• Ways to convince people to continue to study physics

    From Dave@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 16:22:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, uk.poltics.misc

    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate
    emergency, it is fairly important people don't give up on physics at the earliest opportunity. In summary there are 4 key areas of evidence
    missing to convince people of Newtonian mechanics and gravity at the
    human scale.

    1- timed freefall drops from gravity measured with precision.
    Sixty meters minimum, better in a vacuum.

    2- gyros in a closed box with F=ma. There is constant mass, yet you know
    if the gyro is spinning or not.

    3- an experiment of firing something up at known speed,
    see how it gets and measure speed on the way down.
    Useful for mgh and 1/2mv^2 energy equivalence, potential and kinetic energy

    4- missing linear air cart (track) videos for collision checks -
    difference between kinetic energy and momentum, and elastic and
    inelastic collisions

    Again it can be noted that these are not calculations,
    but measurements from a real world experiments which
    should easily agree with the laws of physics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave@21:1/5 to Dave on Sat Jun 8 16:30:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, uk.politics.misc

    On 24 11, Dave wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate emergency, it is fairly important people don't give up on physics at the earliest opportunity.  In summary there are 4 key areas of evidence
    missing to convince people of Newtonian mechanics and gravity at the
    human scale.

    1- timed freefall drops from gravity measured with precision.
    Sixty meters minimum, better in a vacuum.

    2- gyros in a closed box with F=ma. There is constant mass, yet you know
    if the gyro is spinning or not.

    3- an experiment of firing something up at known speed,
    see how it gets and measure speed on the way down.
    Useful for mgh and 1/2mv^2 energy equivalence, potential and kinetic energy

    4- missing linear air cart (track) videos for collision checks -
    difference between kinetic energy and momentum, and elastic and
    inelastic collisions

    Again it can be noted that these are not calculations,
    but measurements from a real world experiments which
    should easily agree with the laws of physics.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Dave on Sat Jun 8 09:21:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics

    In sci.physics Dave <dwickford@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate emergency,

    The Earth's climate has been in a continuous state of flux for about 4.5 billion years and has gone through numerous icehouse and greenhouse
    states.

    A greenhouse state is when no continental glaciers exist anywhere and an icehouse state is when continental glaciers do exist.

    For 85% of its history, The Earth has been in a greenhouse state.

    Understanding Earth's Deep Past. 2011-08-02. doi:10.17226/13111.
    ISBN 978-0-309-20915-1

    Earth is currently in an icehouse state with continental glaciers present
    on both poles.

    Sounds to me like business as usual for the Earth's climate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loran@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 10:30:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, uk.politics.misc

    One more way, climatic catastrophism.

    It's on, we're now in the early stages of a Heinrich Event leading up to
    full glaciation shortly:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-1q5cW_V3M

    TRIPLE CATASTROPHE - 6000-Year Cycle Happening Now

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh8369
    Heinrich event ice discharge and the fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

    YUXIN ZHOU HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-3523-8524 AND JERRY F. MCMANUS HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-7365-1600Authors Info & Affiliations
    SCIENCE
    30 May 2024
    Vol 384, Issue 6699
    pp. 983-986
    DOI: 10.1126/science.adh8369

    Editor’s summary
    Will ice mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet caused by climate
    warming disrupt large-scale ocean circulation? Zhou et al. reconstructed iceberg production rates during the massive calving episodes of the last glacial period, called Heinrich events, when icebergs did affect ocean circulation. The authors found that present-day Greenland Ice Sheet
    calving rates are as high as during some of those events.

    https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/could-the-day-after-tomorrow-come-true/

    A German scientist has echoed the warnings of the film The Day After
    Tomorrow, finding that a major oceanic circulation system is becoming
    more unstable – with concerning implications for the climate.

    A study published in Nature Climate Change observes that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – a massive ocean current
    system that circulates through the Atlantic – may have been losing
    stability over the past century, due to the influx of melted freshwater
    into the ocean.

    This is concerning because the AMOC is responsible for the Gulf Stream,
    a swift current that brings warm water masses from tropical regions to
    the northern hemisphere. Because it redistributes heat, this circulation
    system is not only responsible for creating mild temperatures across
    Europe but also influencing weather systems across the world.

    “The Atlantic Meridional Overturning really is one of our planet’s key circulation systems,” says Niklas Boers, the study’s author from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Free University Berlin
    and Exeter University.

    If it collapses, it could have impacts such as significantly cooling
    Europe and affecting tropical monsoon systems.

    “We already know from some computer simulations and from data from
    Earth’s past, so-called paleoclimate proxy records, that the AMOC can
    exhibit – in addition to the currently attained strong mode – an alternative, substantially weaker mode of operation,” Boers says.

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14877

    Machine-learning prediction of tipping and collapse of the Atlantic
    Meridional Overturning Circulation
    Shirin Panahi, Ling-Wei Kong, Mohammadamin Moradi, Zheng-Meng Zhai,
    Bryan Glaz, Mulugeta Haile, Ying-Cheng Lai
    Recent research on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
    (AMOC) raised concern about its potential collapse through a tipping
    point due to the climate-change caused increase in the freshwater input
    into the North Atlantic. The predicted time window of collapse is
    centered about the middle of the century and the earliest possible start
    is approximately two years from now. More generally, anticipating a
    tipping point at which the system transitions from one stable steady
    state to another is relevant to a broad range of fields. We develop a machine-learning approach to predicting tipping in noisy dynamical
    systems with a time-varying parameter and test it on a number of systems including the AMOC, ecological networks, an electrical power system, and
    a climate model. For the AMOC, our prediction based on simulated
    fingerprint data and real data of the sea surface temperature places the
    time window of a potential collapse between the years 2040 and 2065.

    https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentary/2021-03-24/weve-known-for-years-global-warming-could-lead-to-a-new-ice-age-why-is-no-one-doing-anything

    Call it a cascade of calamitous events.

    According to scientists, a “cold blob” of water has formed south of Greenland. The blob’s origins can be traced to rapidly melting glaciers, which in turn is the consequence of global warming. The blob could
    impede the flow of the Gulf Stream, which carries warm water north. And
    if that happens, the temperature in Europe may drop steeply, hurricanes
    may become more intense, and sea levels on the East Coast of the United
    States may rise even more rapidly than they are already.

    “We’re all wishing it’s not true,” Peter de Menocal, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told The New York Timesearlier
    this month. “Because if that happens, it’s just a monstrous change.”

    A monstrous change indeed — and one that we’ve known about for decades.
    The possibility that climate change could flip and, in just a matter of
    years, plunge part of the world into a new ice age is something that has occasionally made its way into the media. Yet the world has done very
    little about it.

    http://www.longrangeweather.com/climate_change.htm

    Recently, John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, stated that, "manmade global warming is the GREATEST SCAM IN HISTORY!"

    He went on to add, "I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by this
    theory of global warming based on fraudulent science."

    He said this, folks, not me. (But, I certainly agree with Dr. Coleman.)

    Coleman’s climatological opinion has been recently supported by a top observatory that has been measuring a rather dramatic decrease in
    sunspot activity. These scientists are predicting that global
    temperatures will drop by at least two degrees in the next 20 years.

    Our friend, Robert Felix, author of "Not By Fire, But By Ice," believes
    that this significant cool down could possibly be the start of at least
    another "Little Ice Age," possibly a new GREAT ICE AGE, which is overdue following 11,500 years of generally warmer than normal global temperatures.

    This latest period of naturally-occurring warming peaked a decade ago in
    1998. It was the strongest such cycle of warming since the days of Leif Ericcson around 1,000 A.D. At the time, the mighty Vikings were actually farming parts of Greenland growing wheat, vegetables and raising cattle.
    They actually grew tomatoes and grapes!

    Robert Felix gives this warning: "Living in the northern U.S. could
    eventually be hazardous to your health!"

    He goes on to say, "the next major ice age could begin any day...next
    week, next month or next year." (Get that snowblower tuned-up.)

    Felix believes that someday soon we’ll be "buried beneath nine stories
    of ice and snow as the bitter climate of Greenland descends upon Canada, Britain, Norway, Sweden, the U.S. and other northern regions ---
    practically overnight."

    It’s all part of a dependable, predictable, natural cycle of climate
    that returns "like clockwork" every 11,500 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loran@21:1/5 to Dave on Sat Jun 8 10:30:04 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, uk.poltics.misc

    Dave wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate emergency, it is fairly important people don't give up on physics at the earliest opportunity.  In summary there are 4 key areas of evidence
    missing to convince people of Newtonian mechanics and gravity at the
    human scale.

    1- timed freefall drops from gravity measured with precision.
    Sixty meters minimum, better in a vacuum.

    2- gyros in a closed box with F=ma. There is constant mass, yet you know
    if the gyro is spinning or not.

    3- an experiment of firing something up at known speed,
    see how it gets and measure speed on the way down.
    Useful for mgh and 1/2mv^2 energy equivalence, potential and kinetic energy

    4- missing linear air cart (track) videos for collision checks -
    difference between kinetic energy and momentum, and elastic and
    inelastic collisions

    Again it can be noted that these are not calculations,
    but measurements from a real world experiments which
    should easily agree with the laws of physics.



    One more way, climatic catastrophism.

    It's on, we're now in the early stages of a Heinrich Event leading up to
    full glaciation shortly:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-1q5cW_V3M

    TRIPLE CATASTROPHE - 6000-Year Cycle Happening Now

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh8369
    Heinrich event ice discharge and the fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

    YUXIN ZHOU HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-3523-8524 AND JERRY F. MCMANUS HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-7365-1600Authors Info & Affiliations
    SCIENCE
    30 May 2024
    Vol 384, Issue 6699
    pp. 983-986
    DOI: 10.1126/science.adh8369

    Editor’s summary
    Will ice mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet caused by climate
    warming disrupt large-scale ocean circulation? Zhou et al. reconstructed iceberg production rates during the massive calving episodes of the last glacial period, called Heinrich events, when icebergs did affect ocean circulation. The authors found that present-day Greenland Ice Sheet
    calving rates are as high as during some of those events.

    https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/could-the-day-after-tomorrow-come-true/

    A German scientist has echoed the warnings of the film The Day After
    Tomorrow, finding that a major oceanic circulation system is becoming
    more unstable – with concerning implications for the climate.

    A study published in Nature Climate Change observes that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – a massive ocean current
    system that circulates through the Atlantic – may have been losing
    stability over the past century, due to the influx of melted freshwater
    into the ocean.

    This is concerning because the AMOC is responsible for the Gulf Stream,
    a swift current that brings warm water masses from tropical regions to
    the northern hemisphere. Because it redistributes heat, this circulation
    system is not only responsible for creating mild temperatures across
    Europe but also influencing weather systems across the world.

    “The Atlantic Meridional Overturning really is one of our planet’s key circulation systems,” says Niklas Boers, the study’s author from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Free University Berlin
    and Exeter University.

    If it collapses, it could have impacts such as significantly cooling
    Europe and affecting tropical monsoon systems.

    “We already know from some computer simulations and from data from
    Earth’s past, so-called paleoclimate proxy records, that the AMOC can
    exhibit – in addition to the currently attained strong mode – an alternative, substantially weaker mode of operation,” Boers says.

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14877

    Machine-learning prediction of tipping and collapse of the Atlantic
    Meridional Overturning Circulation
    Shirin Panahi, Ling-Wei Kong, Mohammadamin Moradi, Zheng-Meng Zhai,
    Bryan Glaz, Mulugeta Haile, Ying-Cheng Lai
    Recent research on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
    (AMOC) raised concern about its potential collapse through a tipping
    point due to the climate-change caused increase in the freshwater input
    into the North Atlantic. The predicted time window of collapse is
    centered about the middle of the century and the earliest possible start
    is approximately two years from now. More generally, anticipating a
    tipping point at which the system transitions from one stable steady
    state to another is relevant to a broad range of fields. We develop a machine-learning approach to predicting tipping in noisy dynamical
    systems with a time-varying parameter and test it on a number of systems including the AMOC, ecological networks, an electrical power system, and
    a climate model. For the AMOC, our prediction based on simulated
    fingerprint data and real data of the sea surface temperature places the
    time window of a potential collapse between the years 2040 and 2065.

    https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentary/2021-03-24/weve-known-for-years-global-warming-could-lead-to-a-new-ice-age-why-is-no-one-doing-anything

    Call it a cascade of calamitous events.

    According to scientists, a “cold blob” of water has formed south of Greenland. The blob’s origins can be traced to rapidly melting glaciers, which in turn is the consequence of global warming. The blob could
    impede the flow of the Gulf Stream, which carries warm water north. And
    if that happens, the temperature in Europe may drop steeply, hurricanes
    may become more intense, and sea levels on the East Coast of the United
    States may rise even more rapidly than they are already.

    “We’re all wishing it’s not true,” Peter de Menocal, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told The New York Timesearlier
    this month. “Because if that happens, it’s just a monstrous change.”

    A monstrous change indeed — and one that we’ve known about for decades.
    The possibility that climate change could flip and, in just a matter of
    years, plunge part of the world into a new ice age is something that has occasionally made its way into the media. Yet the world has done very
    little about it.

    http://www.longrangeweather.com/climate_change.htm

    Recently, John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, stated that, "manmade global warming is the GREATEST SCAM IN HISTORY!"

    He went on to add, "I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by this
    theory of global warming based on fraudulent science."

    He said this, folks, not me. (But, I certainly agree with Dr. Coleman.)

    Coleman’s climatological opinion has been recently supported by a top observatory that has been measuring a rather dramatic decrease in
    sunspot activity. These scientists are predicting that global
    temperatures will drop by at least two degrees in the next 20 years.

    Our friend, Robert Felix, author of "Not By Fire, But By Ice," believes
    that this significant cool down could possibly be the start of at least
    another "Little Ice Age," possibly a new GREAT ICE AGE, which is overdue following 11,500 years of generally warmer than normal global temperatures.

    This latest period of naturally-occurring warming peaked a decade ago in
    1998. It was the strongest such cycle of warming since the days of Leif Ericcson around 1,000 A.D. At the time, the mighty Vikings were actually farming parts of Greenland growing wheat, vegetables and raising cattle.
    They actually grew tomatoes and grapes!

    Robert Felix gives this warning: "Living in the northern U.S. could
    eventually be hazardous to your health!"

    He goes on to say, "the next major ice age could begin any day...next
    week, next month or next year." (Get that snowblower tuned-up.)

    Felix believes that someday soon we’ll be "buried beneath nine stories
    of ice and snow as the bitter climate of Greenland descends upon Canada, Britain, Norway, Sweden, the U.S. and other northern regions ---
    practically overnight."

    It’s all part of a dependable, predictable, natural cycle of climate
    that returns "like clockwork" every 11,500 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Loran@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Sat Jun 8 12:10:12 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming

    Jim Pennino wrote:
    In sci.physics Dave <dwickford@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate
    emergency,

    The Earth's climate has been in a continuous state of flux for about 4.5 billion years and has gone through numerous icehouse and greenhouse
    states.

    A greenhouse state is when no continental glaciers exist anywhere and an icehouse state is when continental glaciers do exist.

    For 85% of its history, The Earth has been in a greenhouse state.

    Understanding Earth's Deep Past. 2011-08-02. doi:10.17226/13111.
    ISBN 978-0-309-20915-1

    Earth is currently in an icehouse state with continental glaciers present
    on both poles.

    Sounds to me like business as usual for the Earth's climate.


    Consider:


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/05/03/breaking-news-the-climate-actually-changes/

    "Fossil records reveal that atmospheric CO2 levels around 600 million
    years ago were about 7,000 parts per million, compared with 379 ppm in
    2005. Then approximately 480 million years ago those levels gradually
    dropped to 4,000 ppm over about 100 million years, while average
    temperatures remained at a steady 72 degrees. They then jumped rapidly
    to 4,500 ppm and guess what! Temperatures dove to an estimated average
    similar to today, even though the CO2 level was around twelve times
    higher than now. Yes, as CO2 went up, temperatures plummeted.

    About 438 million years ago, atmospheric CO2 dropped from 4,500 ppm to
    3,000 ppm, yet according to fossil records, world temperatures shot
    rapidly back up to an average 72 degrees. So regardless of whether CO2
    levels were 7,000 ppm or 3,000 ppm, temperatures rose and fell
    independently.

    Over those past 600 million years there have been only three periods,
    including now, when Earth's average temperature has been as low as 54
    degrees. One occurred about 315 million years ago, during a 45-million-year-long cool spell called the Late Carboniferous period,
    which established the beginning of most of our planet's (gasp)
    coalfields. Both CO2 and temperatures shot back up at the end of it just
    when the main Mesozoic dinosaur era was commencing. CO2 levels rose to
    between 1,200 ppm and 1,800 ppm, and temperatures again returned to the
    average 72 degrees that Earth seemed to prefer.

    Around 180 million years ago, CO2 rocketed up from about 1,200 ppm to
    2,500 ppm. And would you believe it? This coincided again with another
    big temperature dive from 72 degrees to about 61 degrees. Then at the
    border between the Jurassic period when T. Rex ruled and the Cretaceous
    period that followed, CO2 levels dropped again, while temperatures
    soared back to 72 degrees and remained at that level (about 20 degrees
    higher than now) until long after prodigious populations of dinosaurs
    became extinct. And flatulent as those creatures may possibly have been,
    at least there is no evidence that they burned coal or drove SUVs.

    Based upon a variety of proxy indicators, such as ice core and
    oceansediment samples, our planet has endured large climate swings on a
    number of occasions over the past 1.5 million years due to a number of
    natural causes. Included are seasonal warming and cooling effects of
    plant growth cycles, greenhouse gases and aerosols emitted from volcanic eruptions, Earth orbit and solar changes, and other contributors with
    combined influences. Yet atmospheric CO2 levels have remained relatively
    low over the past 650,000 years, even during the six previous
    interglacial periods when global temperatures were as much as 9 degrees
    warmer than temperatures we currently enjoy.

    Over the past 400,000 years, much of the Northern Hemisphere has been
    covered by ice up to miles thick at regular intervals lasting about
    100,000 years each. Much shorter interglacial cycles like our current
    one lasting 12,000 to 18,000 years have offered reprieves from bitter
    cold. Yes, from this perspective current temperatures are abnormally
    warm. By about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago Earth had warmed enough to
    halt the advance of glaciers and cause sea levels to rise, and the
    average temperature has gradually increased on a fairly constant basis
    ever since, with brief intermissions."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Loran on Sat Jun 8 12:02:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.global-warming

    In sci.physics Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:
    In sci.physics Dave <dwickford@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate
    emergency,

    The Earth's climate has been in a continuous state of flux for about 4.5
    billion years and has gone through numerous icehouse and greenhouse
    states.

    A greenhouse state is when no continental glaciers exist anywhere and an
    icehouse state is when continental glaciers do exist.

    For 85% of its history, The Earth has been in a greenhouse state.

    Understanding Earth's Deep Past. 2011-08-02. doi:10.17226/13111.
    ISBN 978-0-309-20915-1

    Earth is currently in an icehouse state with continental glaciers present
    on both poles.

    Sounds to me like business as usual for the Earth's climate.


    Consider:


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/05/03/breaking-news-the-climate-actually-changes/

    "Fossil records reveal that atmospheric CO2 levels around 600 million
    years ago were about 7,000 parts per million, compared with 379 ppm in
    2005. Then approximately 480 million years ago those levels gradually
    dropped to 4,000 ppm over about 100 million years, while average
    temperatures remained at a steady 72 degrees. They then jumped rapidly
    to 4,500 ppm and guess what! Temperatures dove to an estimated average similar to today, even though the CO2 level was around twelve times
    higher than now. Yes, as CO2 went up, temperatures plummeted.

    About 438 million years ago, atmospheric CO2 dropped from 4,500 ppm to
    3,000 ppm, yet according to fossil records, world temperatures shot
    rapidly back up to an average 72 degrees. So regardless of whether CO2
    levels were 7,000 ppm or 3,000 ppm, temperatures rose and fell
    independently.

    Over those past 600 million years there have been only three periods, including now, when Earth's average temperature has been as low as 54 degrees. One occurred about 315 million years ago, during a 45-million-year-long cool spell called the Late Carboniferous period,
    which established the beginning of most of our planet's (gasp)
    coalfields. Both CO2 and temperatures shot back up at the end of it just
    when the main Mesozoic dinosaur era was commencing. CO2 levels rose to between 1,200 ppm and 1,800 ppm, and temperatures again returned to the average 72 degrees that Earth seemed to prefer.

    Around 180 million years ago, CO2 rocketed up from about 1,200 ppm to
    2,500 ppm. And would you believe it? This coincided again with another
    big temperature dive from 72 degrees to about 61 degrees. Then at the
    border between the Jurassic period when T. Rex ruled and the Cretaceous period that followed, CO2 levels dropped again, while temperatures
    soared back to 72 degrees and remained at that level (about 20 degrees
    higher than now) until long after prodigious populations of dinosaurs
    became extinct. And flatulent as those creatures may possibly have been,
    at least there is no evidence that they burned coal or drove SUVs.

    Based upon a variety of proxy indicators, such as ice core and
    oceansediment samples, our planet has endured large climate swings on a number of occasions over the past 1.5 million years due to a number of natural causes. Included are seasonal warming and cooling effects of
    plant growth cycles, greenhouse gases and aerosols emitted from volcanic eruptions, Earth orbit and solar changes, and other contributors with combined influences. Yet atmospheric CO2 levels have remained relatively
    low over the past 650,000 years, even during the six previous
    interglacial periods when global temperatures were as much as 9 degrees warmer than temperatures we currently enjoy.

    Over the past 400,000 years, much of the Northern Hemisphere has been
    covered by ice up to miles thick at regular intervals lasting about
    100,000 years each. Much shorter interglacial cycles like our current
    one lasting 12,000 to 18,000 years have offered reprieves from bitter
    cold. Yes, from this perspective current temperatures are abnormally
    warm. By about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago Earth had warmed enough to
    halt the advance of glaciers and cause sea levels to rise, and the
    average temperature has gradually increased on a fairly constant basis
    ever since, with brief intermissions."


    With significant changes taking tens of thousand of years, where is
    the "emergency"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CaLaVeRa@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Thu Jun 13 16:45:02 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, alt.global-warming

    On 6/8/2024 1:02 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
    In sci.physics Loran <loran@invalid.net> wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:
    In sci.physics Dave <dwickford@yahoo.com> wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate
    emergency,

    The Earth's climate has been in a continuous state of flux for about 4.5 >>> billion years and has gone through numerous icehouse and greenhouse
    states.

    A greenhouse state is when no continental glaciers exist anywhere and an >>> icehouse state is when continental glaciers do exist.

    For 85% of its history, The Earth has been in a greenhouse state.

    Understanding Earth's Deep Past. 2011-08-02. doi:10.17226/13111.
    ISBN 978-0-309-20915-1

    Earth is currently in an icehouse state with continental glaciers present >>> on both poles.

    Sounds to me like business as usual for the Earth's climate.


    Consider:


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/05/03/breaking-news-the-climate-actually-changes/

    "Fossil records reveal that atmospheric CO2 levels around 600 million
    years ago were about 7,000 parts per million, compared with 379 ppm in
    2005. Then approximately 480 million years ago those levels gradually
    dropped to 4,000 ppm over about 100 million years, while average
    temperatures remained at a steady 72 degrees. They then jumped rapidly
    to 4,500 ppm and guess what! Temperatures dove to an estimated average
    similar to today, even though the CO2 level was around twelve times
    higher than now. Yes, as CO2 went up, temperatures plummeted.

    About 438 million years ago, atmospheric CO2 dropped from 4,500 ppm to
    3,000 ppm, yet according to fossil records, world temperatures shot
    rapidly back up to an average 72 degrees. So regardless of whether CO2
    levels were 7,000 ppm or 3,000 ppm, temperatures rose and fell
    independently.

    Over those past 600 million years there have been only three periods,
    including now, when Earth's average temperature has been as low as 54
    degrees. One occurred about 315 million years ago, during a
    45-million-year-long cool spell called the Late Carboniferous period,
    which established the beginning of most of our planet's (gasp)
    coalfields. Both CO2 and temperatures shot back up at the end of it just
    when the main Mesozoic dinosaur era was commencing. CO2 levels rose to
    between 1,200 ppm and 1,800 ppm, and temperatures again returned to the
    average 72 degrees that Earth seemed to prefer.

    Around 180 million years ago, CO2 rocketed up from about 1,200 ppm to
    2,500 ppm. And would you believe it? This coincided again with another
    big temperature dive from 72 degrees to about 61 degrees. Then at the
    border between the Jurassic period when T. Rex ruled and the Cretaceous
    period that followed, CO2 levels dropped again, while temperatures
    soared back to 72 degrees and remained at that level (about 20 degrees
    higher than now) until long after prodigious populations of dinosaurs
    became extinct. And flatulent as those creatures may possibly have been,
    at least there is no evidence that they burned coal or drove SUVs.

    Based upon a variety of proxy indicators, such as ice core and
    oceansediment samples, our planet has endured large climate swings on a
    number of occasions over the past 1.5 million years due to a number of
    natural causes. Included are seasonal warming and cooling effects of
    plant growth cycles, greenhouse gases and aerosols emitted from volcanic
    eruptions, Earth orbit and solar changes, and other contributors with
    combined influences. Yet atmospheric CO2 levels have remained relatively
    low over the past 650,000 years, even during the six previous
    interglacial periods when global temperatures were as much as 9 degrees
    warmer than temperatures we currently enjoy.

    Over the past 400,000 years, much of the Northern Hemisphere has been
    covered by ice up to miles thick at regular intervals lasting about
    100,000 years each. Much shorter interglacial cycles like our current
    one lasting 12,000 to 18,000 years have offered reprieves from bitter
    cold. Yes, from this perspective current temperatures are abnormally
    warm. By about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago Earth had warmed enough to
    halt the advance of glaciers and cause sea levels to rise, and the
    average temperature has gradually increased on a fairly constant basis
    ever since, with brief intermissions."


    With significant changes taking tens of thousand of years, where is
    the "emergency"?



    We're just a smidge overdue on the 12,000 year solar micronova cycle.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-1q5cW_V3M

    TRIPLE CATASTROPHE - 6000-Year Cycle Happening Now

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh8369
    Heinrich event ice discharge and the fate of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

    YUXIN ZHOU HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-3523-8524 AND JERRY F. MCMANUS HTTPS://ORCID.ORG/0000-0002-7365-1600Authors Info & Affiliations
    SCIENCE
    30 May 2024
    Vol 384, Issue 6699
    pp. 983-986
    DOI: 10.1126/science.adh8369

    Editor’s summary
    Will ice mass loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet caused by climate
    warming disrupt large-scale ocean circulation? Zhou et al. reconstructed iceberg production rates during the massive calving episodes of the last glacial period, called Heinrich events, when icebergs did affect ocean circulation. The authors found that present-day Greenland Ice Sheet
    calving rates are as high as during some of those events.

    https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/could-the-day-after-tomorrow-come-true/

    A German scientist has echoed the warnings of the film The Day After
    Tomorrow, finding that a major oceanic circulation system is becoming
    more unstable – with concerning implications for the climate.

    A study published in Nature Climate Change observes that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) – a massive ocean current
    system that circulates through the Atlantic – may have been losing
    stability over the past century, due to the influx of melted freshwater
    into the ocean.

    This is concerning because the AMOC is responsible for the Gulf Stream,
    a swift current that brings warm water masses from tropical regions to
    the northern hemisphere. Because it redistributes heat, this circulation
    system is not only responsible for creating mild temperatures across
    Europe but also influencing weather systems across the world.

    “The Atlantic Meridional Overturning really is one of our planet’s key circulation systems,” says Niklas Boers, the study’s author from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Free University Berlin
    and Exeter University.

    If it collapses, it could have impacts such as significantly cooling
    Europe and affecting tropical monsoon systems.

    “We already know from some computer simulations and from data from
    Earth’s past, so-called paleoclimate proxy records, that the AMOC can
    exhibit – in addition to the currently attained strong mode – an alternative, substantially weaker mode of operation,” Boers says.

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14877

    Machine-learning prediction of tipping and collapse of the Atlantic
    Meridional Overturning Circulation
    Shirin Panahi, Ling-Wei Kong, Mohammadamin Moradi, Zheng-Meng Zhai,
    Bryan Glaz, Mulugeta Haile, Ying-Cheng Lai
    Recent research on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
    (AMOC) raised concern about its potential collapse through a tipping
    point due to the climate-change caused increase in the freshwater input
    into the North Atlantic. The predicted time window of collapse is
    centered about the middle of the century and the earliest possible start
    is approximately two years from now. More generally, anticipating a
    tipping point at which the system transitions from one stable steady
    state to another is relevant to a broad range of fields. We develop a machine-learning approach to predicting tipping in noisy dynamical
    systems with a time-varying parameter and test it on a number of systems including the AMOC, ecological networks, an electrical power system, and
    a climate model. For the AMOC, our prediction based on simulated
    fingerprint data and real data of the sea surface temperature places the
    time window of a potential collapse between the years 2040 and 2065.

    https://www.wgbh.org/news/commentary/2021-03-24/weve-known-for-years-global-warming-could-lead-to-a-new-ice-age-why-is-no-one-doing-anything

    Call it a cascade of calamitous events.

    According to scientists, a “cold blob” of water has formed south of Greenland. The blob’s origins can be traced to rapidly melting glaciers, which in turn is the consequence of global warming. The blob could
    impede the flow of the Gulf Stream, which carries warm water north. And
    if that happens, the temperature in Europe may drop steeply, hurricanes
    may become more intense, and sea levels on the East Coast of the United
    States may rise even more rapidly than they are already.

    “We’re all wishing it’s not true,” Peter de Menocal, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, told The New York Timesearlier
    this month. “Because if that happens, it’s just a monstrous change.”

    A monstrous change indeed — and one that we’ve known about for decades.
    The possibility that climate change could flip and, in just a matter of
    years, plunge part of the world into a new ice age is something that has occasionally made its way into the media. Yet the world has done very
    little about it.

    http://www.longrangeweather.com/climate_change.htm

    Recently, John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, stated that, "manmade global warming is the GREATEST SCAM IN HISTORY!"

    He went on to add, "I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by this
    theory of global warming based on fraudulent science."

    He said this, folks, not me. (But, I certainly agree with Dr. Coleman.)

    Coleman’s climatological opinion has been recently supported by a top observatory that has been measuring a rather dramatic decrease in
    sunspot activity. These scientists are predicting that global
    temperatures will drop by at least two degrees in the next 20 years.

    Our friend, Robert Felix, author of "Not By Fire, But By Ice," believes
    that this significant cool down could possibly be the start of at least
    another "Little Ice Age," possibly a new GREAT ICE AGE, which is overdue following 11,500 years of generally warmer than normal global temperatures.

    This latest period of naturally-occurring warming peaked a decade ago in
    1998. It was the strongest such cycle of warming since the days of Leif Ericcson around 1,000 A.D. At the time, the mighty Vikings were actually farming parts of Greenland growing wheat, vegetables and raising cattle.
    They actually grew tomatoes and grapes!

    Robert Felix gives this warning: "Living in the northern U.S. could
    eventually be hazardous to your health!"

    He goes on to say, "the next major ice age could begin any day...next
    week, next month or next year." (Get that snowblower tuned-up.)

    Felix believes that someday soon we’ll be "buried beneath nine stories
    of ice and snow as the bitter climate of Greenland descends upon Canada, Britain, Norway, Sweden, the U.S. and other northern regions ---
    practically overnight."

    It’s all part of a dependable, predictable, natural cycle of climate
    that returns "like clockwork" every 11,500 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave@21:1/5 to Dave on Fri Jun 14 11:39:55 2024
    XPost: sci.physics, uk.politics.misc

    On 24 18, Dave wrote:
    On 24 11, Dave wrote:
    Going forward in technology and society, and mindful of the climate
    emergency, it is fairly important people don't give up on physics at
    the earliest opportunity.  In summary there are 4 key areas of
    evidence missing to convince people of Newtonian mechanics and gravity
    at the human scale.

    1- timed freefall drops from gravity measured with precision.
    Sixty meters minimum, better in a vacuum.

    2- gyros in a closed box with F=ma. There is constant mass, yet you
    know if the gyro is spinning or not.

    3- an experiment of firing something up at known speed,
    see how it gets and measure speed on the way down.
    Useful for mgh and 1/2mv^2 energy equivalence, potential and kinetic
    energy

    4- missing linear air cart (track) videos for collision checks -
    difference between kinetic energy and momentum, and elastic and
    inelastic collisions

    Another useful experiment to run is firing rockets downwards.
    Newton says the rocket acceleration and the gravity would add up
    linearly. Relativity would say it doesn't work like this because
    you're pushing against the natural inclination of the spacetime.
    Only experiment can tell which is correct. Beyond a school budget this
    one, unfortunately.

    Again it can be noted that these are not calculations,
    but measurements from a real world experiments which
    should easily agree with the laws of physics.





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)