39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:The evidence against Oswald is judged by a legal/court standard - chain of custody! Fifth Amendment! Miranda! - while every crackpot and hairbrained conspiracy claim is completely believed, no questions asked. JFK was going to breakup the CIA and that's
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.Common sense isn't their strong suit.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
Common sense isn't their strong suit.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18 PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:tragic American hero in their books.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
More proof this is a disease of sorts and not a quest for a greater understanding over what happened that day. Lee is totally innocent of everything that day, including pulling his pistol on the cop in the theater when the arrest was going down. He's aPoor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18 PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:Right, he said he shot Tippit because he was fearful of being arrested for the Walker shooting. Gotta' admit, it's original.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
I'm going from memory here but I think Marsh was one of those who conceded Oswald shotPoor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid of.
Tippit but not JFK.
I would bet that if you polled the people who believe in conspiracy, they would tell you they
believe Oswald shot both JFK and JDT but that he was part of a conspiracy and not the sole
shooter. That position is actually theoretically possible even though there is no evidence for
such a conspiracy. I don't believe that for a minute, but it can't be completely ruled out.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:49:35 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18 PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid
a tragic American hero in their books.More proof this is a disease of sorts and not a quest for a greater understanding over what happened that day. Lee is totally innocent of everything that day, including pulling his pistol on the cop in the theater when the arrest was going down. He's
*Everything* has to be refuted, rejected. Not one piece of evidence against Oswald will be accepted no matter how small or trivial. They can't say, "Yeah, that looks incriminating but the other evidence clears him. The weight of the other materialdiscounts this piece." Nope, can't admit to a single piece.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:39:31?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Common sense isn't their strong suit.
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent withIt's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
The evidence against Oswald...
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent withIt's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
Common sense isn't their strong suit.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18 PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:tragic American hero in their books.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
More proof this is a disease of sorts and not a quest for a greater understanding over what happened that day. Lee is totally innocent of everything that day, including pulling his pistol on the cop in the theater when the arrest was going down. He's aPoor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:39:31?PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:49:35?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
*Everything* has to be refuted, rejected....
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:55:00?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:49:35?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with >>>>>> being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right >>>>>>> twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 >>>>>>> Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell >>>>>> them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
Everything they demand ...
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More proof ...
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:49:35?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:57:50?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:57:50 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:of.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18 PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59 PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09 PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.Everything they demand to be proved/shown in the JFK assassination is met in the Tippit shooting. Direct eyewitnesses - multiple ones - the murder weapon, et cetera. Do they accept the evidence here? Agree he shot Tippit? Of course not.
They *could* still argue he didn't shoot JFK. They could claim that he panicked and shot Tippit, that he was fearful of being framed and snapped. But they won't do that. When the conspiracy mind is seized by this vision it's impossible to get rid
people on the political hard Right saying that they think the CIA killed JFK. Tucker Carlson types.I'm going from memory here but I think Marsh was one of those who conceded Oswald shot
Tippit but not JFK.
I would bet that if you polled the people who believe in conspiracy, they would tell you theyRight, he said he shot Tippit because he was fearful of being arrested for the Walker shooting. Gotta' admit, it's original.
believe Oswald shot both JFK and JDT but that he was part of a conspiracy and not the sole
shooter. That position is actually theoretically possible even though there is no evidence for
such a conspiracy. I don't believe that for a minute, but it can't be completely ruled out.
As to the poll: I can't recall that breakdown; e.g., what percentage thought he had no involvement at all.
Look, if you ask people whether there was a conspiracy in the murder of President Millard Taft you'd have a plurality if not majority saying yes. Even though there was no President Millard Taft. The funny thing is that I see increasing numbers of
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 6:04:10?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:57:50?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with >>>>>> being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right >>>>>>> twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 >>>>>>> Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell >>>>>> them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:17:45 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 6:04:10?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:Logical fallacies deleted... 13 posts now without a single attempt to
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:57:50?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:42:18?PM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote: >>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote: >>>>>> (39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with >>>>>> being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against >>>>>> Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow >>>>>> related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the
bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves >>>>>>> (including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right >>>>>>> twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 >>>>>>> Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was >>>>>>> slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of
these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not
clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the >>>>>> bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell >>>>>> them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant >>>>>> remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
refute my refutation...
Clearly, everyone knows that they lost.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 >>>>> Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More proof ...
That you can't refute my refutation? None needed, no-one expected you
to know the evidence enough to defend Bugs.
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:28:58 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that
we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren
Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the
exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that
all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as
those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of
the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
Notice that Chuckles couldn't say a *SINGLE THING* to refute my
refutation of Bugs?
He knows he can't.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:56:00?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:28:58 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with
being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that
they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER
TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi:
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A
firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded
that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right
twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38
Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell
them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More nonsense refuted...
It's a head scratcher, isn't it? Multiple eyewitnesses, recovered shells from near the crime scene that match the .38 Oswald was arrested with after pulling it on a cop in the theater, etc. and you guys can't even figure this one out.
Everyone was out to get little Lee Oswald that fateful day.
Poor guy.
Notice that Chuckles couldn't say a *SINGLE THING* to refute my
refutation of Bugs?
I hereby announce that I refute your supposed refutation.
He knows he can't.
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 7:04:21?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:49:34 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<chucksch...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 4:42:18?PM UTC-5, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 5:28:59?PM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, July 13, 2023 at 3:21:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
(39) The bullets recovered from Tippit's body were consistent with >>>>>> being fired from Oswald's .38.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that >>>>>> we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren >>>>>> Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against
Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that >>>>>> they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow
related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
And, it seems redundant to point out that this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER >>>>>> TO DO with Oswald, by himself, shooting the President.
But in my never ending quest to protect B.T. George from the
insistence that he's a liar, here's the full argument from Bugliosi: >>>>>>
39. Four bullets were recovered from the body of Officer Tippit. A >>>>>>> firearms identification expert for the Warren Commission concluded >>>>>>> that one of the four bullets was fired from Oswald's revolver to the >>>>>>> exclusion of all other weapons, and another expert acknowledged that >>>>>>> all four bullets "could have been" fired from the revolver, since the >>>>>>> bullets recovered from Tippit had the same general characteristic as >>>>>>> those test-fired from Oswald's revolver-five lands and grooves
(including the same width of the lands and grooves) with a right >>>>>>> twist. (Recall that the bullets were .38 Special bullets, not .38 >>>>>>> Smith & Wesson bullets, and the barrel of Oswald's revolver was
slightly oversized for such a bullet. Therefore, during the passage of >>>>>>> these slightly smaller bullets through the barrel, the barrel did not >>>>>>> clearly imprint its signature striations or markings on the sides of >>>>>>> the bullets to enable a positive identification.)
When the Warren Commission was unable to produce a match on the
bullets, they went "expert hunting" to find someone who would tell >>>>>> them what they wanted to hear. They found him...
You won't hear these facts from Bugliosi. And Huckster Sienzant
remains silent.
More proof ...
That you can't refute my refutation? None needed, no-one expected you
to know the evidence enough to defend Bugs.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:43:54 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,705 |