• Re: I need a second pair of eye on this donload page

    From R.Wieser@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 10 07:55:14 2024
    T,

    For the life of me, I can not find where to download
    the zip file. Maybe I am going blind?

    Nowerdays github thinks its called for to store information like that in a script block of type application/json. For eazy machine consumption I
    suppose. Humans ? Meh, who cares.

    After taking a "view sourcecode" peek the zip-file link seems to be this :

    https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater/archive/refs/heads/master.zip

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 9 22:19:43 2024
    Hi All,

    Over on Windows10Debloater
    https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater

    It says to
    "Download the .zip file on the main page of the
    GitHub and extract the .zip file to your desired
    location"

    For the life of me, I can not find where to download
    the zip file. Maybe I am going blind?

    -T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to R.Wieser on Tue Jan 9 23:15:50 2024
    On 1/9/24 22:55, R.Wieser wrote:
    T,

    For the life of me, I can not find where to download
    the zip file. Maybe I am going blind?

    Nowerdays github thinks its called for to store information like that in a script block of type application/json. For eazy machine consumption I suppose. Humans ? Meh, who cares.

    After taking a "view sourcecode" peek the zip-file link seems to be this :

    https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater/archive/refs/heads/master.zip

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser


    Thank you!

    I finally found the zip under the "Code" button

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 10 04:52:10 2024
    On 1/10/2024 2:15 AM, T wrote:
    On 1/9/24 22:55, R.Wieser wrote:
    T,

    For the life of me, I can not find where to download
    the zip file.  Maybe I am going blind?

    Nowerdays github thinks its called for to store information like that in a >> script block of type application/json.  For eazy machine consumption I
    suppose.  Humans ?  Meh, who cares.

    After taking a "view sourcecode" peek the zip-file link seems to be this : >>
    https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater/archive/refs/heads/master.zip >>
    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser


    Thank you!

    I finally found the zip under the "Code" button

    Just for the record, Github has an "artifically high" browser requirement.

    This means the interface won't work at all, in something like FF52
    or some old version. It's all bomb-squadded, to only work if they
    can store their little cookies or whatever. They think this is going
    to make me use MSEdge. It's not. Surprise!

    Only then do you get the code button with the ZIP hiding in it.

    That's why a lot of people will look at your request and say
    "I don't see no stinkin code button!". It's because they don't
    see it.

    So the page has several appearances, and if you've never
    been there, you don't know where the hidden treasure is,
    and what the page should actually look like.

    Even archive.org is doing this to me! To fix this one, use the
    upper right corner, to replace the function missing from the main page.

    https://archive.org/advancedsearch.php

    Github is a daily annoyance for me, because a number of Google
    hits will throw me under the bus there. It's like going to a
    Reddit link and finding nothing but annoyance.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From T@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Jan 10 03:18:43 2024
    On 1/10/24 01:52, Paul wrote:
    On 1/10/2024 2:15 AM, T wrote:
    On 1/9/24 22:55, R.Wieser wrote:
    T,

    For the life of me, I can not find where to download
    the zip file.  Maybe I am going blind?

    Nowerdays github thinks its called for to store information like that in a >>> script block of type application/json.  For eazy machine consumption I
    suppose.  Humans ?  Meh, who cares.

    After taking a "view sourcecode" peek the zip-file link seems to be this : >>>
    https://github.com/Sycnex/Windows10Debloater/archive/refs/heads/master.zip >>>
    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser


    Thank you!

    I finally found the zip under the "Code" button

    Just for the record, Github has an "artifically high" browser requirement.

    This means the interface won't work at all, in something like FF52
    or some old version. It's all bomb-squadded, to only work if they
    can store their little cookies or whatever. They think this is going
    to make me use MSEdge. It's not. Surprise!

    Only then do you get the code button with the ZIP hiding in it.

    That's why a lot of people will look at your request and say
    "I don't see no stinkin code button!". It's because they don't
    see it.

    So the page has several appearances, and if you've never
    been there, you don't know where the hidden treasure is,
    and what the page should actually look like.

    Even archive.org is doing this to me! To fix this one, use the
    upper right corner, to replace the function missing from the main page.

    https://archive.org/advancedsearch.php

    Github is a daily annoyance for me, because a number of Google
    hits will throw me under the bus there. It's like going to a
    Reddit link and finding nothing but annoyance.

    Paul


    My use of cURL on it must drive it bonkers!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Jan 10 08:34:53 2024
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote
    |
    | Just for the record, Github has an "artifically high" browser requirement.
    |
    | This means the interface won't work at all, in something like FF52
    | or some old version. It's all bomb-squadded, to only work if they
    | can store their little cookies or whatever. They think this is going
    | to make me use MSEdge. It's not. Surprise!
    |

    Yes. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Completely broken
    without script. Broken on XP. Yesterday I was wanting to get
    NetGuard for Android. I went around in circles on Android trying to
    get an APK link. I never did figure out how I found it. On XP I
    wanted to get the FAQ -- simple text -- but as you noted, it's
    embedded in script. Even the FAQ! I ended up copying and parsing
    the blurb from source code. Crazy stuff. Github looks likes it was
    designed by an insufferable geek who hasn't had his coffee yet,
    then touched up by Bill Gates when he has insomnia, furious that
    people are downloading code for free. I think Billy wants to at least
    make sure that we can't get anything compiled without a fight. :)

    Embedding content in script is becoming more common. The only
    possible reason I can see is to force people to use script. The trick
    of putting an opaque DIV on top of content is also becoming more
    common. In some ways it's nostalgic. Remember the old days when
    teenagers would do their Flash masterpieces, and the page would
    announce "Best viewed with IE 4.12345.678"?

    The new commercial websites are similar. You're not supposed
    to be able to read them. You're supposed to see ads. (The content
    may be just auto-generated anyway.)

    As most probably know, MS bought GitHub. MS pages are also
    widely broken. Very few are accessible anymore without enabling
    script. It's not HTML. It's a javascript software program that will
    generate a webpage when you run it. I think it's about time that
    we have a movement to return to HTML and non-obfuscation.

    I've also noticed that archive.org is messed up. It used to work
    well. Now, if I find a page through search I can get file links. But
    I haven't got the search to work for a long time now.

    MS have always been nasty that way. I remember once,
    years ago, they had a site for something for programmers. I don't
    remember now what it was, but it came up in discussions in the
    VB newsgroup. It turned out that the source code was specifically
    written to block anything but IE. And of course, there was at least
    one lapdog MVP to say that was impossible and was just anti-MS
    propaganda. (We had some very good VB MVPs, but also a couple
    of MS attack dogs.)

    Now Google seems to be doing similar tricks with Chrome and has a
    monopoly similar to IE in the 90s. I never use anything but Mozilla-
    related browsers, but I have seen complaints about things not working
    except in Chrome.

    If it doesn't work for me in FF then I just don't go there. Recently
    I told my dentist that their page won't work for me. It's a JS/JSON monstrosity. To my delight they now send me a simple, no-nonsense
    email! To confirm my appt 4 times in 3 weeks I need only reply to
    the email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to winstonmvp@gmail.com on Thu Jan 11 08:35:22 2024
    "...w¡ñ§±¤ñ " <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    | I've never needed to visit my dentist web site to confirm an appt.
    | Mine provides two different methods for confirmation, neither of which
    | are email.
    | - An automated phone call with the ability(when answered) to press a
    | number on the phone(a '1' for confirm or a '2' to cancel
    | - A SMS text message to confirm with the option to reply with a Y or N.
    |

    That would be worse to my mind because it requires
    answering a call at that moment, while email is not
    time-specific... Remember the old days when an appointment
    meant that you had an appointment? No one had to
    confirm anything. The appointment WAS the confirmation.

    I recently read that the current social protocol is a kind
    of ghosting: If you arrange to meet a friend for coffee then
    that must be confirmed via cellphone the day of. If you call
    them on the appointed day and they don't answer then that's
    a cancellation!

    It occurred to me that that protocol signals a change in
    the use of cellphones. It's no longer just about people being
    addicted to them. Cellphones are now the interface through
    which people relate to "other". Any other. The outside world
    is what you contact, or accept contact from, on your
    cellphone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)