Hi all,
I have used RealVNC for remote control of other pc's for quite a few
years. It was a free version. It worked well and I was very happy with it. They will stop with the free version and now I have to pay for it. It is
€ 234.57 per year. To my meaning this is too expensive and I don't want
to pay this much. So now I have to search for alternatives.
Does any of you have a suggestion? I'd like to read it.
Many thanks beforehand.
With regards,
Fokke Nauta
In article <ld85dvFb4icU1@mid.individual.net>, Fokke Nauta wrote...
Hi all,
I have used RealVNC for remote control of other pc's for quite a few
years. It was a free version. It worked well and I was very happy with it. >> They will stop with the free version and now I have to pay for it. It is
€ 234.57 per year. To my meaning this is too expensive and I don't want
to pay this much. So now I have to search for alternatives.
Does any of you have a suggestion? I'd like to read it.
Many thanks beforehand.
With regards,
Fokke Nauta
Never had a problem with UVNC.
https://uvnc.com/
Hi all,
I have used RealVNC for remote control of other pc's for quite a few
years. It was a free version. It worked well and I was very happy with it. They will stop with the free version and now I have to pay for it. It is
€ 234.57 per year. To my meaning this is too expensive and I don't want
to pay this much. So now I have to search for alternatives.
Does any of you have a suggestion? I'd like to read it.
Many thanks beforehand.
On 16/06/2024 15:07, Philip Herlihy wrote:
In article <ld85dvFb4icU1@mid.individual.net>, Fokke Nauta wrote...
Hi all,
I have used RealVNC for remote control of other pc's for quite a few
years. It was a free version. It worked well and I was very happy
with it.
They will stop with the free version and now I have to pay for it. It is >>> € 234.57 per year. To my meaning this is too expensive and I don't want >>> to pay this much. So now I have to search for alternatives.
Does any of you have a suggestion? I'd like to read it.
Many thanks beforehand.
With regards,
Fokke Nauta
Never had a problem with UVNC.
https://uvnc.com/
Thanks very much. I'm going to install this one.
I'll keep you informed.
Fokke
Fokke Nauta wrote:
I installed the Viewer on my W10 Peo PC, and the Server on a W11 Pro
laptop.
When starting the viewer with the port 5900, the answer is that the
connection failed.
Have you enabled the outgoing and incoming ports in Defender Firewall?
Can anybody recommend a good alternative to TeamViewer please? It's supposed to be free for occasional non-business use but I can never get
it to work for more than 30 seconds at a time - so it's useless for
debugging a problem.
I switched off the Defender Firewall on the pc and the laptop. Did not
make a difference.
I installed the Viewer on my W10 Peo PC, and the Server on a W11 Pro
laptop.
When starting the viewer with the port 5900, the answer is that the connection failed.
Fokke Nauta wrote:
I switched off the Defender Firewall on the pc and the laptop. Did not
make a difference.
can you see the server listening by starting a cmd.exe window, then using
netstat -an | find ":5900"
On 16/06/2024 18:03, Andy Burns wrote:
Fokke Nauta wrote:
I switched off the Defender Firewall on the pc and the laptop. Did
not make a difference.
can you see the server listening by starting a cmd.exe window, then using
netstat -an | find ":5900"
I did.
It says: TCP 0.0.0.0:5900 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Fokke
Any suggestions?
On 16/06/2024 18:03, Andy Burns wrote:
Fokke Nauta wrote:
I switched off the Defender Firewall on the pc and the laptop. Did not
make a difference.
can you see the server listening by starting a cmd.exe window, then using
netstat -an | find ":5900"
I did.
It says: TCP 0.0.0.0:5900 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
Fokke
Can anybody recommend a good alternative to TeamViewer please?
It's supposed to be free for occasional non-business use but I can
never get it to work for more than 30 seconds at a time - so it's
useless for debugging a problem.
That's surprising. I use Teamviewer sometimes for hours at a time and I
find it very stable and reliable.
I think they keep logs of who uses it to/from which machines, how often
etc, to decide if it looks like business-use ...
On 16 Jun 2024, Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-10:
Can anybody recommend a good alternative to TeamViewer please?
It's supposed to be free for occasional non-business use but I can
never get it to work for more than 30 seconds at a time - so it's
useless for debugging a problem.
That's surprising. I use Teamviewer sometimes for hours at a time and I
find it very stable and reliable.
On 17/06/2024 12:24, Fokke Nauta wrote:
Any suggestions?
immediately after trying to connect from client, shat does that netstat
say?
Any ESTABLISHED/FINWAIT/TIMEWAIT/CLOSEWAIT/LASTACK statuses?
have you got authentication settings the same in client/server?
Netstat ? I don't know that.
Nil wrote:
That's surprising. I use Teamviewer sometimes for hours at a time
and I find it very stable and reliable.
I think they keep logs of who uses it to/from which machines, how
often etc, to decide if it looks like business-use ...
Fokke Nauta wrote:
Netstat ? I don't know that.
try to connect VNC, then repeat
the same command you ran before, within a couple of seconds, just
copy/paste the output here ...
netstat -an | find ":5900"
I give it up.
Fokke Nauta wrote:
[snip]
I give it up.
Be sure the client and server PCs are on the same LAN and each can
"ping" the other before you start.
Try https://www.tightvnc.com/
Install it. Read the documentation at:
<https://www.tightvnc.com/doc/win/TightVNC_for_Windows-Installation_and_Getting_Started.pdf>
... and make sure you configure it properly.
Can anybody recommend a good alternative to TeamViewer please? It's
supposed to be free for occasional non-business use but I can never get
it to work for more than 30 seconds at a time - so it's useless for
debugging a problem.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 186:40:39 |
Calls: | 9,707 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,737 |
Messages: | 6,179,689 |