• Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems work well WITHOUT lo

    From Andrew@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Jun 29 04:54:02 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a true statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not even Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic functionality (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    Is my statement correct for all the non-Apple common consumer systems?
    Q: Does any non-Apple common OS require a mothership account for the
    basic functionality of the operating system that people love about it?

    That's all I ask to flesh out here, as I care only about the truth.

    I will only respond to those who stick to the topic of whether the
    non-Apple operating systems ALSO are set up on the dumb-terminal model
    (with the inherent loss of privacy, particularly in meta-data collection).

    Below is simply a note I wrote today, in response to a question on the
    Apple iOS newsgroup about what happens if you DENY Apple's daily requests
    to log into their mainframe servers in order to obtain basic iOS
    functionality (which I did on two iPads for two years and Apple bricked
    them at the conclusion of those two years of refusing to log into Apple).

    ===< Please cut below for the content of the message I wrote for iOS >===
    From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
    Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad
    Subject: Re: Ignoring requests for Apple ID
    Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:44:43 -0000 (UTC)
    Message-ID: <v5o3fr$148g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
    X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65

    Your Name wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 16:11:51 +1200 :

    On 2024-06-29 01:29:59 +0000, <bp@www.zefox.net> said:

    For some time the iPhone6 I carry for emergencies has asked
    for my apple ID. I always touch "not now" and go about my
    business. So far, there hasn't been any repercussion and
    the phone works when I need it.

    Why is the phone asking, and will something bad happen, like the
    phone not working, if I keep hitting "not now"?

    Thanks for reading,

    bob prohaska

    Shouldn't be any problem, but there are many reasons why it might be
    asking for it, so you may want to look into why it keeps asking. Apple
    ID is required for things like iCloud features, updating of apps of
    iOS, recent changes to your Touch ID or Face ID, etc., etc.

    When you buy an Apple product - you buy into the dumb-terminal ecosystem.

    Worse, you buy into Apple storing huge amounts of your metadata on the net!
    *I asked Apple for all my data. Here's what was sent back*
    <https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-data-collection-stored-request/>

    These files "contain metadata, like when and who I messaged or called on FaceTime" which is a privacy flaw inherent in the dumb-terminal model.

    For example, Apple unilaterally inserts, into every IPA you install, a
    *unique* code specific only to you so that Apple can track app activity.

    For example, Apple keeps a copy of every app and song you have ever
    downloaded and every tune you've ever added to your iTunes music library.

    Most users are completely unaware there is no common consumer operating
    system other than Apple's which require you to constantly log into their mothership servers for the basic functionality you know & love about iOS.

    And Apple never advertises the huge amount of data it stores about you. *Apple took 8 days to give me the data it had collected on me. It was
    eye opening* <https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/05/04/asked-apple-everything-had-me-heres-what-got/558362002/>

    Apple uses some of this immense data to"sell targeted ads based on our interests in the News and App Store apps" (see that in the references cited since most of the Apple religious zealots hate all truths about Apple).

    1. The walled garden does not work if you don't log into Apple servers.
    2. There are *many* Apple servers you need to log into for it to work.
    3. There's the iCloud & the Apple AppStore, Messages, Facetime, etc.

    On two separate iPads, I have refused to log into those accounts, and what happens, naturally, is you are eventually unable to use the walled garden.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR5mZ287/appleid07.jpg> Apple fails App Store test
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TwN6P0QR/appleid08.jpg> Only Apple requires a login
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    But you can use "some" of the features of the walled garden; just not all.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9XtgRz0y/mothership01.jpg> Apple forces verification
    <https://i.postimg.cc/q73jkvWh/mothership02.jpg> into mothership trackers
    <https://i.postimg.cc/7hmNBGJc/mothership03.jpg> Safari & Chrome work fine
    <https://i.postimg.cc/GhmK4QZ1/mothership04.jpg> So does Youtube work fine
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vBv7BghB/mothership05.jpg> No problem with web pages
    <https://i.postimg.cc/xjtyVmqp/mothership06.jpg> The walled garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ht79m3sN/mothership07.jpg> iMessage garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/5tBL7YZ3/mothership08.jpg> FaceTime garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y09FCXjn/mothership09.jpg> App Store finds 1Blocker
    <https://i.postimg.cc/tC869Nbk/mothership10.jpg> App Store installs apps
    <https://i.postimg.cc/FKVkgtLC/mothership11.jpg> But it won't do iCloud

    Which means, Apple designed iOS as a "dumb terminal" which gets much of its beloved functionality only by logging into Apple's mainframe servers for
    most of the beloved walled-garden functionality - without which - the iOS device reverts to a dumb terminal that can't do what you love about iOS.

    Paradoxically, while all the beloved walled-garden functionality eventually disappears after about two years (tested on two different iPads) of
    refusing to log into the walled-garden Apple servers, the one functionality that remained was the capability of updating your operating system version.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvhgB91S/update01.jpg> iPadOS 16.3.1 is available
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qtfsw654/update02.jpg> 16.3.1 Update Requested
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vmLGL8md/update03.jpg> About 10 minutes remaining
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d11gkJk6/update04.jpg> Preparing Update
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rw1B7n21/update05.jpg> Downloaded
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yN7MKm7w/update06.jpg> Finish Setting Up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/13DSsRwN/update07.jpg> More for your iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xv80B22j/update08.jpg> Update Apple ID Settings
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYLGNJP0/update09.jpg> iPadOS Version 16.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L509Yy8Y/update10.jpg> Sign in to iCloud
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zvfDfm8Y/update11.jpg> Finished Setting up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5Nbnxtn/update12.jpg> Verifying update...

    In summary, of all common consumer operating systems (including Windows
    11), only the Apple operating systems are designed essentially as dumb terminals which don't do what you love about them without logging into the mainframe servers, of which you are logged into them 24/7/365 while
    enjoying Apple products.

    Clearly Apple never advertises that most of the genius of the walled garden
    is simply that the user is making use of these Internet services, all of
    which are tracked in detail and every one of which contains privacy
    metadata which can be detrimental to your privacy & which is saved by
    Apple.

    When you buy an Apple product - you buy into the dumb-terminal ecosystem.

    Here's a snippet of the information Apple maintains due to the inherently flawed nature (from a privacy standpoint) of the dumb-terminal iOS model.

    AccountDetails.xlsx contains basic information about the account holder, including name, address, phone number, and Apple ID information. It also includes when an account was created and IP address of the Apple server
    used to open the account.

    iCloudLogs.xlsx keeps a note on every time one of your devices downloads
    data from iCloud, including your photo library, contacts, and Safari
    browsing history -- but doesn't contain the actual data.

    MailLogs.xlsx also keeps a record of each time something from your Apple
    device interacts with your iCloud email account, but no email content is
    stored here.

    Two more files relate to Apple's flagship end-to-end encrypted messaging
    apps, FaceTime and iMessage. Because even Apple can't access the content of encrypted video calls and text messages, Apple can't turn over the data,
    but it can provide information on all the calls and messages that are
    routed through its servers.

    In both the FaceTime and IDS (iMessage) logs, notes read that the logs only indicate if there was an attempt to place a FaceTime call or to send an iMessage, because both requests are sent through Apple's servers. But
    neither log whether the call was made or message was sent, let alone if it
    was successful.

    In a separate folder, another batch of Excel documents contained
    information mostly pertaining to with my interactions with Apple, like downloads and support requests.

    AOS Orders contains an entire history of devices and accessories I've
    bought from Apple dating back to my first purchase. It also includes the
    five separate occasions I bought new earphones roughly once per year
    because my cat had chewed through them.

    CRM Installed Product is a list of every Apple device ever bought,
    including highly detailed information -- like serial numbers, a note on if
    a device is unlocked, unique networking MAC addresses for Bluetooth,
    Ethernet and Wi-Fi connections, and any other identifying information on a device.

    Read also: What would Steve Jobs think of today's Apple?

    CRM AppleCare Case Contact contains basic contact information on the
    account holder, such as name, address, and phone number -- and if the user
    opts into marketing emails and phone calls.

    CRM AppleCare Case Header included every interaction I've had with customer support. Every time you call, a company representatives make notes about
    the customer's problem, and also describes the next steps or the outcome of
    the call.

    CRM Warranty includes all the information on a device owner's warranty,
    what AppleCare coverage they have -- if any, and when warranties expire.

    DS Signons is a long list of every time you logged in to iTunes and from
    which specific device, and contains peripheral information like if the
    login failed.

    Game Center predictably contains information on all the gaming sessions a
    user has played or interacted with -- which in my case, as you'd expect, is limited to almost zero.

    iForgot keeps a log of every time you visited your Apple ID page on the
    web, or reset your password.

    iTunes Match Uploads retains a record of every song you've ever uploaded to iTunes Match service, which matches your music with higher quality and downloads that copy instead. The list also includes your user agent information, which can identify your device.

    iTunes Match Downloads similarly keeps a list of all matched music that's
    later downloaded from iTunes Match.

    iTunes Downloads contains a user's entire download history since the
    account's creation -- from apps, songs, albums, videos, and movies -- from
    the iTunes Store. It also includes information on which device the item was downloaded and its IP address.

    Repair Transaction Details recounts every time you put in a repair request
    with Apple, and includes information on what the issue is, any notes made
    by Apple staff, and any information that identifies the device, such as a phone's IMEI number.

    Marketing Contact includes the information that Apple uses to contact you
    for marketing reasons, and the reason why -- such as if the user has a developer account.

    In summary, the advantage of Apple's dumb-terminal design of iOS is most of
    the magic you love about the walled garden is handled by Internet servers (which is why all that is reproduced in Android, only with the addition of
    all platform compatibility - not just Apple platforms - if you're willing
    to log into an Internet server to perform those walled-garden tasks).

    The disadvantage of every app you use being tracked by Apple and every
    action being tracked by your Internet login into the mainframe servers,
    is Apple tracks a hellova lot of meta data about you that impacts privacy.

    ===< Please cut above for the content of the message I wrote for iOS >===

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Jun 28 22:35:40 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-06-28 21:54, Andrew wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    Yup.

    Just fine, thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bilsch01@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Jun 28 23:24:36 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 6/28/2024 9:54 PM, Andrew wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a true statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not even Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic functionality (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    Is my statement correct for all the non-Apple common consumer systems?
    Q: Does any non-Apple common OS require a mothership account for the
    basic functionality of the operating system that people love about it?

    That's all I ask to flesh out here, as I care only about the truth.

    I will only respond to those who stick to the topic of whether the
    non-Apple operating systems ALSO are set up on the dumb-terminal model
    (with the inherent loss of privacy, particularly in meta-data collection).

    Below is simply a note I wrote today, in response to a question on the
    Apple iOS newsgroup about what happens if you DENY Apple's daily requests
    to log into their mainframe servers in order to obtain basic iOS functionality (which I did on two iPads for two years and Apple bricked
    them at the conclusion of those two years of refusing to log into Apple).

    ===< Please cut below for the content of the message I wrote for iOS >===
    From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
    Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad
    Subject: Re: Ignoring requests for Apple ID
    Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:44:43 -0000 (UTC)
    Message-ID: <v5o3fr$148g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
    X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65

    Your Name wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 16:11:51 +1200 :

    > On 2024-06-29 01:29:59 +0000, <bp@www.zefox.net> said:
    >>
    >> For some time the iPhone6 I carry for emergencies has asked
    >> for my apple ID. I always touch "not now" and go about my
    >> business. So far, there hasn't been any repercussion and
    >> the phone works when I need it.
    >>
    >> Why is the phone asking, and will something bad happen, like the
    >> phone not working, if I keep hitting "not now"?
    >>
    >> Thanks for reading,
    >>
    >> bob prohaska
    >
    > Shouldn't be any problem, but there are many reasons why it might be
    > asking for it, so you may want to look into why it keeps asking. Apple
    > ID is required for things like iCloud features, updating of apps of
    > iOS, recent changes to your Touch ID or Face ID, etc., etc.

    When you buy an Apple product - you buy into the dumb-terminal ecosystem.

    Worse, you buy into Apple storing huge amounts of your metadata on the net!
    *I asked Apple for all my data. Here's what was sent back*
    <https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-data-collection-stored-request/>

    These files "contain metadata, like when and who I messaged or called on FaceTime" which is a privacy flaw inherent in the dumb-terminal model.

    For example, Apple unilaterally inserts, into every IPA you install, a *unique* code specific only to you so that Apple can track app activity.

    For example, Apple keeps a copy of every app and song you have ever downloaded and every tune you've ever added to your iTunes music library.

    Most users are completely unaware there is no common consumer operating system other than Apple's which require you to constantly log into their mothership servers for the basic functionality you know & love about iOS.

    And Apple never advertises the huge amount of data it stores about you. ���*Apple took 8 days to give me the data it had collected on me. It was
    eye opening* ���<https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/05/04/asked-apple-everything-had-me-heres-what-got/558362002/>

    Apple uses some of this immense data to"sell targeted ads based on our interests in the News and App Store apps" (see that in the references cited since most of the Apple religious zealots hate all truths about Apple).

    1. The walled garden does not work if you don't log into Apple servers.
    2. There are *many* Apple servers you need to log into for it to work.
    3. There's the iCloud & the Apple AppStore, Messages, Facetime, etc.

    On two separate iPads, I have refused to log into those accounts, and what happens, naturally, is you are eventually unable to use the walled garden.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR5mZ287/appleid07.jpg> Apple fails App Store test
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TwN6P0QR/appleid08.jpg> Only Apple requires a login
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    But you can use "some" of the features of the walled garden; just not all.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9XtgRz0y/mothership01.jpg> Apple forces verification
    <https://i.postimg.cc/q73jkvWh/mothership02.jpg> into mothership trackers
    <https://i.postimg.cc/7hmNBGJc/mothership03.jpg> Safari & Chrome work fine
    <https://i.postimg.cc/GhmK4QZ1/mothership04.jpg> So does Youtube work fine
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vBv7BghB/mothership05.jpg> No problem with web pages
    <https://i.postimg.cc/xjtyVmqp/mothership06.jpg> The walled garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ht79m3sN/mothership07.jpg> iMessage garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/5tBL7YZ3/mothership08.jpg> FaceTime garden fails
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y09FCXjn/mothership09.jpg> App Store finds 1Blocker
    <https://i.postimg.cc/tC869Nbk/mothership10.jpg> App Store installs apps
    <https://i.postimg.cc/FKVkgtLC/mothership11.jpg> But it won't do iCloud

    Which means, Apple designed iOS as a "dumb terminal" which gets much of its beloved functionality only by logging into Apple's mainframe servers for
    most of the beloved walled-garden functionality - without which - the iOS device reverts to a dumb terminal that can't do what you love about iOS.

    Paradoxically, while all the beloved walled-garden functionality eventually disappears after about two years (tested on two different iPads) of
    refusing to log into the walled-garden Apple servers, the one functionality that remained was the capability of updating your operating system version.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvhgB91S/update01.jpg> iPadOS 16.3.1 is available
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qtfsw654/update02.jpg> 16.3.1 Update Requested
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vmLGL8md/update03.jpg> About 10 minutes remaining
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d11gkJk6/update04.jpg> Preparing Update
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rw1B7n21/update05.jpg> Downloaded
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yN7MKm7w/update06.jpg> Finish Setting Up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/13DSsRwN/update07.jpg> More for your iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xv80B22j/update08.jpg> Update Apple ID Settings
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYLGNJP0/update09.jpg> iPadOS Version 16.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L509Yy8Y/update10.jpg> Sign in to iCloud
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zvfDfm8Y/update11.jpg> Finished Setting up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5Nbnxtn/update12.jpg> Verifying update...

    In summary, of all common consumer operating systems (including Windows
    11), only the Apple operating systems are designed essentially as dumb terminals which don't do what you love about them without logging into the mainframe servers, of which you are logged into them 24/7/365 while
    enjoying Apple products.

    Clearly Apple never advertises that most of the genius of the walled garden is simply that the user is making use of these Internet services, all of which are tracked in detail and every one of which contains privacy
    metadata which can be detrimental to your privacy & which is saved by
    Apple.

    When you buy an Apple product - you buy into the dumb-terminal ecosystem.

    Here's a snippet of the information Apple maintains due to the inherently flawed nature (from a privacy standpoint) of the dumb-terminal iOS model.

    AccountDetails.xlsx contains basic information about the account holder, including name, address, phone number, and Apple ID information. It also includes when an account was created and IP address of the Apple server
    used to open the account.

    iCloudLogs.xlsx keeps a note on every time one of your devices downloads
    data from iCloud, including your photo library, contacts, and Safari
    browsing history -- but doesn't contain the actual data.

    MailLogs.xlsx also keeps a record of each time something from your Apple device interacts with your iCloud email account, but no email content is stored here.

    Two more files relate to Apple's flagship end-to-end encrypted messaging apps, FaceTime and iMessage. Because even Apple can't access the content of encrypted video calls and text messages, Apple can't turn over the data,
    but it can provide information on all the calls and messages that are
    routed through its servers.

    In both the FaceTime and IDS (iMessage) logs, notes read that the logs only indicate if there was an attempt to place a FaceTime call or to send an iMessage, because both requests are sent through Apple's servers. But
    neither log whether the call was made or message was sent, let alone if it was successful.

    In a separate folder, another batch of Excel documents contained
    information mostly pertaining to with my interactions with Apple, like downloads and support requests.

    AOS Orders contains an entire history of devices and accessories I've
    bought from Apple dating back to my first purchase. It also includes the
    five separate occasions I bought new earphones roughly once per year
    because my cat had chewed through them.

    CRM Installed Product is a list of every Apple device ever bought,
    including highly detailed information -- like serial numbers, a note on if
    a device is unlocked, unique networking MAC addresses for Bluetooth,
    Ethernet and Wi-Fi connections, and any other identifying information on a device.

    Read also: What would Steve Jobs think of today's Apple?

    CRM AppleCare Case Contact contains basic contact information on the
    account holder, such as name, address, and phone number -- and if the user opts into marketing emails and phone calls.

    CRM AppleCare Case Header included every interaction I've had with customer support. Every time you call, a company representatives make notes about
    the customer's problem, and also describes the next steps or the outcome of the call.

    CRM Warranty includes all the information on a device owner's warranty,
    what AppleCare coverage they have -- if any, and when warranties expire.

    DS Signons is a long list of every time you logged in to iTunes and from which specific device, and contains peripheral information like if the
    login failed.

    Game Center predictably contains information on all the gaming sessions a user has played or interacted with -- which in my case, as you'd expect, is limited to almost zero.

    iForgot keeps a log of every time you visited your Apple ID page on the
    web, or reset your password.

    iTunes Match Uploads retains a record of every song you've ever uploaded to iTunes Match service, which matches your music with higher quality and downloads that copy instead. The list also includes your user agent information, which can identify your device.

    iTunes Match Downloads similarly keeps a list of all matched music that's later downloaded from iTunes Match.

    iTunes Downloads contains a user's entire download history since the account's creation -- from apps, songs, albums, videos, and movies -- from the iTunes Store. It also includes information on which device the item was downloaded and its IP address.

    Repair Transaction Details recounts every time you put in a repair request with Apple, and includes information on what the issue is, any notes made
    by Apple staff, and any information that identifies the device, such as a phone's IMEI number.

    Marketing Contact includes the information that Apple uses to contact you
    for marketing reasons, and the reason why -- such as if the user has a developer account.

    In summary, the advantage of Apple's dumb-terminal design of iOS is most of the magic you love about the walled garden is handled by Internet servers (which is why all that is reproduced in Android, only with the addition of all platform compatibility - not just Apple platforms - if you're willing
    to log into an Internet server to perform those walled-garden tasks).

    The disadvantage of every app you use being tracked by Apple and every
    action being tracked by your Internet login into the mainframe servers,
    is Apple tracks a hellova lot of meta data about you that impacts privacy.

    ===< Please cut above for the content of the message I wrote for iOS >===
    Andrew,
    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill S.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Jun 29 03:47:18 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 6/29/2024 12:54 AM, Andrew wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a true statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not even Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic functionality (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    Is my statement correct for all the non-Apple common consumer systems?
    Q: Does any non-Apple common OS require a mothership account for the
    basic functionality of the operating system that people love about it?

    You can ask ecosystem questions, of Copilot.

    *******

    Question for CoPilot:

    Of all the Apple hardware products, which products require a
    cloud login to function day-to-day ?

    Answer:

    Apple's hardware products are designed to work seamlessly with their
    ecosystem of services. While most Apple devices can function independently without a constant cloud connection, some features and services do rely
    on cloud integration.

    Here are the key products and scenarios where cloud login is relevant:

    1. **iPhone and iPad**:
    - **iCloud**: iPhones and iPads heavily rely on iCloud for features
    like device backup, photo synchronization, Find My iPhone,
    and seamless app data sharing across devices.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the App Store, users need an
    Apple ID (which is tied to iCloud).

    2. **MacBooks and iMacs**:
    - **iCloud**: Similar to iOS devices, Macs use iCloud for data synchronization, Keychain, and Find My Mac.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the Mac App Store, users need an Apple ID.

    3. **Apple Watch**:
    - **iCloud**: Apple Watches sync health data, watch faces, and settings through iCloud.
    - **Activation Lock**: If the watch is lost or stolen, Activation Lock prevents unauthorized use.

    4. **Apple TV**:
    - **Apple ID**: Users need an Apple ID to access the App Store, stream content from
    Apple TV+, and use features like HomeKit.

    5. **HomePod and HomePod mini**:
    - **Apple ID**: HomePods require an Apple ID for setup and access to
    Apple Music, HomeKit, and personalized features.

    6. **AirPods and AirPods Pro**:
    - While AirPods themselves don't require cloud login, features like
    automatic switching between devices and Find My AirPods rely on iCloud.

    7. **Apple Services**:
    - **Apple Music**: Requires an Apple Music subscription and iCloud Music Library
    for seamless music streaming across devices.
    - **Apple TV+**: Subscribers need an Apple ID to access Apple's streaming service.
    - **iMessage and FaceTime**: These messaging services work across devices using iCloud.

    8. **HomeKit-Compatible Devices**:
    - Devices like smart lights, thermostats, and security cameras integrated with
    HomeKit require an Apple ID for setup and remote control via iCloud.

    Remember that while cloud login enhances the user experience by enabling synchronization
    and seamless transitions between devices, it's not strictly necessary for basic functionality.
    Users can choose to use local accounts for some features and services.

    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Introduction to Apple platform security - Apple Support.
    https://support.apple.com/guide/security/intro-to-apple-platform-security-seccd5016d31/web

    (2) Apple at Work - Platform Security.
    https://www.apple.com/business/docs/site/AAW_Platform_Security.pdf

    (3) How to use Apple’s advanced iCloud security tools.
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1618339/how-to-use-apples-advanced-icloud-security-tools.html

    *******

    Question: When using ChromeOS, do I need a cloud login to make it work ?

    **ChromeOS**, the operating system developed by Google, is designed to
    work seamlessly with cloud-based services. Here are some key points regarding ChromeOS and cloud login:

    1. **Cloud-Centric Approach**:
    - **ChromeOS** is inherently cloud-centric. It relies heavily on cloud services for
    storage, synchronization, and application functionality.

    - When you sign in to a Chromebook or ChromeOS device, you typically use your
    **Google Account** credentials. This account serves as your gateway to
    the cloud-based ecosystem.

    2. **Google Account Sign-In**:
    - **Users must enter their Google Account username and password each time they
    sign in to their device**.

    - If your organization uses **SAML single sign-on (SSO)** for devices, users
    are directed to the SAML identity provider (IdP) page without manually
    entering their email address².

    3. **ChromeOS Flex**:
    - Google offers **ChromeOS Flex**, a secure, cloud-based OS for PCs and Macs.
    It brings the benefits of ChromeOS to existing devices.

    - With **ChromeOS Flex**, you can make your existing PCs and Macs faster and
    more secure. It offers features like 6-second boot-up times and automatic background updates.

    - Set-up is straightforward: create a bootable ChromeOS Flex USB drive, install
    it on your PC or Mac to replace the existing operating system, and upgrade
    other legacy devices via USB or network deployment¹.

    4. **Offline Capabilities**:
    - While ChromeOS is cloud-centric, it does have **offline capabilities**.
    You can work offline with certain apps and files.
    - However, the full power of ChromeOS is realized when connected to the internet,
    as it leverages cloud services for data storage, synchronization, and collaboration⁵.

    In summary, while ChromeOS doesn't strictly require a cloud login, its
    design philosophy revolves around cloud integration. Whether you're using
    a Chromebook or ChromeOS on other devices, having a Google Account enhances
    the experience by enabling seamless access to cloud-based services.

    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Set ChromeOS device policies - Chrome Enterprise and Education Help.
    https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/1375678?hl=en
    (2) Upgrade Your PC: Faster and More Secure with ChromeOS Flex.
    https://chromeos.google/products/chromeos-flex/
    (3) Chrome OS offline: Can you really use a Chromebook without the cloud ....
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1485641/chrome-os-offline-can-you-really-use-a-chromebook-without-the-cloud.html

    (4) Google: We don't need Chrome OS, we want cloud login for PCs.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-we-dont-need-chrome-os-we-want-cloud-login-for-pcs/ <==== Year 2011

    (5) Get started with Chrome & ChromeOS device management.
    https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/13781354?hl=en

    Article number (4) there, highlights the financial importance of
    associating an account with an advertising profile you have for sale.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Big Al@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Jun 29 14:13:38 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 6/29/24 12:54 AM, Andrew wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a true statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not even Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic functionality (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    As far as I have seen, Linux does not require any hooks into any Windows, Google, Apple, Mac
    connections.
    As you or something in your article said, adding account logins just enhances the experience. I
    myself use the google calendar events that show on my Android phone and now show on my Linux calendar.
    --
    Linux Mint 21.3, Cinnamon 6.0.4, Kernel 5.15.0-113-generic
    Al

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Big Al on Sat Jun 29 21:38:19 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Big Al wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 14:13:38 -0400 :

    As far as I have seen, Linux does not require any hooks into any Windows, Google, Apple, Mac
    connections.

    Thanks for checking on Linux, as I haven't used 'nix since I stopped dual booting to Centos & Windows 10 (to turn off Windows update), long ago.

    Paul brought up ChromeOS, which does use, pretty much, the dumb-terminal concept which negates basic functionality if you're not logged in 24/7/365.

    Even Windows S, kind of, is a dumb-terminal concept in that it requires you
    to use the Windows App Store (as far as I know) for basic functionality.

    1. Linux = does not require mothership login for basic functionality
    2. ChromeOS = essentially requires mothership login for basic functionality
    3. Windows S = requires mothership login for basic functionality
    4. Windows 10 = does not require mothership login for basic functionality
    5. Windows 11 = I think it does not require the mothership login (right?)

    As you or something in your article said, adding account logins just enhances the experience.

    +1. Agree.

    There is no doubt that having an Internet login "enhances the experience".

    Although, once you're on Linux, there are plenty of servers you can use!
    a. Home Calendar server
    <https://www.linux.com/training-tutorials/five-best-open-source-calendar-servers-linux/>
    b. Home WebDav server
    <https://reintech.io/blog/installing-configuring-webdav-server-ubuntu-22> c. Home FileSync server
    <https://www.resilio.com/blog/linux-file-sync>
    d. Home CardDav contacts server
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CardDAV>

    Although there are some Windows servers, most work best with Linux, right?
    <https://help.goodsync.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002527572-Syncing-in-a-mixed-environment>

    There is a ton of "magic" that the dumb-terminal gains by logging into the
    huge mainframe servers, of that there is no doubt.

    That's where Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, PulseSMS, etc., gain much of their magic; but there's also a privacy downside to the fact that every single
    thing you do is tied to a single well-identified username & password
    account (particularly when meta data is stored and hence can be retrieved).

    Personally, I prefer that Internet account to be "optional", much as it is
    with Windows 10 where I can't think of a single app that I'd want from the Microsoft Store that I can't get from outside of the Microsoft Store.

    Can you?

    I myself use the google calendar events that show on my Android phone and now show on my Linux calendar.

    Yes. Agreed.

    Personally, I prefer to set up my own calendar server, for privacy.

    But here's where Linux is better than all the other platforms in that the WebDAV and CalDAV and CardDav, etc., servers are usually best on Linux.

    Right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Paul on Sat Jun 29 21:19:03 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Paul wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 03:47:18 -0400 :

    You can ask ecosystem questions, of Copilot.

    Hi Paul,
    I studied AI in the late 1970's in grad school, and it bored me even then
    (at that time it was all about probabilities and correcting them
    endlessly), so I haven't kept up with the capabilities of AI lately.

    Googling...

    1. Copilot (Microsoft, previously BingChat, included in Windows 11,
    apparently Copilot is on Windows 10 but in some limited fashion)
    <https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/how-to-use-microsoft-copilot-ai-what-to-try>
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/welcome-to-copilot-on-windows-675708af-8c16-4675-afeb-85a5a476ccb0>
    2. Gemini (Google, requires account, privacy implications)
    <https://dorik.com/blog/how-to-use-gemini-ai>
    3. ChatGPT (apparently it does not require a login to work via text only)
    <https://chatgpt.com/auth/login>
    <https://www.howtogeek.com/how-to-run-chatgpt-as-a-windows-app/>
    4. Apple AI (doesn't actually work in the real world, only iPhone 15 Pro,
    & doesn't work in Europe, etc., so it's mostly mere marketing fluff)
    <https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/06/introducing-apple-intelligence-for-iphone-ipad-and-mac/>
    5. Others?

    The trick, of course, at least for free, is to get one of these to work via voice alone (STT and then TTS), which I do not think exists yet. Does it?

    *******

    Question for CoPilot:

    Of all the Apple hardware products, which products require a
    cloud login to function day-to-day ?

    Answer:

    Apple's hardware products are designed to work seamlessly with their ecosystem of services. While most Apple devices can function independently without a constant cloud connection, some features and services do rely
    on cloud integration.

    Here are the key products and scenarios where cloud login is relevant:

    1. **iPhone and iPad**:
    - **iCloud**: iPhones and iPads heavily rely on iCloud for features
    like device backup, photo synchronization, Find My iPhone,
    and seamless app data sharing across devices.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the App Store, users need an
    Apple ID (which is tied to iCloud).

    2. **MacBooks and iMacs**:
    - **iCloud**: Similar to iOS devices, Macs use iCloud for data synchronization, Keychain, and Find My Mac.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the Mac App Store, users need an Apple ID.

    3. **Apple Watch**:
    - **iCloud**: Apple Watches sync health data, watch faces, and settings through iCloud.
    - **Activation Lock**: If the watch is lost or stolen, Activation Lock prevents unauthorized use.

    4. **Apple TV**:
    - **Apple ID**: Users need an Apple ID to access the App Store, stream content from
    Apple TV+, and use features like HomeKit.

    5. **HomePod and HomePod mini**:
    - **Apple ID**: HomePods require an Apple ID for setup and access to
    Apple Music, HomeKit, and personalized features.

    6. **AirPods and AirPods Pro**:
    - While AirPods themselves don't require cloud login, features like
    automatic switching between devices and Find My AirPods rely on iCloud.

    7. **Apple Services**:
    - **Apple Music**: Requires an Apple Music subscription and iCloud Music Library
    for seamless music streaming across devices.
    - **Apple TV+**: Subscribers need an Apple ID to access Apple's streaming service.
    - **iMessage and FaceTime**: These messaging services work across devices using iCloud.

    8. **HomeKit-Compatible Devices**:
    - Devices like smart lights, thermostats, and security cameras integrated with
    HomeKit require an Apple ID for setup and remote control via iCloud.

    This is a good summary Paul. Very good. Thanks. AI is useful I guess.

    Notice that the users' App Store login is required ONLY on Apple devices;
    it is not required on Android or Linux or Windows (AFAIAA).

    I haven't had any Google (or Samsung) account on my Galaxy for years, and I
    can easily download off the Google Play Store repository without it.

    Having said that, I do realize most people log into their Google Account to download apps from the Google Play Store; but it turns out that there are
    FOSS Google Play Store clients (such as Aurora) that negate that need.
    <https://aurorastore.org/> & <https://auroraoss.com/>

    Same with YouTube, where there are FOSS YouTube clients which negate the
    need to create an account on your phone & still get full functionality.
    <https://newpipe.net/>

    Same with the MUA, where there are plenty of privacy-aware MUAs on Android.
    <https://email.faircode.eu/>

    I don't know all that it's missing but I know it's missing the fact that
    the messaging app, the way 99.99% of Apple users use it anyway, requires logging into the Apple Messaging servers. Which is a horrible privacy hole.

    The Apple users "think" they have privacy; but it's only because Apple
    cleverly advertises that - but in reality - Apple knows EVERY message they
    make (due to the extensive metadata that Apple gets from the login action).

    Note: The iOS messages app can work with SMS/MMS *without logging into*
    Apple's servers, but only 0.01% of Apple users would even know that, and
    even fewer would do that because they then lose the walled-garden niceties
    that the dumb-terminal design of the iPhone/iPad provide those users.

    Bear in mind, the dumb-terminal design has merits even in non Apple worlds.

    If Linux/Android/Windows users felt like logging into an Internet server,
    they too would have all that walled-garden magic - plus compatibility.
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    Speaking of all the nice things that happen when you log into Internet
    servers, I'm sure WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and many others using the dumb-terminal concept also get those niceties - but since they're not
    required to use messaging on Android, Linux and Windows, they're extras.

    Remember that while cloud login enhances the user experience by enabling synchronization
    and seamless transitions between devices, it's not strictly necessary for basic functionality.
    Users can choose to use local accounts for some features and services.

    The cloud itself isn't required for "basic functionality", but you can't do
    all the messaging things Apple owners crow about (like saving all your messages) without the dumb-terminal logging into the mainframe server - as
    most of those magical things (like the end-to-end encryption) require the metadata-saving account on the server.


    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Introduction to Apple platform security - Apple Support.
    https://support.apple.com/guide/security/intro-to-apple-platform-security-seccd5016d31/web

    (2) Apple at Work - Platform Security.
    https://www.apple.com/business/docs/site/AAW_Platform_Security.pdf

    (3) How to use Apple's advanced iCloud security tools.
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1618339/how-to-use-apples-advanced-icloud-security-tools.html

    *******

    Question: When using ChromeOS, do I need a cloud login to make it work ?

    **ChromeOS**, the operating system developed by Google, is designed to
    work seamlessly with cloud-based services. Here are some key points regarding ChromeOS and cloud login:

    1. **Cloud-Centric Approach**:
    - **ChromeOS** is inherently cloud-centric. It relies heavily on cloud services for
    storage, synchronization, and application functionality.

    - When you sign in to a Chromebook or ChromeOS device, you typically use your
    **Google Account** credentials. This account serves as your gateway to
    the cloud-based ecosystem.

    2. **Google Account Sign-In**:
    - **Users must enter their Google Account username and password each time they
    sign in to their device**.

    - If your organization uses **SAML single sign-on (SSO)** for devices, users
    are directed to the SAML identity provider (IdP) page without manually
    entering their email address².

    3. **ChromeOS Flex**:
    - Google offers **ChromeOS Flex**, a secure, cloud-based OS for PCs and Macs.
    It brings the benefits of ChromeOS to existing devices.

    - With **ChromeOS Flex**, you can make your existing PCs and Macs faster and
    more secure. It offers features like 6-second boot-up times and automatic background updates.

    - Set-up is straightforward: create a bootable ChromeOS Flex USB drive, install
    it on your PC or Mac to replace the existing operating system, and upgrade
    other legacy devices via USB or network deployment¹.

    4. **Offline Capabilities**:
    - While ChromeOS is cloud-centric, it does have **offline capabilities**.
    You can work offline with certain apps and files.
    - However, the full power of ChromeOS is realized when connected to the internet,
    as it leverages cloud services for data storage, synchronization, and collaboration⁵.

    In summary, while ChromeOS doesn't strictly require a cloud login, its
    design philosophy revolves around cloud integration. Whether you're using
    a Chromebook or ChromeOS on other devices, having a Google Account enhances the experience by enabling seamless access to cloud-based services.

    Thank you for bringing up ChromeOS, which has a dumb-terminal use model
    much like Apple does, so it's relevant even as I didn't even think of it.

    Come to think of it, like ChromeOS, the Windows S also seems to be designed like Apple products are as dumb terminals logging into mainframe servers
    for most of the functionality - even if much of that is simply cloud
    storage (and in the case of Windows S, it's also the Microsoft App Store).

    Delving deeper, we have to remember that even the HP Stream devices when converted from Windows S to Windows 10 Home or Windows 11 Home are more of
    a dumb-terminal logging-into-a-mainframe-server concept in that they have
    so small of a C:\ drive that you're pretty much "almost" forced into using cloud storage (as you can't even pin an app icon onto the Windows task bar
    if you've installed it onto an sdcard in the D:\ drive on HP Stream PCs.


    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Set ChromeOS device policies - Chrome Enterprise and Education Help.
    https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/1375678?hl=en
    (2) Upgrade Your PC: Faster and More Secure with ChromeOS Flex.
    https://chromeos.google/products/chromeos-flex/
    (3) Chrome OS offline: Can you really use a Chromebook without the cloud ....
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1485641/chrome-os-offline-can-you-really-use-a-chromebook-without-the-cloud.html

    (4) Google: We don't need Chrome OS, we want cloud login for PCs.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-we-dont-need-chrome-os-we-want-cloud-login-for-pcs/ <==== Year 2011

    (5) Get started with Chrome & ChromeOS device management.
    https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/13781354?hl=en

    Article number (4) there, highlights the financial importance of
    associating an account with an advertising profile you have for sale.

    In short, it seems that ChromeOS and Apple's iOS are both designed, from
    the start, as dumb terminals which are basically non functional if you're
    not constantly logging into the mainframe servers.

    The problem with that use model is that without the Internet, almost
    nothing works - and worse - even with the Internet - that one account knows every single thing you are doing in terms of metadata collection & storage.

    Remember, no other operating system but iOS puts a unique code unique to
    your Apple ID into every IPA app you install - even Google doesn't do that.

    Certainly Linux & Windows don't insert a unique ID unique to you for every
    app you've installed.... do they?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Jun 29 19:23:24 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Andrew wrote:
    Paul wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2024 03:47:18 -0400 :

    You can ask ecosystem questions, of Copilot.

    Hi Paul,
    I studied AI in the late 1970's in grad school, and it bored me even then
    (at that time it was all about probabilities and correcting them
    endlessly), so I haven't kept up with the capabilities of AI lately.

    Googling...

    1. Copilot (Microsoft, previously BingChat, included in Windows 11,
    apparently Copilot is on Windows 10 but in some limited fashion)
    <https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/how-to-use-microsoft-copilot-ai-what-to-try>
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/welcome-to-copilot-on-windows-675708af-8c16-4675-afeb-85a5a476ccb0>
    2. Gemini (Google, requires account, privacy implications)
    <https://dorik.com/blog/how-to-use-gemini-ai>
    3. ChatGPT (apparently it does not require a login to work via text only)
    <https://chatgpt.com/auth/login>
    <https://www.howtogeek.com/how-to-run-chatgpt-as-a-windows-app/>
    4. Apple AI (doesn't actually work in the real world, only iPhone 15 Pro,
    & doesn't work in Europe, etc., so it's mostly mere marketing fluff)
    <https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/06/introducing-apple-intelligence-for-iphone-ipad-and-mac/>
    5. Others?

    The trick, of course, at least for free, is to get one of these to work via voice alone (STT and then TTS), which I do not think exists yet. Does it?

    *******

    Question for CoPilot:

    Of all the Apple hardware products, which products require a
    cloud login to function day-to-day ?

    Answer:

    Apple's hardware products are designed to work seamlessly with their
    ecosystem of services. While most Apple devices can function independently >> without a constant cloud connection, some features and services do rely
    on cloud integration.

    Here are the key products and scenarios where cloud login is relevant:

    1. **iPhone and iPad**:
    - **iCloud**: iPhones and iPads heavily rely on iCloud for features
    like device backup, photo synchronization, Find My iPhone, >> and seamless app data sharing across devices.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the App Store, users need an
    Apple ID (which is tied to iCloud).

    2. **MacBooks and iMacs**:
    - **iCloud**: Similar to iOS devices, Macs use iCloud for data synchronization, Keychain, and Find My Mac.
    - **App Store**: To download apps from the Mac App Store, users need an Apple ID.

    3. **Apple Watch**:
    - **iCloud**: Apple Watches sync health data, watch faces, and settings through iCloud.
    - **Activation Lock**: If the watch is lost or stolen, Activation Lock prevents unauthorized use.

    4. **Apple TV**:
    - **Apple ID**: Users need an Apple ID to access the App Store, stream content from
    Apple TV+, and use features like HomeKit.

    5. **HomePod and HomePod mini**:
    - **Apple ID**: HomePods require an Apple ID for setup and access to
    Apple Music, HomeKit, and personalized features.

    6. **AirPods and AirPods Pro**:
    - While AirPods themselves don't require cloud login, features like
    automatic switching between devices and Find My AirPods rely on iCloud.

    7. **Apple Services**:
    - **Apple Music**: Requires an Apple Music subscription and iCloud Music Library
    for seamless music streaming across devices.
    - **Apple TV+**: Subscribers need an Apple ID to access Apple's streaming service.
    - **iMessage and FaceTime**: These messaging services work across devices using iCloud.

    8. **HomeKit-Compatible Devices**:
    - Devices like smart lights, thermostats, and security cameras integrated with
    HomeKit require an Apple ID for setup and remote control via iCloud.

    This is a good summary Paul. Very good. Thanks. AI is useful I guess.

    Notice that the users' App Store login is required ONLY on Apple devices;
    it is not required on Android or Linux or Windows (AFAIAA).

    I haven't had any Google (or Samsung) account on my Galaxy for years, and I can easily download off the Google Play Store repository without it.

    Having said that, I do realize most people log into their Google Account to download apps from the Google Play Store; but it turns out that there are FOSS Google Play Store clients (such as Aurora) that negate that need.
    <https://aurorastore.org/> & <https://auroraoss.com/>

    Same with YouTube, where there are FOSS YouTube clients which negate the
    need to create an account on your phone & still get full functionality.
    <https://newpipe.net/>

    Same with the MUA, where there are plenty of privacy-aware MUAs on Android.
    <https://email.faircode.eu/>

    I don't know all that it's missing but I know it's missing the fact that
    the messaging app, the way 99.99% of Apple users use it anyway, requires logging into the Apple Messaging servers. Which is a horrible privacy hole.

    The Apple users "think" they have privacy; but it's only because Apple cleverly advertises that - but in reality - Apple knows EVERY message they make (due to the extensive metadata that Apple gets from the login action).

    Note: The iOS messages app can work with SMS/MMS *without logging into* Apple's servers, but only 0.01% of Apple users would even know that, and
    even fewer would do that because they then lose the walled-garden niceties that the dumb-terminal design of the iPhone/iPad provide those users.

    Bear in mind, the dumb-terminal design has merits even in non Apple worlds.

    If Linux/Android/Windows users felt like logging into an Internet server, they too would have all that walled-garden magic - plus compatibility.
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    Speaking of all the nice things that happen when you log into Internet servers, I'm sure WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and many others using the dumb-terminal concept also get those niceties - but since they're not required to use messaging on Android, Linux and Windows, they're extras.

    Remember that while cloud login enhances the user experience by enabling synchronization
    and seamless transitions between devices, it's not strictly necessary for basic functionality.
    Users can choose to use local accounts for some features and services.

    The cloud itself isn't required for "basic functionality", but you can't do all the messaging things Apple owners crow about (like saving all your messages) without the dumb-terminal logging into the mainframe server - as most of those magical things (like the end-to-end encryption) require the metadata-saving account on the server.


    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Introduction to Apple platform security - Apple Support.
    https://support.apple.com/guide/security/intro-to-apple-platform-security-seccd5016d31/web

    (2) Apple at Work - Platform Security.
    https://www.apple.com/business/docs/site/AAW_Platform_Security.pdf

    (3) How to use Apple's advanced iCloud security tools.
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1618339/how-to-use-apples-advanced-icloud-security-tools.html

    *******

    Question: When using ChromeOS, do I need a cloud login to make it work ?

    **ChromeOS**, the operating system developed by Google, is designed to
    work seamlessly with cloud-based services. Here are some key points regarding ChromeOS and cloud login:

    1. **Cloud-Centric Approach**:
    - **ChromeOS** is inherently cloud-centric. It relies heavily on cloud services for
    storage, synchronization, and application functionality.

    - When you sign in to a Chromebook or ChromeOS device, you typically use your
    **Google Account** credentials. This account serves as your gateway to >> the cloud-based ecosystem.

    2. **Google Account Sign-In**:
    - **Users must enter their Google Account username and password each time they
    sign in to their device**.

    - If your organization uses **SAML single sign-on (SSO)** for devices, users
    are directed to the SAML identity provider (IdP) page without manually >> entering their email address².

    3. **ChromeOS Flex**:
    - Google offers **ChromeOS Flex**, a secure, cloud-based OS for PCs and Macs.
    It brings the benefits of ChromeOS to existing devices.

    - With **ChromeOS Flex**, you can make your existing PCs and Macs faster and
    more secure. It offers features like 6-second boot-up times and automatic background updates.

    - Set-up is straightforward: create a bootable ChromeOS Flex USB drive, install
    it on your PC or Mac to replace the existing operating system, and upgrade
    other legacy devices via USB or network deployment¹.

    4. **Offline Capabilities**:
    - While ChromeOS is cloud-centric, it does have **offline capabilities**.
    You can work offline with certain apps and files.
    - However, the full power of ChromeOS is realized when connected to the internet,
    as it leverages cloud services for data storage, synchronization, and collaboration⁵.

    In summary, while ChromeOS doesn't strictly require a cloud login, its
    design philosophy revolves around cloud integration. Whether you're using
    a Chromebook or ChromeOS on other devices, having a Google Account enhances >> the experience by enabling seamless access to cloud-based services.

    Thank you for bringing up ChromeOS, which has a dumb-terminal use model
    much like Apple does, so it's relevant even as I didn't even think of it.

    Come to think of it, like ChromeOS, the Windows S also seems to be designed like Apple products are as dumb terminals logging into mainframe servers
    for most of the functionality - even if much of that is simply cloud
    storage (and in the case of Windows S, it's also the Microsoft App Store).

    Delving deeper, we have to remember that even the HP Stream devices when converted from Windows S to Windows 10 Home or Windows 11 Home are more of
    a dumb-terminal logging-into-a-mainframe-server concept in that they have
    so small of a C:\ drive that you're pretty much "almost" forced into using cloud storage (as you can't even pin an app icon onto the Windows task bar
    if you've installed it onto an sdcard in the D:\ drive on HP Stream PCs.


    Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/29/2024
    (1) Set ChromeOS device policies - Chrome Enterprise and Education Help.
    https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/1375678?hl=en
    (2) Upgrade Your PC: Faster and More Secure with ChromeOS Flex.
    https://chromeos.google/products/chromeos-flex/
    (3) Chrome OS offline: Can you really use a Chromebook without the cloud ....
    https://www.computerworld.com/article/1485641/chrome-os-offline-can-you-really-use-a-chromebook-without-the-cloud.html

    (4) Google: We don't need Chrome OS, we want cloud login for PCs.
    https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-we-dont-need-chrome-os-we-want-cloud-login-for-pcs/ <==== Year 2011

    (5) Get started with Chrome & ChromeOS device management.
    https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/13781354?hl=en

    Article number (4) there, highlights the financial importance of
    associating an account with an advertising profile you have for sale.

    In short, it seems that ChromeOS and Apple's iOS are both designed, from
    the start, as dumb terminals which are basically non functional if you're
    not constantly logging into the mainframe servers.

    The problem with that use model is that without the Internet, almost
    nothing works - and worse - even with the Internet - that one account knows every single thing you are doing in terms of metadata collection & storage.

    Remember, no other operating system but iOS puts a unique code unique to
    your Apple ID into every IPA app you install - even Google doesn't do that.

    Certainly Linux & Windows don't insert a unique ID unique to you for every app you've installed.... do they?


    How many years has it been since apple first started shitting on you?

    Man, you should fight back!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frankie@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Sun Jun 30 01:54:11 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.privacy

    On 29/6/2024, Hank Rogers wrote:

    How many years has it been since apple first started shitting on you?

    This thread is about which consumer systems require the operating system vendor's constant logging into in order for basic functionality to work.

    Windows S = yes (the Internet login account is required for the basics) ChromeOS = yes (almost exclusively, again, if you want the basic apps)
    Windows 11 = no (you don't need an Internet login account for basics)
    Windows 10 = no (you don't need an Internet login account for basics)
    Linux = no (you don't need an Internet login account for the basics)
    iOS = yes (the Internet login account is required for the basics)
    macOS = has anyone answered whether the mac also requires the account?

    I've never used a mac.

    Does it also require logging into the Internet to get basic functionality?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kees Nuyt@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 30 14:49:38 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:24:36 -0700, bilsch01 <usenet@writer.com>
    wrote:

    Andrew,
    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.
    --
    Kees Nuyt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Larry Wolff@21:1/5 to Kees Nuyt on Sun Jun 30 12:31:18 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems
    are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the
    vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan K.@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 30 19:14:23 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    W Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:43:42 +0200, Steve Hayes napisal:

    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, >>win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    I saw a complaint from a Windows 11 user to the effect that it would
    not allow him to save stuff locally.

    I tried to find out more about it for him and it appears that it
    offers a chic, but his machine was set to log in to the MS server, and
    he didn't know how to change it.

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into a Microsoft mainframe server account so that they can start to market products to you
    and so they can sell your meta data, but I don't think that Microsoft login account on the net is required for the essential operation of the device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 30 18:43:42 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:54:02 -0000 (UTC), Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
    wrote:

    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, >win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    I saw a complaint from a Windows 11 user to the effect that it would
    not allow him to save stuff locally.

    I tried to find out more about it for him and it appears that it
    offers a chic, but his machine was set to log in to the MS server, and
    he didn't know how to change it.

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jul 1 03:29:46 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 6/30/2024 12:43 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:54:02 -0000 (UTC), Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
    wrote:

    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux,
    win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    I saw a complaint from a Windows 11 user to the effect that it would
    not allow him to save stuff locally.

    I tried to find out more about it for him and it appears that it
    offers a chic, but his machine was set to log in to the MS server, and
    he didn't know how to change it.

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.

    There are a series of steps to it.

    https://www.elevenforum.com/t/unable-to-completely-delete-onedrive.26099/

    "However, whatever I do, when I create a new document, the file is saved in
    "C:\Users\dforr\OneDrive" folder and not
    "C:\Users\dforr\Documents" folder as it should be."

    It includes things like:

    (Do a backup first. If something goes wrong, restore from backup.)

    Turn off the [MSFT] Backup option, if it is turned on.

    Remove the OneDrive software.

    Correct the links in the profile, so they point to local storage.

    Visit the OneDrive storage using the web interface, and retrieve your files.

    Ruining your profile was likely automated.

    Un-ruining it is manual.

    And for obvious reasons -- "abuse your customer... profit!" .

    *******

    When I check this W11Home OS (my daily driver), I notice that:

    C:\Users\username\Documents

    exists but the OneDrive folder is not under username (any more).
    No copy of OneDrive is running on the machine. Obviously something
    has happened to OneDrive. Could it have been hit by a bus ?
    I don't know, but something happened to it :-) I don't
    remember doing it. Musta been the trauma of it going missing.

    I might have to find a different OS installation, to see
    samples of the files.

    Right now, the hardware-test machine, has a new unlicensed W11 on it,
    and there is no MSA on it. I'm waiting for that machine to crash.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/hPnfpKFF/click-the-onedrive-folder-this-happens.gif

    Now, that OS is not setup for "Backups", no dialog for Backups was clicked.
    A OneDrive executable is running. Clicking the C:\Users\username\OneDrive folder, prompts for the addition of an MSA to the account, for the storage involved (on the Microsoft server).

    The Properties of three of the folders in my profile, show there is a
    "repair" for the linkage. But what we don't know, is whether the repair
    option restores the "unblemished" profile, or the repair restores
    the OneDrive-preferred [Backup???] setup.

    Anyway, I'm not attempting an answer here, just trying to point out that
    there are moving parts. Too many moving parts for the people who
    are being abused. Is every customer a Level 37 Wizard ? NO.

    Do you make friends by doing stuff like this ?

    Does Oracle make friends when it does business ? :-/

    Does Adobe make friends (now) when it does business ?

    I fail to see how treating people poorly, is a good
    long term business plan. Yet, the idea is stupidly popular.
    Just look at what Broadcom is doing right now, with VMWare.
    They sunk a huge amount of money into that acquisition.
    As if milk cows come with a guarantee of riches.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Mon Jul 1 14:10:03 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Jan K. <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote at 17:14 this Sunday (GMT):
    W Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:43:42 +0200, Steve Hayes napisal:

    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, >>>win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    I saw a complaint from a Windows 11 user to the effect that it would
    not allow him to save stuff locally.

    I tried to find out more about it for him and it appears that it
    offers a chic, but his machine was set to log in to the MS server, and
    he didn't know how to change it.

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into a Microsoft mainframe server account so that they can start to market products to you
    and so they can sell your meta data, but I don't think that Microsoft login account on the net is required for the essential operation of the device.


    I'm sure they'll try and find some excuse tho.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Cine@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jul 1 07:50:22 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:29:46 -0400, Paul wrote:

    Right now, the hardware-test machine, has a new unlicensed W11 on it,
    and there is no MSA on it. I'm waiting for that machine to crash.

    My desktop can't upgrade to Windows 11 but I'd like to ask if I ever do
    upgrade to Windows 11, in simple terms, what are the basic steps NOT to do
    in order to NOT have it set up the Windows 11 Microsoft Account on the net?

    Also, if I don't set up the Windows 11 MSA for-profit account, what bad
    things happen to me?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan K.@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 1 17:42:38 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 napisal:

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into a Microsoft >> mainframe server account so that they can start to market products to you
    and so they can sell your meta data, but I don't think that Microsoft login >> account on the net is required for the essential operation of the device.

    I'm sure they'll try and find some excuse tho.

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jul 1 17:46:16 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Paul wrote:

    [snip]

    Also, if I don't set up the Windows 11 MSA for-profit account, what bad
    things happen to me?


    I had to do this multiple times, and eventually it worked.
    I was doing this on a Win10 the other day, and it wasn't nearly as pestilent:

    hit Shift + F10 and type OOBE/BYPASSNRO, which will let you create a local account

    The Shift + F10 combination is to open a command window. On a laptop
    with a small keyboard you may find you need Shift + Fn + F10 because the
    key marked F10 does not actually generate F10 on its own. You might
    need to ask the manufacturer ...

    It's important that you don't connect any network until AFTER you have
    created the local account.

    No bad things happen with only local accounts. You won't be able to
    activate modern MS Office apps or the like without having a MSA. But you
    never need to log into the machine with one.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Mon Jul 1 11:08:48 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 7/1/2024 8:42 AM, Jan K. wrote:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    Can't speak for W11 but I'm posting with a cheapie 10" laptop that I
    bought a few months ago (from Amazon, where else?) that came with a W10
    Pro local account (no MS sign up requested). I've not had any problems
    for my use yet. YMMV of course...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Nick Cine on Mon Jul 1 11:01:35 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 7/1/2024 9:50 AM, Nick Cine wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:29:46 -0400, Paul wrote:

    Right now, the hardware-test machine, has a new unlicensed W11 on it,
    and there is no MSA on it. I'm waiting for that machine to crash.

    My desktop can't upgrade to Windows 11 but I'd like to ask if I ever do upgrade to Windows 11, in simple terms, what are the basic steps NOT to do
    in order to NOT have it set up the Windows 11 Microsoft Account on the net?

    Also, if I don't set up the Windows 11 MSA for-profit account, what bad things happen to me?


    I had to do this multiple times, and eventually it worked.
    I was doing this on a Win10 the other day, and it wasn't nearly as pestilent:

    hit Shift + F10 and type OOBE/BYPASSNRO, which will let you create
    a local account instead if you do not have an internet connection
    (so disconnect the internet for this).

    What that does, is sets a registry entry when you're at or near the
    beginning of the Out Of Box Experience sequence after the last phase
    of installation completes (75% to 100% phase maybe). After setting the
    Registry entry, it reboots the computer, and the OOBE sequence starts
    again at the language choice and Machine Name step.

    *******

    Nothing bad happens to you with a local account. Things which are cloud related, may need an account to establish the cloud relationship and
    keep your goods separated from my goods, on the Cloud server.

    But in the case of OneDrive (or for that matter DropBox or whatever),
    there is the danger of the end-user not understanding where their
    files are, which is the current version, when is a file synchronized
    and so on. If a person makes their own backups at home with Macrium,
    they have the necessary "clues" right in front of them, as to how
    prepared they are for a disaster. OneDrive has the ability to "pull"
    a file from remote storage, to some place locally (while you work on it),
    and then kick it back to the Cloud. But if some sort of fault develops
    in any of the handling of those materials, the "user is nothing but
    a victim". If you don't know how it all works, you're a piece of
    fly shit on the railroad track.

    We know that a rather large company in Australia, lost access to their
    Cloud content. Seems the account was deleted or something. We know there
    are some rather large gaps in the Cloud. And you could fall through one
    of those gaps, onto the ground below. Say, for example, you erase your
    TPM or you switch between TPMs, your PIN stops working, re-logging
    using your MSA password is not enough, you have to use your recovery
    procedure to get back into your fucking session!!! See how pleasant this
    state diagram is ? Not pleasant at all. It's like playing Quake, with
    pools of lava everywhere to step in.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Mon Jul 1 19:22:37 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Jan K. wrote:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    To me, on this Win11 Home laptop ... nothing.
    I think it asked me once to "finish off installing" or some such phrase.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan K.@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 00:39:24 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:22:37 +0100, Andy Burns napisal:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    To me, on this Win11 Home laptop ... nothing.
    I think it asked me once to "finish off installing" or some such phrase.

    What is confusing is how nonchalant everyone is /today/ about the ability
    to simply not create a Windows 11 MSA - but when Windows 11 first came out
    - it seemed everyone was saying that you must create an online MSA account.

    What changed?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jack@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Tue Jul 2 00:07:35 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 01/07/2024 23:39, Jan K. wrote:
    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:22:37 +0100, Andy Burns napisal:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    To me, on this Win11 Home laptop ... nothing.
    I think it asked me once to "finish off installing" or some such phrase.

    What is confusing is how nonchalant everyone is /today/ about the ability
    to simply not create a Windows 11 MSA - but when Windows 11 first came
    out
    - it seemed everyone was saying that you must create an online MSA
    account.

    What changed?

    What has changed is that people not using Windows 11 are spreading
    falsehoods and misinformation about Microsoft. To them Microsoft is evil
    and spying on jobless people because jobless people are making Microsoft
    more money. These are the people on newsgroups and so the best thing is
    to ignore them. You get a page and a half of irrelevant information about Windows 11 but not a hint of direct answer to a direct question. They
    simply make up the response as they go along hoping that the original
    poster will accept it.

    Useless groups removed from my response.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Mon Jul 1 20:39:41 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 7/1/2024 6:39 PM, Jan K. wrote:
    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:22:37 +0100, Andy Burns napisal:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    To me, on this Win11 Home laptop ... nothing.
    I think it asked me once to "finish off installing" or some such phrase.

    What is confusing is how nonchalant everyone is /today/ about the ability
    to simply not create a Windows 11 MSA - but when Windows 11 first came out
    - it seemed everyone was saying that you must create an online MSA account.

    What changed?

    You might have been hearing some public relations material.

    Like this material. This is "how we do things at the ranch".

    https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/windows-11-24h2-will-enable-bitlocker-encryption-for-everyone-happens-on-both-clean-installs-and-reinstalls

    "published 7 May 2024

    Windows 11 24H2 will enable BitLocker encryption for everyone
    happens on both clean installs and reinstalls

    You can still manually disable encryption if desired.
    "

    "The easiest method is to create a bootable ISO through Rufus USB,
    which has the ability to disable Windows 11 24H2's drive encryption."

    That's a "wear and tear play" on your nerves. Is it working ?

    Well we have solutions for this. Nobody puts unnecessary wear on
    my equipment and gets away with it.

    Now, if you want to put a slider switch on one of the OOBE
    panels for this, as an "Opt-In", I'm all for it. But of course
    it "wouldn't be the Ranch if we did it that way, now would it".

    # First step, is set your limiter to "11" "23H2" which is 22631.xxx
    # You do not want a surprise attack, as a starting step.

    https://www.grc.com/incontrol.htm

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.co on Tue Jul 2 05:41:21 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:42:38 +0200, "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:

    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 napisal:

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally, but it
    is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into a Microsoft >>> mainframe server account so that they can start to market products to you >>> and so they can sell your meta data, but I don't think that Microsoft login >>> account on the net is required for the essential operation of the device. >>
    I'm sure they'll try and find some excuse tho.

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    It works.

    It does on my wife's computer.

    But the problem seems to start when people either set up such an
    account without knowing its limitations, or perhaps have it set up for
    them by the vendor.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 06:05:08 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:50:22 -0600, Nick Cine <nickcine@is.invalid>
    wrote:

    My desktop can't upgrade to Windows 11 but I'd like to ask if I ever do >upgrade to Windows 11, in simple terms, what are the basic steps NOT to do
    in order to NOT have it set up the Windows 11 Microsoft Account on the net?

    Also, if I don't set up the Windows 11 MSA for-profit account, what bad >things happen to me?

    This site could help:

    <https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/how-to-set-up-microsoft-windows-with-local-account>



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to larrywolff@larrywolff.net on Tue Jul 2 05:36:53 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:

    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems
    are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You can
    take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no internet
    access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do research.
    You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers cease
    to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Jul 1 22:00:28 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:

    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems
    are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the
    vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You can
    take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no internet
    access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do research.
    You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers cease
    to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Jul 2 18:53:28 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Steve Hayes wrote on 2/7/24 1:41 pm:
    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:42:38 +0200, "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:
    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 napisal:

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally,
    but it is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to
    find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into
    a Microsoft mainframe server account so that they can start to
    market products to you and so they can sell your meta data, but
    I don't think that Microsoft login account on the net is
    required for the essential operation of the device.

    I'm sure they'll try and find some excuse tho.

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    It works.

    It does on my wife's computer.

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will not
    play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    HMM! Is it part of the initial purchase agreement of the OS that MS MUST provide the purchaser with any relevant updates??
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jul 2 18:45:10 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Alan wrote on 2/7/24 3:00 pm:
    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself with this
    kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating
    systems are designed to require logging into the maker's servers
    for most of the vital essential services that comprise the core
    of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You
    can take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no
    internet access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do
    research. You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity
    goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers
    cease to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    .... except by the Wi-Fi or USB Dongle that you use to get your signal
    out of your Mac laptops to where ever they are distend.

    Otherwise the signal would NEVER have left your Mac laptop.
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 06:12:47 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 7/2/2024 4:53 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
    Steve Hayes wrote on 2/7/24 1:41 pm:
    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:42:38 +0200, "Jan K." <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:
    W Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:10:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 napisal:

    Someone else told me that Windows 11 does save files locally,
    but it is so many levels deep that you have to be a hacker to
    find them.

    I think Windows 11 wants you to create and continually log into
    a Microsoft mainframe server account so that they can start to
    market products to you and so they can sell your meta data, but
    I don't think that Microsoft login account on the net is
    required for the essential operation of the device.

    I'm sure they'll try and find some excuse tho.

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    It works.

    It does on my wife's computer.

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will not play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    HMM! Is it part of the initial purchase agreement of the OS that MS MUST provide the purchaser with any relevant updates??

    The MSA account has NOTHING to do with Windows Update.

    Not that I have seen.

    Remember that Windows Update was around with WinXP, and
    there was no tracking mechanism there.

    Patching is all done by local calculation.
    Even when the OS collects various "history" information
    about patch success, none of that matters when
    Windows Update runs. You can erase some of the markers and
    backups, and it makes no different to WU success. (Even if
    a Troubleshooter routine deletes various stuff, it does not
    stop WU from working.)

    It just computes the current situation, what patches do I need,
    boom and done.

    The speed of Windows Update, the delay can be three minutes (functional minimum,
    a rough approximate value), or it can stretch to infinite time (Vista SP2!!!). You can no longer properly patch Vista. You may also find that some other experiences have degraded (somewhat due to SHA2 signing and the proper patch order).
    But the Vista situation is the absolute worst. I suspect signing has put a knife
    into that puppy. I once succeeded in patching Vista SP2, but when I tried recently, the recipe no longer works.

    Microsoft knows the WU scheme is un-scalable. The wheels keep falling off it, and
    they apply duct tape and binder twine to hold the wheels on it. I think they're internally proud of the mess, and how they have staff shackled to desks, keeping it running :-) The quality of the experience (how long it takes to install),
    is partially a function of pruning the update tree properly.

    Back in the WinXP era, a middle-manager said "I promise you we will fix WU once and
    for all, before the end of WinXP", when the end of WinXP was only in a few months.
    I always like to tell that story, because that middle-manager was so full of shit,
    and that middle-manager knew exactly how and why WU was broken. And WU, the core
    part of it, how the calculations are done, has not changed since it was invented.
    That's why the WSUSSCN2.cab file used to track packages BEFORE your current OS. It could be using calculations based on some WinXP era updates, when working on a Windows Update for Windows 10. It has a long and "continuous" history. Imagine
    for example, how awful the supersedence tree for KB890830 is.

    The invention of things like Cumulative Updates, is an attempt to hide the rickety
    nature of Windows Update. And you'll notice at times, it's getting almost as bad as
    it was in the Windows XP era. Even though our processors are X times faster.

    Back in the Win7 era, I found a thread where some IT people were reporting on Windows Update problems. One guy claimed once an hour or so, Windows Update would
    start computing "do I need patches". The process used up all the RAM on a W7 2GB RAM machine.
    The employees in the enterprise, could then not use their (cheap) computer. The IT people were
    begging and pleading to "fix this quickly before I get fired" :-) And Microsoft made
    one of the few clever fixes for Windows Update. It added a memory compressor for the
    WU data structure in memory. This makes the memory consuming process execute slower, but, the
    data structure no longer takes up all the machine memory, so those employees were
    no longer being held hostage by Windows Update :-) Which I think is a cool fix.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 11:27:48 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Daniel70 wrote:

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will not
    play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    What have updates got to do with an MSA?

    Microsoft have been more and more insistent on creating an MSA at
    install time, though there are still ways around it; even if they close
    all the loopholes, you can install with an MSA, create a local admin
    account then delete the MSA ... just make sure you have copies of any
    bitlocker keys elsewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Jul 2 14:00:03 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote at 10:27 this Tuesday (GMT):
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will not
    play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    What have updates got to do with an MSA?

    Microsoft have been more and more insistent on creating an MSA at
    install time, though there are still ways around it; even if they close
    all the loopholes, you can install with an MSA, create a local admin
    account then delete the MSA ... just make sure you have copies of any bitlocker keys elsewhere.


    I wouldn't be surprised if they would still send telemetry about that
    account even after deletion..
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 15:23:42 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    candycanearter07 wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Microsoft have been more and more insistent on creating an MSA at
    install time, though there are still ways around it; even if they close
    all the loopholes, you can install with an MSA, create a local admin
    account then delete the MSA ... just make sure you have copies of any
    bitlocker keys elsewhere.


    I wouldn't be surprised if they would still send telemetry about that
    account even after deletion..

    I'm sure they send telemetry whatever you do, but there won't be much to
    send about an account that's been deleted, and therefore can't login

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 07:33:17 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Daniel70 wrote:
    Jan K. wrote:
    AJL wrote:

    What happens if you do not create that MSA account on Windows 11?

    Can't speak for W11 but I'm posting with a cheapie 10" laptop
    that I bought a few months ago (from Amazon, where else?) that
    came with a W10 Pro local account (no MS sign up requested). I've
    not had any problems for my use yet. YMMV of course...

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will
    not play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    I'm still getting updates on this Windows 10 Pro laptop (described
    above) that has NEVER HAD an MS account. One update is waiting to
    install now. However I read that the updates will stop in another year
    unless I upgrade to Windows 11. And since there have been no offers I
    suspect this cheapie laptop is not capable of using Windows 11.

    HMM! Is it part of the initial purchase agreement of the OS that MS
    MUST provide the purchaser with any relevant updates??

    Dunno about agreements, but every new gadget I have had came with a
    period of updates including my Chromebooks and Android toys...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Jul 2 14:50:03 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote at 14:23 this Tuesday (GMT):
    candycanearter07 wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Microsoft have been more and more insistent on creating an MSA at
    install time, though there are still ways around it; even if they close >>> all the loopholes, you can install with an MSA, create a local admin
    account then delete the MSA ... just make sure you have copies of any
    bitlocker keys elsewhere.


    I wouldn't be surprised if they would still send telemetry about that
    account even after deletion..

    I'm sure they send telemetry whatever you do, but there won't be much to
    send about an account that's been deleted, and therefore can't login


    Ohh, I thought you meant delete it from the computer.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to AJL on Tue Jul 2 14:54:36 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    AJL wrote on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:33:17 -0700 :

    Do you still get all the OS updates?? Or does MS think if you will
    not play nicely with them, they will not play nicely with you??

    I'm still getting updates on this Windows 10 Pro laptop (described
    above) that has NEVER HAD an MS account. One update is waiting to
    install now. However I read that the updates will stop in another year
    unless I upgrade to Windows 11. And since there have been no offers I
    suspect this cheapie laptop is not capable of using Windows 11.

    My Windows 10 Pro desktop has been getting updates from Microsoft for
    something like almost 15 years, given the free Windows OS upgrades.

    No MSA account for me either. Hell, I don't even have a password set.
    (I never understood why people set a password on a home computer.)

    HMM! Is it part of the initial purchase agreement of the OS that MS
    MUST provide the purchaser with any relevant updates??

    Dunno about agreements, but every new gadget I have had came with a
    period of updates including my Chromebooks and Android toys...

    Related to the power of marketing on the period of updates, almost nobody
    knows that Apple has the *worst* operating system support in the industry.

    Yup. The worst. And most people think it's the best. Why? Advertising.
    That's why. People believe whatever they're told to believe by marketing.

    We already showed above that Microsoft fully supports Windows 10 and
    Windows 11 (as defined by fixing every bug that MS knows about).

    The two major Android manufacturers fully support up to seven releases simultaneously (again, full support means fixing every bug they know of).
    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
    <https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/google-pixel-8-software-updates>

    Google even monthly updates all Android 10+ devices on the net (which is billions every month) for over two dozen core packages (which has no EOL).
    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>

    Apple?

    Apple has the *worst* operating system hotfix support in the industry.
    <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>

    Apple was forced to admit they've NEVER fully updated ever more than one release and they were forced to publish their update policy to that effect.
    <https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/>
    <https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

    Worse, Apple was forced to finally ditch their ancient monolithic update mechanism to join the modern world in the process of how to patch an OS.
    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201224>

    And worse than even the fact only Apple refuses to fully support more than
    one release at a time, Apple's promise is only for a mere measly 5 years.
    <https://www.androidauthority.com/iphone-software-support-commitment-3449135/>

    It's no wonder why the Apple devices are the most exploited in history.
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to AJL on Tue Jul 2 16:43:58 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    AJL wrote on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:24:41 -0700 :

    (I never understood why people set a password on a home computer.)

    Here in the big city home burglaries happen. My neighbor lost all his electronics in one. A home computer's passwords (pins in my case) are
    all that stand between my data and the perp. Granted most stolen
    electronics are likely wiped before resale but still one never knows...

    Even if your computer or phone is stolen, all they get is the device.
    Nobody who knows computers has sensitive data stored in the clear on them.

    Besides... MARKETING is who is telling people they need to lock it all up. (There are reasons for why MARKETING wants this - but that's a long story.)

    It's a standing joke that people who put biometric gimmicks on their phones
    & computers must live in the slums - but it's not supposed to be literal.

    Putting locks like that on a *personal* home desktop computer or phone is
    like welding bars across your windows & blocking the doors with furniture.

    If people can't trust their own spouse and children around their personal desktop computers, then I feel sorry for them. I really do. It's sad.

    I should change my slogan from "People who lock computers live in the
    slums", to something like "I feel sorry for those who can't trust anyone".

    Note though that a *corporate* computer is different, and also note that
    only a fool stores his private data unencrypted on his own desktop PC.

    Also note nobody allows the login/password to be stored, in the clear, and saved for things like banking (which is simply an indication of ignorance).

    In summary, it's my educated assessment that people who use passwords (and biometric gimmicks) on *personal* computing devices - don't know how to use computers effectively (or, they don't trust their closest companions, which
    is even worse than ignorance).

    Having said that, I'm well aware that most people don't know how to use computers & hence that's why they lock iron bars all around their devices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jul 2 09:24:41 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 7/2/2024 7:54 AM, Andrew wrote:

    (I never understood why people set a password on a home computer.)

    Here in the big city home burglaries happen. My neighbor lost all his electronics in one. A home computer's passwords (pins in my case) are
    all that stand between my data and the perp. Granted most stolen
    electronics are likely wiped before resale but still one never knows...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jul 2 11:31:02 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-02 09:43, Andrew wrote:
    AJL wrote on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:24:41 -0700 :

    (I never understood why people set a password on a home computer.)
    Here in the big city home burglaries happen. My neighbor lost all his
    electronics in one. A home computer's passwords (pins in my case) are
    all that stand between my data and the perp. Granted most stolen
    electronics are likely wiped before resale but still one never knows...
    Even if your computer or phone is stolen, all they get is the device.
    Nobody who knows computers has sensitive data stored in the clear on them.

    Besides... MARKETING is who is telling people they need to lock it all up. (There are reasons for why MARKETING wants this - but that's a long story.)

    It's a standing joke that people who put biometric gimmicks on their phones
    & computers must live in the slums - but it's not supposed to be literal.

    What a horrid person you are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jul 2 11:25:56 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 7/2/2024 9:43 AM, Andrew wrote:
    AJL wrote on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:24:41 -0700 :

    Here in the big city home burglaries happen. My neighbor lost all
    his electronics in one. A home computer's passwords (pins in my
    case) are all that stand between my data and the perp. Granted
    most stolen electronics are likely wiped before resale but still
    one never knows...

    Even if your computer or phone is stolen, all they get is the
    device.

    The only thing that stands between most folks Android phone's unlocked
    Google data is the lock screen.

    Nobody who knows computers has sensitive data stored in the clear on
    them.

    Agreed. My sensitive data requires 2 passwords/pins. One for the lock
    screen and one for the sensitive app.

    It's a standing joke that people who put biometric gimmicks on their
    phones

    I never could get my lock screen fingerprint to work the first time. I
    found that I could more easily enter a pin in a few seconds.

    & computers must live in the slums - but it's not supposed to be
    literal.

    Burglaries happen everywhere. In both good and bad parts of town.

    Putting locks like that on a *personal* home desktop computer or
    phone is like welding bars across your windows & blocking the doors
    with furniture.

    As I said I get a 2 second lock screen entry. Not all that terrible...

    If people can't trust their own spouse and children around their
    personal desktop computers, then I feel sorry for them. I really do.
    It's sad.

    My wife knows my pins/passwords in case I croak.

    "I feel sorry for those who can't trust anyone"

    I do trust some folks. But I still lock my house, car, and electronics...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to AJL on Tue Jul 2 20:07:52 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    AJL wrote on Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:25:56 -0700 :

    Even if your computer or phone is stolen, all they get is the
    device.

    The only thing that stands between most folks Android phone's unlocked
    Google data is the lock screen.

    I know this. I agree with you. It's sad.
    We agree on principles.
    We differ slightly on implementation.

    Fundamentally though, most people aren't like you and me (and most here).

    Most people don't know how to use computers.

    Specifically, most people don't know how to keep sensitive data separate
    from everything else. If they did understand how to use computers, they wouldn't need to lock steel bars all around their phones & PCs.

    Overall, I feel sorry for anyone who puts a lock on a phone or computer.
    It's sad that they live in such intense fear of everyone around them.

    Nobody who knows computers has sensitive data stored in the clear on
    them.

    Agreed. My sensitive data requires 2 passwords/pins. One for the lock
    screen and one for the sensitive app.

    While Android can lock specific apps with an additional PIN, I'm not aware Windows or Linux can lock specific apps with an addition PIN. Can they?

    Even so, most of the people on this newsgroup know enough about computers
    to understand the concept of keeping only the sensitive data under wraps.

    Of course, I'm only talking about *personal* devices, as corporate devices follow a much more stringent rule of locking everything down to the core.

    It's a standing joke that people who put biometric gimmicks on their
    phones

    I never could get my lock screen fingerprint to work the first time. I
    found that I could more easily enter a pin in a few seconds.

    I agree with you that, if locks are necessary, the PIN is very reliable. Biometrics are a marketing gimmick - mostly propagated by Apple marketing.

    Very few people, I believe, are aware that biometric gimmicks were mainly propogated by Apple because the design of the iPhone is inherently flawed.

    In keeping with the topic of this thread, it's obvious to all who
    understand privacy that the iPhone is designed as a dumb-terminal device.

    Hence, the iPhone is so poorly designed that it absolutely must log into
    the Apple mainframe servers dozens of times a day - just to be useful.

    Think about that flaw. Dozens and dozens and dozens of times a day, the
    iPhone is logging into the Apple matrix mainframe servers in Cupertino.

    No other common consumer operating system (other than ChromeOS) requires logging into mothership mainframe servers every moment of your life.

    No wonder Apple promotes biometric gimmicks to make it easier to do that.

    & computers must live in the slums - but it's not supposed to be
    literal.

    Burglaries happen everywhere. In both good and bad parts of town.

    The "slums" part is intentional to make a point; it's not meant to be
    literal - but the main point I am making is that if you set up your device intelligently - when it's stolen - you lose no sensitive data.

    I may need to repeat that statement because it's a fundamental point.

    If you set up your device intelligently, it doesn't matter if it's stolen.
    All they get is the device.

    They never get your sensitive data if you are intelligent about setup.

    Putting locks like that on a *personal* home desktop computer or
    phone is like welding bars across your windows & blocking the doors
    with furniture.

    As I said I get a 2 second lock screen entry. Not all that terrible...

    It's not a concept of "terrible" so much as a concept of poor setup design.
    Any personal device that needs to be locked - is poorly set up by the user.

    All sensitive data should be locked - but there's no need to lock up your
    web browsers or your app installers or anything that is not sensitive data.

    Again, I'm talking about *personal* devices; not corporate equipment.

    If people can't trust their own spouse and children around their
    personal desktop computers, then I feel sorry for them. I really do.
    It's sad.

    My wife knows my pins/passwords in case I croak.

    I would expect most of us to trust our wives and kids, which is why I said
    it's sad when people have to lock up their devices to protect against them.

    Overall, I feel sorry for anyone who puts a lock on a phone or computer.
    It's sad that they live in such intense fear of everyone around them.

    "I feel sorry for those who can't trust anyone"

    I do trust some folks. But I still lock my house, car, and electronics...

    While I put the daily drives unlocked in the garage, the kids' cars are
    parked outside unlocked, as are my tools in the unlocked shed.

    The Federal Express/Amazon/DHL/etc., delivery guys put the packages on my
    front door (which they don't even know, nor care, is likewise unlocked).

    I don't live in the slums though, and I trust my wife and kids.

    In summary, this is a philosophical question, where the only thing I want others to think about is to ask themselves WHY are biometric locks so
    highly advertised by companies that WANT you to log into their mainframe servers every moment of your life (or the device won't work otherwise).

    I want people to THINK about why Apple, in particular, is really big on promoting not only that you MUST log into their servers every moment of
    your life just for the phone to do the stuff you like - but also why you
    must lock up your data which is stored on the cloud services they sell you.

    I propose an intelligently set up device is:
    a. One that keeps sensitive data separate from everything else
    b. Where only that sensitive data is locked
    c. And, where the device works WITHOUT needing to be logged into servers

    This has been a philosophical discussion - which was a tangent from the one statement which you picked up upon that people don't need to lock personal devices unless those personal devices are badly designed or poorly set up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jul 2 14:42:04 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 7/2/2024 1:07 PM, Andrew wrote:

    I feel sorry for anyone who puts a lock on a phone or computer.

    These days even a screen lock can be ineffective if the perp grabs your
    phone and runs while you're using it.

    It's sad that they live in such intense fear of everyone around
    them.

    I prefer the word caution. And being aware of ones surroundings. I spoke
    to a lot of victims in one of my earlier careers that could likely have
    avoided becoming victims had they done so.

    While Android can lock specific apps with an additional PIN, I'm not
    aware Windows or Linux can lock specific apps with an addition PIN.
    Can they?

    With Windows I use a browser to access my sensitive sites. Most require
    a password and initially 2FA.

    I agree with you that, if locks are necessary, the PIN is very
    reliable. Biometrics are a marketing gimmick

    From what I read biometrics are safer than my 6 digit pins.

    No other common consumer operating system (other than ChromeOS)
    requires logging into mothership mainframe servers every moment of
    your life.

    I was assimilated by Google many years ago...

    if you set up your device intelligently - when it's stolen - you lose
    no sensitive data.

    That's what the pin is for. Gives me time to get to another device and
    change my Google password. Then even if the perp breaks my phone's lock
    screen pin my Google stuff will no longer work.

    They never get your sensitive data if you are intelligent about
    setup.

    Yup.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jasen Betts@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Jul 3 01:28:25 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-06-29, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux, win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a true statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not even Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic functionality (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    If I want upgrades they come from debian servers but I don't need to
    log in or to connect to their servers for the upgrades. (can use a
    third party, or self hosted, mirror etc)

    Is my statement correct for all the non-Apple common consumer systems?

    It's almost certainly false for some non-apple system, possibly one
    that you have not considered. If you mean only the systems you listed
    above, you should explicitly say that.

    Q: Does any non-Apple common OS require a mothership account for the
    basic functionality of the operating system that people love about it?

    I think windows asks, but there's a way to refuse.

    That's all I ask to flesh out here, as I care only about the truth.

    You are using a lot of words in slightly unusual ways, and yet saying very little, are your Arlen?

    I will only respond to those who stick to the topic of whether the
    non-Apple operating systems ALSO are set up on the dumb-terminal model
    (with the inherent loss of privacy, particularly in meta-data collection).

    "dumb-terminal model" Well that's clear as mud! you must be Arlen.

    Below is simply a note I wrote today,in response to a question on the
    Apple iOS newsgroup

    I'm stopping here' I don't want to read a cross post out of context
    and don't trust you to use language in an understandable way.

    --
    Jasen.
    🇺🇦 Слава Україні

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jack@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Jul 3 01:19:28 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 02/07/2024 15:54, Andrew wrote:
    My Windows 10 Pro desktop has been getting updates from Microsoft for something like almost 15 years, given the free Windows OS upgrades.
    Windows 10 updates for 15 years! You must be the genius one to make
    things up on these newsgroups.

    The rest was not worthy to read by anybody so snipped it in this post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 3 05:12:09 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:00:28 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:

    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems >>> are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >>> vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You can
    take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no internet
    access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do research.
    You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers cease
    to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    And they were all non-Apple?


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Jack on Wed Jul 3 17:26:22 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Jack wrote on Wed, 3 Jul 2024 01:19:28 +0000 :

    On 02/07/2024 15:54, Andrew wrote:
    My Windows 10 Pro desktop has been getting updates from Microsoft for
    something like almost 15 years, given the free Windows OS upgrades.
    Windows 10 updates for 15 years! You must be the genius one to make
    things up on these newsgroups.

    You missed the pragmatic part about sequential OS version updates that themselves, were free which were included into that total time period.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Jul 3 11:50:00 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-02 20:12, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:00:28 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:

    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems >>>> are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >>>> vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system. >>>
    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You can
    take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no internet
    access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do research.
    You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers cease
    to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    And they were all non-Apple?

    Why would you ask something so ignorant?

    I've had Mac laptops for...forever, and I've used them both iCloud and
    its predecessor MobileMe.

    In no way, shape, or form has using those services prevented my machines
    from being portable.

    I have taken them to remote locations where there was no internet access
    and they continued to work fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 8 10:50:49 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-02 01:45, Daniel70 wrote:
    Alan wrote on 2/7/24 3:00 pm:
    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself with this
    kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating
    systems are designed to require logging into the maker's servers
    for most of the vital essential services that comprise the core
    of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You
    can take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no
    internet access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do
    research. You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity
    goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers
    cease to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    .... except by the Wi-Fi or USB Dongle that you use to get your signal
    out of your Mac laptops to where ever they are distend.

    Otherwise the signal would NEVER have left your Mac laptop.

    But that is no more and no less "tethered" than any other personal
    computer using any operating system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to ...winston on Mon Jul 8 10:53:29 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2024-07-02 23:48, ...winston wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    The first Mac laptop(the MacBook) was released in 2006(28 yrs ago)

    Prior to 2006, Apple's laptops were Apple Powerbooks and iBooks, but not
    Mac laptops.

    They were laptop Macintosh computers.

    Ergo, colloquially, "Mac laptops".

    But maybe you should tell these guys about it:

    <https://everymac.com>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Larry Wolff on Mon Jul 8 10:54:12 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-06-30 09:31, Larry Wolff wrote:
    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself
    with this kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems
    are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Big Al on Mon Jul 8 10:55:04 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-06-29 11:13, Big Al wrote:
    On 6/29/24 12:54 AM, Andrew wrote:
    Do the non-Apple common consumer operating systems (android, linux,
    win10/win11) work WITHOUT logging into the mothership mainframe servers?

    My only question to the non-Apple newsgroups is whether or not it is a
    true
    statement of mine that no other common consumer operating system (not
    even
    Windows 11) requires a mothership tracking account for basic
    functionality
    (certainly I am well aware Android does not require it).

    As far as I have seen, Linux does not require any hooks into any
    Windows, Google, Apple, Mac connections.
    As you or something in your article said, adding account logins just
    enhances the experience.  I myself use the google calendar events that
    show on my Android phone and now show on my Linux calendar.

    And macOS doesn't require any hooks into anything either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jul 9 04:17:19 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:54:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-06-30 09:31, Larry Wolff wrote:

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems
    are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the
    vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,
    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other circumstances where an internet connection is not available.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Jul 9 20:05:20 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Alan wrote on 9/7/24 3:50 am:
    On 2024-07-02 01:45, Daniel70 wrote:
    Alan wrote on 2/7/24 3:00 pm:
    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself with this
    kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating
    systems are designed to require logging into the maker's servers
    for most of the vital essential services that comprise the core
    of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You
    can take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no
    internet access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do
    research. You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity
    goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers
    cease to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    .... except by the Wi-Fi or USB Dongle that you use to get your signal
    out of your Mac laptops to where ever they are distend.

    Otherwise the signal would NEVER have left your Mac laptop.

    But that is no more and no less "tethered" than any other personal
    computer using any operating system.

    Sorry! Are we talking at different things??

    Currently, this Laptop uses its Wi-Fi to connect to a Box at the end of
    my Landline Phone-line. If I were to take the Laptop to a Coffee-Bar,
    the Wi-Fi would not work .... unless the Coffee-Bar offered Public Wi-Fi
    .... but I'd have to obtain the Coffee-Bar Wi-Fi Password first.

    Previously, I had a Dongle that I'd plug into a USB socket on this same
    Laptop and, as long as I was with-in 'sight' of a Telco Antenna, I could
    talk to the world.

    In either case, I considered that I WAS Tethered! Maybe not by a
    physical wire, but Tethered none the less.

    Are we talking at different things??
    --
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Jul 9 09:23:37 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-08 19:17, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:54:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-06-30 09:31, Larry Wolff wrote:

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems >>> are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >>> vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system.

    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,

    Which works fine saving to the local drive.

    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other circumstances where an internet connection is not available.

    Which works fine as previously stated.

    You CAN make use of cloud services on a Mac if you choose to do so.

    Off the top of my head:

    Contacts
    Calendar
    To do list
    Notes
    Photos
    ...
    .
    .
    .

    ...and a plethora more.

    But none are mandatory to use the computer.

    I like having my data synchronized between my computer and my phone and
    tablet, so I make use of them, but if one chooses to, you can perform
    that synchronization for much of it by plugging the iOS devices into the computer.

    So anyone who doesn't want to use those services can operate their
    devices just as well (absent the cloud synching of course).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 9 09:18:26 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-09 03:05, Daniel70 wrote:
    Alan wrote on 9/7/24 3:50 am:
    On 2024-07-02 01:45, Daniel70 wrote:
    Alan wrote on 2/7/24 3:00 pm:
    On 2024-07-01 20:36, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:31:18 -0400, Larry Wolff
    <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 6/30/2024 8:49 AM, Kees Nuyt wrote:

    You must be out of your mind to concern yourself with this
    kind of thing.

    Bill, you must be out of your mind to quote all 245 lines of
    Andrew's article to just add your 2 cents.

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating
    systems are designed to require logging into the maker's servers
    for most of the vital essential services that comprise the core
    of the operating system.

    It's not just a privacy concern.

    The point about laptop computers is that they are *portable*. You
    can take them to meetings at remote locations where there is no
    internet access. You can take them to libraries and archives to do
    research. You can use them (for a while) if the mains electricity
    goes off.

    Being tethered to the mothership means that portable computers
    cease to be portable and are forced to be, well, tethered.

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    .... except by the Wi-Fi or USB Dongle that you use to get your
    signal out of your Mac laptops to where ever they are distend.

    Otherwise the signal would NEVER have left your Mac laptop.

    But that is no more and no less "tethered" than any other personal
    computer using any operating system.

    Sorry! Are we talking at different things??

    Probably.


    Currently, this Laptop uses its Wi-Fi to connect to a Box at the end of
    my Landline Phone-line. If I were to take the Laptop to a Coffee-Bar,
    the Wi-Fi would not work .... unless the Coffee-Bar offered Public Wi-Fi
    .... but I'd have to obtain the Coffee-Bar Wi-Fi Password first.

    Yes. And?


    Previously, I had a Dongle that I'd plug into a USB socket on this same Laptop and, as long as I was with-in 'sight' of a Telco Antenna, I could
    talk to the world.

    OK. And?

    Could you not get such a dongle for a Mac laptop. (Hint: I know you can).


    In either case, I considered that I WAS Tethered! Maybe not by a
    physical wire, but Tethered none the less.

    Are we talking at different things??

    Definitely.

    This alleged "tethering" was about whether or not a Mac can be used
    without signing in with an AppleID.

    I'm here to tell you, it most definitely can.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mickey D@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Jul 9 12:30:38 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 04:17:19 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,
    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other circumstances where an internet connection is not available.

    The problem with the design of the entire Apple ecosystem (which is
    different from Windows & Linux & Android) is that you stop logging into the Apple servers, the entire ecosystem stops working the way it's designed.

    Very few companies other than Apple can convince dumb users that their
    devices stop working when you're no longer on the Internet is a good thing.

    HP certainly can't. https://boingboing.net/2024/07/09/hp-will-no-longer-sell-printers-that-require-online-connection.html

    "HP has finally been forced to discontinue its cheaper e-series LaserJet printers due to customers experiencing problems with their online-only and always tied to HP+ subscription requirements. Among other things, HP+
    requires a permanent Internet connection, and customers only use
    HP-original ink and toners, not allowing for third-party alternatives to be used at all."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Mickey D on Tue Jul 9 10:53:31 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-09 09:30, Mickey D wrote:
    On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 04:17:19 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote:

    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,
    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other
    circumstances where an internet connection is not available.

    The problem with the design of the entire Apple ecosystem (which is
    different from Windows & Linux & Android) is that you stop logging into the Apple servers, the entire ecosystem stops working the way it's designed.

    Oh that is an EXCELLENT ATTEMPT to obfuscate.


    Very few companies other than Apple can convince dumb users that their devices stop working when you're no longer on the Internet is a good thing.

    None of my devices stop working when I'm not on the internet, Arlen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to ...winston on Tue Jul 9 14:57:31 2024
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2024-07-08 19:01, ...winston wrote:
    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-07-02 23:48, ...winston wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    Ummmm...

    I've had Mac laptops for more than 30 years.

    I've never been tethered.

    The first Mac laptop(the MacBook) was released in 2006(28 yrs ago)

    Prior to 2006, Apple's laptops were Apple Powerbooks and iBooks, but
    not Mac laptops.

    They were laptop Macintosh computers.

    Ergo, colloquially, "Mac laptops".

    But maybe you should tell these guys about it:

    <https://everymac.com>

    I only noted that Mac laptop were first released in 2006.
    Whatever anyone was using 30 yrs ago wasn't a 'Mac **laptop**'

    I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

    A laptop that runs Mac OS is a Mac laptop.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David W. Hodgins@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Tue Jul 9 11:05:57 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:05:20 -0400, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    <snip>
    Previously, I had a Dongle that I'd plug into a USB socket on this same Laptop and, as long as I was with-in 'sight' of a Telco Antenna, I could
    talk to the world.

    In either case, I considered that I WAS Tethered! Maybe not by a
    physical wire, but Tethered none the less.

    Are we talking at different things??

    Yes. You are talking about connected to the internet. Alan was talking about the
    os using the internet to "phone home" to M$, Apple, or the linux distributor.


    Regards, Dave Hodgins

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to daniel47@nomail.afraid.org on Wed Jul 10 05:15:19 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:05:20 +1000, Daniel70
    <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    Alan wrote on 9/7/24 3:50 am:
    On 2024-07-02 01:45, Daniel70 wrote:

    But that is no more and no less "tethered" than any other personal
    computer using any operating system.

    Sorry! Are we talking at different things??

    Currently, this Laptop uses its Wi-Fi to connect to a Box at the end of
    my Landline Phone-line. If I were to take the Laptop to a Coffee-Bar,
    the Wi-Fi would not work .... unless the Coffee-Bar offered Public Wi-Fi
    .... but I'd have to obtain the Coffee-Bar Wi-Fi Password first.

    Previously, I had a Dongle that I'd plug into a USB socket on this same >Laptop and, as long as I was with-in 'sight' of a Telco Antenna, I could
    talk to the world.

    In either case, I considered that I WAS Tethered! Maybe not by a
    physical wire, but Tethered none the less.

    Are we talking at different things??

    Yes, we are talking about different things.

    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a
    document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.




    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 10 05:20:41 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:23:37 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-08 19:17, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:54:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-06-30 09:31, Larry Wolff wrote:

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems >>>> are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >>>> vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system. >>>
    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,

    Which works fine saving to the local drive.

    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other
    circumstances where an internet connection is not available.

    Which works fine as previously stated.

    You CAN make use of cloud services on a Mac if you choose to do so.

    Off the top of my head:

    But you have just yourself pointed out that a system with a Mac OS is
    an Apple system.

    If it is an Apple system, then in my understabnding of logic, it
    cannot be non-Apple system. Check the subject line -- we are talking
    here about *non-Apple* systems.




    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Jul 9 20:36:55 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-09 20:15, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:05:20 +1000, Daniel70
    <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    Alan wrote on 9/7/24 3:50 am:
    On 2024-07-02 01:45, Daniel70 wrote:

    But that is no more and no less "tethered" than any other personal
    computer using any operating system.

    Sorry! Are we talking at different things??

    Currently, this Laptop uses its Wi-Fi to connect to a Box at the end of
    my Landline Phone-line. If I were to take the Laptop to a Coffee-Bar,
    the Wi-Fi would not work .... unless the Coffee-Bar offered Public Wi-Fi
    .... but I'd have to obtain the Coffee-Bar Wi-Fi Password first.

    Previously, I had a Dongle that I'd plug into a USB socket on this same
    Laptop and, as long as I was with-in 'sight' of a Telco Antenna, I could
    talk to the world.

    In either case, I considered that I WAS Tethered! Maybe not by a
    physical wire, but Tethered none the less.

    Are we talking at different things??

    Yes, we are talking about different things.

    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.

    There is no Apple computer or device made today that has that problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Tue Jul 9 20:37:49 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-09 20:20, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:23:37 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-08 19:17, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:54:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-06-30 09:31, Larry Wolff wrote:

    It's a worthwhile privacy concern to think about which operating systems >>>>> are designed to require logging into the maker's servers for most of the >>>>> vital essential services that comprise the core of the operating system. >>>>
    What "vital essential services" would those be?

    My concerns are not so much "privacy" as working.

    "Vital essential services" would be things like saving your work,

    Which works fine saving to the local drive.

    accessing your data on a laptop when away from home or in any other
    circumstances where an internet connection is not available.

    Which works fine as previously stated.

    You CAN make use of cloud services on a Mac if you choose to do so.

    Off the top of my head:

    But you have just yourself pointed out that a system with a Mac OS is
    an Apple system.

    Indeed.


    If it is an Apple system, then in my understabnding of logic, it
    cannot be non-Apple system. Check the subject line -- we are talking
    here about *non-Apple* systems.

    Because the OP implies that Apple systems won't work well without
    logging into Apple's servers...

    ...and that's bullshit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Larry Wolff@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 10 03:16:20 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 7/9/2024 11:37 PM, Alan wrote:

    If it is an Apple system, then in my understabnding of logic, it
    cannot be non-Apple system. Check the subject line -- we are talking
    here about *non-Apple* systems.

    Because the OP implies that Apple systems won't work well without
    logging into Apple's servers...

    ...and that's bullshit.

    How do iPhone owners install apps without logging into Apple servers?
    How do they even set up the iPhone without creating an iCloud account?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 10 10:15:01 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:36:55 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-09 20:15, Steve Hayes wrote:
    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a
    document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a
    particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's
    operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.

    There is no Apple computer or device made today that has that problem.

    There is no Apple computer or device made today that has a non-Apple
    common computer operating system.

    Oh, I forgot Schrodinger's Apple OS.



    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Jul 10 07:27:27 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    Steve Hayes wrote on Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:15:19 +0200 :

    Are we talking at different things??

    Yes, we are talking about different things.

    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.

    While this thread is specifically NOT about the dumb-terminal design of
    Apple systems, it's well known to everyone that if you don't log into the
    Apple servers every moment of every day of the rest of your life, all the "walled-garden" stuff Apple users crow about, suddenly stops working.

    Ask me how I know this (see images in the original post proving it).

    It needs to be stated that this Alan Baker guy is what most of us would
    refer to as a strange Apple religious fundamentalist zealot, who feels his
    only value in life is to defend Apple to the death, no matter what.

    He doesn't even realize he had to log into Apple servers on the Internet
    just to create the AppleID which is an Internet requirement that is found
    on no other common consumer operating system.

    Once he has that Apple ID on the Internet, he doesn't realize all his apps
    are tied specifically to that unique Apple ID such that no app installer
    can be copied to another device (that doesn't have his unique Apple ID).

    Again, that every app (even free apps) are locked to his specific ID is a requirement that is found on no other common consumer operating system.

    Once he installs that app, which is locked to his Apple ID, if that app is
    a key component of the infamous walled garden (such as Messages or
    Facetime), then again he has to log into *another* Apple server on the
    Internet to use all the features of the walled garden he crows about.

    It's well known that I have many Apple products where I specifically
    decided to NOT log into the Apple Internet servers, where Apple
    unilaterally bricks your login after about two years (twice!), and then,
    you have to literally visit an Apple store, in person, where they literally copy down your government ID (Apple's policy, as stated to me by Apple, is
    that you MUST show your government ID - nothing else is acceptable), and
    then, and only then, will Apple unlock your ID that they bricked simply
    because you refused to log into it over time. (Again, see images posted.)

    How's that for privacy!

    In summary, while this thread is specifically NOT about the Apple
    ecosystem, the idiocy spewed by Alan Baker requires that it be openly
    stated that no other common consumer operating system requires that you
    create, maintain and constantly log into the mothership tracking servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Jul 10 06:54:31 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-10 01:15, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:36:55 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2024-07-09 20:15, Steve Hayes wrote:
    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a
    document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a
    particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's
    operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.

    There is no Apple computer or device made today that has that problem.

    There is no Apple computer or device made today that has a non-Apple
    common computer operating system.

    Oh, I forgot Schrodinger's Apple OS.

    The whole reason for this thread is for Arlen to imply that Apple's
    devices need to be logged in.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Jul 10 11:50:03 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-10 00:27, Andrew wrote:
    Steve Hayes wrote on Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:15:19 +0200 :

    Are we talking at different things??

    Yes, we are talking about different things.

    We are talking about computers that are no longer computers, but are
    being turned into dumb terminals because they will not perform
    functions that a stand-alone computer normall performs, like saving a
    document, without being tethered, not merely to the Internet, but to a
    particular site on the internet owned by the vendor of the computer's
    operating system - like asn Apple computer not working unless it is
    linked to the Apple company's web site, or a Microsoft computer not
    working unless it is linked to the Microsoft company's web site.

    While this thread is specifically NOT about the dumb-terminal design of
    Apple systems, it's well known to everyone that if you don't log into the Apple servers every moment of every day of the rest of your life, all the "walled-garden" stuff Apple users crow about, suddenly stops working.

    Utterly false.


    Ask me how I know this (see images in the original post proving it).

    It needs to be stated that this Alan Baker guy is what most of us would
    refer to as a strange Apple religious fundamentalist zealot, who feels his only value in life is to defend Apple to the death, no matter what.

    He doesn't even realize he had to log into Apple servers on the Internet
    just to create the AppleID which is an Internet requirement that is found
    on no other common consumer operating system.

    Once he has that Apple ID on the Internet, he doesn't realize all his apps are tied specifically to that unique Apple ID such that no app installer
    can be copied to another device (that doesn't have his unique Apple ID).

    Again, that every app (even free apps) are locked to his specific ID is a requirement that is found on no other common consumer operating system.

    This is utterly false, inasmuch as Arlen is ignorant of the fact that
    only iOS devices require you to use the app store.

    Once he installs that app, which is locked to his Apple ID, if that app is
    a key component of the infamous walled garden (such as Messages or
    Facetime), then again he has to log into *another* Apple server on the Internet to use all the features of the walled garden he crows about.

    In order to use ANY service that transmit messages from one person to
    another, you need to log in to identify yourself.


    It's well known that I have many Apple products where I specifically
    decided to NOT log into the Apple Internet servers, where Apple
    unilaterally bricks your login after about two years (twice!), and then,

    He's simply lying.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Larry Wolff on Wed Jul 10 12:04:43 2024
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.os.linux
    XPost: alt.privacy

    On 2024-07-10 00:16, Larry Wolff wrote:
    On 7/9/2024 11:37 PM, Alan wrote:

    If it is an Apple system, then in my understabnding of logic, it
    cannot be non-Apple system. Check the subject line -- we are talking
    here about *non-Apple* systems.

    Because the OP implies that Apple systems won't work well without
    logging into Apple's servers...

    ...and that's bullshit.

    How do iPhone owners install apps without logging into Apple servers?

    Are iPhones all that Apple sells?

    The OP troll is insisting that you can't do anything without logging in
    to an AppleID and you most certainly can use a Mac without ever even
    HAVING an AppleID.

    Second of all, yes: on an iOS device, you need your AppleID when you
    want to download apps.

    That is the only time you NEED to use it. Period.

    How do they even set up the iPhone without creating an iCloud account?

    First of all, get your terms right.

    It's not an "iCloud account". You create an "AppleID".

    Next, while you will need one for an iOS device, it requires no personal information to be made public, and only minimal information you must
    share with Apple to create it.

    I just tested what information you have to provide Apple to set up an
    new AppleID:

    Date of birth (which you can lie about)

    Phone number for a text confirmation code.

    That's it.

    So it's quite the tempest in a teapot, isn't it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)