They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,
He's convicted historically...
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,
yet cannor cite
any evidence showing why he should have been.
The cowardice is just shocking!
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,He's convicted historically
yet cannor citeFringe reset.
any evidence showing why he should have been.
Read it and weep:
https://www.govinfo.gov/features/warren-commission-report-and-hearings
The cowardice is just shocking!Indeed!
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 10:22:09 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
By "historically", however, you can't mean by the periodic pollsCorbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,He's convicted historically
or by the number of books on the subject.
You mean "convicted" by the best minds in America, at least in their own eyes. (OK, minds don't have eyes)
, stupid. No one pretends he had a criminal trial.
yet cannor citeFringe reset.
any evidence showing why he should have been.
Read it and weep:
https://www.govinfo.gov/features/warren-commission-report-and-hearings
The cowardice is just shocking!Indeed!
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 10:22:09 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
By "historically", however, you can't mean by the periodic polls or by the number of books on the subject. You mean "convicted" by the best minds in America, at least in their own eyes. (OK, minds don't have eyes)Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,He's convicted historically
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 2:51:06?PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 10:22:09?AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:By "historically", however, you can't mean by the periodic polls or by the number of books on the subject. You mean "convicted" by the best minds in America, at least in their own eyes. (OK, minds don't have eyes)
He's convicted historicallyThey look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the >>>>> evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,
The assclowns...
He's convicted historically, stupid.
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits that
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the >> evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
That's a gate that swings both ways, John.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.Look who's talking about being stupid.
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits that
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
That's a gate that swings both ways, John.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 4:53:01?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.Look who's talking about being stupid.
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits that
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
It's called an ability to weigh evidence.
The WC collected 26 volumes of data, exhibits, and
testimony. Not all of it was reliability
and there were numerous cases in which it was
contradictory, especially regarding eyewitness testimony.
When two people give conflicting
accounts of the same event, it makes no sense to accept both as being accurate.
It's possible
both could be wrong but not possible for both to be right. It was the job of the WC to wade
through all that raw data and determine what happened. They did an admirable job of
separating the wheat from the chaff.
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
How can any reasonable person doubt Oswald's guilt in two murders.
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the >>> evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
That's a gate that swings both ways, John.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits that
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty Jim
https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-presidentminute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELY THAT IT
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the last-
Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:records."
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:Jim Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty
last-minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELYhttps://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-president
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the
records."Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.JFK's "own library?"
Founding Benefactors of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation
The Family of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
and
AT&T
Altria Group, Inc.
American Airlines
Anonymous
The Armand Hammer Foundation
Bank of America
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
David and Mary Boies/Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Boston 2004, Inc.
Jack Manning/Boston Capital Foundation
The Boston Foundation
The Boston Globe
Boston Herald
David and Trixie Burke
CBS Corporation
Camrose & Kross, LLC
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Chestnut Hill Charitable Foundation
Citizens Bank Foundation
Citizens Energy Corporation
The Coca-Cola Company
Communications Workers of America
William F. and Margot C. Connell
Jill Ker Conway
T. Jefferson Coolidge/Coolidge Family Fund
Corcoran Jennison Companies
John and Diddy Cullinane
Charles U. and Christine Sullivan Daly/The Daly Fund
Marvin and Barbara Davis
Paul A. Dever Fund
C. Douglas Dillon/Dillon Fund
Marilyn and Gerard F. Doherty
Nancy and Richard K. Donahue
John and Kathe Dyson
EMC Corporation
The Robert and Eleanor Edgren Trust
Toni and Jack Fallon
Law Offices of Kenneth R. Feinberg, PC
Freedom Forum
Irene Gardner
General Dynamics
Elma and Milton A. Gilbert
Gillette
Carol and Avram Goldberg
Gourmet Caterers
Katharine Graham
Greenberg Traurig LLP
Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S.
Harper Collins and News Corporation
Bill and Robie Harris
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
H.J. Heinz Company Foundation
Carol and Patrick Hemingway
Arnold Hiatt
Ted Hoff and Kathleen O’Connell
Nicole and Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
John Hancock Financial Services
The Joyce Foundation
Jurys Doyle Hotel Group
Stanley A. Kamen
W. K. Kellogg Foundation
Gail and Paul G. Kirk, Jr.
Philip H. Knight
Marjorie Kovler Fund
L’Oreal
Joanna Lau/Lau Technologies
Thomas H. Lee
Liberty Mutual Group
Lombard Family Foundation
The Lowell Institute
Carolyn and Peter S. Lynch
The Lynch Foundation
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Kevin and Polly Maroni
The Martin Agency
Mellon New England
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Arthur and Kathryn Murray
NSTAR
National Amusements
Rosemary and Thomas O’Keeffe
Leon A. Pennington and Mary E. Pennington Trusts
Michael, John and William Perik
Richard and Sally Phelps
Raytheon Company
Red Sox Foundation
Sumner M. Redstone
Carol and Robert E. Riley
Samalexa Charitable Foundation
Save America’s Treasures
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Fund
Serono, Inc.
The Walter H. and Phyllis J. Shorenstein Foundation
Susan and Alan Solomont
Theodore C. Sorensen Fund
The Tiffany & Co. Foundation
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Universal Studios, Inc.
Verizon
Viacom
WBUR/Boston University
WCVB-TV/DT Channel 5
Dr. An Wang
Wasserman Foundation
Susan and Donald M. Wilson
Alicia and Vince Wolfington
Yawkey Foundation II
The Roy J. Zuckerberg Family Foundation
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty Jim
https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-presidentminute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELY THAT IT
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the last-
Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:records."
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 3:20:39 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Jim Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty
last-minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELYhttps://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-president
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the
records."Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.JFK's "own library?"
Founding Benefactors of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation
The Family of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
and
AT&TObviously, the JFK Family and all of the above named individuals and companies have joined
Altria Group, Inc.
American Airlines
Anonymous
The Armand Hammer Foundation
Bank of America
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
David and Mary Boies/Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Boston 2004, Inc.
Jack Manning/Boston Capital Foundation
The Boston Foundation
The Boston Globe
Boston Herald
David and Trixie Burke
CBS Corporation
Camrose & Kross, LLC
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Chestnut Hill Charitable Foundation
Citizens Bank Foundation
Citizens Energy Corporation
The Coca-Cola Company
Communications Workers of America
William F. and Margot C. Connell
Jill Ker Conway
T. Jefferson Coolidge/Coolidge Family Fund
Corcoran Jennison Companies
John and Diddy Cullinane
Charles U. and Christine Sullivan Daly/The Daly Fund
Marvin and Barbara Davis
Paul A. Dever Fund
C. Douglas Dillon/Dillon Fund
Marilyn and Gerard F. Doherty
Nancy and Richard K. Donahue
John and Kathe Dyson
EMC Corporation
The Robert and Eleanor Edgren Trust
Toni and Jack Fallon
Law Offices of Kenneth R. Feinberg, PC
Freedom Forum
Irene Gardner
General Dynamics
Elma and Milton A. Gilbert
Gillette
Carol and Avram Goldberg
Gourmet Caterers
Katharine Graham
Greenberg Traurig LLP
Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S.
Harper Collins and News Corporation
Bill and Robie Harris
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
H.J. Heinz Company Foundation
Carol and Patrick Hemingway
Arnold Hiatt
Ted Hoff and Kathleen O’Connell
Nicole and Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
John Hancock Financial Services
The Joyce Foundation
Jurys Doyle Hotel Group
Stanley A. Kamen
W. K. Kellogg Foundation
Gail and Paul G. Kirk, Jr.
Philip H. Knight
Marjorie Kovler Fund
L’Oreal
Joanna Lau/Lau Technologies
Thomas H. Lee
Liberty Mutual Group
Lombard Family Foundation
The Lowell Institute
Carolyn and Peter S. Lynch
The Lynch Foundation
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Kevin and Polly Maroni
The Martin Agency
Mellon New England
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Arthur and Kathryn Murray
NSTAR
National Amusements
Rosemary and Thomas O’Keeffe
Leon A. Pennington and Mary E. Pennington Trusts
Michael, John and William Perik
Richard and Sally Phelps
Raytheon Company
Red Sox Foundation
Sumner M. Redstone
Carol and Robert E. Riley
Samalexa Charitable Foundation
Save America’s Treasures
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Fund
Serono, Inc.
The Walter H. and Phyllis J. Shorenstein Foundation
Susan and Alan Solomont
Theodore C. Sorensen Fund
The Tiffany & Co. Foundation
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Universal Studios, Inc.
Verizon
Viacom
WBUR/Boston University
WCVB-TV/DT Channel 5
Dr. An Wang
Wasserman Foundation
Susan and Donald M. Wilson
Alicia and Vince Wolfington
Yawkey Foundation II
The Roy J. Zuckerberg Family Foundation
the cover-up. I'm really suspicious of Anonymous.
Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like Raytheonand General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:45:57 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Raytheon and General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like
These lone nutters are too stupid ( ignorant ) to know a lot of things.You said the "Russians got it right" in their investigation, the one that concluded (four days after the assassination) that the CIA killed JFK. Then you admitted you knew nothing about their investigation. The same one you said "got it right." You had
They come in here and argue about topics they have no knowledge of.
Not only are there corporate benefactors involved in the JFK library, it, like all Presidential Libraries, is under the administration
of the National Archives, not the Kennedy family.
Corbett didn't even know THAT.
Thank goodness he doesn't care about this subject anymore.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 6:26:23 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Raytheon and General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:45:57 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like
no questions about how they conducted it, whether they had any legal protections for the people they accused, whether their procedures were fair and impartial. None at all. But you not only didn't question it, you fully accepted it.These lone nutters are too stupid ( ignorant ) to know a lot of things. They come in here and argue about topics they have no knowledge of.
Not only are there corporate benefactors involved in the JFK library, it, like all Presidential Libraries, is under the administration
of the National Archives, not the Kennedy family.
Corbett didn't even know THAT.
Thank goodness he doesn't care about this subject anymore.You said the "Russians got it right" in their investigation, the one that concluded (four days after the assassination) that the CIA killed JFK. Then you admitted you knew nothing about their investigation. The same one you said "got it right." You had
Then you said the Birchers killed JFK, that they were *allowed* to do so because the militarists in Washington who wanted war needed to get rid of JFK. So they "let" the Birchers do this. Including people like Earl Warren. The Birchers are not the CIAand the CIA is not the Birchers. But you think both killed JFK. Then you recently said the anti-Castro Cubans killed JFK They are not, of course, the Birchers.
You accuse lone assassin believers of being Neo Nazis and not recognizing that Oswald is innocent until proven guilty. Yet you and you fellow conspiracists accuse all sorts of people of murdering JFK without the slightest concern about "innocent untilproven guilty." And you embrace an investigation by a monstrous regime - the Soviets - without the slightest interest in whether it was fairly done. There may be more shameless people on the internet but you are difficult to top.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:45:57 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:Raytheon and General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like
These lone nutters are too stupid ( ignorant ) to know a lot of things.
They come in here and argue about topics they have no knowledge of.
Not only are there corporate benefactors involved in the JFK library, it, like all Presidential Libraries, is under the administration
of the National Archives, not the Kennedy family.
Corbett didn't even know THAT.
Thank goodness he doesn't care about this subject anymore.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 9:15:22 AM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:Raytheon and General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 6:26:23 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:45:57 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like
had no questions about how they conducted it, whether they had any legal protections for the people they accused, whether their procedures were fair and impartial. None at all. But you not only didn't question it, you fully accepted it.These lone nutters are too stupid ( ignorant ) to know a lot of things. They come in here and argue about topics they have no knowledge of.
Not only are there corporate benefactors involved in the JFK library, it, like all Presidential Libraries, is under the administration
of the National Archives, not the Kennedy family.
Corbett didn't even know THAT.
Thank goodness he doesn't care about this subject anymore.You said the "Russians got it right" in their investigation, the one that concluded (four days after the assassination) that the CIA killed JFK. Then you admitted you knew nothing about their investigation. The same one you said "got it right." You
CIA and the CIA is not the Birchers. But you think both killed JFK. Then you recently said the anti-Castro Cubans killed JFK They are not, of course, the Birchers.Then you said the Birchers killed JFK, that they were *allowed* to do so because the militarists in Washington who wanted war needed to get rid of JFK. So they "let" the Birchers do this. Including people like Earl Warren. The Birchers are not the
until proven guilty." And you embrace an investigation by a monstrous regime - the Soviets - without the slightest interest in whether it was fairly done. There may be more shameless people on the internet but you are difficult to top.You accuse lone assassin believers of being Neo Nazis and not recognizing that Oswald is innocent until proven guilty. Yet you and you fellow conspiracists accuse all sorts of people of murdering JFK without the slightest concern about "innocent
Looks like it's time for Gil to bail out of another thread after his hypocrisy has been exposed.Appears so. Again, conspiracists like him accuse all sorts of people, important and not so important, of being involved in the assassination. People like Ruth Paine most notably (she supposedly set Oswald up with the job). Does he lecture them on
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:Jim Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty
last-minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELYhttps://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-president
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the
records."Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.JFK's "own library?"
Founding Benefactors of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation
The Family of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy
and
AT&T
Altria Group, Inc.
American Airlines
Anonymous
The Armand Hammer Foundation
Bank of America
Best Buy Co., Inc.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts
David and Mary Boies/Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Boston 2004, Inc.
Jack Manning/Boston Capital Foundation
The Boston Foundation
The Boston Globe
Boston Herald
David and Trixie Burke
CBS Corporation
Camrose & Kross, LLC
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Chestnut Hill Charitable Foundation
Citizens Bank Foundation
Citizens Energy Corporation
The Coca-Cola Company
Communications Workers of America
William F. and Margot C. Connell
Jill Ker Conway
T. Jefferson Coolidge/Coolidge Family Fund
Corcoran Jennison Companies
John and Diddy Cullinane
Charles U. and Christine Sullivan Daly/The Daly Fund
Marvin and Barbara Davis
Paul A. Dever Fund
C. Douglas Dillon/Dillon Fund
Marilyn and Gerard F. Doherty
Nancy and Richard K. Donahue
John and Kathe Dyson
EMC Corporation
The Robert and Eleanor Edgren Trust
Toni and Jack Fallon
Law Offices of Kenneth R. Feinberg, PC
Freedom Forum
Irene Gardner
General Dynamics
Elma and Milton A. Gilbert
Gillette
Carol and Avram Goldberg
Gourmet Caterers
Katharine Graham
Greenberg Traurig LLP
Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S.
Harper Collins and News Corporation
Bill and Robie Harris
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
H.J. Heinz Company Foundation
Carol and Patrick Hemingway
Arnold Hiatt
Ted Hoff and Kathleen O’Connell
Nicole and Thomas J. Hynes, Jr.
International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers
John Hancock Financial Services
The Joyce Foundation
Jurys Doyle Hotel Group
Stanley A. Kamen
W. K. Kellogg Foundation
Gail and Paul G. Kirk, Jr.
Philip H. Knight
Marjorie Kovler Fund
L’Oreal
Joanna Lau/Lau Technologies
Thomas H. Lee
Liberty Mutual Group
Lombard Family Foundation
The Lowell Institute
Carolyn and Peter S. Lynch
The Lynch Foundation
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Kevin and Polly Maroni
The Martin Agency
Mellon New England
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Arthur and Kathryn Murray
NSTAR
National Amusements
Rosemary and Thomas O’Keeffe
Leon A. Pennington and Mary E. Pennington Trusts
Michael, John and William Perik
Richard and Sally Phelps
Raytheon Company
Red Sox Foundation
Sumner M. Redstone
Carol and Robert E. Riley
Samalexa Charitable Foundation
Save America’s Treasures
Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Fund
Serono, Inc.
The Walter H. and Phyllis J. Shorenstein Foundation
Susan and Alan Solomont
Theodore C. Sorensen Fund
The Tiffany & Co. Foundation
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Universal Studios, Inc.
Verizon
Viacom
WBUR/Boston University
WCVB-TV/DT Channel 5
Dr. An Wang
Wasserman Foundation
Susan and Donald M. Wilson
Alicia and Vince Wolfington
Yawkey Foundation II
The Roy J. Zuckerberg Family Foundation
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:Jim Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty
last-minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELYhttps://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-president
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the
records."Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.Come on, Chuck. Obviously the JFK Library and the National Archives have joined the multi-
generational cover up.
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 4:34:04 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:Jim Marrs, etc. The library links to the findings here:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 9:31:05 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 3:53:01 PM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 1:22:09 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
He's convicted historically, stupid.
Look who's talking about being stupid.Where did I say innocent until convicted historically?
Innocent until convicted HISTORICALLY ?
WTF does that even mean ?It means Oswald as JFK's murderer has been settled--historically. It's part of the United States of America's official history.
Notice that JFK's own library at https://www.jfklibrary.org/ links to the Warren Commission Report for interested parties to learn about JFK's murder. It doesn't link to your hobby website or Oliver Stone's fictional movie or Crossfire by the nutty
last-minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. AFTER THE REPORT APPEARED IN PRINT, ACOUSTICS EXPERTS ANALYZED THE TAPE AND PROVED CONCLUSIVELYhttps://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/november-22-1963-death-of-the-president
The library addresses the "fourth shot" in the HSCA here:
"Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the
records."Our National Archives make historical documents relevant to the mission of each presidential library available for researchers and visitors. See the library link here:
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/visit
The National Archives and Records Administration is an independent agency of our government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration
Per Wikipedia, "The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is an "independent federal agency of the United States government within the executive branch",[4] charged with the preservation and documentation of government and historical
If a lie is told and the truth can't be proven, does the lie then become the truth ?
Of course not.
And what does it say about your mental state of mind when you're shown documents, testimony and exhibits thatWhat conspiracy, Gil? You can't even decide how it happened or who did it or how many shots were fired.
question Oswald's guilt, collected by your own Warren investgation, and you reject them and refuse to look at the
links where they're located ?
How can any reasonable person believe you people are right in the head ?
They look at all the evidence in this context and must make theThat's a gate that swings both ways, John.
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of Oswald's INNOCENCE, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the
evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in GUILT, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out such an open and shut case of a double murder.
As you judge, so shall you be judged.
ROFLMAO.Hey Gil, we all get it that Oswald didn't have his day in court. Stop putting him on trial at the newsgroup and trying to play Johnny Cochrane and raise reasonable doubt. JFK is dead and he's not coming back. Oswald is dead and he's not coming back.
no KNOWN help.Lol.Oswald is guilty historically. If you can come up with a better conclusion that leaves less holes than the conclusion you disagree with, please share it right now.Come on, Chuck. Obviously the JFK Library and the National Archives have joined the multi-
generational cover up.
Oswald isn't criminally guilty, but he sure as hell is historically guilty. And that's unlikely to change unless these losers can start putting together an assassination theory that is more credible than the historically accepted scenario: Oswald alone,
Get busy Gil.LBJ didn't have a trial but that doesn't prevent them from saying he was involved. Hoover, McCone, Dulles. They say Ruth Paine set Oswald up by getting him the job at the TSBD. He doesn't say that's wrong. He says all sorts of people were involved in
John Wilkes Booth never had a trial.
Mohammad Atta and the 9/11 hijackers on those doomed flights never had a trial.
They didn't get a day in court, but the verdict of history is that they are GUILTY.
Lee Harvey Oswald is guilty of killing JFK and Tippit through multiple investigations and through the verdict of history.
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 2:51:06?PM UTC-4, donald willis wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 10:22:09?AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 11:02:37?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:By "historically", however, you can't mean by the periodic polls
He's convicted historicallyThey look at all the evidence in this context and must make the
evidence fit their beliefs rather than making their beliefs fit the
evidence. No matter what evidence they are presented with of
Oswald's guilt, they will invent an excuse for disregarding it. If the >>>>> evidence doesn't fit their preconceived belief in a conspiracy, it
must be the evidence that is flawed. They are looking through the
wrong end of the telescope. Is it any wonder they can't figure out
such an open and shut case of a double murder.
Corbutt continues to act as if Oswald was convicted,
What do those polls say about Oswald`s guilt?
or by the number of books on the subject.
You mean "convicted" by the best minds in America, at least in their own eyes. (OK, minds don't have eyes)
, stupid. No one pretends he had a criminal trial.
yet cannor citeFringe reset.
any evidence showing why he should have been.
Read it and weep:
https://www.govinfo.gov/features/warren-commission-report-and-hearings
Indeed!
The cowardice is just shocking!
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 6:26:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Raytheon and General Dynamics, there is not going to be any funding of the truth about the assassination. The Merchants of Death pay the bills at JFK"s "own library."
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 5:45:57?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>> Obviously, you're too stupid to understand that the JFK Library is an establishment corporate entity, not a little family library looking after the interests of the murdered president or the interests of the American people. With sponsors like
These lone nutters are too stupid ( ignorant ) to know a lot of things.
They come in here and argue about topics they have no knowledge of.
Not only are there corporate benefactors involved in the JFK library, it, like all Presidential Libraries, is under the administration
of the National Archives, not the Kennedy family.
Corbett didn't even know THAT.
Thank goodness he doesn't care about this subject anymore.
You said ...
Looks like it's time for Gil to bail out of another thread after his hypocrisy has been exposed.
How terrible that the above entities--non profits, corporations, sports teams and so on--want to contribute time, money and resources to preserving our national history.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:00:18 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,693 |