• Re: Destroying Corby's "forensics"

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to geowright1963@gmail.com on Mon Jul 10 06:40:04 2023
    On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 12:35:30 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 1:27:08?PM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    John Corbett writes:

    This is a short summation of the forensic evidence at the scene of the >murders of JFK and Tippit.
    1. Oswald's rifle was found on the 6th floor of the TSBD. There is a clear >paper trail and photographs establishing his ownership of the rifle.

    ANS. Clear paper trail ? The shipping documents the FBI provided had neither the serial number of the rifle ( C 2766 ) nor the number of the carton it was in ( 3376 ) on them.
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside520-1.jpg
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/harborside170.jpg
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/rupp-1.jpg

    2. His palm print was on the underside of the barrel and fibers matching >the shirt he wore were on the butt plate of the rifle.

    ANS. But the FBI said that when they exmained the rifle on the day after the assassinationthe assassination, there was no palm print. ( 4 H 24 ) The FBI agent who travelled with the rifle from Dallas to Washington, Vincent Drain, was never called to
    testify. Why not ?
    Why wasn't the palm print photographed after it was dusted ?
    Why wasn't it photographed after it was lifted ?
    And your star witness, Howard Brennan, testified that the clothes Oswald wore at the police lineup were not the same clothes the man he saw with the rifle on the 6th floor wore. ( 3 H 161 )
    So how did the fibers from Oswald's arrested shirt get on the rifle when there's no evidence that he was wearing that shirt prior to or at the time of the shooting ? Who identified that shirt as the one he was wearing prior to the shooting ?

    3. In addition there were partial fingerprints on the trigger guard were >consistent with Oswald's prints but lacked the sufficient number of points >for the FBI to say they were a positive match.

    ANS. So what are you trying to say ?

    4. Three spent shells were found at the window were the witnesses placed >the shooter and they were positively matched to Oswald ( sic ) to the >exclusion of all other weapons in the world.

    Those shells were found by Dallas Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney. Did he ever identify them as the shells he found ?

    5. The only two bullets recovered from the shooting also were matched to >Oswald's rifle to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.

    ANS. Could one of those be the famous "stretcher bullet" which the four people who handled it couldn't identify ?
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/WH_Vol24_412.jpg

    6. Oswald's fingerprints were found on top of the boxes that had been >stacked to form a rifle rest and were oriented as they would be if Oswald >were facing down Elm St.

    ANS. How did Oswald lift those cartons from the top ?

    7. A bag large enough to hold the disassembled rifle was found near the >window with Oswald's finger and palm print and.....

    ANS. How do you know the bag was on the sixth floor ? Was it photographed in place ?
    Here's the crime scene photo. Where is it ?
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ce729.jpg

    8...... fibers matching the blanket Oswald had used to store his rifle.

    ANS. Were those fibers identified as having come from the blanket in the Paine garage ?
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/WC_Vol4_88-stombaugh.gif

    9. In the case of the Tippit murder, the .38 Special bullets had been fired >from a gun with a slightly larger diameter barrel that prevented consistent >enough markings to positive match them to any firearm. However, the >bullets had the same twist
    characteristics as Oswald's revolver.

    ANS. You don't match bullets by primary characteristics ( grooves and twists ) any more than you match fingerprint because it's a whorl, a loop or an arch.
    You match them from individual characterisitics. The individual characteristics are the "fingerprint".
    You obviously don't know anything about firearms identification.

    10. Two different makes of bullets were recovered from Tippit's body and >Oswald had those same two makes of bullets in his possession when >arrested a little more than a half hour later.

    ANS. Those cartridges were allegedly found on Oswald outside the lineup room for the 4:05pm lineup.
    But Oswald was searched twice before those cartridges were found and there was nothing in his pockets.
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/105-82555-Sec-78-pg-14-1.png
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/image003.png

    The bullets removed from Tippit didn't match the shells did they? But you know what DID match ? The number of .38 cartridges recovered from JD Tippit and the number of .38 cartridges allegedly found on LHO and in his revolver.

    Did Tippit ...


    Tut tut tut, Corbutt... ANSWER THE TOPIC THAT GIL BROUGHT UP.

    Logical fallacies can't convince anyone.


    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/38-cartridge-montage.jpg

    So here we have two different Dallas policemen, one a detective and the other a uniformed officer, who searched suspect Oswald prior to the escort by Sims, Boyd and Hall to the lineup room and both reported that Oswald’s pockets were empty. They
    recover (11) .38 cartridges from Tippit and 40 minutes later retrieve 5 from Oswald's pocket. ROFLMAO...what a joke !!!

    11. Four shells were recovered from the place where the Tippit shooter was >seen dumping them and those shells were positively matched to Oswald's >revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons in the world.

    ANS. Were those shells ever identified by the witnesses who found them ?
    https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/discovery.png

    It is impossible to construct a plausible scenario for Oswald's innocence >that takes into account all of the above forensic evidence. If it were >possible, somebody would have done so by now.

    Earth to John Corbett:
    Not impossible to prove a lie. Or 11 lies. I just did. And I did it using official documents and testimony

    The only thing you proved is that you're...


    Logical fallacies merely show that *YOU* know you lost.

    Gil took the time, and you've been spanked by the evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)