On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 8:31:13 PM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:59:31 AM UTC+10, Brian Doyle wrote:
On Friday, July 7, 2023 at 2:00:26 AM UTC-4, Greg Parker wrote:
How about I put in a good word for you with the mods?Cotter is the only one with the common sense to see what Bojzcuk is doing...
Don't forget Bojzcuk, like Odisio, is an ROKC troll...
These Parker-generated disruption trolls are corrupting the evidence in order to squeeze Oswald in to Sarah Stanton's body on the front steps...
In effect, Gordon has allowed Cinque point 2 (one person over from "Doorway Man") to dominate and control the Education Forum...
This is done with Larry Hancock chiming in that he supports these trolls...
Meanwhile James Gordon is getting away with the murder of suggesting he moderates the Education Forum to its best interest and by the best academic standards while he protects the 2nd worst troll fest on the internet and the damage it does to soundresearch...
Anyone with a sound understanding of the conspiracy knows the same people who tightly controlled the set-up also controlled the cover-up...Bojzcuk is a Parker troll who is trying to set the scene by manipulating a weak Education Forum moderator (Larsen)in to accepting his Prayer Man garbage...According to the Greg Parker make-it-up-as-you-go-along school of research if the evidence goes against you you simply make the evidence fit your theory by saying different people controlled the cover-up...Don't
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 8:27:57 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 7:39:21 PM UTC-5, clarence...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 2:33:27 AM UTC+11, Tropp...@aol.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:05:46 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 8:27:57 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:Odisio wrote:
On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 7:39:21 PM UTC-5, clarence...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 2:33:27 AM UTC+11, Tropp...@aol.com wrote:
" But most at ROKC are focused on the exoneration of Oswald, though of course not entirely, and see Prayerman as the key to that effort at the moment. There is plenty of evidence that Oswald didn't do it, was not even on the 6th floor, so even if thefigure on the steps turns out to be someone else, the mission won't change. "
It is plainly clear that Roger Odisio knows Prayer Man isn't Oswald...Odisio is an ROKC member and he has self-imposed himself as an ROKC apologist on the Kennedy internet...Roger Odisio is a motherfucker because, while making lengthy posts on theEducation Forum protesting the dishonesty of the EF moderators, and how they ignore the valid material of some selected researchers, or how they arbitrarily remove posts and posters, Odisio isn't afraid to then turn around and practice the obscene
Odisio is an ROKC apologist who is trying to get away with the murder of making Parker's troll farm look like innocent researchers seeking the truth...He is aided in this rogue deception by Gordon and the Education Forum clique who are universallyignoring my research...This is achieved by pretending my entire documented and website-preserved history in arguing the Prayer Man evidence doesn't exist...This is probably one of the most depraved crimes against intellectualism and research ever
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:05:46 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 8:27:57 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
On Wednesday, July 12, 2023 at 12:42:57 PM UTC-4, Brian Doyle wrote:complaining about with the judge...He's taking moral exception to the judge and his ignoring but at the same time he sets the example of ignoring the Prayer Man proof right in its face...
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 10:05:46 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:Odisio is over on the Education Forum complaining that the Federal Judge ignored the purpose of the ARRB and Documents Release...However he himself is ignoring my proof that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...So Odisio is basically guilty of what he is
On Saturday, December 10, 2022 at 8:27:57 AM UTC-5, Scrum Drum wrote:
A federal judge ruling on the wrongdoing of the Federal Government is kind of a conflict of interest and the matter needs to be sent to another venue...
The Constitution gives the people the right to take these kind of matters in to their own hands when the government acts against itself and its Constitution...
It seems to me there may be an opportunity to petition for a re-opening of the ARRB from all this since the judge failed to answer the main issue of forthcomingness...The judge certainly doesn't have the power or authority to ignore or over-rule aCongressional Act...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 110:17:30 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,826 |