISAGREE with this historical
LONE NUTTERS ARE OBSOLETE, SINCE SEPT 1964.
DELUDED, EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:31:49 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 9:25:22 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:21:05 PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 8:48:32 AM UTC-7, John Corbett wrote:
Stop it. You're killing me.You wanted to be told who the murderers were. Though I guess the technical term for Fritz & Williams would be co-conspirators. Consider yourself told, weasel...Your posts are really getting comical, Don.Since you can't even tell us who these murderers wereFritz was part of the conspiracy so he can be considered a murderer, even though he didn't do any shooting or stabbing. Same goes for Bonnie Ray Williams.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: Nay...
JFK was killed by the CIA...
Oswald was framed as a patsy and then killed himself to shut him up...
The Warren Commission was controlled by the government murderers and covered it up...
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official history.
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was rendered
validation of what we are already know to be true: the facts of conspiracy in these unresolved events in our history."Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.The conspiracy-oriented "The JFK Historical Group" agrees also...
"The objective of the JFK Historical Group is to change the historical reality associated with the political assassinations of the 1960s by bringing to light new information uncovered by researchers, journalists and historians. We seek institutional
https://www.jfkhistorical.com/what-were-about
"historical reality", that has a nice ring to it. Don`t know how you go about changing reality, though.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:16:06 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote:rendered through crooked investigations. In the opinion of CTs, the official history is thus WRONG. They want to CHANGE the official history. They want to REOPEN the case and look at the OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS again in the hopes of CHANGING the official
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
We all acknowledge that Lee Oswald never had his day in court and never directly confessed to killing JFK or JDT, but he is guilty of the murders through multiple investigations and through the verdict of our nation's official history.
The reason CTs post here is because they DISAGREE with the verdict of history and they use this board and their own websites, YouTube channels, etc. as an outlet to express their disagreement with the verdict of history, which they feel was
validation of what we are already know to be true: the facts of conspiracy in these unresolved events in our history."Isn't it nice that we all agree on something?
We all agree Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty in the eyes of history of killing JFK and JDT. Some agree with the official history, some do not, but we all can agree that history has pronounced Oswald guilty of these crimes.The conspiracy-oriented "The JFK Historical Group" agrees also...
"The objective of the JFK Historical Group is to change the historical reality associated with the political assassinations of the 1960s by bringing to light new information uncovered by researchers, journalists and historians. We seek institutional
https://www.jfkhistorical.com/what-were-about
"historical reality", that has a nice ring to it. Don`t know how you go about changing reality, though.At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think happened.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 10:53:31?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:01:57?AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
Gil Jesus agrees with this. So does Ben Holmes, the Toilet, Gentleman Don Willis, David Healy (from Dealey), Brian Doyle, David Drummond a/k/a Boris the Truther, Greg "I'm not a conspiracist but I think a conspiracy killed JFK" Parker, and others.
I do not agree
By virtue of posting here...
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:59:41?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 11:51:02?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>> Since you don't give a fuck, why do you want me to tell you?
Corbett is addicted to this newsgroup.
He can't NOT respond to a post. He HAS to respond. He has no choice.
Tell that to Ben Holmes. I haven't responded to him for about two months. Maybe longer.
This is his only outlet for socialization. He has no life.
When one of us doesn't post for a few days, like an addict dying for a fix, he has to post about it.
And he's not the only one.
When they start threads, it's usually about other posters, not about the evidence.
They're losers and they know it.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historicalThe fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of
them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
lying:
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 9:03:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of
them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
The fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're
lying:
The Challenge - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >> The Challenge - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >> My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >> My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
I sent this to the historians at JFK's Library and Museum. I'm surprised they haven't got back to you, lol.
Where's the part about the pre-autopsy autopsy?
Where's the part about the shot that went through the limo windshield from the front?
Where's the part about how JFK's body/coffin was hijacked?
Sorry Ben, you'll need to do much better before the men around here take you seriously.
When you get out of prison Monday on work-release, please take a moment and address the items I detailed, okay?
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 9:03:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of
them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
The fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're
lying:
The Challenge - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
I sent this to the historians at JFK's Library and Museum. I'm surprised they haven't got back to you, lol.Meaningless.
Where's the part about the pre-autopsy autopsy?Can you name this logical fallacy?
Where's the part about the shot that went through the limo windshield from the front?Ditto.
Where's the part about how JFK's body/coffin was hijacked?Ditto.
Sorry Ben, you'll need to do much better before the men around here take you seriously.Ditto.
When you get out of prison Monday on work-release, please take a moment and address the items I detailed, okay?Ditto.
I rather suspect that believers really have no idea how foolish they
look when all they have to answer critics are logical fallacies.
Huckster must be crying.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 9:34:48?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 9:03:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Meaningless.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of >>>>> them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
The fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're
lying:
The Challenge - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
I sent this to the historians at JFK's Library and Museum. I'm surprised they haven't got back to you, lol.
Where's the part about the pre-autopsy autopsy?Can you name this logical fallacy?
Where's the part about the shot that went through the limo windshield from the front?Ditto.
Where's the part about how JFK's body/coffin was hijacked?Ditto.
Sorry Ben, you'll need to do much better before the men around here take you seriously.Ditto.
When you get out of prison Monday on work-release, please take a moment and address the items I detailed, okay?Ditto.
I rather suspect that believers really have no idea how foolish they
look when all they have to answer critics are logical fallacies.
Huckster must be crying.
You posted...
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 9:34:48?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 9:03:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Meaningless.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of >>>>> them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
The fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're
lying:
The Challenge - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
I sent this to the historians at JFK's Library and Museum. I'm surprised they haven't got back to you, lol.
Where's the part about the pre-autopsy autopsy?Can you name this logical fallacy?
Where's the part about the shot that went through the limo windshield from the front?Ditto.
Where's the part about how JFK's body/coffin was hijacked?Ditto.
Sorry Ben, you'll need to do much better before the men around here take you seriously.Ditto.
When you get out of prison Monday on work-release, please take a moment and address the items I detailed, okay?Ditto.
I rather suspect that believers really have no idea how foolish they
look when all they have to answer critics are logical fallacies.
Huckster must be crying.
You posted...
Indeed.
Sadly, you can't respond.
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 12:27:37?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 9:34:48?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 13:41:02 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 9:03:50?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Meaningless.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 21:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
At this board, the kooks are striking out on the "historical
reality" that Oswald killed JFK and JDT, that's for sure. Not one of >>>>>>> them can cobble together a detailed summary of what they think
happened.
The fact that you refuse to respond to this proves you KNOW you're >>>>>> lying:
The Challenge - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
I sent this to the historians at JFK's Library and Museum. I'm surprised they haven't got back to you, lol.
Where's the part about the pre-autopsy autopsy?Can you name this logical fallacy?
Where's the part about the shot that went through the limo windshield from the front?Ditto.
Where's the part about how JFK's body/coffin was hijacked?Ditto.
Sorry Ben, you'll need to do much better before the men around here take you seriously.Ditto.
When you get out of prison Monday on work-release, please take a moment and address the items I detailed, okay?Ditto.
I rather suspect that believers really have no idea how foolish they
look when all they have to answer critics are logical fallacies.
Huckster must be crying.
You posted...
Indeed.
Sadly, you can't respond.
You hide...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 126:11:34 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,951 |