On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:55:41 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 10:36:09 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 11:11:33 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 11:13:07 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

Stancak has posted his pseudo-science You Tube video where he tries to place Stanton behind Shelley in Altgens 6...

The Tiny Face between Lovelady & Shelley in Altgens 6 is Pauline Sanders...The Education Forum is a group of dishonest assholes because they are having a case of selective amnesia by not holding Stancak accountable for not showing the best images he
previously showed...Years ago Stancak presented a very sharp blow up of the Tiny Face and you could see Sanders' forehead and eyes clearly...Because that works against Stancak he now hides that better image and hopes people forget so he can post his
imaginary claims...Gordon made up a special rule that was only applied to myself where you had to use the best images...Apparently that doesn't apply to Stancak who is allowed to hide his best image of Sanders so he can decieve the membership...

The Education Forum membership needs to directly challenge Stancak and ask him why he withdrew his clear image of Sanders' face?...Stancak is about to have his ass handed to him because Alan Ford discovered that the image Stancak is calling Sanders in
Darnell is actually a photo glitch that only appears in one frame...Ford is a nut from Duncan's website, however he is correct on that one and Stancak is about to finally be credibly challenged instead of cheerleaded...Larsen is correct...Stancak is a
phony and a fraud who tries to take command with bombastic professorial language but any fool could see he has no idea what he is doing evidence wise...Stancak does not respond to correct criticism of his made up claims...Because I have been censored by
that crook Gordon no one is telling Stancak that there is no one standing in between Lovelady & Shelley in Wiegman so therefore his claim that Stanton is standing there is easily proven bullshit...Stancak is lying and saying Wiegman started filming
seconds after Altgens 6, however that isn't true and any scientific examination of the people in the portal and position of the motorcade cars will show that Wiegman started filming no more than a second after Altgens 6...Stancak is lying about that gap
because he knows Stanton isn't there...He's trying to say she slipped out of view in those alleged few seconds...Stancak ignores that Wiegman shows that everyone else is in the exact same place and posture that they were in Altgens...If that was Stanton
in between Lovelady & Shelley she would still be there...Stancak is too incompetent and dishonest to admit the Tiny Face is that of Pauline Sanders and she is behind Shelley right where she said she was in her statement...What Stancak is dishonestly
avoiding admitting is once you show Sanders then Prayer Man automatically becomes Stanton...

I think Alan Ford is about to show the scoop neckline that the rest of the cowards and that crook Gordon were trying to not mention...Those assholes on the Education Forum operate by deliberately excluding evidence and Larsen has a real set of balls
accusing Stancak of not listening to correct evidence seeing how he is probably even worse...The Education Forum is a clusterfuck of dishonest posters deliberately not presenting the best evidence and using banning to do it...It is actually that asshole
Gordon who is in violation of his best image/best evidence rule...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:55:41 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 10:36:09 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 11:11:33 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

Stancak ignores all the other evidence that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton in order to present his pseudo-analyses...

The woman's dress neckline in Darnell will verify at a film analysis science level...Stancak is being allowed to make excuses on the Education Forum because he just doesn't want to admit that this most recent evidence destroys the Oswald as Prayer Man
theory...If the original Darnell film is ever gotten it will show that the woman's neckline is not a distortion due to processing like Stancak falsely asserts...It will prove to be a solid feature on the original film and therefore real...

No one points out to Stancak that he is just ignoring what Ford already showed...That Darnell's camera was steady and had stopped panning when it took the neckline frame...Yet the idiots on the Education Forum allow Stancak to say the image is heavily
motion-blurred when Ford already proved that it wasn't...

Stancak also thinks he has the privilege to ignore the height issue that doesn't go away...Prayer Man is still Stanton's exact 5 foot 4 height and still has the exact same length dress sleeve as seen in Owens...The Prayer Man hijackers have also managed
to disappear the Davidson enhancement from Wiegman that showed Stanton's female face...Stancak deals with this other layered evidence by ignoring it and that idiot Gordon lets him...That image should be re-posted in the current Education Forum thread...

Proof of the realness of the woman's neckline is how the bottom flat part was already caught in the other Darnell frame as seen in the flat line in the exact same place in that other frame...Please observe the flat horizontal line at the bottom of the
neckline caught in the other frame (and therefore photographically verifying it)...Stancak will, of course, ignore this or make a false excuse for it:


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1647580235580649&set=gm.2115465245280615&idorvanity=243480929145732




--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:39:26 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:55:41 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 10:36:09 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

The latest scoop neckline evidence is totally valid and is legitimate film evidence that does accurately portray the neckline on Prayer Man's garment...The Prayer Man people are currently abusing their censorship-gained privilege and trying an end around
in order to force the false suggestion that the scoop neckline is somehow manipulated...Jim DiEugenio assumes the entitled privilege of making absolute pronouncements without ever providing any technical explanation that would be required of anyone else..
.Jim is doing his usual bullshit and trying to rescue the Prayer Man trolls...However the technical evidence that the crook Gordon excluded from his website by means of dirty banning won't let DiEugenio get away with it...

The Prayer Man idiots are trying to get away with ignoring that the original Darnell film will produce the exact same scoop neckline as seen in Kamp's image...Jim DiEugenio is lying...This will be proven once the original Darnell film is scanned and
produces the exact same image - proving that the neckline has not been manipulated and Kamp's frame is accurate...The Prayer Man cultists are delusional if they think they can get away with just ignoring this...They are trying to use swarm trolling to
avoid the obvious...That Kamp's new frame is damning proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...Dirty Jim knows what his job is...By the way, the original Wiegman celluloid will also produce Davidson's woman's face exactly - also confirming that Davidson was
totally accurate and serves as credible proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...

If you go to the best enlargements of the previous Darnell image of Prayer Man you can see that the skin area seen in the scoop neckline is present in that image in exact proportion to Kamp's clear frame...The original Prayer Man frame was more blurry
than Kamp's new frame, however it was of clear enough resolution that it shows the proportion of white skin to clothing and you can see the exact proportion of skin seen in the scoop neckline image is present in that previous image...This is confirming
proof that Kamp's scoop neckline frame is totally accurate and credible and is not manipulated as the Prayer Man people are desperately claiming...They are just ignoring the most intelligent analyses that disprove them...They are lying and trying to
ignore that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera was still (despite their lies trying to say the opposite)...Stancak is trying to get away with ignoring that Kamp's new frame is sharper because Darnell's camera stopped sweeping and
therefore took a sharp frame...This is the simple obvious that the Education Forum allows Stancak to avoid by posting lengthy pseudo-science bullshit that then gets armchair praise from the useful idiots who know what their job is...Stancak is
dishonestly trying to avoid admitting that the previous Blue-Ray version was blurry and Kamp's new frame is sharp and therefore depicts Prayer Man's neckline more accurately...The Education Forum is organized and dedicated dishonesty based on stupid
censorship...Backwards dumb-down moderation...

This proof needs to be shown on the Education Forum and the Prayer Man people need to be forced to answer it...Only that is being prevented by one UK-based cyber criminal named James Gordon...Greg Parker will ignore all this and troll and his useful
idiot proxies on the Education Forum will ignore it...However it is still credible proof that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...The Education Forum is also trying to get away with the murder of ignoring that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton's exact 5 foot
4 height and possesses her elbow-length sleeve as seen in Owens...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 11:48:39 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 7:39:26 AM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:

On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 8:55:41 AM UTC-4, Scrum Drum wrote:

Stancak is not being forced to answer the fact that the woman's dress scoop neckline Ford presented is legitimate and does show Sarah Stanton's dress neckline in Darnell...There is nothing wrong with that image and its does clearly show the woman's dress
neckline on Prayer Man...This could be proven very simply by obtaining the original Darnell film and doing a high quality scan...That scan will reproduce the woman's neckline identically therefore proving that Stancak and DiEugenio's claim that the image
is somehow altered is provably false...This correct conclusive point is being dishonestly kept from the Education Forum by the moderators and DiEugenio and Stancak are being aided in not answering it...That also holds true for the Davidson enhancement in
Wiegman that will also exactly verify on the original Wiegman celluoid...Stancak and DiEugenio are research/photo science scofflaws and the Education Forum is getting away with contempt of good argument...Time for the credible research community to take
back the JFK internet from the petty jerks who just don't want to admit they've been refuted on Prayer Man...Welcome to Jim DiEugenio thinking he can rule the JFK internet with his arrogance and dishonesty...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)