On Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7:13:29 PM UTC+1, Brian Doyle wrote:
James Gordon wrote:
Mr Doyle,
I agree with all Mark has said.
I will await your response to Mark, but I fully support Mark’s reference to “shitposting.”
Clealry in time the members of the admin team will make a decision on your re-admitance. Not to jump ahead to what that decision might come to be - and a non re-admitance is possible - if the team decide to give you another chance and you return ( even
once to your previous antics ) I will immediately remove your membership for ever.
I recollect in the past giving you chance after chance. That will not happen this time. The admin team is tired of playing these games.
Do not assume this email suggests you will be re-admited. It does not. That said you now know the conditions that will affect your re-admitance should the admin team allow you back.
I suggest you take Mark’s email to you with the upmost seriousness.
James
Mr Gordon is lying above when he says he gave me chance after chance...It simply isn't true and the thread record will back me...Gordon is used to getting away with unchallenged murder on the Education Forum, so that is what he's doing here because he
knows he will never be called on it by his automatically-approving back-up man Knight (who I have never seen disagree with Gordon or any of his terribly unjust rulings)...
So while Knight gets away with admitting that he didn't know what my original banning was about but he was going to enforce it anyway, and gets away with calling me a "Shit-Poster" (a hypocritical violation of Education Forum rules), Gordon is clearly
abusing his authority and acting on personal grounds...
Gordon wrote "If you return to your previous antics you will be permanently banned"...And in doing that he succeeds in condemning me without ever showing any evidence of those "antics"...In Gordon's moderation world his simply accusing someone of
violations is equal to condemning proof and unquestioning guilt...Gordon speaks from a position of unquestionable-ness...He says it - you are guilty...
But of we go back to the actual thread record the reality speaks quite differently...In 2016 I tried to present the Davidson enhancement as final proof that Prayer Man wasn't Oswald...I also tried to show my height argument that proved Prayer Man was
far too short in height to be Oswald...I was immediately set upon by almost the entire board - with Gordon joining them...Gordon was taking Private Messages from the Prayer Man people, who tried to get around directly discussing my evidence by making
specious methodology complaints...Gordon was relaying those complaints without checking their legitimacy first and using them to take moderator actions against me...It was this intentional railroading of the thread by this dubious means that detoured
discussion away from my evidence and switched the topic to Gordon's false methodology complaints against me...Even worse, the Prayer Man people were the ones who were guilty of what they were accusing me of...It was when I pointed that out to Gordon that
I got banned (He obviously realized I was correct)...
Since 2016 I have massively improved my evidence for Prayer Man being Stanton...However, since the JFK internet has been hijacked by the Prayer Man people, the false slander you see Gordon make above has been effectively used to censor it...Gordon is
still being permitted to describe the best most intelligent presentation of evidence on the Prayer Man issue as the "antics" of a "Shit-Poster" that had been justly moderated...Knight gives zero accounting for this true version and Gordon is allowed to
continue his horrifically unfair abuse...If you disprove a 95% majority with brilliant research they will not stand up for you when a rogue moderator unfairly bans you...Gordon and the membership have bypassed the rigor they call for and work with each
other in an unholy relationship...That's how they avoided my evidence...
Gordon is a liar and the existing thread record does not support his lies above and attempt to disparage and defame me in order to justify his censoring of the correct Prayer Man evidence...Gordon moderated backwards and assisted the Prayer Man people
to avoid Peer Review of Davidson and Peer Review of my height argument...This has stood uncorrected since I was banned in 2016 and now I see Gordon has added wrongful defamation and false claims of deserved moderation to his offenses...
All Gordon is doing above is using false moderator complaints to avoid my actually being allowed to fairly argue my proof...Gordon knows that if I were allowed to do what my research has earned that it would, in turn, prove I was correct and, in turn,
prove that he wrongfully moderated...He's not going to let that happen as long as he has the power to railroad someone rather than let them make their case...No credible moderator or membership would look at my evidence and not admit I had proven Prayer
Man was Sarah Stanton...These people shame themselves by using the intentional destruction of an innocent researcher in order to save face and preserve their bogus theory...
No one cares about your bullshit and lies.
So fuck off!!!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)