• Confused by new sleep options

    From Newyana2@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 09:15:59 2024
    It used to be that I could choose Sleep when shutting down,
    then wake the computer by hitting any key. (I've always set
    the keyboard to be able to wake while disabling that option
    for the mouse.)

    With my latest build I have options in the BIOS. One is
    something I've never seen before: A setting to wake from
    either OS or BIOS. If I enable S3 and set to wake from the
    BIOS, the computer can be woken via keyboard, but it can
    also be started from cold by touching the keyboard! There
    are also other options of how to wake it, such as USB. But
    since I have a PS2 trackball I'm able to have it wake only
    via PS2 keyboard.

    Does that mean it's always in some version of sleep if
    I select wake via BIOS?

    If instead I choose to wake from the OS, the keyboard no
    longer responds, and the BIOS choices disappear, but I can
    wake it by pressing the blinking
    power button. Perhaps I should mention that I've built this
    computer reusing an older case, so the power button is
    probably 10 years old or so. But the motherboard connections
    seem to still be the same.

    All of this is not really a problem, but I'm trying to understand
    my options and how this "modern" design works under the surface.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Jason@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 07:54:52 2024
    On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:15:59 -0400, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
    wrote:

    It used to be that I could choose Sleep when shutting down,
    then wake the computer by hitting any key. (I've always set
    the keyboard to be able to wake while disabling that option
    for the mouse.)

    With my latest build I have options in the BIOS. One is
    something I've never seen before: A setting to wake from
    either OS or BIOS. If I enable S3 and set to wake from the
    BIOS, the computer can be woken via keyboard, but it can
    also be started from cold by touching the keyboard! There
    are also other options of how to wake it, such as USB. But
    since I have a PS2 trackball I'm able to have it wake only
    via PS2 keyboard.

    Does that mean it's always in some version of sleep if
    I select wake via BIOS?

    If instead I choose to wake from the OS, the keyboard no
    longer responds, and the BIOS choices disappear, but I can
    wake it by pressing the blinking
    power button. Perhaps I should mention that I've built this
    computer reusing an older case, so the power button is
    probably 10 years old or so. But the motherboard connections
    seem to still be the same.

    All of this is not really a problem, but I'm trying to understand
    my options and how this "modern" design works under the surface.

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight. I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zaidy036@21:1/5 to Peter Jason on Sun Jun 9 21:42:49 2024
    On 6/9/2024 5:54 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
    On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:15:59 -0400, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
    wrote:

    It used to be that I could choose Sleep when shutting down,
    then wake the computer by hitting any key. (I've always set
    the keyboard to be able to wake while disabling that option
    for the mouse.)

    With my latest build I have options in the BIOS. One is
    something I've never seen before: A setting to wake from
    either OS or BIOS. If I enable S3 and set to wake from the
    BIOS, the computer can be woken via keyboard, but it can
    also be started from cold by touching the keyboard! There
    are also other options of how to wake it, such as USB. But
    since I have a PS2 trackball I'm able to have it wake only
    via PS2 keyboard.

    Does that mean it's always in some version of sleep if
    I select wake via BIOS?

    If instead I choose to wake from the OS, the keyboard no
    longer responds, and the BIOS choices disappear, but I can
    wake it by pressing the blinking
    power button. Perhaps I should mention that I've built this
    computer reusing an older case, so the power button is
    probably 10 years old or so. But the motherboard connections
    seem to still be the same.

    All of this is not really a problem, but I'm trying to understand
    my options and how this "modern" design works under the surface.

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight. I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.

    Better to not rely on a mechanical switch which can fail.

    A Shortcut using the free
    NirSoft\multimonitortool-x64\MultiMonitorTool.exe can turn off one or
    two monitors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 9 22:30:58 2024
    On 6/8/2024 9:15 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
      It used to be that I could choose Sleep when shutting down,
    then wake the computer by hitting any key. (I've always set
    the keyboard to be able to wake while disabling that option
    for the mouse.)

      With my latest build I have options in the BIOS. One is
    something I've never seen before: A setting to wake from
    either OS or BIOS. If I enable S3 and set to wake from the
    BIOS, the computer can be woken via keyboard, but it can
    also be started from cold by touching the keyboard! There
    are also other options of how to wake it, such as USB. But
    since I have a PS2 trackball I'm able to have it wake only
    via PS2 keyboard.

        Does that mean it's always in some version of sleep if
    I select wake via BIOS?

      If instead I choose to wake from the OS, the keyboard no
    longer responds, and the BIOS choices disappear, but I can
    wake it by pressing the blinking
    power button. Perhaps I should mention that I've built this
    computer reusing an older case, so the power button is
    probably 10 years old or so. But the motherboard connections
    seem to still be the same.

       All of this is not really a problem, but I'm trying to understand
    my options and how this "modern" design works under the surface.

    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/

    To me, only the BIOS choice makes sense. If the PC is in S4, then
    we need the BIOS to handle PME (power management event, any event
    raising the power state of a peripheral interface -- originally
    used for Wake On LAN). The Windows setting in Device Manager,
    to "allow this device to wake the computer", the OS sends the info
    to the BIOS, and the BIOS is the last one to ensure the USB port
    is ready to wake when a PME happens.

    Choosing the OS, suggests a reduction in function.

    The Power Button on your PC, is translated by the BIOS to
    an ACPI OBject of the same name. It should be tied as a PME-like
    event, the BIOS should raise the machine state and pass the ACPI object
    (wake time info) so the machine knows why it woke up.

    At the OS level, the Power Button is programmable. It can be
    tied to Sleep, or it can be tied to Shutdown. There is a four second
    timer on the button, so brushing against it, will not result in
    instantaneous behavior. In the event of a fire, you reach for the
    power switch on the back of the PC, as that is faster.

    By the way, that's the first I've heard of that setting, and
    with my luck, there will be one in my MSI motherboard too.

    Paul


    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Jun 9 22:54:02 2024
    On 6/9/2024 10:30 PM, Paul wrote:

    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/

    Yes. That's it. I have a B760M-P. I've actually had Asus boards
    for many years. This is the first MSI board in a long time. It seems
    to be fine, generally. My last Asus was also fine.

    To me, only the BIOS choice makes sense. If the PC is in S4, then
    we need the BIOS to handle PME (power management event, any event
    raising the power state of a peripheral interface -- originally
    used for Wake On LAN). The Windows setting in Device Manager,
    to "allow this device to wake the computer", the OS sends the info
    to the BIOS, and the BIOS is the last one to ensure the USB port
    is ready to wake when a PME happens.

    When I choose BIOS I have a choice to sleep in S3 and
    wake up via USB device or PS2. The trouble is that the
    trackball is USB. I don't want that to be able to cause a wake
    because any vibration can set it off.

    I realize now that I mixed things up in my initial description. The
    keyboard is PS2. Not the trackball. I chose the PS2 option so
    that I could be sure only pressing a key would wake it up. (I was
    surprised to find that the motherboard has both PS2 ports.)
    Now only the power button wakes it up. My hesitation with
    BIOS option is that I don't like the idea of the BIOS standing by.
    I don't want wake on LAN or any other wake option other than
    the keyboard. But I suppose that if I'm waking via the OS then
    the BIOS must still be standing by, no?

    Mainly I just don't want any security risks from remote, and
    I don't want the mouse/trackball to be able to wake it up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Peter Jason on Sun Jun 9 22:41:08 2024
    On 6/9/2024 5:54 PM, Peter Jason wrote:

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight. I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.


    You mean you can't get your computer to go into sleep
    mode at all but you leave the computer on constantly?
    That's unfortunate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 02:05:16 2024
    On 6/9/2024 10:41 PM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 5:54 PM, Peter Jason wrote:

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight.  I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.


      You mean you can't get your computer to go into sleep
    mode at all but you leave the computer on constantly?
    That's unfortunate.

    Well, you know the name of that tune.

    If you no longer have Control Panels, go

    start : run : control.exe

    Once Control Panels show

    https://static1.makeuseofimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/enable-sleep-option-control-panel.png?q=50&fit=crop&w=943&dpr=1.5

    Control Panels : Hardware and Sound : Power Options : System Settings

    "Define power buttons and..."

    You can see the same kind of instructions, here.

    https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/69741-change-default-action-power-button-windows-10-a.html

    "Choose what the power buttons do"

    At BIOS level, you can "Enable S1 and S3 state". Modern BIOS simply assume
    that is set to Yes, and they don't even bother to show it any more. And
    that's because the OS has tick boxes too, and if the user does not want
    the feature, it can be switched off at OS level.

    With older Windows OSes, you used Dumppo, to reset S3 Sleep.
    You can't even get Dumppo.exe any more. The site offering it is gone.

    The modern OSes don't need that. They need for you to ensure the
    BIOS has not specifically been configured to defeat the OS at this
    game. Then, it's a matter of ticking those boxes, and checking the
    power menu to see if Sleep and Hibernate were added back or not.

    *******

    The Powercfg utility is a power house of options. A very useful utility

    Administrator terminal:

    powercfg /? # Help items

    powercfg /a # Before working on your dialog, see what the report
    # says about your ACPI support. See if S3 and S4 are there.

    powercfg /AVAILABLESLEEPSTATES # Same as the previous command.

    My machine offers a reminder. My hibernate is damaged, because I did this on purpose

    powercfg /h off

    I have to do this, to "improve" my available sleep states.

    powercfg /h on

    With my hibernation disabled, my output says this:

    *******
    powercfg /a

    The following sleep states are available on this system:
    Standby (S3) S3=Sleep, no S4 Hibernate

    The following sleep states are not available on this system:
    Standby (S1)
    The system firmware does not support this standby state. [But it blanks the stupid monitor, anyway]

    Standby (S2)
    The system firmware does not support this standby state. [Neither does anyone else support S2]

    Hibernate
    Hibernation has not been enabled.

    Standby (S0 Low Power Idle)
    The system firmware does not support this standby state. [The Kill-O-Watt power meter says otherwise]
    [A person would check BIOS "C States" for details]
    Hybrid Sleep
    Hibernation is not available. [This is S3 Sleep + the hiberfil.sys]
    The hypervisor does not support this standby state.

    Fast Startup
    Hibernation is not available.

    *******

    Does not look all that good.

    I've been through my BIOS, top to bottom, a couple times, and
    there's a lot of stuff I cannot find (so far). The other machine
    (Asus) isn't quite that bad.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 01:43:42 2024
    On 6/9/2024 10:54 PM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 10:30 PM, Paul wrote:

    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/

       Yes. That's it. I have a B760M-P.  I've actually had Asus boards
    for many years. This is the first MSI board in a long time. It seems
    to be fine, generally. My last Asus was also fine.

    To me, only the BIOS choice makes sense. If the PC is in S4, then
    we need the BIOS to handle PME (power management event, any event
    raising the power state of a peripheral interface -- originally
    used for Wake On LAN). The Windows setting in Device Manager,
    to "allow this device to wake the computer", the OS sends the info
    to the BIOS, and the BIOS is the last one to ensure the USB port
    is ready to wake when a PME happens.

      When I choose BIOS I have a choice to sleep in S3 and
    wake up via USB device or PS2. The trouble is that the
    trackball is USB. I don't want that to be able to cause a wake
    because any vibration can set it off.

      I realize now that I mixed things up in my initial description. The keyboard is PS2. Not the trackball. I chose the PS2 option so
    that I could be sure only pressing a key would wake it up. (I was
    surprised to find that the motherboard has both PS2 ports.)
    Now only the power button wakes it up. My hesitation with
    BIOS option is that I don't like the idea of the BIOS standing by.
    I don't want wake on LAN or any other wake option other than
    the keyboard. But I suppose that if I'm waking via the OS then
    the BIOS must still be standing by, no?

       Mainly I just don't want any security risks from remote, and
    I don't want the mouse/trackball to be able to wake it up.


    The BIOS arms the PCH (Southbridge) for PME events. The BIOS
    then normally goes to sleep.

    It's hardware, a logic block, that is watching the store. There
    is no program activity to speak of.

    Newer hardware could have some whizzy way of waking for short
    intervals. Nothing I have here does that, but my gear isn't all
    that fancy. I assume even S0IC devices have low power states
    when the user isn't using the machine. S0IC allows being in S3,
    and then waking up for 500 usec to deal with, maybe Wifi or something.
    Perhaps it can keep connections alive, while the machine "nominally"
    sleeps. A kind of "fitful sleep", a lot of tossing and turning.

    When the BIOS wakes up, it passes control to the OS as soon as
    initialization is complete. The OS also has initialization after
    sleep, as the drivers need to prime the registers on the
    chips that did not have power. That is regarded as a kind of
    "warm start", since you were sleeping, the code for the driver
    is already loaded, but the registers are not the way you like them.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jun 10 07:45:31 2024
    On 6/10/2024 2:05 AM, Paul wrote:

    The Powercfg utility is a power house of options. A very useful utility


    I didn't know about that one. Aside from the forced ribbon menu
    on Explorer windows, I pretty much like what MS did with Win10....
    At least after I throttle the spyware and install Classic Shell, and
    a hundred other tweaks... But they really made a mess of the settings.

    Things are split between Control Panel and a Metro-for-dumbies
    settings system that's prone to freezing and entirely superfluous. It's as though MS are saying, "You're going to use that goddam Metro cellphone
    UI whether you like it or not, buddyboy!" But then there are also things
    like powercfg, that handle just a few minor settings not provided in
    either of the settings systems.

    I've actually had hibernate disabled, too. I saw no reason to waste
    4GB of space that I don't use. I hadn't realized that powercfg
    had other options. It tells me that I have support only for S3. That's
    OK with me.

    Now there's also another quirk: If I don't turn on the monitor fast
    enough at boot, it doesn't see the DisplayPort connection. I have
    to try to remember to turn on the monitor first, or else reboot. Makes
    no sense. But maybe I can just think of these things as mindbenders
    for seniors. Microsoft and MSI are helping me to avoid old age senility
    without having to do crossword puzzles. So I guess I'm ahead of the
    game.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jun 10 07:50:32 2024
    On 6/10/2024 1:43 AM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 10:54 PM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 10:30 PM, Paul wrote:

    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/ >>>
       Yes. That's it. I have a B760M-P.  I've actually had Asus boards
    for many years. This is the first MSI board in a long time. It seems
    to be fine, generally. My last Asus was also fine.

    To me, only the BIOS choice makes sense. If the PC is in S4, then
    we need the BIOS to handle PME (power management event, any event
    raising the power state of a peripheral interface -- originally
    used for Wake On LAN). The Windows setting in Device Manager,
    to "allow this device to wake the computer", the OS sends the info
    to the BIOS, and the BIOS is the last one to ensure the USB port
    is ready to wake when a PME happens.

      When I choose BIOS I have a choice to sleep in S3 and
    wake up via USB device or PS2. The trouble is that the
    trackball is USB. I don't want that to be able to cause a wake
    because any vibration can set it off.

      I realize now that I mixed things up in my initial description. The
    keyboard is PS2. Not the trackball. I chose the PS2 option so
    that I could be sure only pressing a key would wake it up. (I was
    surprised to find that the motherboard has both PS2 ports.)
    Now only the power button wakes it up. My hesitation with
    BIOS option is that I don't like the idea of the BIOS standing by.
    I don't want wake on LAN or any other wake option other than
    the keyboard. But I suppose that if I'm waking via the OS then
    the BIOS must still be standing by, no?

       Mainly I just don't want any security risks from remote, and
    I don't want the mouse/trackball to be able to wake it up.


    The BIOS arms the PCH (Southbridge) for PME events. The BIOS
    then normally goes to sleep.

    It's hardware, a logic block, that is watching the store. There
    is no program activity to speak of.

    Newer hardware could have some whizzy way of waking for short
    intervals. Nothing I have here does that, but my gear isn't all
    that fancy. I assume even S0IC devices have low power states
    when the user isn't using the machine. S0IC allows being in S3,
    and then waking up for 500 usec to deal with, maybe Wifi or something. Perhaps it can keep connections alive, while the machine "nominally"
    sleeps. A kind of "fitful sleep", a lot of tossing and turning.

    When the BIOS wakes up, it passes control to the OS as soon as
    initialization is complete. The OS also has initialization after
    sleep, as the drivers need to prime the registers on the
    chips that did not have power. That is regarded as a kind of
    "warm start", since you were sleeping, the code for the driver
    is already loaded, but the registers are not the way you like them.


    So where does all that leave security? Would it be accurate to
    say that neither PC nor BIOS wake is insecure, but that there's
    always a remote possibility that some kind of hack coming down
    the wire or the airwaves could wake them up if ethernet and/or
    wifi are connected?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 08:37:13 2024
    On 6/10/2024 7:50 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 1:43 AM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 10:54 PM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/9/2024 10:30 PM, Paul wrote:

    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?attachments/1646496155729-jpeg.157510/ >>>>
        Yes. That's it. I have a B760M-P.  I've actually had Asus boards
    for many years. This is the first MSI board in a long time. It seems
    to be fine, generally. My last Asus was also fine.

    To me, only the BIOS choice makes sense. If the PC is in S4, then
    we need the BIOS to handle PME (power management event, any event
    raising the power state of a peripheral interface -- originally
    used for Wake On LAN). The Windows setting in Device Manager,
    to "allow this device to wake the computer", the OS sends the info
    to the BIOS, and the BIOS is the last one to ensure the USB port
    is ready to wake when a PME happens.

       When I choose BIOS I have a choice to sleep in S3 and
    wake up via USB device or PS2. The trouble is that the
    trackball is USB. I don't want that to be able to cause a wake
    because any vibration can set it off.

       I realize now that I mixed things up in my initial description. The
    keyboard is PS2. Not the trackball. I chose the PS2 option so
    that I could be sure only pressing a key would wake it up. (I was
    surprised to find that the motherboard has both PS2 ports.)
    Now only the power button wakes it up. My hesitation with
    BIOS option is that I don't like the idea of the BIOS standing by.
    I don't want wake on LAN or any other wake option other than
    the keyboard. But I suppose that if I'm waking via the OS then
    the BIOS must still be standing by, no?

        Mainly I just don't want any security risks from remote, and
    I don't want the mouse/trackball to be able to wake it up.


    The BIOS arms the PCH (Southbridge) for PME events. The BIOS
    then normally goes to sleep.

    It's hardware, a logic block, that is watching the store. There
    is no program activity to speak of.

    Newer hardware could have some whizzy way of waking for short
    intervals. Nothing I have here does that, but my gear isn't all
    that fancy. I assume even S0IC devices have low power states
    when the user isn't using the machine. S0IC allows being in S3,
    and then waking up for 500 usec to deal with, maybe Wifi or something.
    Perhaps it can keep connections alive, while the machine "nominally"
    sleeps. A kind of "fitful sleep", a lot of tossing and turning.

    When the BIOS wakes up, it passes control to the OS as soon as
    initialization is complete. The OS also has initialization after
    sleep, as the drivers need to prime the registers on the
    chips that did not have power. That is regarded as a kind of
    "warm start", since you were sleeping, the code for the driver
    is already loaded, but the registers are not the way you like them.


      So where does all that leave security? Would it be accurate to
    say that neither PC nor BIOS wake is insecure, but that there's
    always a remote possibility that some kind of hack coming down
    the wire or the airwaves could wake them up if ethernet and/or
    wifi are connected?

    But wouldn't that attack surface always be present ?

    If there was some un-sanitized packet input that could tip
    over an S0ic box, the issue could be present when in S0.
    As well as whatever passes for snoozing.

    I'm not even sure, what percentage of Windows boxes use S0ic.
    It was originally on Microsoft Surface products. Other companies
    like HP, said they would "wait and see", what the level of
    stability was like, before they would sell similar products.
    And that's all I've heard since. No questions seem to pop up
    here, about S0ic. But it represents a change to the ACPI model.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jun 10 11:34:57 2024
    On 6/10/2024 8:37 AM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 7:50 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 1:43 AM, Paul wrote:

      So where does all that leave security? Would it be accurate to
    say that neither PC nor BIOS wake is insecure, but that there's
    always a remote possibility that some kind of hack coming down
    the wire or the airwaves could wake them up if ethernet and/or
    wifi are connected?

    But wouldn't that attack surface always be present ?

    That's what I'm not clear about. I can disable wake-on-LAN,
    but the possibility of it implies that an outside signal can start
    the computer, possibly even when I consider it to be off and
    not asleep.

    I don't understand how that works or what form a hack
    might take. I suppose the easiest is just to leave it unplugged,
    which is what I've generally done in the past. All my computers
    are running hardwired to Internet and the main one I usually
    unplug when not in use.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 10 14:48:29 2024
    On 6/10/2024 11:34 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 8:37 AM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 7:50 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 1:43 AM, Paul wrote:

       So where does all that leave security? Would it be accurate to
    say that neither PC nor BIOS wake is insecure, but that there's
    always a remote possibility that some kind of hack coming down
    the wire or the airwaves could wake them up if ethernet and/or
    wifi are connected?

    But wouldn't that attack surface always be present ?

     That's what I'm not clear about. I can disable wake-on-LAN,
    but the possibility of it implies that an outside signal can start
    the computer, possibly even when I consider it to be off and
    not asleep.

      I don't understand how that works or what form a hack
    might take. I suppose the easiest is just to leave it unplugged,
    which is what I've generally done in the past. All my computers
    are running hardwired to Internet and the main one I usually
    unplug when not in use.

    In Device Manager (right-click Start menu Win10, to find the item),
    then look at the Properties of the NIC.

    In the Power Management tab of the NIC properties, it says

    Allow this device to wake the computer

    If that box is unticked, then the Ethernet LED on the switch/router
    should be un-lit, when the computer does a shutdown, and the Ethernet
    is then not supposed to be listening for WOL. The Allow this device to wake
    the computer, should affect the PME path from the NIC to the rest of
    the machine. But the BIOS also interprets this state request, as a
    request to power off the core of the NIC (saving one watt). There's no
    point having the NIC core running, if it is no longer possible to wake
    the PC. That's regular ACPI, the S0ic behavior could be different.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Jason@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 11 07:07:22 2024
    On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:42:49 -0400, Zaidy036 <Zaidy036@air.isp.spam>
    wrote:

    On 6/9/2024 5:54 PM, Peter Jason wrote:
    On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:15:59 -0400, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
    wrote:

    It used to be that I could choose Sleep when shutting down,
    then wake the computer by hitting any key. (I've always set
    the keyboard to be able to wake while disabling that option
    for the mouse.)

    With my latest build I have options in the BIOS. One is
    something I've never seen before: A setting to wake from
    either OS or BIOS. If I enable S3 and set to wake from the
    BIOS, the computer can be woken via keyboard, but it can
    also be started from cold by touching the keyboard! There
    are also other options of how to wake it, such as USB. But
    since I have a PS2 trackball I'm able to have it wake only
    via PS2 keyboard.

    Does that mean it's always in some version of sleep if
    I select wake via BIOS?

    If instead I choose to wake from the OS, the keyboard no
    longer responds, and the BIOS choices disappear, but I can
    wake it by pressing the blinking
    power button. Perhaps I should mention that I've built this
    computer reusing an older case, so the power button is
    probably 10 years old or so. But the motherboard connections
    seem to still be the same.

    All of this is not really a problem, but I'm trying to understand
    my options and how this "modern" design works under the surface.

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight. I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.

    Better to not rely on a mechanical switch which can fail.

    A Shortcut using the free
    NirSoft\multimonitortool-x64\MultiMonitorTool.exe can turn off one or
    two monitors.

    Thanx, I'll check this out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Jason@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 11 07:06:43 2024
    On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:41:08 -0400, Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
    wrote:

    On 6/9/2024 5:54 PM, Peter Jason wrote:

    I have a separate switch to turn off the monitor overnight. I can't
    get the MSoft menu to work.


    You mean you can't get your computer to go into sleep
    mode at all but you leave the computer on constantly?
    That's unfortunate.

    I'm always downloading stuff overnight.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to ...winston on Mon Jun 10 17:32:13 2024
    On 6/10/2024 3:03 PM, ...winston wrote:

    I never use the UEFI/BIOS wake/sleep option, just Windows Power Options.

    Inactivity configurations
      - On desktop (Win10 Pro)
    Display off at 15 min, SSD at 20 min, Computer sleep at 30 min

      - On laptop (Win11 Pro)
    For Battery settings Display 10 min, SSD Never, Computer sleep 20 min
    For Plug in settings Display 15 min, SSD Never, Computer sleep 30 min


    I never use any of those options. I just put it to
    sleep when I'm not going to be using it for awhile.
    The waking up was the part that got me confused.
    It used to be simpler.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Jun 10 17:29:57 2024
    On 6/10/2024 2:48 PM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 11:34 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 8:37 AM, Paul wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 7:50 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 6/10/2024 1:43 AM, Paul wrote:

       So where does all that leave security? Would it be accurate to
    say that neither PC nor BIOS wake is insecure, but that there's
    always a remote possibility that some kind of hack coming down
    the wire or the airwaves could wake them up if ethernet and/or
    wifi are connected?

    But wouldn't that attack surface always be present ?

     That's what I'm not clear about. I can disable wake-on-LAN,
    but the possibility of it implies that an outside signal can start
    the computer, possibly even when I consider it to be off and
    not asleep.

      I don't understand how that works or what form a hack
    might take. I suppose the easiest is just to leave it unplugged,
    which is what I've generally done in the past. All my computers
    are running hardwired to Internet and the main one I usually
    unplug when not in use.

    In Device Manager (right-click Start menu Win10, to find the item),
    then look at the Properties of the NIC.

    In the Power Management tab of the NIC properties, it says

    Allow this device to wake the computer

    If that box is unticked, then the Ethernet LED on the switch/router
    should be un-lit, when the computer does a shutdown, and the Ethernet
    is then not supposed to be listening for WOL. The Allow this device to wake the computer, should affect the PME path from the NIC to the rest of
    the machine. But the BIOS also interprets this state request, as a
    request to power off the core of the NIC (saving one watt). There's no
    point having the NIC core running, if it is no longer possible to wake
    the PC. That's regular ACPI, the S0ic behavior could be different.


    Thanks. It hadn't occurred to me to check whether that setting
    existed. Allow to wake and allow to wake via "magic packet" are
    both unchecked.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)