My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red,
except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except
for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right of
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if
you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to
leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to
find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring
the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of windows will be a boy or a girl?
On 6/28/2024 10:02 PM, micky wrote:
My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red,
except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except
for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right of
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if
you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to
leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to
find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always
highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring
the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of
windows will be a boy or a girl?
Pictures or it didn't happen.
Between "Accessibility" and "Themes", you can do some pretty serious
coloration and intensity damage. If there was a master reset for
Themes, maybe it could be fixed that way.
Paul
Between "Accessibility" and "Themes", you can do some pretty serious
It's not a theme or a color setting. It's temporary and will go away,
then come back later. Does it mean I'm running out of a resource?
Now it's red all the way to the right border, including the day/date
area.
coloration and intensity damage. If there was a master reset for
Themes, maybe it could be fixed that way.
My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red,
except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except
for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right of
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if
you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to
leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to
find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring
the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of windows will be a boy or a girl?
micky wrote:
My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red,
except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except
for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right of
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if
you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to
leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to
find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always
highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring
the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of
windows will be a boy or a girl?
It sounds very much as though it's shifting colour in coordination
with the general background colour changes; from light to dark, or
something similar.
Turn transparency effects on or off; turn light/dark settings on or
off; make sure you don't have some third-party software running that
might be doing it.
Ed
Ed Cryer wrote on 6/30/2024 6:08 AM:
micky wrote:
My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red,
except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except >>> for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right of
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if
you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to
leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to >>> find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always
highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring >>> the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of
windows will be a boy or a girl?
It sounds very much as though it's shifting colour in coordination with the general background colour changes; from light to dark, or something similar.
Turn transparency effects on or off; turn light/dark settings on or off; make sure you don't have some third-party software running that might be doing it.
Ed
My guess is that his hard drive is corrupted. Should do a "Properties > Tools > Check" on Drive C.
Other than that, should use some disk cleaning software to eliminate garbage and some persistent malware embedded in the user data cache.
Try this portable version of "Wise Disk Cleaner":
https://portableapps.com/apps/utilities/wise-disk-cleaner-portable
On 6/30/2024 6:34 AM, 😎 Mighty Wannabe ✅ wrote:
Ed Cryer wrote on 6/30/2024 6:08 AM:??? Que ?
micky wrote:My guess is that his hard drive is corrupted. Should do a "Properties > Tools > Check" on Drive C.
My taskbar background, win10 Home, fully updated, has turned pink/red, >>>> except for the task that has focus (which is white or cream), and except >>>> for the day/date section on the right, and ever thing to the right ofIt sounds very much as though it's shifting colour in coordination with the general background colour changes; from light to dark, or something similar.
that (which is still grey).
Sometimes -- I haven't figured out when -- it turns baby blue.
What does all this mean?
For years the background had no color iirc, although a long time
complaint has been that early on, the task with focus was clearly a
different color from all the others and 10 years ago or more, that
stopped. Most tasks can be identified by what's on the screen but if >>>> you have more than one window of Firefox, for example, and you want to >>>> leave Firefox or whatever browser and come back to the same window
later, you want to be able to see which of the tasks you're in first, to >>>> find it again. But that has usually not been possible for years.
So MS went from coloring the taskbar informatively, to no longer always >>>> highlighting the task in focus (coloribg them all the same), to coloring >>>> the taskbar pink, or maybe blue. Does this mean the next generation of >>>> windows will be a boy or a girl?
Turn transparency effects on or off; turn light/dark settings on or off; make sure you don't have some third-party software running that might be doing it.
Ed
Other than that, should use some disk cleaning software to eliminate garbage and some persistent malware embedded in the user data cache.
Try this portable version of "Wise Disk Cleaner":
https://portableapps.com/apps/utilities/wise-disk-cleaner-portable
And where is the user data cache ?
This sounds like an all-important development.
Windows has a System Read Cache. It uses RAM. The RAM is not booked.
Cached material is ejected when there is any sort of memory pressure.
Just about every OS has one of those by the way.
Windows has a System Write Cache. It uses RAM. The RAM is booked.
You can watch in Task Manager as it deflates when data makes it to disk. There is a limit to how much of the RAM it is allowed to use.
These both start clean, every time you boot the machine.
At shutdown, the System Write Cache is flushed, and any remaining clusters
go out to disk.
Neither of those is a "user data cache".
Both of those are System functions, enjoyed by anything that runs on the computer.
NTFS has the "Robust NTFS feature", which is background checking that
the file system is in good shape. This is why, an attempt to select
Checking of a partition in Properties, results in a message telling you
"we don't think anything is wrong, but we'll check for you anyway".
That's because the file system is checked as a background process.
The algorithmic details were never published as far as I know, just
the name of the feature was announced.
The OS checks for the dirty bit at startup, and can check the file systems marked as such, automatically. You will see a status on the screen. The
dirty bit tends to be set by Linux, after GParted resizes partitions,
moves partitions, clones or copies partitions. The OS itself, likely only uses the dirty bit if the OS "does an unclean shutdown".
The design of the system is relatively well covered.
Snake oil cleaners are not needed.
If you want to clean some materials on your disk, the OS provides "cleanmgr.exe" . You should review the options offered carefully, before using them. For example, if you attempt to clean %temp%, cleanmgr.exe isn't aggressive enough. You can go into %temp% your own self, and attempt to
throw it all out. Anything that is "locked" you can skip.
But generally speaking, the only cleaning you should be doing, is cleaning you researched yourself. You need to be informed about what the consequences of screwing around are. A browser cache can be cleaned. But, if you were
that clever, by now you would have switched the browser cache to "running in RAM",
and then, never again would you need to clean the disk cache it used to use. Once reconfigured, the problem is permanently fixed. No more snake oil
needed for that one. Not that the browser cache had any side effects to speak of in the first place. If you dial down the size of the cache, that can
quite frequently be sufficient to reduce any "mess".
I don't have any Snake Oil Cleaners on my disk drive here as samples.
I will not even scan them with an AV for you. Because they're simply
not fit for human consumption.
The Registry does not need cleaning. If you look at the size of the
files, they are quite modest these days. They are also doubly journaled,
for your protection. Mostly gone are the days of registry corruption.
It takes a malware to foul them up now (an outright attempt to ruin them).
Paul
Paul wrote on 6/30/2024 9:20 AM:
And where is the user data cache ?
I have stepped up to Windows11. In my Windows11, the Firefox cache is in:
(You have to enable Windows11 to show hidden files by clicking: View > Show > Hidden items)
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox
I mainly use Firefox and Microsoft Edge. In my Windows11, the Microsoft Edge cache is in:
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Edge
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Edge
Your computer may be different. Just look under C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\ to find everything there. Don't forget to enable Windows to show hidden files, because "AppData" is a hidden folder Under C:\Users\(Your user name).
On 6/30/2024 12:31 PM, ? Mighty Wannabe ? wrote:
Paul wrote on 6/30/2024 9:20 AM:
And where is the user data cache ?
I have stepped up to Windows11. In my Windows11, the Firefox cache is in:
(You have to enable Windows11 to show hidden files by clicking: View > Show > Hidden items)
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox
I mainly use Firefox and Microsoft Edge. In my Windows11, the Microsoft Edge cache is in:
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Edge
C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Edge
Your computer may be different. Just look under C:\Users\(Your user name)\AppData\ to find everything there. Don't forget to enable Windows to show hidden files, because "AppData" is a hidden folder Under C:\Users\(Your user name).
Look into setting up Firefox with the RAM cache option.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/set-ram-cache-firefox-41282.html
browser.cache.disk.enable FALSE
browser.cache.memory.enable TRUE
browser.cache.memory.capacity 131072 KB (128MB)
As you would expect, the Chrome answer is a mess. The first link
indicates that perhaps Chrome does not give a fuck about how you
want to configure things.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44596937/chrome-memory-cache-vs-disk-cache
Whether this works or not, who knows. At least it doesn't sound
like it's storing the entire profile in your RAMDisk.
https://superuser.com/questions/866016/moving-chrome-cache-folder
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe"
--disk-cache-dir=r:\chrome_cache (assuming r: is your ramdisk)
I've done the Firefox one. It seems to work. I didn't find any files
any more in cache2 area.
If you want to learn about cleaning things, a package called Bleachbit
has scripts for cleaning. I don't run the scripts themselves, but I
do look at the scripts when I need hints on how to clean something.
The scripts can give you a rough idea where the data folders might
be located.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BleachBit
Paul
It's back to blue now.
It has no correlation with the colors on the rest of the screen, and as
you predicted, no correlation with the amount of resources in use, and
it scanning the harddrive (SSD) showed no problems, so if I can't use it
as an early warning about resources, or for any other useful purpose,
I'm just going to forget about it
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 439 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:40:19 |
Calls: | 9,149 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,433 |
Messages: | 6,042,785 |