• Why I hate synch

    From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 00:24:21 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it. Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can actually delete from the other device. I
    nearly destroyed 1000 holiday snaps.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because one of us wants rid of it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Mon Oct 16 01:40:08 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup.  When setting up my phone I said yes
    to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things
    gmail won't work.  So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?"  A search says no.  Synch can
    actually delete from the other device.  I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions. You surely got an email telling you
    about them.

    You could configure the "backup" to not save photos at the original
    resolution and quality, but letting google compress or optimize them. In
    that case you can store many more.

    Or you can buy more space at google.

    Or you can backup them somewhere else, for example at Amazon Prime
    services. Currently no limits.


    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things.  You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither
    of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because
    one of us wants rid of it!

    And your question is...?


    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 04:43:49 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said yes
    to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things
    gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think,
    "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can
    actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday
    snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system works?

    You surely got an email telling you about them.

    If I did I would have deleted it. You do realise those are written in legalese and no normal person can comprehend them?

    You could configure the "backup" to not save photos at the original resolution and quality, but letting google compress or optimize them. In
    that case you can store many more.

    I saw no such option.

    Or you can buy more space at google.

    Absolutely not!

    Or you can backup them somewhere else, for example at Amazon Prime
    services. Currently no limits.

    I make my own copies, on devices on my own property, so I know where everything is.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither
    of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because
    one of us wants rid of it!

    And your question is...?

    I made that very clear at the beginning. Synchronising things to back them up should not cause something to be deleted in all places just because you delete it from one.

    It's all very well when you take a photo on your phone, it's then copied to your computer, your other phone, the cloud, etc. That's nice if you lose your phone.

    But if I decide I don't need 500 holiday snaps on phone 2, I don't expect them to auto-delete from elsewhere, this is beyond insanity!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 00:18:28 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 10/15/2023 7:40 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.  Google only offers 15GB for backup.  When setting up my phone I said yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    And your question is...?

    This is obviously an awful way to deal with photos.

    If the SD card has photos on it.

    1) Unplug it.
    2) Plug into the SD card port on the laptop, copy the stuff.
    3) Done.

    I didn't know my laptop had a port. There was one of those
    "black plastic fillers" in the hole. I also have a
    USB to SD adapter for the job.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Oct 16 06:18:17 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 05:18:28 +0100, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On 10/15/2023 7:40 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it. Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    And your question is...?

    This is obviously an awful way to deal with photos.

    If the SD card has photos on it.

    1) Unplug it.
    2) Plug into the SD card port on the laptop, copy the stuff.
    3) Done.

    I didn't know my laptop had a port. There was one of those
    "black plastic fillers" in the hole. I also have a
    USB to SD adapter for the job.

    The synch is a good idea in principle, the photos are backed up as you take them, without your intervention, and while you're away on holiday.

    But for manual copying, I don't take the SD card out of the phone. I'd have to remove the silicone protective surround, use a pin to remove the tiny little tray containing the SD card and SIM, remove the miniature SD card smaller than my fingernail, not
    drop it and stand on it, plug it into a computer, then do all that in reverse, all wearing out tiny little connections. No, I just use a USB cable to copy on mass. Or the app "KDE Connect", which allows transmitting a photo or several over wireless.
    It refused when I selected 1000, so I used the cable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Mon Oct 16 08:54:08 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2023-10-16 05:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup.  When setting up my phone I said yes >>> to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things
    gmail won't work.  So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, >>> "are those photos safe on my phone?"  A search says no.  Synch can
    actually delete from the other device.  I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday >>> snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system works?


    Because they changed how the system works.

    You surely got an email telling you about them.

    If I did I would have deleted it.  You do realise those are written in legalese and no normal person can comprehend them?

    Not true, I understood them and my first language is not English.


    You could configure the "backup" to not save photos at the original
    resolution and quality, but letting google compress or optimize them. In
    that case you can store many more.

    I saw no such option.

    You didn't look much.


    Or you can buy more space at google.

    Absolutely not!

    well, it is your option. It is not evil. :-p


    Or you can backup them somewhere else, for example at Amazon Prime
    services. Currently no limits.

    I make my own copies, on devices on my own property, so I know where everything is.

    Good.


    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things.  You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither
    of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because >>> one of us wants rid of it!

    And your question is...?

    I made that very clear at the beginning.  Synchronising things to back
    them up should not cause something to be deleted in all places just
    because you delete it from one.

    Yes, it should. It is doing as advertised, keeping things in sync. It
    even tells you in a popup.

    It's all very well when you take a photo on your phone, it's then copied
    to your computer, your other phone, the cloud, etc.  That's nice if you
    lose your phone.

    But if I decide I don't need 500 holiday snaps on phone 2, I don't
    expect them to auto-delete from elsewhere, this is beyond insanity!


    Misunderstanding on your part :-p

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 09:03:19 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Carlos E. R. wrote:

    [snip]


    But if I decide I don't need 500 holiday snaps on phone 2, I don't
    expect them to auto-delete from elsewhere, this is beyond insanity!


    Misunderstanding on your part :-p

    The OP has misunderstood the word "synch",

    It means to synchronise all the devices, so that what is done on any one
    device is replicated on all the others.

    It is in no way intended to be a backup mechanism. If you need backup,
    then get a backup solution.


    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Mon Oct 16 08:38:48 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said yes >>> to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things
    gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, >>> "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can
    actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday
    snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system works?

    You surely got an email telling you about them.

    If I did I would have deleted it. You do realise those are written in legalese and no normal person can comprehend them?

    You could configure the "backup" to not save photos at the original
    resolution and quality, but letting google compress or optimize them. In
    that case you can store many more.

    I saw no such option.

    Or you can buy more space at google.

    Absolutely not!

    Or you can backup them somewhere else, for example at Amazon Prime
    services. Currently no limits.

    I make my own copies, on devices on my own property, so I know where everything is.

    That is an actual backup.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither
    of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because >>> one of us wants rid of it!

    And your question is...?

    I made that very clear at the beginning. Synchronising things to back
    them up should not cause something to be deleted in all places just
    because you delete it from one.

    Sync to cloud is not a back up. This is a common misconception which has tripped up a lot of people.

    Everyone should stop using "backup" to describe cloud sync. It is
    continuous mirror to keep all devices consistent.

    If a backup is required then do something else.

    It's all very well when you take a photo on your phone, it's then copied
    to your computer, your other phone, the cloud, etc. That's nice if you lose your phone.

    Correct.

    But if I decide I don't need 500 holiday snaps on phone 2, I don't expect them to auto-delete from elsewhere, this is beyond insanity!

    You don't understand how it works. People making assumptions is also a bad thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 11:58:34 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:54:08 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 05:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said yes >>>> to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things >>>> gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, >>>> "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can
    actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday >>>> snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system works?

    Because they changed how the system works.

    A contract is to do with what they charge you for etc, not what they fuck up.

    You surely got an email telling you about them.

    If I did I would have deleted it. You do realise those are written in
    legalese and no normal person can comprehend them?

    Not true, I understood them and my first language is not English.

    Then you're abnormal, go get a job as a lawyer and make millions.

    You could configure the "backup" to not save photos at the original
    resolution and quality, but letting google compress or optimize them. In >>> that case you can store many more.

    I saw no such option.

    You didn't look much.

    I prefer intuitive, something programmers are incapable of making nowadays.

    Or you can buy more space at google.

    Absolutely not!

    well, it is your option. It is not evil. :-p

    It's taking money when it's not needed.

    Or you can backup them somewhere else, for example at Amazon Prime
    services. Currently no limits.

    I make my own copies, on devices on my own property, so I know where
    everything is.

    Good.

    Much better than synch shit.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you, neither >>>> of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the bin because >>>> one of us wants rid of it!

    And your question is...?

    I made that very clear at the beginning. Synchronising things to back
    them up should not cause something to be deleted in all places just
    because you delete it from one.

    Yes, it should. It is doing as advertised, keeping things in sync. It
    even tells you in a popup.

    But deleting everything at once is unintuitive and dangerous.

    It's all very well when you take a photo on your phone, it's then copied
    to your computer, your other phone, the cloud, etc. That's nice if you
    lose your phone.

    But if I decide I don't need 500 holiday snaps on phone 2, I don't
    expect them to auto-delete from elsewhere, this is beyond insanity!

    Misunderstanding on your part :-p

    No, expectations of sense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 16 07:38:41 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    T24gMTAvMTYvMjAyMyAxOjE4IEFNLCBDb21tYW5kZXIgS2luc2V5IHdyb3RlOg0KPiBPbiBN b24sIDE2IE9jdCAyMDIzIDA1OjE4OjI4ICswMTAwLCBQYXVsIDxub3NwYW1AbmVlZGVkLmlu dmFsaWQ+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4+IE9uIDEwLzE1LzIwMjMgNzo0MCBQTSwgQ2FybG9zIEUu IFIuIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4+IE9uIDIwMjMtMTAtMTYgMDE6MjQsIENvbW1hbmRlciBLaW5zZXkg d3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4+IFRoaXMgaXMgZm9yIEdvb2dsZSwgb3RoZXJzIG1heSBiZWhhdmUgZGlm ZmVyZW50bHkuDQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IE15IHBob25lIGhhcyBhIGxhcmdlIGNhcGFjaXR5IGZv ciBwaG90b3MsIGl0IGhhcyBhbiBTRCBjYXJkIGluIGl0LiAgDQo+Pj4+IEdvb2dsZSBvbmx5 IG9mZmVycyAxNUdCIGZvciBiYWNrdXAuwqAgV2hlbiBzZXR0aW5nIHVwIG15IHBob25lIEkg c2FpZCANCj4+Pj4geWVzIHRvIGJhY2t1cCwgdGhpbmtpbmcgaXQgd291bGQganVzdCBzdG9w IHdoZW4gZnVsbC4NCj4+Pj4NCj4+PiBBbmQgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcy4uLj8NCj4+DQo+ PiBUaGlzIGlzIG9idmlvdXNseSBhbiBhd2Z1bCB3YXkgdG8gZGVhbCB3aXRoIHBob3Rvcy4N Cj4+DQo+PiBJZiB0aGUgU0QgY2FyZCBoYXMgcGhvdG9zIG9uIGl0Lg0KPj4NCj4+IDEpIFVu cGx1ZyBpdC4NCj4+IDIpIFBsdWcgaW50byB0aGUgU0QgY2FyZCBwb3J0IG9uIHRoZSBsYXB0 b3AsIGNvcHkgdGhlIHN0dWZmLg0KPj4gMykgRG9uZS4NCj4+DQo+PiBJIGRpZG4ndCBrbm93 IG15IGxhcHRvcCBoYWQgYSBwb3J0LiBUaGVyZSB3YXMgb25lIG9mIHRob3NlDQo+PiAiYmxh Y2sgcGxhc3RpYyBmaWxsZXJzIiBpbiB0aGUgaG9sZS4gSSBhbHNvIGhhdmUgYQ0KPj4gVVNC IHRvIFNEIGFkYXB0ZXIgZm9yIHRoZSBqb2IuDQo+IA0KPiBUaGUgc3luY2ggaXMgYSBnb29k IGlkZWEgaW4gcHJpbmNpcGxlLCB0aGUgcGhvdG9zIGFyZSBiYWNrZWQgdXAgYXMgeW91IA0K PiB0YWtlIHRoZW0sIHdpdGhvdXQgeW91ciBpbnRlcnZlbnRpb24sIGFuZCB3aGlsZSB5b3Un cmUgYXdheSBvbiBob2xpZGF5Lg0KPiANCj4gQnV0IGZvciBtYW51YWwgY29weWluZywgSSBk b24ndCB0YWtlIHRoZSBTRCBjYXJkIG91dCBvZiB0aGUgcGhvbmUuwqAgSSdkIA0KPiBoYXZl IHRvIHJlbW92ZSB0aGUgc2lsaWNvbmUgcHJvdGVjdGl2ZSBzdXJyb3VuZCwgdXNlIGEgcGlu IHRvIHJlbW92ZSB0aGUgDQo+IHRpbnkgbGl0dGxlIHRyYXkgY29udGFpbmluZyB0aGUgU0Qg Y2FyZCBhbmQgU0lNLCByZW1vdmUgdGhlIG1pbmlhdHVyZSBTRCANCj4gY2FyZCBzbWFsbGVy IHRoYW4gbXkgZmluZ2VybmFpbCwgbm90IGRyb3AgaXQgYW5kIHN0YW5kIG9uIGl0LCBwbHVn IGl0IA0KPiBpbnRvIGEgY29tcHV0ZXIsIHRoZW4gZG8gYWxsIHRoYXQgaW4gcmV2ZXJzZSwg YWxsIHdlYXJpbmcgb3V0IHRpbnkgDQo+IGxpdHRsZSBjb25uZWN0aW9ucy7CoCBObywgSSBq dXN0IHVzZSBhIFVTQiBjYWJsZSB0byBjb3B5IG9uIG1hc3MuwqAgT3IgdGhlIA0KPiBhcHAg IktERSBDb25uZWN0Iiwgd2hpY2ggYWxsb3dzIHRyYW5zbWl0dGluZyBhIHBob3RvIG9yIHNl dmVyYWwgb3ZlciANCj4gd2lyZWxlc3MuwqAgSXQgcmVmdXNlZCB3aGVuIEkgc2VsZWN0ZWQg MTAwMCwgc28gSSB1c2VkIHRoZSBjYWJsZS4NClRoZXJlIGFyZSBzZXZlcmFsIHdheXMgdG8g dHJhbnNmZXIgZmlsZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgcGhvbmUgdG8gdGhlIGNvbXB1dGVyLiANCiAgSWYg dGhleSBoYXZlIGJlZW4gc3luY2VkIHRvIHRoZSBjbG91ZC4gZ28gZG93bmxvYWQgdGhlbSBm cm9tIHRoZSBjbG91ZCANCnRvIHlvdXIgY29tcHV0ZXIuICBJZiB5b3UgZG8gaXQgZnJlcXVl bnRseSwgeW91IGNhbiBkbyBpdCBieSBCbHVldG9vdGgsIA0Kb3Igd2l0aCB0aGUgcmlnaHQg c29mdHdhcmUsIHRocm91Z2ggeW91IGxvY2FsIExBTi4gIChJIGFzc3VtZSBBcHBsZSANCnBo b25lIGNhbiBkb3dubG9hZCB0byBhIFBDLiAgSSBrbm93IGFuIGFuZHJvaWQgcGhvbmUgd2ls bC4pDQoNCklmIHlvdSBoYXZlIGEgY29tcHV0ZXIgd2l0aCBsaW1pdGVkIHN0b3JhZ2Ugd2hp Y2ggaXMgbW9zdCBjb21wdXRlcnMgc29sZCANCnRvZGF5LCAgYnV5IHR3byBleHRlcm5hbCBo YXJkIGRyaXZlcyBvZiBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBUQiBlYWNoIGFuZCBtb3ZlIHRoZSANCmZpbGVz IG9uIHRoZSBjb21wdXRlciB0byB0aGVtDQoNCg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Mon Oct 16 06:57:07 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said
    yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete
    things gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google
    then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no.
    Synch can actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed
    1000 holiday snaps.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you,
    neither of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the
    bin because one of us wants rid of it!

    No, you assuming is bad. You thought e-mail, photo, and other services
    had separate quotas. Nope, it's all one shared quota. If you need more
    space, but it. Else, learn to trim. Be more neat with your quota than
    you are with the interior of your house.

    You don't get to use more quota just because you want it. You're a
    freeloader, like many of us, using someone else's service. You comply
    with their quota. It's their service, not yours. Google, nor any
    online storage provider or e-mail provider, are your parents doling out
    free stuff to their kids at their expense.

    If you won't comply with a service's quotas, don't use them.

    You get one quota to share across all Google services: Gmail, Google
    Drive, and Google Photos. The quota is by account, not by individual
    service.

    https://support.google.com/googleone/answer/9312312?hl=en

    https://one.google.com/storage#upgrade

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Mon Oct 16 13:28:45 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2023-10-16 12:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:54:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 05:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup.  When setting up my phone I
    said yes
    to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things >>>>> gmail won't work.  So I'm about to delete things form Google then
    think,
    "are those photos safe on my phone?"  A search says no.  Synch can >>>>> actually delete from the other device.  I nearly destroyed 1000
    holiday
    snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system
    works?

    Because they changed how the system works.

    A contract is to do with what they charge you for etc, not what they
    fuck up.

    You are trolling again.

    ...

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 13:03:58 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:28:45 +0100, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 12:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:54:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 05:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:40:08 +0100, Carlos E. R.
    <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it. >>>>>> Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I
    said yes
    to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things >>>>>> gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then
    think,
    "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can >>>>>> actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed 1000
    holiday
    snaps.

    Correct.

    New google contractual conditions.

    What have "contractual conditions" got to do with the way the system
    works?

    Because they changed how the system works.

    A contract is to do with what they charge you for etc, not what they
    fuck up.

    You are trolling again.

    No such thing. I'm stating my opinion or a fact, whichever you choose to call it. Either dismiss it with evidence or fuck off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to knuttle on Mon Oct 16 13:06:54 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:38:41 +0100, knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 10/16/2023 1:18 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 05:18:28 +0100, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On 10/15/2023 7:40 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-10-16 01:24, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said >>>>> yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    And your question is...?

    This is obviously an awful way to deal with photos.

    If the SD card has photos on it.

    1) Unplug it.
    2) Plug into the SD card port on the laptop, copy the stuff.
    3) Done.

    I didn't know my laptop had a port. There was one of those
    "black plastic fillers" in the hole. I also have a
    USB to SD adapter for the job.

    The synch is a good idea in principle, the photos are backed up as you
    take them, without your intervention, and while you're away on holiday.

    But for manual copying, I don't take the SD card out of the phone. I'd
    have to remove the silicone protective surround, use a pin to remove the
    tiny little tray containing the SD card and SIM, remove the miniature SD
    card smaller than my fingernail, not drop it and stand on it, plug it
    into a computer, then do all that in reverse, all wearing out tiny
    little connections. No, I just use a USB cable to copy on mass. Or the
    app "KDE Connect", which allows transmitting a photo or several over
    wireless. It refused when I selected 1000, so I used the cable.
    There are several ways to transfer files from the phone to the computer.

    There have to be, because mostly they don't work, so you need options.

    If they have been synced to the cloud. go download them from the cloud
    to your computer.

    Clouds are vague and untrustworthy.

    If you do it frequently, you can do it by Bluetooth,

    ROTFPMSL! I tried to bluetooth form my Android to my Aunt's Iphone. They refused. Fuck Apple.

    or with the right software, through you local LAN. (I assume Apple
    phone can download to a PC. I know an android phone will.)

    If I use KDE connect (which can be flaky). It should be part of the Android OS.

    If you have a computer with limited storage which is most computers sold today, buy two external hard drives of a couple of TB each and move the files on the computer to them

    I would never buy a computer. I build it. They're modular and easy to assemble, a child could do it.

    My computer has 1 1TB NVME and a 4TB rust spinner. Backups are two 4TB rust spinners.

    Will all be NVME at next upgrade (I double the size of anything too small), as they're getting very cheap.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Oct 16 11:11:51 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Paul wrote:
    If the SD card has photos on it.

    1) Unplug it.
    2) Plug into the SD card port on the laptop, copy the stuff.
    3) Done.

    I didn't know my laptop had a port. There was one of those
    "black plastic fillers" in the hole. I also have a
    USB to SD adapter for the job.

    Paul




    Those USB adapter's are becoming more and more handy.

    Have seen current laptops without SD(SDXC) card slots.



    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Mon Oct 16 07:16:38 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:28:45 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 12:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    A contract is to do with what they charge you for etc, not what they
    fuck up.

    You are trolling again.

    And successfully, it would seem. :-(



    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Logies@21:1/5 to CK1@nospam.com on Mon Oct 16 19:43:37 2023
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:24:21 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can actually delete from the other device. I
    nearly destroyed 1000 holiday snaps.

    The fotos should be still in the trash can of Google Fotos for 4 weeks
    where you can get them back.
    In the Google Fotos App you can change the compression level for
    uploading from "original" to a bit compressed, which will help a lot.
    You can change the compression level even after uploading in the
    online version of Google Fotos.
    You can download all your pictures from Google Fotos to your PC for an
    offline backup, if you want. Then you can delete them in Google Fotos.
    If you want to keep them in your phone then copy or move them to a
    directory that Google Fotos does not manage on your phone.

    Google One is quite cheap, if you need more capacity.

    Regards

    M.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Tue Oct 17 00:11:51 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:57:07 +0100, VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote:

    Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    This is for Google, others may behave differently.

    My phone has a large capacity for photos, it has an SD card in it.
    Google only offers 15GB for backup. When setting up my phone I said
    yes to backup, thinking it would just stop when full.

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete
    things gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google
    then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no.
    Synch can actually delete from the other device. I nearly destroyed
    1000 holiday snaps.

    Computers assuming is a bad thing.

    If two things hold a copy, and one gets full, you might delete some
    things. You don't want to delete them everywhere!

    If I have a music CD, and I make you a copy and give it to you,
    neither of us should be able to make the other one get thrown in the
    bin because one of us wants rid of it!

    No, you assuming is bad. You thought e-mail, photo, and other services
    had separate quotas. Nope, it's all one shared quota. If you need more space, but it. Else, learn to trim. Be more neat with your quota than
    you are with the interior of your house.

    When my tool cupboard is too full, my cutlery drawer doesn't refuse to take another spoon. The two should not be related.

    You don't get to use more quota just because you want it. You're a freeloader, like many of us, using someone else's service.

    Google offered me something for free then thwarted it so they'd get money. I don't pay scammers.

    And it's not free, they make billions from adverts (for those stupid enough to pay attention to adverts).

    You comply with their quota. It's their service, not yours. Google, nor any online storage provider or e-mail provider, are your parents doling out
    free stuff to their kids at their expense.

    If you won't comply with a service's quotas, don't use them.

    You get one quota to share across all Google services: Gmail, Google
    Drive, and Google Photos. The quota is by account, not by individual service.

    https://support.google.com/googleone/answer/9312312?hl=en

    https://one.google.com/storage#upgrade

    All this shit ignored since you're repeating yourself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Tue Oct 17 00:09:54 2023
    XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:16:38 +0100, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:28:45 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    On 2023-10-16 12:58, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    A contract is to do with what they charge you for etc, not what they
    fuck up.

    You are trolling again.

    And successfully, it would seem. :-(

    I can't help it if people are stupid and can't follow simple reasoning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Michael Logies on Tue Oct 17 00:13:39 2023
    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:43:37 +0100, Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> wrote:

    On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 00:24:21 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
    <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

    But now I get an email saying nearly full and if I don't delete things gmail won't work. So I'm about to delete things form Google then think, "are those photos safe on my phone?" A search says no. Synch can actually delete from the other device.
    I nearly destroyed 1000 holiday snaps.

    The fotos should be still in the trash can of Google Fotos for 4 weeks
    where you can get them back.
    In the Google Fotos App you can change the compression level for
    uploading from "original" to a bit compressed, which will help a lot.
    You can change the compression level even after uploading in the
    online version of Google Fotos.

    Why would I settle for inferior copies? What if I used one of those because I was accessing them from the web, and ended up with half the quality missing? I take 50MP HDR images and expect them to stay that way.

    You can download all your pictures from Google Fotos to your PC for an offline backup, if you want. Then you can delete them in Google Fotos.
    If you want to keep them in your phone then copy or move them to a
    directory that Google Fotos does not manage on your phone.

    Yes, I can manually store things, which puts me back to square one.

    Google One is quite cheap, if you need more capacity.

    They charge £1.50 per month for the smallest upgrade!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Logies@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 18 13:35:52 2023
    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:13:39 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@spam.com>
    wrote:

    Why would I settle for inferior copies? What if I used one of those because I was accessing them from the web,
    and ended up with half the quality missing? I take 50MP HDR images and expect them to stay that way.

    You should compare the compressed version with the original one and
    decide, whether much bigger files are worth the little difference in
    quality (if any).
    A print 10*15 cm needs 3 MP. Your eyes can resolve about 6 MP: https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

    Google shrinks to 16 MP, which is enough for me.

    Google One is quite cheap, if you need more capacity.

    They charge £1.50 per month for the smallest upgrade!

    I pay per year, 200 GB for 30 Euro, which I consider cheap. Most of
    the space is used for my locally encrypted backups. And up to 6
    persons can share this space.

    I have >100,000 pictures on my hard drives, and some videos, which
    would be too much for storing online. But I like Google Fotos for
    temporary storing of fotos (before download for local backup, then
    deleted online), uploaded automatically from smartphone, distributed
    the within family and friends.

    Regards

    M.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Michael Logies on Thu Oct 19 05:32:10 2023
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:35:52 +0100, Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> wrote:

    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:13:39 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@spam.com>
    wrote:

    Why would I settle for inferior copies? What if I used one of those because I was accessing them from the web,
    and ended up with half the quality missing? I take 50MP HDR images and expect them to stay that way.

    You should compare the compressed version with the original one and
    decide, whether much bigger files are worth the little difference in
    quality (if any).
    A print 10*15 cm needs 3 MP. Your eyes can resolve about 6 MP: https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

    Don't believe everything you read.

    Also, who looks at 10x15cm? We did that to save money back in the days of film and expensive developing. I look at photos on a 40 inch TV.

    And you're forgetting people might want to zoom in on something. Never ever remove MP.

    Google shrinks to 16 MP, which is enough for me.

    Google One is quite cheap, if you need more capacity.

    They charge £1.50 per month for the smallest upgrade!

    I pay per year, 200 GB for 30 Euro, which I consider cheap. Most of
    the space is used for my locally encrypted backups. And up to 6
    persons can share this space.

    What if it's 6 people? I really don't get why some folk distinguish between persons and people. Something to do with if they know each other? Whether you can count that high? Seems it's finally going out of fashion: https://www.merriam-webster.com/
    grammar/people-vs-persons

    I can't wait for fewer to go out of fashion. Why do you feel the need to tell me the items you're mentioning are countable? I know apples are countable. And why is there no opposite word "severaler"? Few is a quantity, about 3, so surely 2 is fewer
    than 1, since 2 is closer to 3, which is a few. What's really weird is nobody says "fewer often". But you can count the number of times it rains in a month, so surely in June it rains fewer often?

    I have >100,000 pictures on my hard drives, and some videos, which
    would be too much for storing online. But I like Google Fotos for

    Can you or Google not spell? It's photos.

    temporary storing of fotos (before download for local backup, then
    deleted online), uploaded automatically from smartphone, distributed
    the within family and friends.

    I prefer to be in control. I store things on my own property. I don't trust Google. They might fuck up, I might forget my password, I might get banned [1]. If I want to show family and friends, I either email them copies, or I show them from my own
    phone when I'm there.

    I'm banned from Youtube, which uses a Google account, so now I have two Google accounts, which causes no end of bother because browsers keep remembering the wrong one. I was banned for uploading pirate videos. Except they were uploaded by the person
    who hacked my account. And Google told me it was hacked and to change my password. I did so and deleted the videos, but 2 months later they banned me for the videos, then asked me to prove it was hacked. Telling them they were the ones with the proof
    didn't work. I was talking to a simpleton.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Logies@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 19 18:36:20 2023
    On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:32:10 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@spam.com>
    wrote:

    A print 10*15 cm needs 3 MP. Your eyes can resolve about 6 MP:
    https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

    Don't believe everything you read.

    Also, who looks at 10x15cm? We did that to save money back in the days of film and expensive developing. I look at photos on a 40 inch TV.

    A 10cm x15 cm foto is printed with 300 dpi. That`s
    10/2.54*15/2.54x300x300= about 2.1 MP.
    Your 40 inch TV may be 4 k, 16:9. That`s 4096x2304 or 9.4 MP. But from
    a reasonable viewing distance, the eye's resolution is lower.

    Your biological limitation of about 6 MP resolution when viewing a
    photo as a whole cannot be removed.

    And you're forgetting people might want to zoom in on something. Never ever remove MP.

    Google shrinks to 16 MP, which is enough for me.

    What if it's 6 people? I really don't get why some folk distinguish between persons and people.

    I am German and have no particular interest in the intricacies of the
    English language. If you understand what I am talking about, it was
    expressed well enough.

    I have >100,000 pictures on my hard drives, and some videos, which
    would be too much for storing online. But I like Google Fotos for

    Can you or Google not spell? It's photos.

    In germany it is Google Fotos.

    Regards

    M.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Commander Kinsey on Sat Oct 21 13:30:28 2023
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    Commander Kinsey <CK1@spam.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:35:52 +0100, Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> wrote:

    On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:13:39 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@spam.com>
    wrote:

    Why would I settle for inferior copies? What if I used one of those
    because I was accessing them from the web,
    and ended up with half the quality missing? I take 50MP HDR images and
    expect them to stay that way.

    You should compare the compressed version with the original one and
    decide, whether much bigger files are worth the little difference in
    quality (if any).
    A print 10*15 cm needs 3 MP. Your eyes can resolve about 6 MP:
    https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

    Don't believe everything you read.

    Also, who looks at 10x15cm? We did that to save money back in the days
    of film and expensive developing. I look at photos on a 40 inch TV.

    If it's 4k it'll only be 9MP so a compressed 50MP photo will look just
    fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peeler@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 21 16:36:20 2023
    XPost: alt.usage.english

    On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 13:30:28 -0000 (UTC), Chris, the mentally deficient, troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


    If it's 4k it'll only be 9MP so a compressed 50MP photo will look just
    fine.

    What off topic sick trollshit is this now about, you trolling and
    troll-feeding senile ASSHOLES?

    --
    More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "Commander Kinsey" LOL) inane crap:
    "The car can never prevent the human from beating the crap out of it with a tyre iron"
    Message-ID: <op.y6iq1nn6js98qf@red.lan>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vladimir Putin@21:1/5 to Michael Logies on Sat Nov 4 04:57:42 2023
    On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 17:36:20 +0100, Michael Logies <logies@t-online.de> wrote:

    On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 05:32:10 +0100, "Commander Kinsey" <CK1@spam.com>
    wrote:

    A print 10*15 cm needs 3 MP. Your eyes can resolve about 6 MP:
    https://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

    Don't believe everything you read.

    Also, who looks at 10x15cm? We did that to save money back in the days of film and expensive developing. I look at photos on a 40 inch TV.

    A 10cm x15 cm foto is printed with 300 dpi. That`s
    10/2.54*15/2.54x300x300= about 2.1 MP.
    Your 40 inch TV may be 4 k, 16:9. That`s 4096x2304 or 9.4 MP. But from
    a reasonable viewing distance, the eye's resolution is lower.

    Define reasonable viewing distance. I have a 40" TV as a monitor only 1.5 feet from me, it almost fills my vision.

    Your biological limitation of about 6 MP resolution when viewing a
    photo as a whole cannot be removed.

    Your eyes might have that limit, I can notice things above 6MP at that size.

    And you're forgetting people might want to zoom in on something. Never ever remove MP.

    I see you skipped this important point.

    Google shrinks to 16 MP, which is enough for me.

    What if it's 6 people? I really don't get why some folk distinguish between persons and people.

    I am German and have no particular interest in the intricacies of the
    English language. If you understand what I am talking about, it was
    expressed well enough.

    But Germans insist on precision.

    I have >100,000 pictures on my hard drives, and some videos, which
    would be too much for storing online. But I like Google Fotos for

    Can you or Google not spell? It's photos.

    In germany it is Google Fotos.

    But we're not speaking German.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)