1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Re: Education Forum Has Destroyed Credible Conspiracy Research

    From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Scrum Drum on Mon Oct 30 08:22:25 2023
    On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:50:50 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:35:34 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:



    The fact that you can take the original Darnell film and reproduce the exact scoop neckline image is proof that Jim D's claim that the image is manipulated is false...

    So why is this point being kept from the Education Forum?...

    Why are the moderators not held accountable for preventing this conclusive evidence?...

    The Prayer Man posters are ignoring Prayer Man's 5 foot 4 height and elbow-length sleeve that is seen in Owens...

    Why?...

    Why is this conclusive evidence point being prevented by the moderators on the Education Forum?...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From robert johnson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 30 08:55:37 2023
    Why are moronic cunts like you still around??????????????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Tue Oct 31 05:55:07 2023
    On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 11:22:27 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:50:50 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:35:34 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:



    The Education Forum does not operate by evidence and Peer Review...

    It operates by who in the clique is acceptable and who isn't...

    It deliberately excludes the fact that the scoop neckline can be proven to be legitimate by scanning the original Darnell film and reproducing it exactly...This will prove that the image is accurate and is not manipulated, like DiEugenio falsely claims
    and the idiots there don't challenge...

    Under Gordon, if you don't like the evidence that disproves you you can ignore it and enter already-disproven bullshit...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Doyle@21:1/5 to Brian Doyle on Tue Nov 7 11:08:45 2023
    On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 8:55:09 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 11:22:27 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 11:50:50 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:



    Right now the current status of the Prayer Man issue on the Education Forum is hoax posters Stancak, Ford, and Larsen have managed to hijack the subject in to Ford's Cinque-like insanity and derail it into chasing Ford's crazy claims that Lovelady has
    been altered in order to hide Oswald...Nothing has been done to Lovelady...The shadow is just the column and Ford is an uncontrolled troll...

    Ford's imaginary Oswald is Doorway Man.3

    Doorway Man.2 was Prayer Man...

    And Doorway Man.1 was Cinque's original Lovelady as Oswald...

    The responsibility for this lay at the feet of James Gordon and Sandy Larsen who have decided to enforce rogue incompetent oversight and the promotion of crazed lunatic research over cogency of rigor and academic standards...The internet has adopted and
    accommodated a cess pit of research delinquency that has become a clusterfuck of stupidity and self-indulgence by unqualified researchers at the expense of good research...Whether this is an intentional thing done by persons with COINTELPRO-like motives
    is unknown...The other culprits are the mainstream researchers like DiEugenio and Hancock who sit back and say nothing while this crazy circus is upheld...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Sienzant@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 18:31:15 2023
    Was there ever any credible conspiracy research?

    Cite three examples.

    Go ahead, we’ll wait.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 08:03:00 2023
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 18:31:15 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
    <hsienzant@aol.com> wrote:


    Go ahead and defend your lies, Huckster... we'll wait:


    You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
    description of the *location* of the large head wound.

    Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
    paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

    You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

    Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

    Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

    Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
    and exited the back of his head.

    More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

    Are you proud of yourself?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)