On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:23:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
My latest appearance on the Lone Gunman Podcast:
Episode # 241:
I discuss items in the case for which there is NO EVIDENCE.
https://www.spreaker.com/user/thelonegunman/ep-241-no-evidence-w-gil-jesus
Gil starts off by saying there was no evidence Oswald brought a 38 inch bag into the TSBD
Then Gil says there is no evidence Oswald made the bag.
Gil claims the paperwork showing Klein's shipping the rifle to Oswald's PO Box was made up.
Gil says there is no evidence Oswald picked up the rifle.
All these asinine observations were made in about the first five minutes.
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:43:17?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:23:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
My latest appearance on the Lone Gunman Podcast:Gil starts off by saying there was no evidence Oswald brought a 38 inch bag into the TSBD
Episode # 241:
I discuss items in the case for which there is NO EVIDENCE.
https://www.spreaker.com/user/thelonegunman/ep-241-no-evidence-w-gil-jesus
even though a 38 inch bag found in the TSBD with Oswald's finger and palm prints. We have
a real sleuth in our midst.
Name the person who saw Oswald with a THIRTY-EIGHT inch package on November 22nd.
He claims the witnesses who saw him with the package said it was
shorter but one of these same witnesses said when Oswald held it just below the top of it, the
bag almost touched the ground. Try that with a two foot long package.
I tried it. 28 1/2 inches from the top of the bag to the floor.
Then Gil says there is no evidence Oswald made the bag. Did he expect Oswald would have
taken a selfie of himself making the bag. Yet he accuses the DPD of making the bag without
a scrap of evidence they did so. He says Oswald couldn't have made the bag without leaving
more fingerprints on the bag but he thinks the cops could have constructed the bag without
leaving fingerprints on it. Gil is the Inspector Clouseau of the JFK assassination.
Great comeback. Who said the cops didn't leave fingerprints on it ?
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
She also estimated that "long brown package" as being 27-28 1/2 inches long. ( CD 7, pg. 299, 2 H 250 )
I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".
It all depends what you're talking about. Some people think 1o inches is long, but that something you wouldn't know about.
In fact, if you had a half-inch less, you'd have two belly buttons.
Gil claims the paperwork showing Klein's shipping the rifle to Oswald's PO Box was made up.
What evidence does Gil present that this was done? Absolutely nothing. He thinks the rifle
was ordered by the conspirators (unnamed of course) in August or September.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle/
Gil says there is no evidence Oswald picked up the rifle. Just what evidence would he expect. He wonder why nobody at the Dallas Post Office would remember giving Oswald the most
famous rifle in the world. Why would they think it was the most famous rifle in the world when
the handed it to him? Why would they even know it was a rifle? Why would he think a PO
employee would remember handing a package to Oswald back in March?
You're right, they probably thought it was a fishing pole.
All these asinine observations were made in about the first five minutes. If somebody has 90
minutes of their lives to spend listening to all of Gil's drivel, have at it.
What a tool!!!
What a fool !!! All you have to post is your worthless opinions and speculations.
Post evidence or STFU.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:33:18 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:standard. But he and his "brother" accuse all sorts of people - Greer et al. - of being the murderers. His "innocent until proven guilty" rule suddenly disappears.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:26:54 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:His "brother" has repeatedly called him a "fucktard." In return, he's implied that his "brother" is a disinformation agent. He says we are Neo Nazis for accusing Oswald of being the assassin. Because we don't adhere to the "innocent until proven guilty"
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 5:23:10 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:You're not standing. You're running away with feathers on your ass.
Okay. I withdraw the suggestion.I didn't mean to go off on you, brother.
I just wanted them to know where I stand on the subject.
:-)
These are very, very strange people.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:36:52 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
When you can tell me what happened to the second Oswald, then I'll believe there was a second Oswald.
Otherwise, it's just a theory.
They manufactured evidence/paper work of a rifle purchase in order to frame him ...
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:59:53 AM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:guilty" standard. But he and his "brother" accuse all sorts of people - Greer et al. - of being the murderers. His "innocent until proven guilty" rule suddenly disappears.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:33:18 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:26:54 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:His "brother" has repeatedly called him a "fucktard." In return, he's implied that his "brother" is a disinformation agent. He says we are Neo Nazis for accusing Oswald of being the assassin. Because we don't adhere to the "innocent until proven
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 5:23:10 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:You're not standing. You're running away with feathers on your ass.
Okay. I withdraw the suggestion.I didn't mean to go off on you, brother.
I just wanted them to know where I stand on the subject.
:-)
He makes these same arguments at the Edu Forum where people calmly challenge them. With "cites". He disappears there too. This complaint that he is being attacked but not his arguments is, like most of his claims, imaginary.These are very, very strange people.Look for Gil to go off and start a new thread with another baseless claim rather than defending
what he has presented here. Gil does not like having his arguments challenged with critical
questioning. He wants people to simply accept his assertions as if they are established facts.
He gets very frustrated when that doesn't happen.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:59:53?AM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:guilty" standard. But he and his "brother" accuse all sorts of people - Greer et al. - of being the murderers. His "innocent until proven guilty" rule suddenly disappears.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:33:18?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:26:54?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:His "brother" has repeatedly called him a "fucktard." In return, he's implied that his "brother" is a disinformation agent. He says we are Neo Nazis for accusing Oswald of being the assassin. Because we don't adhere to the "innocent until proven
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 5:23:10?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>>>> Okay. I withdraw the suggestion.You're not standing. You're running away with feathers on your ass.
I didn't mean to go off on you, brother.
I just wanted them to know where I stand on the subject.
:-)
These are very, very strange people.
Look for Gil to go off and start a new thread with another baseless claim rather than defending
what he has presented here.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 10:09:02?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:guilty" standard. But he and his "brother" accuse all sorts of people - Greer et al. - of being the murderers. His "innocent until proven guilty" rule suddenly disappears.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:59:53?AM UTC-4, Steven Galbraith wrote:
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:33:18?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 6:26:54?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:His "brother" has repeatedly called him a "fucktard." In return, he's implied that his "brother" is a disinformation agent. He says we are Neo Nazis for accusing Oswald of being the assassin. Because we don't adhere to the "innocent until proven
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 5:23:10?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote: >>>>>> Okay. I withdraw the suggestion.You're not standing. You're running away with feathers on your ass.
I didn't mean to go off on you, brother.
I just wanted them to know where I stand on the subject.
:-)
He makes these same arguments at the Edu Forum where people calmlyThese are very, very strange people.Look for Gil to go off and start a new thread with another baseless claim rather than defending
what he has presented here. Gil does not like having his arguments challenged with critical
questioning. He wants people to simply accept his assertions as if they are established facts.
He gets very frustrated when that doesn't happen.
challenge them. With "cites". He disappears there too. This complaint
that he is being attacked but not his arguments is, like most of his
claims, imaginary.
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that
morning.
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.You are such a fucking liar and I'll prove it.
Cite where either one of those witnesses said that they saw Oswald with a 38 inch package.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that
morning.
Citation where they said it was 38 inches long ?
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.
You are such a fucking liar and I'll prove it.
Cite where either one of those witnesses said that they saw Oswald with a 38 inch package.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:48:21?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 7:08:15?PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
Linnie Mae Randle and Buell Wesley Frazier both saw Oswald with the 38 inch package that morning.You are such a fucking liar and I'll prove it.
Cite where either one of those witnesses said that they saw Oswald with a 38 inch package.
They both saw Oswald with a long, brown paper package. That package was found in the
TSBD and MEASURED at 38 inches.
That trumps the estimate of the length of the package
made from memory, especially since one of them remembered the package almost touching
the ground.
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".Notice folks, that Chickenshit is passing off his speculation in place
of the ACTUAL TESTIMONY.
Chickenshit is terrified of what Linnie Mae Randle actually STATED,
and replaces what she said with what Chickenshit "thinks."
Chickenshit is clearly a coward.
And a liar.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:53:37?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
They both saw Oswald with a long, brown paper package. That package was found in the
TSBD and MEASURED at 38 inches. That trumps the estimate of the length of the package
made from memory, especially since one of them remembered the package almost touching
the ground.
Bullshit. A "long, brown paper package" doesn't trump an actual measurement of the package they saw.
How did the witnesses' determine what was "long" and what was short ?
Did Frazier identify the package in evidence as the package he saw ? >https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/frazier_no_id_bag.jpg
Here he is on video saying "there was no gun" in the package. >https://youtu.be/4olEc4xdVB4
Did Randle identify CE 142 as the package she saw ?
No. She folded the bag DOWN to the size she estimated it to be and when they measured it, it was 28 1/2 inches. ( 2 H 249-250 )
Neither witness identified the 38 inch "gunsack" CE 142 as the package they saw on the morning of November 22nd.
And THAT trumps any decription of it being "long".
They both saw Oswald with a long, brown paper package. That package was found in the
TSBD and MEASURED at 38 inches. That trumps the estimate of the length of the package
made from memory, especially since one of them remembered the package almost touching
the ground.
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 3:42:05?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:Logical fallacy deleted.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 10:43:17?AM UTC-4, Bud wrote:
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:Name the person who saw Oswald with a THIRTY-EIGHT inch package on November 22nd.
On Sunday, July 9, 2023 at 8:23:23?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
My latest appearance on the Lone Gunman Podcast:Gil starts off by saying there was no evidence Oswald brought a 38 inch bag into the TSBD
Episode # 241:
I discuss items in the case for which there is NO EVIDENCE.
https://www.spreaker.com/user/thelonegunman/ep-241-no-evidence-w-gil-jesus
even though a 38 inch bag found in the TSBD with Oswald's finger and palm prints. We have
a real sleuth in our midst.
Clearly, Chickenshit can't give the only answer.
He claims the witnesses who saw him with the package said it was
shorter but one of these same witnesses said when Oswald held it just below the top of it, the
bag almost touched the ground. Try that with a two foot long package. >> I tried it. 28 1/2 inches from the top of the bag to the floor.
If your arm is straight down, and this gives you little to hold.Chickenshit agrees with Gil...
Logical fallacy deleted.Great comeback. Who said the cops didn't leave fingerprints on it ?Then Gil says there is no evidence Oswald made the bag. Did he expect Oswald would have
taken a selfie of himself making the bag. Yet he accuses the DPD of making the bag without
a scrap of evidence they did so. He says Oswald couldn't have made the bag without leaving
more fingerprints on the bag but he thinks the cops could have constructed the bag without
leaving fingerprints on it. Gil is the Inspector Clouseau of the JFK assassination.
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...She also estimated that "long brown package" as being 27-28 1/2 inches long. ( CD 7, pg. 299, 2 H 250 )
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".It all depends what you're talking about.
Some people think 1o inches is long, but that something you wouldn't know about.
In fact, if you had a half-inch less, you'd have two belly buttons.
https://gil-jesus.com/the-rifle/Gil claims the paperwork showing Klein's shipping the rifle to Oswald's PO Box was made up.
What evidence does Gil present that this was done? Absolutely nothing. He thinks the rifle
was ordered by the conspirators (unnamed of course) in August or September.
You're right, they probably thought it was a fishing pole.Gil says there is no evidence Oswald picked up the rifle. Just what evidence would he expect. He wonder why nobody at the Dallas Post Office would remember giving Oswald the most
famous rifle in the world. Why would they think it was the most famous rifle in the world when
the handed it to him? Why would they even know it was a rifle? Why would he think a PO
employee would remember handing a package to Oswald back in March?
What a fool !!! All you have to post is your worthless opinions and speculations.All these asinine observations were made in about the first five minutes. If somebody has 90
minutes of their lives to spend listening to all of Gil's drivel, have at it.
What a tool!!!
It was the opinion ...
Chickenshit agrees again with Gil.
Post evidence or STFU.
Clearly, Chickenshit can't do either.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:40:46 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
I`m applying reasoning and my life experience to the information, stupid.I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".Notice folks, that Chickenshit is passing off his speculation in place
of the ACTUAL TESTIMONY.
Would you describe a two foot package as "long"?
Chickenshit is terrified of what Linnie Mae Randle actually STATED,I`m fine with what she said. I just opt to look at it correctly rather than play silly games with it.
and replaces what she said with what Chickenshit "thinks."
Chickenshit is clearly a coward.
And a liar.
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:39:28?AM UTC-7, Bud wrote:
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:40:46?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>I`m applying reasoning and my life experience to the information, stupid.
wrote:
Another thing to consider is that LMR said she saw Oswald carrying "a long brown package"...Notice folks, that Chickenshit is passing off his speculation in place
https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth337089/m1/1/?q=randle
I don`t think I would ever describe a two foot package as "long".
of the ACTUAL TESTIMONY.
Would you describe a two foot package as "long"?
Chickenshit is terrified of what Linnie Mae Randle actually STATED,I`m fine with what she said. I just opt to look at it correctly rather than play silly games with it.
and replaces what she said with what Chickenshit "thinks."
Chickenshit is clearly a coward.
And a liar.
Corbutt is really fucking this up for you Bud. You have some evidence mending to get done here... lmfao
On Monday, July 10, 2023 at 11:53:37 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:52:33 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,854 |
