• Texting via Phone App in Windws 10

    From jaugustine@verizon.net@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 8 15:14:49 2023
    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he
    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Sun Oct 8 17:12:21 2023
    <jaugustine@verizon.net> wrote

    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he
    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    There are email-to-sms/mms gateways with specific addresses for each
    carrier, but I use Google Voice which is free for unlimited calls and text
    (as far as I know) in the USA.

    There's also a ton of "link to Windows" Android apps, so look up what
    Samsung and Microsoft have done in their link-to-windows endeavors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Sun Oct 8 18:09:55 2023
    jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he
    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    Windows 10 and 11 phone app is included in the o/s and called Phone Link.
    In Windows 10 only Android is supported, in Windows 11 both Android and
    iPhone.

    Phone Link requires use of a Microsoft Account(MSA)
    - i.e. A Microsoft account is required to link the phone to a MSFT
    account and use in Windows 10/11/.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices


    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to ...winston on Mon Oct 9 18:32:55 2023
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he
    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    Windows 10 and 11 phone app is included in the o/s and called Phone Link.
    In Windows 10 only Android is supported, in Windows 11 both Android and iPhone.

    Phone Link requires use of a Microsoft Account(MSA)
    - i.e. A Microsoft account is required to link the phone to a MSFT
    account and use in Windows 10/11/.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?
    --
    "He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge..." --Psalm 91:4. Columbus/Indigenous People's Day. Please give native Indians stuff back. More wars & strikes. Ughly. :(
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
    | |o o| |
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From knuttle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 9 15:07:36 2023
    T24gMTAvMDkvMjAyMyAzOjAwIFBNLCAuLi53aW5zdG9uIHdyb3RlOg0KPiBBbnQgd3JvdGU6 DQo+PiAuLi53aW5zdG9uIDx3aW5zdG9ubXZwQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQo+Pj4gamF1 Z3VzdGluZUB2ZXJpem9uLm5ldCB3cm90ZToNCj4+Pj4gSGksDQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoCBNeSBicm90aGVyIGhhcyBhIFdpbmRvd3MgMTAgbGFwdG9wLsKgIEkgaGF2ZSBh IFdpbmRvd3MgNyBsYXB0b3AuDQo+Pj4+IE5vdGU6IE15IFdpbmRvd3MgMTAgbGFwdG9wIGhh cyBpc3N1ZXMuDQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCBIZSBhc2tlZCBtZSBpZiB0aGVy ZSBpcyBhbiBhcHAgZm9yIFdpbjEwIGhlIGNhbiB1c2Ugc28gaGUNCj4+Pj4gY2FuIHNlbmQg YSBUZXh0IG1lc3NhZ2UgdG8gc29tZW9uZSdzIENlbGwgUGhvbmUuwqAgTm90ZTogTXkgYnJv dGhlcg0KPj4+PiBoYXMgYSBsYW5kIGxpbmUgKE5PIGNlbGwgcGhvbmUpLg0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+ PiDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgSSBkaWQgYSBnb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIGFuZCBhdCBtaWNyb3NvZnQn cyB3ZWIgc2l0ZSBmb3IgV2luZG93cyANCj4+Pj4gMTAsDQo+Pj4+IHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBJIHNhdyBoYWQgdG8gZG8gd2l0aCB1c2luZyBhIFBob25lIEFwcCzCoCB0aGVuIHNlbGVj dA0KPj4+PiBNZXNzYWdlLCBldGMuDQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCBNeSBicm90 aGVyIGxpdmVzIGZhciBmcm9tIG1lLsKgIEkgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBzZW5kIGhpbSBhbiBl bWFpbA0KPj4+PiB3aXRoIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4NCj4+Pj4NCj4+Pj4gwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgIERpZCBXaW5kb3dzIDEwIGNvbWUgd2l0aCBhIFBob25lIGFwcCB3aXRoIHRoZSBhYmls aXR5IHRvIFRleHQ/DQo+Pj4+DQo+Pj4+IMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIFRoYW5rIFlv dSBpbiBhZHZhbmNlLMKgIEpvaG4NCj4+Pj4gLA0KPj4+Pg0KPj4+IFdpbmRvd3MgMTAgYW5k IDExIHBob25lIGFwcCBpcyBpbmNsdWRlZCBpbiB0aGUgby9zIGFuZCBjYWxsZWQgUGhvbmUg DQo+Pj4gTGluay4NCj4+PiBJbiBXaW5kb3dzIDEwIG9ubHkgQW5kcm9pZCBpcyBzdXBwb3J0 ZWQsIGluIFdpbmRvd3MgMTEgYm90aCBBbmRyb2lkIGFuZA0KPj4+IGlQaG9uZS4NCj4+DQo+ Pj4gUGhvbmUgTGluayByZXF1aXJlcyB1c2Ugb2YgYSBNaWNyb3NvZnQgQWNjb3VudChNU0Ep DQo+Pj4gwqAgLSBpLmUuIEEgTWljcm9zb2Z0IGFjY291bnQgaXMgcmVxdWlyZWQgdG8gbGlu ayB0aGUgcGhvbmUgdG8gYSBNU0ZUDQo+Pj4gYWNjb3VudCBhbmQgdXNlIGluIFdpbmRvd3Mg MTAvMTEvLg0KPj4NCj4+PiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5taWNyb3NvZnQuY29tL2VuLXVzL3dpbmRv d3Mvc3luYy1hY3Jvc3MteW91ci1kZXZpY2VzDQo+Pg0KPj4gV2lsbCBNUyBiZSBhZGRpbmcg aVBob25lIHN1cHBvcnQgaW50byBpdHMgb2xkIFcxMCBpbiB0aGUgZnV0dXJlPw0KPj4NCj4g Tm8uIFdpbjEwIGlzL3dhcyB0b28gZmFyIGFsb25nIGluIHRoZSBwcm9kdWN0IGxpZmVjeWNs ZS4NCj4gV2luZG93cyAxMSB3YXMgdGhlIG9ubHkgby9zIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgZm9yIGlPUy4N Cj4gDQo+IFBob25lIExpbmsgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHNlZW4sIGdvaW5nIGZvcndhcmQsIGZvciBi b3RoIEFuZHJvaWQgYW5kIGlPUyBhcyANCj4gY29tcGFuaW9uIHRvb2wgdG8gV2luZG93cy4g Rm9yIGlPUywgc2luY2UgcmVjZW50bHkgbmV3KE1heSAyMDIzKSBpdCdzIA0KPiBzdGlsbCBh IHdvcmsgaW4gcHJvZ3Jlc3MuDQo+IA0KPiBCbHVldG9vdGggY29ubmVjdGlvbi9wYWlyaW5n IGlzIGFsc28gcmVxdWlyZWQuIE1lc3NhZ2luZyBmZWF0dXJlIGlzIA0KPiBsaW1pdGVkIGJ5 IGlPUywgSW1hZ2UvdmlkZW8gc2hhcmluZyBhbmQgZ3JvdXAgbWVzc2FnZXMgbm90IHN1cHBv cnRlZCwgDQo+IGFuZCBNZXNzYWdlcyBhcmUgc2Vzc2lvbiBiYXNlZChhdmFpbGFibGUgd2hl biB0aGUgcGhvbmUgaXMgY29ubmVjdGVkIHRvIFBDLg0KPiANCkkgaGF2ZSBzdWNjZXNzZnVs bHkgdXNlIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBpbiB0aGlzIGxpbmsgdG8gc3VjZXNzZnVsbHkgc2Vu ZCANCnRleHQgbWVzc2FnZXMgZnJvbSBteSBjb21wdXRlciAoVGh1bmRlcmJyaWQpIHRvIGNl bGwgcGhvbmVzLg0KDQpodHRwczovL2F2dGVjaC5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZXMvMTM4L2xpc3Qtb2Yt ZW1haWwtdG8tc21zLWFkZHJlc3Nlcy8NCg==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Ant on Mon Oct 9 15:00:45 2023
    Ant wrote:
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he
    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10, >>> the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    Windows 10 and 11 phone app is included in the o/s and called Phone Link.
    In Windows 10 only Android is supported, in Windows 11 both Android and
    iPhone.

    Phone Link requires use of a Microsoft Account(MSA)
    - i.e. A Microsoft account is required to link the phone to a MSFT
    account and use in Windows 10/11/.

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as
    companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to ...winston on Mon Oct 9 15:23:07 2023
    ...winston wrote:
    Ant wrote:

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.


    p.s. Forgot to mention. Phone link for iOS is not photo related(often
    expected or misinterpreted)

    Photos on an iPhone is not a Phone Link feature, it's a optional
    feature available in the Windows 11 Photos app that integrates with the
    Windows iCloud app.

    To view iPhone's photos in Windows 11, they need to be on the phone's
    Apple ID iCloud, iCloud for Windows app installed in Windows 11, then
    once signed on with an MSA in Photos, sync your photos....the iCloud
    photos will then appear in the Photo's app.

    Note: It's best to use the same email address as a Microsoft
    account(MSA) for your Windows logon *and* the same email address for
    your Apple ID account(iCloud, iTunes, iCloud app, Windows Photos, Phone
    link).
    i.e. email address should be common, password for the MSA and the
    Apple ID should be different for security reasons.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Ant on Mon Oct 9 16:32:29 2023
    Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    I'm going to point out something (quite obvious) that almost NOBODY knows.

    With respect to Ant's question...
    1. Windows users don't understand where the power of Apple comes from.
    2. Apple users don't understand where the power of Apple comes from.
    3. Almost nobody realizes the simple truth of where it really comes from.

    Sure... we "say" it's the walled garden - which is true - but what is the single most important "thing" that enables that garden to _be_ a garden?

    HINT: Apple users are logged into the mothership tracking servers every
    second of every day of every week of every year of their lives.

    This is important to realize - not only because of the privacy issues.
    But because without that logging in - nothing works on iOS.

    Ask me how I know this because if you log out, everything STOPs working.

    HINT: I refused to log in and Apple locked me out of my own devices!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Mon Oct 9 17:08:17 2023
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    Note: It's best to use the same email address as a Microsoft
    account(MSA) for your Windows logon *and* the same email address for
    your Apple ID account(iCloud, iTunes, iCloud app, Windows Photos, Phone link).
    i.e. email address should be common, password for the MSA and the
    Apple ID should be different for security reasons.

    Below is extremely important (quite obvious) fundamental information...
    (Most people don't know this _because_ it's so very basic!)

    *You don't get that power _without_ logging into mothership servers*

    While using the same mothership tracking server account does provide the
    power which people incorrectly "associate" with Apple's garden...

    Another way to accomplish texting on _any_ device is PulseSMS software.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qd21dwVw/pulsesms01.jpg> Text from/to anywhere

    And yes - Pulse does require an account because that's the _only_ way it
    works (there's nothing magic about Apple's "just working" because what they really mean by that phrase is "just logging into a mothership server").
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    Of course, I text from Android/Windows (physically) w/o _any account.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mrz6gJpC/scrcpy23.jpg> Android SMS/MMS on Windows

    If you're not smart, you need an account; but if you're smart, you don't.
    --
    Marketing will always lead you into the direction _they_ want you to go.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Mon Oct 9 15:37:03 2023
    <jaugustine@verizon.net> wrote:

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he can send a
    Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother has a land
    line (NO cell phone).

    Have you tried sending an e-mail to the recipient's phone number?

    Make sure the Subject and Body of the e-mail are blank. Make sure your
    e-mail client doesn't add a signature. In the To field, enter the cell
    phone number (all digits, no separators) of the recipient. Follow with @carrier, where you specify the e-mail address for the recipient's cell carrier.

    5551234567@vtext.com

    vtext.com is Verizon's cell phone e-mail address. tmomail.net for
    T-Mobile. txt.att.net for AT&T. In the Body, enter a short message.
    More than 160 characters (70 for Unicode) would involve using MMS which
    may not work with the recipient.

    https://support.keepandshare.com/support/solutions/articles/3000004076-how-do-i-add-a-mobile-email-address-to-my-communication-settings-

    has a list of the e-mail-to-text addresses for some common cellular
    carriers. You might need to check with your recipient what is the
    e-mail domain for their e-mail-to-text service. Some more are listed
    at:

    https://avtech.com/articles/138/list-of-email-to-sms-addresses/
    (same article as knuttle mentioned)

    For MVNOs (Mobile Virtual Network Operator), like Tracfone, where you
    pay them for discounted access to an actual carrier, your recipient will
    have to know to which cellular carrier they are assigned by their MVNO.
    For example, I use Tracfone as the MVNO who assigned me to AT&T
    (although Verizon acquired Tracfone, and Tracfone tries to prod me to
    switch to Verison). Your recipient could contact whomever is his
    cellular provider to ask what e-mail domain to use to have texts sent to him/her.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Mon Oct 9 17:53:14 2023
    <jaugustine@verizon.net> wrote

    | Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?
    |

    I've only used this method a couple of times, but it seems
    to work fine. You just compose a regular email and send it to
    an address below. But you have to know the recipient's
    service company:

    Verizon xxxxxxxxxx@vtext.com
    T-Mobile xxxxxxxxxx@tmomail.net
    AT&T xxxxxxxxxx@txt.att.net
    Virgin Mobile xxxxxxxxxx@vmobl.com
    Cingular xxxxxxxxxx@cingularme.com
    Nextel xxxxxxxxxx@messaging.nextel.com
    US Cellular xxxxxxxxxx@email.uscc.net
    Boost xxxxxxxxxx@myboostmobile.com
    Alltel xxxxxxxxxx@message.alltel.com
    Qwest: number@qwestmp.com
    Sprint: number@messaging.sprintpcs.com or number@pm.sprint.com
    Virgin Mobile: number@vmobl.com
    Nextel: number@messaging.nextel.com
    Alltel: number@message.alltel.com
    Metro PCS: number@mymetropcs.com
    Powertel: number@ptel.com
    Boost Mobile: number@myboostmobile.com
    Suncom: number@tms.suncom.com
    Tracfone: number@mmst5.tracfone.com
    U.S. Cellular: number@email.uscc.net

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Mon Oct 9 15:54:59 2023
    On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    There's no need. You can send an email to any phone and it will be
    delivered as a text. For example, to send to a Verizon subscriber's
    phone use the form 2125556789@vzwpix.com if the message contains
    images or emojis, and 2124446789@vtext.com if it's pure text.

    Googling "email to text" is how I found this out. You might want to
    add the carrier's name (outside the quotes) if it's not one of these:

    AT&T: phonenumber@txt.att.net
    T-Mobile: phonenumber@tmomail.net
    Verizon: phonenumber@vtext.com or phonenumber@vzwpix.com
    Virgin Mobile: phonenumber@vmobl.com

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Mon Oct 9 19:12:12 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?


    I think the odds are roughly the same as (politician's name)
    recanting his lies and handing back all the money.

    While I don't disagree with Stan, what anyone can do is mirror the iPhone audio, video, keyboard, clipboard and mouse onto Windows 10 for free.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/k5gv0yw8/vysor34.jpg> Apple iOS & Android mirroring

    In 999,999,999 out of 1,000,000,000 cases, the user will then be able to send/receive text from the iPad on Windows - without another account.

    In my case (1 out of 1,000,000,000), I can't because I ran a test of NOT logging into the Apple mothership - & Apple literally killed the device.

    Long story, but I tried _two_ iPads, both of which Apple killed off
    (simply because I refused to log into the Apple mothership ever again).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8zSvshQf/appleid04.jpg> Apple _locks_ you out!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/SKGfmgnK/appleid05.jpg> Apple won't let you back in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR5mZ287/appleid07.jpg> Apple fails App Store test
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TwN6P0QR/appleid08.jpg> Only Apple requires a login
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    So be it.

    The point, which I was making in response to Ant's insinuation, was that nothing works on the iPad if you refuse to log into the mothership servers.
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Ant on Mon Oct 9 15:56:50 2023
    On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 18:32:55 +0000, Ant wrote:
    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?


    I think the odds are roughly the same as (politician's name)
    recanting his lies and handing back all the money.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wally J on Mon Oct 9 16:48:08 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-09 16:12, Wally J wrote:
    Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?


    I think the odds are roughly the same as (politician's name)
    recanting his lies and handing back all the money.

    While I don't disagree with Stan, what anyone can do is mirror the iPhone audio, video, keyboard, clipboard and mouse onto Windows 10 for free.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/k5gv0yw8/vysor34.jpg> Apple iOS & Android mirroring

    In 999,999,999 out of 1,000,000,000 cases, the user will then be able to send/receive text from the iPad on Windows - without another account.

    In my case (1 out of 1,000,000,000), I can't because I ran a test of NOT logging into the Apple mothership - & Apple literally killed the device.

    Now you're lying... ...again.


    Long story, but I tried _two_ iPads, both of which Apple killed off
    (simply because I refused to log into the Apple mothership ever again).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out!

    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!

    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Is there some important technical reason that both that and the
    preceding image were so lo-res...

    ...or was it just that you didn't want people to be able to read what
    was there?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/8zSvshQf/appleid04.jpg> Apple _locks_ you out!

    See the "Unlock Account" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/SKGfmgnK/appleid05.jpg> Apple won't let you back in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR5mZ287/appleid07.jpg> Apple fails App Store test
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TwN6P0QR/appleid08.jpg> Only Apple requires a login
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    So be it.

    The point, which I was making in response to Ant's insinuation, was that nothing works on the iPad if you refuse to log into the mothership servers.

    And your point is a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Oct 9 20:19:33 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:48:08 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out!

    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!

    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gregory@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Tue Oct 10 01:43:50 2023
    On 09/10/2023 23:54, Stan Brown wrote:
    On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    There's no need. You can send an email to any phone and it will be
    delivered as a text. For example, to send to a Verizon subscriber's
    phone use the form 2125556789@vzwpix.com if the message contains
    images or emojis, and 2124446789@vtext.com if it's pure text.

    Googling "email to text" is how I found this out. You might want to
    add the carrier's name (outside the quotes) if it's not one of these:

    AT&T: phonenumber@txt.att.net
    T-Mobile: phonenumber@tmomail.net
    Verizon: phonenumber@vtext.com or phonenumber@vzwpix.com
    Virgin Mobile: phonenumber@vmobl.com


    And how do they then send a reply text back to you?

    --
    Brian Gregory (in England).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VIP@21:1/5 to Brian Gregory on Tue Oct 10 02:00:00 2023
    On 10/10/2023 01:43, Brian Gregory wrote:
    On 09/10/2023 23:54, Stan Brown wrote:
    On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    There's no need. You can send an email to any phone and it will be
    delivered as a text. For example, to send to a Verizon subscriber's
    phone use the form 2125556789@vzwpix.com if the message contains
    images or emojis, and 2124446789@vtext.com if it's pure text.

    Googling "email to text" is how I found this out. You might want to
    add the carrier's name (outside the quotes) if it's not one of these:

    AT&T: phonenumber@txt.att.net
    T-Mobile: phonenumber@tmomail.net
    Verizon: phonenumber@vtext.com or phonenumber@vzwpix.com
    Virgin Mobile: phonenumber@vmobl.com


    And how do they then send a reply text back to you?

    Using the same method. "sender'sphonenumber@his/her carrier.com"

    Works if you are in the same country. If you are in Thailand then tough luck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 02:01:09 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10, Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:48:08 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a
    lock out!

    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_
    your acct!

    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    It can. You're (assuming you aren't just another Arlen nym) being lied
    to, and swallowing that load of bullshit without question. Taste good?

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 15:09:05 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 00:19:33 +0000, Wolf Greenblatt said:
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:48:08 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out!

    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct! >>
    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    Our iPad is not logged into an account and doesn't use any iCloud
    "features". The only time I log in is in the App Store when one of the
    apps has an updated version to install, and after updating I log out
    again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Oct 9 22:13:58 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 10 Oct 2023 02:01:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    It can.

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Your Name on Mon Oct 9 22:17:54 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:09:05 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    Our iPad is not logged into an account and doesn't use any iCloud
    "features". The only time I log in is in the App Store when one of the
    apps has an updated version to install, and after updating I log out
    again.

    You're a liar. Why are you lying?
    You had to create the apple account or the ios ipad/iphone won't work.

    You can't install apps without using that account.
    You can't even send messages without logging into it.

    When you stop lying, then we can continue a normal conversation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Brian Gregory on Mon Oct 9 22:38:57 2023
    "Brian Gregory" <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> wrote

    | And how do they then send a reply text back to you?
    |
    That's the best part. They have to use email. :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to VIP on Mon Oct 9 20:40:10 2023
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 02:00:00 +0000, VIP wrote:
    On 10/10/2023 01:43, Brian Gregory wrote:
    And how do they then send a reply text back to you?

    Using the same method. "sender'sphonenumber@his/her carrier.com"

    That would work, but it's not the easiest way. The
    easiest way is for the recipient simply to reply to it
    as to any other text.

    Disclaimer: That's how it works on Android phones, i my
    experience (N = 2). I've no idea what iPhones do,
    though I'd be surprised if it's much different.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 9 20:37:39 2023
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 01:43:50 +0100, Brian Gregory
    wrote:

    On 09/10/2023 23:54, Stan Brown wrote:
    On Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:
    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    There's no need. You can send an email to any phone and it will be delivered as a text. For example, to send to a Verizon subscriber's
    phone use the form 2125556789@vzwpix.com if the message contains
    images or emojis, and 2124446789@vtext.com if it's pure text.

    Googling "email to text" is how I found this out. You might want to
    add the carrier's name (outside the quotes) if it's not one of these:

    AT&T: phonenumber@txt.att.net
    T-Mobile: phonenumber@tmomail.net
    Verizon: phonenumber@vtext.com or phonenumber@vzwpix.com
    Virgin Mobile: phonenumber@vmobl.com


    And how do they then send a reply text back to you?

    As they would reply to any other text. The phone (at
    least an Android phone) treats email addresses the same
    as phone numbers for purposes of texting. And on my
    computer, when I check email, there is a mail from
    phonenumber@vzwpix.com or pmonenumber@mms.att.net or
    whatever.

    On my phone, the text chain is labeled with the email
    address of my correspondent, and I reply exactly as if
    it were labeled with a phone number or a contact's
    name.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 03:50:12 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10, Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    On 10 Oct 2023 02:01:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    It can.

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    Which messaging services don't require an account, dip shit?

    And your suggestion that iPads are only useful for messaging is
    laughable on its face. There are tons of things you can do on an iPad
    that don't require any connection to Apple.

    You're an idiot troll.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 03:52:10 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10, Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:09:05 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    Our iPad is not logged into an account and doesn't use any iCloud
    "features". The only time I log in is in the App Store when one of
    the apps has an updated version to install, and after updating I log
    out again.

    You're a liar. Why are you lying?

    No he isn't. You are though, and the reason is you're a weak troll.

    You had to create the apple account or the ios ipad/iphone won't work.

    Wrong. You've clearly never tried.

    You can't install apps without using that account.

    All App Stores require an account, liar.

    You can't even send messages without logging into it.

    All messaging services require accounts, liar.

    When you stop lying, then we can continue a normal conversation.

    When you stop trolling, the world will instantly be a better place.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 9 20:41:30 2023
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 22:38:57 -0400, Newyana2 wrote:
    "Brian Gregory" <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> wrote

    | And how do they then send a reply text back to you?
    |
    That's the best part. They have to use email. :)


    Whatever gave you that idea? They just reply in the
    Messaging app, as to any other text. The carrier's
    computers turn the text into an email.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Mon Oct 9 22:40:28 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-09 19:13, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On 10 Oct 2023 02:01:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    It can.

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    iMessage is a service separate from SMS.

    Try sending a WhatsApp message without a WhatsApp login.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Mon Oct 9 22:41:20 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-09 17:19, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:48:08 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out! >>
    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!

    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    It absolutely.

    Sorry, Snowflake.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 18:16:47 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 02:13:58 +0000, Wolf Greenblatt said:

    On 10 Oct 2023 02:01:09 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple
    account?

    It can.

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    Another idiot for the killfile. :-\

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue Oct 10 03:39:04 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 10 Oct 2023 03:52:10 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    All App Stores require an account, liar.

    Why do you lie?
    That you feel you need to lie about the apple login account is revealing.

    You lied about the apple app store & now you're lying about the google play
    app store which does not need you to create an account to use it.

    You can't even send messages without logging into it.

    All messaging services require accounts, liar.

    Why do you lie?

    You lied saying apple messaging doesn't need people to create an account &
    now you're lying about android messaging needing them to create one.

    Apple's messaging won't work without an account. Android does.


    When you stop lying, then we can continue a normal conversation.

    When you stop trolling, the world will instantly be a better place.

    Why are you lying denying that nothing works on ios without the user being logged into an account. Not the messaging. Not installing apps. Nothing.

    All that works on android without needing to create any server login.
    Why do you lie when everyone knows none of that works on ios without it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue Oct 10 03:34:00 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 10 Oct 2023 03:50:12 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    Which messaging services don't require an account, dip shit?

    You lied that the iphone doesn't need to log into apple to send a message.
    It does.

    And now you lie that android needs an google account to send messages.
    It doesn't.

    Why are you lying about everything?
    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    And your suggestion that iPads are only useful for messaging is
    laughable on its face. There are tons of things you can do on an iPad
    that don't require any connection to Apple.

    Stop lying.

    You can't even use ios without constantly logging into apple's servers.
    The iphone can't even install apps without being logged into apple servers.

    Why are you lying about the need to log into apple servers to do anything?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Wally J on Tue Oct 10 10:33:22 2023
    On 09/10/2023 22:08, Wally J wrote:
    snip <

    Another way to accomplish texting on _any_ device is PulseSMS software.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qd21dwVw/pulsesms01.jpg> Text from/to anywhere

    And yes - Pulse does require an account because that's the _only_ way it works (there's nothing magic about Apple's "just working" because what they really mean by that phrase is "just logging into a mothership server").
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>


    How much does an account with Pulse cost?

    "Pick your plan to set up an account. The subscription option will
    provide you with a free 7-day trial, through the Play Store."

    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Tue Oct 10 08:44:57 2023
    "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    | > That's the best part. They have to use email. :)
    | >
    |
    | Whatever gave you that idea? They just reply in the
    | Messaging app, as to any other text. The carrier's
    | computers turn the text into an email.
    |

    How can that work? I'm on my Windows computer.
    I send a text to phonenumber@service.com. It goes
    through maybe a Verizon server and gets sent as a
    text. There's no phone number on my end. Does the
    text they receive embed the email address? And their
    app is designed to convert a text to email, recognizing
    that as the source? And what about when I haven't
    sent an email? Can they address a text to
    someone@emailcompany.com?

    That also raises other questions. For example, HTML
    email. That presumably won't go as text. Some email
    programs these days seem to ruin the plain text version.
    I just got such an email this morning, from the spyware
    company ConstantContact that offers email tracking
    services. There's a plain text block in the email, which is
    what I see, but all line returns and links are missing. It's
    just one continuous line of text.

    I've only sent email-as-text occasionally, mostly as
    a joke. I'm not aware of anyone who's sent a text to
    me as email. But I know some people who might like
    that option. With texts, maybe I've responded to one
    or two. Aside from that I've never used texting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 07:59:16 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 00:34, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On 10 Oct 2023 03:50:12 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    No it can't. You're a liar. Try it. Send me an imessage without it.

    Which messaging services don't require an account, dip shit?

    You lied that the iphone doesn't need to log into apple to send a message.
    It does.

    No, he didn't lie about that.

    But using the example that a messaging service requires and ID is just...

    ...really stupid.


    And now you lie that android needs an google account to send messages.
    It doesn't.

    That's not what he said.

    He said that messaging services require IDs...

    ...which is true.


    Why are you lying about everything?
    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    Utterly false.


    And your suggestion that iPads are only useful for messaging is
    laughable on its face. There are tons of things you can do on an iPad
    that don't require any connection to Apple.

    Stop lying.

    He's not.


    You can't even use ios without constantly logging into apple's servers.

    False.

    The iphone can't even install apps without being logged into apple servers.

    You need to log in to install the app.

    Then you don't need to be logged in to USE the app.


    Why are you lying about the need to log into apple servers to do anything?

    He's not and you're apparently to ignorant and/or stupid to figure that out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 14:42:43 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10, Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    On 10 Oct 2023 03:52:10 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    All App Stores require an account, liar.

    Why do you lie?
    you need to lie
    You lied
    you're lying
    Why do you lie?
    You lied
    you're lyingi
    Why are you lying
    Why do you lie

    The lady doth protests too much, me thinks.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 08:10:31 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 00:39, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On 10 Oct 2023 03:52:10 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    All App Stores require an account, liar.

    Why do you lie?

    How is that a lie?

    That you feel you need to lie about the apple login account is revealing.

    You lied about the apple app store & now you're lying about the google play app store which does not need you to create an account to use it.

    Attempting to download a FREE book from the Google Play store:

    "Please sign in

    In order to continue, you must sign in."

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4nAhzDqg5nBSyDAaMHS13cYeW8I-Cw3/view?usp=share_link>



    You can't even send messages without logging into it.

    All messaging services require accounts, liar.

    Why do you lie?

    You lied saying apple messaging doesn't need people to create an account &

    No, he didn't say that.

    now you're lying about android messaging needing them to create one.

    All messaging services require accounts, you ignoramus...

    ...because they need to know WHERE to send the messages.


    Apple's messaging won't work without an account. Android does.

    Show how that is supposed to work.



    When you stop lying, then we can continue a normal conversation.

    When you stop trolling, the world will instantly be a better place.

    Why are you lying denying that nothing works on ios without the user being logged into an account. Not the messaging. Not installing apps. Nothing.

    He's not lying.

    Lots of things work.


    All that works on android without needing to create any server login.

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4nAhzDqg5nBSyDAaMHS13cYeW8I-Cw3/view?usp=share_link>

    Why do you lie when everyone knows none of that works on ios without it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Wally J on Tue Oct 10 14:23:23 2023
    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    Note: It's best to use the same email address as a Microsoft
    account(MSA) for your Windows logon *and* the same email address for
    your Apple ID account(iCloud, iTunes, iCloud app, Windows Photos, Phone
    link).
    i.e. email address should be common, password for the MSA and the
    Apple ID should be different for security reasons.

    Below is extremely important (quite obvious) fundamental information...
    (Most people don't know this _because_ it's so very basic!)

    *You don't get that power _without_ logging into mothership servers*

    While using the same mothership tracking server account does provide the power which people incorrectly "associate" with Apple's garden...

    Another way to accomplish texting on _any_ device is PulseSMS software.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qd21dwVw/pulsesms01.jpg> Text from/to anywhere

    And yes - Pulse does require an account because that's the _only_ way it works (there's nothing magic about Apple's "just working" because what they really mean by that phrase is "just logging into a mothership server").
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    Of course, I text from Android/Windows (physically) w/o _any account.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mrz6gJpC/scrcpy23.jpg> Android SMS/MMS on Windows

    If you're not smart, you need an account; but if you're smart, you don't.


    Yes, alternative applications are available...but the question presented
    was specific - Testing via the Windows 10 Phone app.
    - The Windows 10/11 Phone app's requirements need to be met to do so.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 10 11:53:29 2023
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:44:57 -0400, Newyana2 wrote:
    "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    | Whatever gave you that idea? They just reply in the
    | Messaging app, as to any other text. The carrier's
    | computers turn the text into an email.

    How can that work? I'm on my Windows computer.
    I send a text to phonenumber@service.com. It goes
    through maybe a Verizon server and gets sent as a
    text. There's no phone number on my end.

    Sounds like you're not aware that, when you start a text thread on
    your phone, you can direct it to one of your contacts, to any phone
    number, or to any email address. Maybe not every phone works that
    way, but my low-end Moto e5+ did, and my Samsung does, so I imagine
    most do if not all.

    Does the
    text they receive embed the email address? And their
    app is designed to convert a text to email, recognizing
    that as the source?

    I really don't know the technical details of how it works, but it
    does work. I could well be wrong, but I guess that it's the carrier's
    network, not the user's phone, that directs text messages to the
    right path.

    And what about when I haven't
    sent an email? Can they address a text to
    someone@emailcompany.com?

    Yes.

    That also raises other questions. For example, HTML
    email. That presumably won't go as text.

    I've no idea.

    I've only sent email-as-text occasionally, mostly as
    a joke. I'm not aware of anyone who's sent a text to
    me as email. But I know some people who might like
    that option.

    And as I keep saying, they have that option, at least for the major
    carriers and quite a few of the minor ones.

    It's okay for you to be skeptical, but why not just try it yourself,
    as I have? Then you'll know it works.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Oct 10 14:58:23 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 07:59:16 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Why are you lying about the need to log into apple servers to do anything?

    He's not and you're apparently to ignorant and/or stupid to figure that out.

    It's not a question of whether you lied or not because you definitely lied.

    Android does not need you to create any account to send messages using the default messaging app that comes with every android phone. iOS does.

    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps
    taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to ...winston on Tue Oct 10 19:38:07 2023
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    ...
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.
    --
    "Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us be thankful, and so worship God acceptably with reverence and awe for our God is a consuming fire." --Hebrews 12:28-29. More shots, wars, out(r)ages, strikes, sickness, no
    supports, etc. Ughly. :(
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
    | |o o| |
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Oct 10 15:39:10 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:10:31 -0700, Alan wrote:

    now you're lying about android messaging needing them to create one.

    All messaging services require accounts, you ignoramus...

    ...because they need to know WHERE to send the messages.

    You lied. Why did you lie when everyone knows how it works?

    The android default messenger works without having to create any account on
    any google servers. The ios default messenger requires that apple account.

    It's even worse with your unique apple id required just to run free apps.

    Android does not put a google id into your free apps. Apple puts your
    unique apple id into your free apps. Are you going to lie about that too?

    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 12:28:12 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 11:58, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 07:59:16 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Why are you lying about the need to log into apple servers to do anything? >>
    He's not and you're apparently to ignorant and/or stupid to figure that out.

    It's not a question of whether you lied or not because you definitely lied.

    That's a lie.


    Android does not need you to create any account to send messages using the default messaging app that comes with every android phone. iOS does.

    Those are both false.

    But go ahead, explain how you send messages with having an account.


    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    I showed you a screenshot to prove that false:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4nAhzDqg5nBSyDAaMHS13cYeW8I-Cw3/view?usp=share_link>


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    I'm sorry, but that is laughably false.

    I can turn off all forms of data on my iPhone and still do a lot of
    things with it.

    If it were actually just "a dumb terminal", that wouldn't be possible.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 13:10:30 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 12:39, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:10:31 -0700, Alan wrote:

    now you're lying about android messaging needing them to create one.

    All messaging services require accounts, you ignoramus...

    ...because they need to know WHERE to send the messages.

    You lied. Why did you lie when everyone knows how it works?

    Why won't you address my point?


    The android default messenger works without having to create any account on any google servers. The ios default messenger requires that apple account.

    "the android default messenger" is what: SMS?

    iOS can send and receive messages without an Apple account.

    'You can use iMessage even with iCloud completely disabled, or even if
    you’ve never setup an iCloud account at all. If you’re on an iPhone, you don’t even need to sign in with an Apple ID if you only want to send and receive iMessages using your cellular phone number; an Apple account is
    only required to associate email addresses with iMessage.'

    <https://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/using-imessage-without-icloud>


    It's even worse with your unique apple id required just to run free apps.

    No. It is not.


    Android does not put a google id into your free apps. Apple puts your
    unique apple id into your free apps. Are you going to lie about that too?

    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    And I haven't lied about anything.


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    The only dumb thing in this thread is you, my friend.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Ant on Tue Oct 10 15:39:44 2023
    Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Tue Oct 10 17:10:24 2023
    "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    | Sounds like you're not aware that, when you start a text thread on
    | your phone, you can direct it to one of your contacts, to any phone
    | number, or to any email address.

    No, I didn't know that. Thanks. So in theory one
    of my texting friends could already be texting my
    email without me even knowing it. I'll have to tell
    the people who keep complaining that I don't have
    texting. Though I suppose the reason that many
    of them prefer texting is because they expect me
    to read it NOW.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Tue Oct 10 17:07:57 2023
    "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    | Sounds like you're not aware that, when you start a text thread on
    | your phone, you can direct it to one of your contacts, to any phone
    | number, or to any email address.

    No, I didn't know that. Thanks. So in theory one
    of my texting friends could already be texting my
    email without me even knowing it. I'll have to tell
    the people who keep complaining that I don't have
    texting. Though I suppose the reason that many
    of them prefer texting is because they expect me
    to read it NOW.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 17:56:21 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-09 20:19, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:48:08 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Nope. See that "Not Now" button?

    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out! >>
    Prove that was actually your iPad.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!

    "To enable your account, reset your password on appleid.apple.com"

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    My iPad works fine not logged in. Of course that means I don't have
    Apple Messages, synchronization with my Notes, Reminders, etc. on my
    other devices.

    Everything else is fine.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Newyana2@invalid.nospam on Tue Oct 10 17:00:30 2023
    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    "Stan Brown" <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote

    | Sounds like you're not aware that, when you start a text thread on
    | your phone, you can direct it to one of your contacts, to any phone
    | number, or to any email address.

    No, I didn't know that. Thanks. So in theory one
    of my texting friends could already be texting my
    email without me even knowing it. I'll have to tell
    the people who keep complaining that I don't have
    texting. Though I suppose the reason that many
    of them prefer texting is because they expect me
    to read it NOW.

    With me, texters would be disappointed if they think I'm interrupting
    whatever I am currently involved to read something that may not be
    important, or worse is spam crap or a nuisance message. They get to
    request my attention. They don't get to command it. That's why they
    are called notifications, not Taser zaps. I'm not a Pavlov dog.

    With Gmail, my client uses Google's Mail API instead of polling
    intervals using POP or IMAP. With Hotmail, I use ActiveSync. For IMAP accounts, my client and service support IMAP PUSH. I get e-mails as
    fast as I get texts, so no delay in getting an e-mail telling me of a
    text. In fact, I have Google Voice send me a copy of a text via e-mail.
    While that generates doubled notifications (e-mail and text app), it
    works to notify me of texts on computers that have no cellular access,
    like a desktop PC.

    Texting is not guaranteed for immediate attention. Neither is e-mail.
    If immediate interaction is required, make a phone call, or use a chat
    client (e.g., WhatsApp). But neither will override an overwhelming
    immediate need for a bathroom break, a puking cat, or smoke alarm.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 17:58:25 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-09 22:17, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:09:05 +1300, Your Name wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account? >>
    Our iPad is not logged into an account and doesn't use any iCloud
    "features". The only time I log in is in the App Store when one of the
    apps has an updated version to install, and after updating I log out
    again.

    You're a liar. Why are you lying?
    You had to create the apple account or the ios ipad/iphone won't work.

    You can't install apps without using that account.
    You can't even send messages without logging into it.

    When you stop lying, then we can continue a normal conversation.

    Nobody's lying.

    My iPad works fine w/o being logged in. But for those things that need
    the Apple account, of course one has to be logged in.

    Just like for my Proton Mail to send/receive I have to be logged into
    that account.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 18:03:25 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 14:58, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 07:59:16 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Why are you lying about the need to log into apple servers to do anything? >>
    He's not and you're apparently to ignorant and/or stupid to figure that out.

    It's not a question of whether you lied or not because you definitely lied.

    Android does not need you to create any account to send messages using the default messaging app that comes with every android phone. iOS does.

    Not at all.

    If I'm on my iPhone, logged out of Apple, SMS/MMS works fine because:
    phone. No log in at all.

    And so do all other messaging apps. Because: phone and/or WiFi. And I
    have to be logged into those too for them to work.

    It's only Apple's messaging system that requires I log in. Of course.

    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    Yes. This is the Apple way. Don't like it? Fine. Move along.


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    Far from it.


    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Oct 10 18:28:26 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:58:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Nobody's lying.

    They said the default messenger doesn't need an apple account
    That's a lie.

    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    They said apple doesn't insert a unique number tied only to your appleid
    into every app you download and install on your iphone or on your ipad.
    That's a lie.

    My iPad works fine w/o being logged in.

    Try to send a typical message to someone without logging into it.
    Try to download and install a typical app without logging into it.
    Try to copy your ipa to your neighbor's ios device to see if it works.

    All of a sudden, when you don't log into ios, it stops working fine.
    Why can't you admit that?

    But for those things that need
    the Apple account, of course one has to be logged in.

    Just like for my Proton Mail to send/receive I have to be logged into
    that account.

    That's a red herring which shows that you too are lying.
    Of course you need an account to log into something like email.

    But you claiming a bank needs an account is your way of lying because what we've been discussing here is the basic default messaging app & app store.

    Why do you feel that you have to lie about needing that apple id account?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Oct 10 18:36:50 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:56:21 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account?

    My iPad works fine not logged in.

    You are being fooled by the automatic log in process.
    Log out. Then try it. You'll find out that nothing works anymore.

    Try it. Almost everything you like about ios will stop working.

    Of course that means I don't have
    Apple Messages, synchronization with my Notes, Reminders, etc. on my
    other devices.

    Yes. You know this. That is good.
    The apple device is like a dumb terminal when you log out of it.

    It has to be logged into the apple "mainframe" server to do anything.

    Everything else is fine.

    After logging out, try to send something as simple as a text message.
    Try to download and install an ipa from the apple app store.

    Nothing will work unless you're logged in.
    You don't notice it only because you're always logged in.

    Try it after you log out.
    Write back what happens.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Oct 10 18:17:07 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:10:30 -0700, Alan wrote:

    You lied. Why did you lie when everyone knows how it works?

    Why won't you address my point?

    You are trying to bring up unrelated apps like whatsapp and youtube, which,
    of course, they need an account. You did that because you lied about the default messenger which doesn't need an account on the google server for android but which needs the account on the apple server for ios to work.

    The android default messenger works without having to create any account on >> any google servers. The ios default messenger requires that apple account.

    "the android default messenger" is what: SMS?

    It's both sms & mms and it does not need any account on the google server.

    iOS can send and receive messages without an Apple account.

    'You can use iMessage even with iCloud completely disabled, or even if
    youve never setup an iCloud account at all. If youre on an iPhone, you dont even need to sign in with an Apple ID if you only want to send and receive iMessages using your cellular phone number; an Apple account is
    only required to associate email addresses with iMessage.'

    <https://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/using-imessage-without-icloud>

    The icloud is different than requiring an apple id just to download and
    install apps. Besides that was for ios 5 and you're on ios 17 now.

    Apple removed that long ago, around ios 9 or 10.

    Now you can't send or receive anything in apple's ios messages without
    creating an apple account on the apple servers. With android you can.

    It's even worse with your unique apple id required just to run free apps.

    No. It is not.

    Why do you think apple inserts a unique id into every app you install?
    Google doesn't do that for Android apps. Only apple does that.

    Android does not put a google id into your free apps. Apple puts your
    unique apple id into your free apps. Are you going to lie about that too?

    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    Are you playing dumb? Or are you really so dumb as not know why it matters?

    And I haven't lied about anything.

    You're right. You lied about ios messages not needing the apple account.
    And you lied about the app store not needing the apple account.

    But you were not lying when you were playing dumb by claiming that you
    don't know why apple inserting your unique apple id into every app you
    download (even free apps) matters.

    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    The only dumb thing in this thread is you, my friend.

    You lied about the app store apple id.
    You lied about the messages apple id.
    You say you don't know why it matters that apple inserts your id into apps.

    I confront you on those lies. And then you say it's me who is dumb?
    I'm only asking you why you feel it's necessary for you to lie about it?

    Just admit ios is a dumb terminal that needs to log into apple servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Oct 10 18:50:23 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:03:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    If I'm on my iPhone, logged out of Apple, SMS/MMS works fine because:
    phone. No log in at all.

    That's exactly how it works on android but it doesn't work that way on ios.
    Try it.

    Log out of your apple id account.
    Then try to send a text message using your default apple messenger.

    Write back what happens.


    And so do all other messaging apps.
    Because: phone and/or WiFi. And I
    have to be logged into those too for them to work.

    That's a different subject - which means you know you're lying.

    Of course your banking app or your linked-in account needs a login.
    Of course whatsapp or telegram or signal or facebook need an account.

    On any platform.

    But we're talking about two of the most basic things a phone does.
    Sending text messages and installing apps from the company app store.

    Android sends messages without needing to create a google account.
    The iphone can't.

    Android installs from the company app store without creating an account.
    The iphone can't.

    Don't equate those basic tasks with setting up an email account because on
    all platforms (windows, linux & macos too!) email will need an account.

    It's only Apple's messaging system that requires I log in. Of course.

    At least you agree that apple's messaging system requires an account.
    Android's messaging does not.

    Why did the others lie about that?

    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps
    taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    Yes. This is the Apple way. Don't like it? Fine. Move along.

    It's not a question of liking that ios requires a login to work.

    It's a question of what is the case.
    And that the others lied about it.

    Apple's messaging system requires you log in.
    Android's messaging system does not.

    Why did they feel they needed to lie about what we agree is the case?

    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    Far from it.

    It's a dumb terminal in that without logging into the apple servers, it
    can't do even the simple things like messaging and installing apps.

    Certainly ios can't do the complicated things you like about it either
    without logging into the apple account (in that way it's a dumb terminal).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 18:51:53 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 18:36, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:56:21 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Why can't the ipad work without being forced to log into an Apple account? >>
    My iPad works fine not logged in.

    You are being fooled by the automatic log in process.
    Log out. Then try it. You'll find out that nothing works anymore.

    Try it. Almost everything you like about ios will stop working.

    1- am currently logged out on my iPad mini.
    2- doing all the things I said I can do.

    Other reply also applies, so I'll snip the rest of your nonsense away.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 16:48:22 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 15:28, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:58:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Nobody's lying.

    They said the default messenger doesn't need an apple account
    That's a lie.

    No. We said that the very same services that don't need a Google
    account—SMS & MMS—also don't need an Apple account.

    And that's just a face.


    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    No. I said that the Google Play store needs an account as well.

    And that's a fact.


    They said apple doesn't insert a unique number tied only to your appleid
    into every app you download and install on your iphone or on your ipad. That's a lie.

    Nope. Literally no one said that.


    My iPad works fine w/o being logged in.

    Try to send a typical message to someone without logging into it.

    SMS or MMS? Works fine!

    Try to download and install a typical app without logging into it.

    "Straw man" ever heard the term? You really must have.

    Try to copy your ipa to your neighbor's ios device to see if it works.

    Straw man.


    All of a sudden, when you don't log into ios, it stops working fine.
    Why can't you admit that?

    Because it's not true.


    But for those things that need
    the Apple account, of course one has to be logged in.

    Just like for my Proton Mail to send/receive I have to be logged into
    that account.

    That's a red herring which shows that you too are lying.
    Of course you need an account to log into something like email.

    But you claiming a bank needs an account is your way of lying because what we've been discussing here is the basic default messaging app & app store.

    And you've been either wrong or presenting straw men.


    Why do you feel that you have to lie about needing that apple id account?

    Why must you lie?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 16:36:45 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 15:17, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:10:30 -0700, Alan wrote:

    You lied. Why did you lie when everyone knows how it works?

    Why won't you address my point?

    You are trying to bring up unrelated apps like whatsapp and youtube, which, of course, they need an account. You did that because you lied about the default messenger which doesn't need an account on the google server for android but which needs the account on the apple server for ios to work.

    The android default messenger works without having to create any account on >>> any google servers. The ios default messenger requires that apple account. >>
    "the android default messenger" is what: SMS?

    It's both sms & mms and it does not need any account on the google server.

    Oh, so it DOES need an account of some kind...

    ...just not one on a google server.

    That's not what you said before.


    iOS can send and receive messages without an Apple account.

    'You can use iMessage even with iCloud completely disabled, or even if
    you’ve never setup an iCloud account at all. If you’re on an iPhone, you >> don’t even need to sign in with an Apple ID if you only want to send and >> receive iMessages using your cellular phone number; an Apple account is
    only required to associate email addresses with iMessage.'

    <https://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/using-imessage-without-icloud>

    The icloud is different than requiring an apple id just to download and install apps. Besides that was for ios 5 and you're on ios 17 now.

    Apple removed that long ago, around ios 9 or 10.

    iOS 5 was released in October of 2011...

    ...12 YEARS ago...

    ...and that article:

    'Using iMessage without iCloud
    By Jesse Hollington
    May 16, 2021 4:09 pm UTC'

    So, once again, you're full of shit.



    Now you can't send or receive anything in apple's ios messages without creating an apple account on the apple servers. With android you can.

    You can't receive APPLE's iMessages, no.

    But you CAN received SMS and MMS messages based off your phone number.

    So it's exactly the same situation as Android.


    It's even worse with your unique apple id required just to run free apps. >>
    No. It is not.

    Why do you think apple inserts a unique id into every app you install?
    Google doesn't do that for Android apps. Only apple does that.

    What does it matter?


    Android does not put a google id into your free apps. Apple puts your
    unique apple id into your free apps. Are you going to lie about that too? >>
    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    Are you playing dumb? Or are you really so dumb as not know why it matters?

    I notice you can't explain.


    And I haven't lied about anything.

    You're right. You lied about ios messages not needing the apple account.

    Nope. I specifically pointed to SMS and MMS...

    ...both of which don't require an Apple account.

    And you lied about the app store not needing the apple account.

    I never claimed that. What I said and showed was that you need an
    account to access the Google Play store.

    Something you keep refusing to acknowledge is true.


    But you were not lying when you were playing dumb by claiming that you
    don't know why apple inserting your unique apple id into every app you download (even free apps) matters.

    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    The only dumb thing in this thread is you, my friend.

    You lied about the app store apple id.

    False

    You lied about the messages apple id.

    False.

    You say you don't know why it matters that apple inserts your id into apps.

    False. What I asked you was why YOU think it matters.

    I confront you on those lies. And then you say it's me who is dumb?

    Because I haven't lied.

    You have, however.

    I'm only asking you why you feel it's necessary for you to lie about it?

    Just admit ios is a dumb terminal that needs to log into apple servers.

    It's not. That's simply a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Tue Oct 10 20:26:22 2023
    "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    | Texting is not guaranteed for immediate attention. Neither is e-mail.
    | If immediate interaction is required, make a phone call, or use a chat
    | client (e.g., WhatsApp).

    I've noticed that things have gradually changed. At one
    time, people always answered cellphoes because it was
    almost always guaranteed to be relevant. People got mad
    at me because I wasn't on call.

    Then people switched to text because no one aswered
    their cellphones. Text was the way to get through quick.
    People got mad at me because I didn't text. Now I've noticed
    that texting is so ubiquitous, people are not answering texts,
    either.

    So I guess we're back to leaving messages, except that no
    one listens to messages anymore. I heard recently that the
    new edicate says you should text to get permission to call
    now. Don't just "show up uninvited" on the other end of
    the line!

    I mostly use email. Customers, friends, family... Occasionally
    with family I talk for an hour or more on the phone. But email
    allows me to keep in touch, write long emails if necessary, and
    I don't need to coordinate timing. I just check email when I'm
    in the mood, a few times a day. I'm not a drug dealer or a
    country doctor. No one needs to reach me NOW.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Oct 10 23:14:00 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:50:49 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    They said the default messenger doesn't need an apple account
    That's a lie.

    It doesn't - therefore it is not a lie. It does require, of course, a
    phone connection.

    It is a lie.
    The default apple ios messenger doesn't work without the apple id.
    The default android messenger does work without a google id.


    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    I didn't say that. I don't care. And if you do, then stop griping
    about it and move along.

    Why do you call it "griping" when I'm simply explaining how it works?

    It's not a gripe that the apple app store requires you to create an account while the google app store doesn't require you to create that account.

    Do you call it "griping" because you can no longer lie about it?

    They said apple doesn't insert a unique number tied only to your appleid
    into every app you download and install on your iphone or on your ipad.
    That's a lie.

    I wouldn't know. And I do not care.

    You might not care that apple inserts a unique identifier unique to your
    apple id account with every app you download - but apple cares. A lot!

    All of a sudden, when you don't log into ios, it stops working fine.
    Why can't you admit that?

    It works fine. Mail. Maps. Dozens and dozens of apps, all work fine.
    Of course I lose what I value most with Apple - the seamless integration between my various Apple devices.

    Fundamentally that iphone is a dumb terminal because nothing works if you
    don't connect it to the apple "mainframe" servers every day of its life.

    All that "good stuff" you value requires you to be connected for sure.

    That's a red herring which shows that you too are lying.
    Of course you need an account to log into something like email.

    No different than Android. Right.

    Maybe you missed the main point that android works fine without creating an account to use it while the iphone doesn't work at all if you don't.

    I don't know why you and the others feel the need to lie about it.
    Are you embarrassed by it perhaps?

    But you claiming a bank needs an account is your way of lying because what >> we've been discussing here is the basic default messaging app & app store.

    Which - again - work fine. On the phone I don't need to be logged into
    the Apple account to send SMS/MMS or use other apps (themselves need log
    in).

    This is correct. You can't do anything with the default message app if you don't log into the apple servers while android messaging doesn't do that.

    Why did the others lie about that?

    Why do you feel that you have to lie about needing that apple id account?

    Not lying. Laid it out above (and elsewhere) clear enough for most
    people with a room temperature (Fahrenheit) IQ can understand it. If
    you're struggling, I suggest you stop letting Apple have rent in your
    head and move on.

    What is the case is that android doesn't need to create an account on the company servers to do what the iphone requires a perpetual login to do.

    It's not a gripe. It is what it is. You seem to be embarrassed by that.

    No need to lie about it if you are embarrassed by it being what it is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 19:52:07 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 15:17, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:10:30 -0700, Alan wrote:

    You lied. Why did you lie when everyone knows how it works?

    Why won't you address my point?

    You are trying to bring up unrelated apps like whatsapp and youtube,
    which,

    I didn't mention either of those but messaging apps OBVIOUSLY need
    something to tell them where a message is supposed to go.

    of course, they need an account. You did that because you lied about
    the default messenger which doesn't need an account on the google
    server for android but which needs the account on the apple server
    for ios to work.

    I'm sorry, but that's simply false.

    To send APPLE's "iMessages" you need an AppleID just as you need an ID
    for any other messaging app...

    ...except for SMS/MMS messaging, which is based on the phone number and
    works perfectly on an iPhone without any AppleID at all.


    The android default messenger works without having to create any
    account on any google servers. The ios default messenger requires
    that apple account.

    "the android default messenger" is what: SMS?

    It's both sms & mms and it does not need any account on the google
    server.

    So just the same as Messages on an iPhone, then.


    iOS can send and receive messages without an Apple account.

    'You can use iMessage even with iCloud completely disabled, or even
    if you’ve never setup an iCloud account at all. If you’re on an
    iPhone, you don’t even need to sign in with an Apple ID if you only
    want to send and receive iMessages using your cellular phone
    number; an Apple account is only required to associate email
    addresses with iMessage.'

    <https://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/using-imessage-without-icloud>


    The icloud is different than requiring an apple id just to download
    and install apps. Besides that was for ios 5 and you're on ios 17
    now.

    'If you’re on an iPhone, you don’t even need to sign in with an Apple ID
    if you only want to send and receive iMessages using your cellular phone number'


    Apple removed that long ago, around ios 9 or 10.

    So an article explicitly saying you can do it written in 2021 is wrong?


    Now you can't send or receive anything in apple's ios messages
    without creating an apple account on the apple servers. With android
    you can.

    "Apple's iOS messages" or SMS/MMS messages?


    It's even worse with your unique apple id required just to run
    free apps.

    No. It is not.

    Why do you think apple inserts a unique id into every app you
    install? Google doesn't do that for Android apps. Only apple does
    that.

    OK. So what?


    Android does not put a google id into your free apps. Apple puts
    your unique apple id into your free apps. Are you going to lie
    about that too?

    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    Are you playing dumb? Or are you really so dumb as not know why it
    matters?

    I'm asking you to tell me what you "think"...

    ...and you keep ducking.


    And I haven't lied about anything.

    You're right. You lied about ios messages not needing the apple
    account.

    Wrong. You don't need an Apple account to send SMS/MMS messages.

    And you lied about the app store not needing the apple
    account.

    Wrong, because I never once said that.


    But you were not lying when you were playing dumb by claiming that
    you don't know why apple inserting your unique apple id into every
    app you download (even free apps) matters.

    I know you won't tell me why YOU think it matters.


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe
    servers.

    The only dumb thing in this thread is you, my friend.

    You lied about the app store apple id. You lied about the messages
    apple id. You say you don't know why it matters that apple inserts
    your id into apps.

    <Yawn>


    I confront you on those lies. And then you say it's me who is dumb?
    I'm only asking you why you feel it's necessary for you to lie about
    it?

    Just admit ios is a dumb terminal that needs to log into apple
    servers.

    It's not. As Alan Browne demonstrated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Wed Oct 11 04:21:51 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    I wouldn't know. And I do not care.

    You might not care that apple inserts a unique identifier unique to your apple id account with every app you download - but apple cares. A lot!

    The reason Apple ties every app installed to the person who installed it
    is that Apple is logging every mouse click he does with every app he uses.

    It's all tied to his AppleID which is why Apple wants him logging in.

    Apple is probably selling his data to the developers and to advertisers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Oct 10 23:47:21 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:51:53 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Try it. Almost everything you like about ios will stop working.

    1- am currently logged out on my iPad mini.
    2- doing all the things I said I can do.

    You're saying you are installing apple app store apps without an account?

    You're a liar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mickey D@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Oct 10 23:44:00 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/10/2023, Alan wrote:

    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    No. I said that the Google Play store needs an account as well.

    And that's a fact.

    No it's not a fact. It's wrong. Either you're stupid. Or you're lying.

    Assuming the best case, which is that you're just stupid, then you need to learn something before you respond again with your stupidity.

    You do NOT need to create a Google account to download & install apps off
    the Google Play Store as there are FOSS apps which do all that for you.

    One of those FOSS apps that searches for, downloads, and installs the apps directly off the Google Play Store is Aurora (but many others exist). https://gitlab.com/AuroraOSS/AuroraStore

    Given are wrong because you are stupid, or you are wrong because you wish
    to continue to lie about this, please let us know which when you respond.

    Are you stupid?
    Or are you a liar?

    It's one or both.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 20:19:45 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 20:14, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:50:49 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    They said the default messenger doesn't need an apple account
    That's a lie.

    It doesn't - therefore it is not a lie. It does require, of course, a
    phone connection.

    It is a lie.

    It's not a lie.

    The default apple ios messenger doesn't work without the apple id.

    It doesn't work of Apple's "iMessage" system.

    It does work for SMS/MMS messages.

    The default android messenger does work without a google id.

    For exactly the same kinds of messages that work with an AppleID on an
    iPHone.



    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    I didn't say that. I don't care. And if you do, then stop griping
    about it and move along.

    Why do you call it "griping" when I'm simply explaining how it works?

    Because you're explaining it incorrectly.


    It's not a gripe that the apple app store requires you to create an account while the google app store doesn't require you to create that account.

    Sorry, but I've already shown you the screenshot that proves that is false.

    Do you need to see it again?


    Do you call it "griping" because you can no longer lie about it?

    They said apple doesn't insert a unique number tied only to your appleid >>> into every app you download and install on your iphone or on your ipad.
    That's a lie.

    I wouldn't know. And I do not care.

    You might not care that apple inserts a unique identifier unique to your apple id account with every app you download - but apple cares. A lot!

    And yet you won't say why it matters.

    Got it.


    All of a sudden, when you don't log into ios, it stops working fine.
    Why can't you admit that?

    It works fine. Mail. Maps. Dozens and dozens of apps, all work fine.
    Of course I lose what I value most with Apple - the seamless integration
    between my various Apple devices.

    Fundamentally that iphone is a dumb terminal because nothing works if you don't connect it to the apple "mainframe" servers every day of its life.

    Sorry, but that's false.


    All that "good stuff" you value requires you to be connected for sure.

    And my bet is we'll never see a reply to the message where Alan showed
    you that's false.


    That's a red herring which shows that you too are lying.
    Of course you need an account to log into something like email.

    No different than Android. Right.

    Maybe you missed the main point that android works fine without creating an account to use it while the iphone doesn't work at all if you don't.

    I'm sorry, but that remains false.


    I don't know why you and the others feel the need to lie about it.
    Are you embarrassed by it perhaps?

    But you claiming a bank needs an account is your way of lying because what >>> we've been discussing here is the basic default messaging app & app store. >>
    Which - again - work fine. On the phone I don't need to be logged into
    the Apple account to send SMS/MMS or use other apps (themselves need log
    in).

    This is correct. You can't do anything with the default message app if you don't log into the apple servers while android messaging doesn't do that.

    Nope. He sends SMS/MMS messages with Apple's default message app: Messages.


    Why did the others lie about that?

    No one has lied about his but you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 23:11:16 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 15:50, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:03:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    If I'm on my iPhone, logged out of Apple, SMS/MMS works fine because:
    phone. No log in at all.

    That's exactly how it works on android but it doesn't work that way on ios. Try it.

    Log out of your apple id account.
    Then try to send a text message using your default apple messenger.

    Write back what happens.

    He did.

    You crawled away like a coward from answering his reply.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Tue Oct 10 23:09:59 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 20:47, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:51:53 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Try it. Almost everything you like about ios will stop working.

    1- am currently logged out on my iPad mini.
    2- doing all the things I said I can do.

    You're saying you are installing apple app store apps without an account?

    You're a liar.

    How is not being able to do that one thing the same as "almost everything"?

    I'm betting you'll never answer that question.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Mickey D on Tue Oct 10 23:09:18 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 20:44, Mickey D wrote:
    On 11/10/2023, Alan wrote:

    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    No. I said that the Google Play store needs an account as well.

    And that's a fact.

    No it's not a fact. It's wrong. Either you're stupid. Or you're lying.

    I'm sorry... ...are you seriously telling me this screenshot is a FAKE:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4nAhzDqg5nBSyDAaMHS13cYeW8I-Cw3/view?usp=share_link>

    That is a screenshot of me on the Google Play store attempting to
    download a FREE book, and being asked to "Please sign in"


    Assuming the best case, which is that you're just stupid, then you need to learn something before you respond again with your stupidity.

    You do NOT need to create a Google account to download & install apps off
    the Google Play Store as there are FOSS apps which do all that for you.

    One of those FOSS apps that searches for, downloads, and installs the apps directly off the Google Play Store is Aurora (but many others exist). https://gitlab.com/AuroraOSS/AuroraStore

    "Account login: You can login with either personal or an anonymous account"

    So you still need an account.

    Are you stupid, or a liar...

    ...or both?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Newyana2@invalid.nospam on Wed Oct 11 01:16:19 2023
    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    "VanguardLH" <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    | Texting is not guaranteed for immediate attention. Neither is e-mail.
    | If immediate interaction is required, make a phone call, or use a chat
    | client (e.g., WhatsApp).

    I've noticed that things have gradually changed. At one
    time, people always answered cellphoes because it was
    almost always guaranteed to be relevant. People got mad
    at me because I wasn't on call.

    Long ago, cell phones were called mobile phones. They were extensions
    of the landlines/POTS that we had back then. People were accustomed to
    running through the house to answer a call. I wasn't, but it seemed
    most everyone else was well trained.

    I still remember when some folks thought carrying a pager was a status
    symbol. They were more important because they had a pager, and were on
    call. My opinion was you were at the beck-n-call of someone else. You
    were a peon someone else could pull your strings.

    Then people switched to text because no one aswered
    their cellphones. Text was the way to get through quick.
    People got mad at me because I didn't text. Now I've noticed
    that texting is so ubiquitous, people are not answering texts,
    either.

    As I recall, texts showed up to reduce costs to communicate versus
    making calls. You used your quota more slowly by texting. That was
    back when you had quotas (calls, data, texts). Nowadays most major
    cellular carriers give unlimited quotas.

    Alas, there are many folks that do poorly when making calls. They're
    not prepared with what they want to talk about, they are very poor at
    public speaking, they think in words instead of sentences. As evidenced
    by many e-mails, the latest generation is also very poor at writing, and
    their texts suck, too. Humans now have an attention span shorter than goldfish.

    So I guess we're back to leaving messages, except that no
    one listens to messages anymore. I heard recently that the
    new edicate says you should text to get permission to call
    now. Don't just "show up uninvited" on the other end of
    the line!

    To me, texts are the equivalent of pagers. If I don't pickup a call,
    assuming I heard the ring (*), there's voicemail. If a caller doesn't
    leave a message, it was not an important call.

    (*) My global ring tone is quiet, so it is easy to miss, and won't
    interfere with what is going on at the time, like a meeting. I
    assign a loud ring tone to my contacts. That way, wrong dials,
    spam, and unimportant calls don't irritate me with a loud ring, but
    contacts get a loud ring, so I know it is someone I know that is
    calling me. Volume is low for notifications, so those don't bother
    me much, either.

    That I own a phone is not permission for others to waste my time.

    I mostly use email. Customers, friends, family... Occasionally
    with family I talk for an hour or more on the phone. But email
    allows me to keep in touch, write long emails if necessary, and
    I don't need to coordinate timing. I just check email when I'm
    in the mood, a few times a day. I'm not a drug dealer or a
    country doctor. No one needs to reach me NOW.

    E-mail requires some minimum that the sender can write. Not always true
    (my sister is horrendously bad). Instead of attempting to figure out
    what to say during a call, what to say in a voicemail, or dash out in a
    text, e-mail tends to make senders communicate better. It's getting out
    of favor because the kids think it's old technology, and they just must
    use newer stuff.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Peter on Wed Oct 11 19:19:27 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-11 03:21:51 +0000, Peter said:
    Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    I wouldn't know. And I do not care.

    You might not care that apple inserts a unique identifier unique to your
    apple id account with every app you download - but apple cares. A lot!

    The reason Apple ties every app installed to the person who installed it
    is that Apple is logging every mouse click he does with every app he uses.

    It's all tied to his AppleID which is why Apple wants him logging in.

    Apple is probably selling his data to the developers and to advertisers.

    Another brainless numbnut for the killfile.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Wed Oct 11 09:03:03 2023
    VanguardLH wrote:

    Long ago, cell phones were called mobile phones.

    As far as I know, the "where" matters more than the "when".

    In the UK, they're mobile phones, cell phones is an American thing, in
    Germany they're called a handy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Wed Oct 11 08:29:25 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-10 18:50, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:03:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    If I'm on my iPhone, logged out of Apple, SMS/MMS works fine because:
    phone. No log in at all.

    That's exactly how it works on android but it doesn't work that way on ios. Try it.

    Log out of your apple id account.
    Then try to send a text message using your default apple messenger.

    Write back what happens.

    To assuage all doubts, I just wasted time and logged out of Apple on my
    iPhone.

    Apple Message Works fine. Of course not via iMessage. Just via plain
    "old" SMS/MMS.

    And so do all other messaging apps.
    Because: phone and/or WiFi. And I
    have to be logged into those too for them to work.

    That's a different subject - which means you know you're lying.

    Of course your banking app or your linked-in account needs a login.
    Of course whatsapp or telegram or signal or facebook need an account.

    On any platform.

    But we're talking about two of the most basic things a phone does.
    Sending text messages and installing apps from the company app store.

    Android sends messages without needing to create a google account.
    The iphone can't.

    Well, as I say, logged out of my iPhone and used Message to send
    SMS/MMS. No issue.

    As to dowloading apps from Apple's app store - being logged in is no
    issue at all for me.

    If it's an issue for you, then stop moaning about it and blow off.



    Android installs from the company app store without creating an account.
    The iphone can't.

    Don't equate those basic tasks with setting up an email account because on all platforms (windows, linux & macos too!) email will need an account.

    It's only Apple's messaging system that requires I log in. Of course.

    At least you agree that apple's messaging system requires an account. Android's messaging does not.

    I don't agree with you. Apple Message works fine, not logged in to
    Apple, using MMS/SMS.


    Why did the others lie about that?

    Won't speak for them - but if they said what I say above, it would
    appear that you are the liar. Surprise! (not).


    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps >>> taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    Yes. This is the Apple way. Don't like it? Fine. Move along.

    It's not a question of liking that ios requires a login to work.

    Not at all. As explained. Not my problem you can't handle facts.


    It's a question of what is the case.
    And that the others lied about it.

    Apple's messaging system requires you log in.

    To use Apple's iMessage service:Yes. (Like all messaging services that
    are not SMS/MMS).

    Android's messaging system does not.

    Other than SMS/MMS? Most - probably all.


    Why did they feel they needed to lie about what we agree is the case?

    Keep circling. Watch for the drain.


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers.

    Far from it.

    It's a dumb terminal in that without logging into the apple servers, it
    can't do even the simple things like messaging and installing apps.

    Sheesh you're a repetitive idiot.


    Certainly ios can't do the complicated things you like about it either without logging into the apple account (in that way it's a dumb terminal).

    Far from it. Only those things that use the Apple integration (aka: eco-system) need it. And that is fine - because that integration is
    head and shoulders above anything in the Android universe.

    Done with you.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Oct 11 15:29:34 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-11, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-10-10 20:44, Mickey D wrote:
    On 11/10/2023, Alan wrote:

    They said the apple app store doesn't need an apple account.
    That's a lie.

    No. I said that the Google Play store needs an account as well.

    And that's a fact.

    No it's not a fact. It's wrong. Either you're stupid. Or you're lying.

    I'm sorry... ...are you seriously telling me this screenshot is a FAKE:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4nAhzDqg5nBSyDAaMHS13cYeW8I-Cw3/view?usp=share_link>

    That is a screenshot of me on the Google Play store attempting to
    download a FREE book, and being asked to "Please sign in"


    Assuming the best case, which is that you're just stupid, then you need to >> learn something before you respond again with your stupidity.

    You do NOT need to create a Google account to download & install apps off
    the Google Play Store as there are FOSS apps which do all that for you.

    One of those FOSS apps that searches for, downloads, and installs the apps >> directly off the Google Play Store is Aurora (but many others exist).
    https://gitlab.com/AuroraOSS/AuroraStore

    "Account login: You can login with either personal or an anonymous account"

    So you still need an account.

    Are you stupid, or a liar...

    ...or both?

    Both, and a weak troll to boot.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Peter on Wed Oct 11 15:28:30 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-11, Peter <confused@nospam.net> wrote:
    Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    I wouldn't know. And I do not care.

    You might not care that apple inserts a unique identifier unique to your
    apple id account with every app you download - but apple cares. A lot!

    The reason Apple ties every app installed to the person who installed it
    is that Apple is logging every mouse click he does with every app he uses.

    It's all tied to his AppleID which is why Apple wants him logging in.

    Apple is probably selling his data to the developers and to advertisers.

    Everything in this post is false.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Wed Oct 11 15:33:17 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-11, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-10-10 18:50, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:03:25 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    If I'm on my iPhone, logged out of Apple, SMS/MMS works fine because:
    phone. No log in at all.

    That's exactly how it works on android but it doesn't work that way on ios. >> Try it.

    Log out of your apple id account.
    Then try to send a text message using your default apple messenger.

    Write back what happens.

    To assuage all doubts, I just wasted time and logged out of Apple on my iPhone.

    Apple Message Works fine. Of course not via iMessage. Just via plain
    "old" SMS/MMS.

    And so do all other messaging apps.
    Because: phone and/or WiFi. And I
    have to be logged into those too for them to work.

    That's a different subject - which means you know you're lying.

    Of course your banking app or your linked-in account needs a login.
    Of course whatsapp or telegram or signal or facebook need an account.

    On any platform.

    But we're talking about two of the most basic things a phone does.
    Sending text messages and installing apps from the company app store.

    Android sends messages without needing to create a google account.
    The iphone can't.

    Well, as I say, logged out of my iPhone and used Message to send
    SMS/MMS. No issue.

    As to dowloading apps from Apple's app store - being logged in is no
    issue at all for me.

    If it's an issue for you, then stop moaning about it and blow off.



    Android installs from the company app store without creating an account.
    The iphone can't.

    Don't equate those basic tasks with setting up an email account because on >> all platforms (windows, linux & macos too!) email will need an account.

    It's only Apple's messaging system that requires I log in. Of course.

    At least you agree that apple's messaging system requires an account.
    Android's messaging does not.

    I don't agree with you. Apple Message works fine, not logged in to
    Apple, using MMS/SMS.


    Why did the others lie about that?

    Won't speak for them - but if they said what I say above, it would
    appear that you are the liar. Surprise! (not).


    Android does not need you to create any account to find and install apps >>>> taken directly off the official app store. iOS does.

    Yes. This is the Apple way. Don't like it? Fine. Move along.

    It's not a question of liking that ios requires a login to work.

    Not at all. As explained. Not my problem you can't handle facts.


    It's a question of what is the case.
    And that the others lied about it.

    Apple's messaging system requires you log in.

    To use Apple's iMessage service:Yes. (Like all messaging services that
    are not SMS/MMS).

    Android's messaging system does not.

    Other than SMS/MMS? Most - probably all.


    Why did they feel they needed to lie about what we agree is the case?

    Keep circling. Watch for the drain.


    The iphone is a dumb terminal connected to the apple mainframe servers. >>>
    Far from it.

    It's a dumb terminal in that without logging into the apple servers, it
    can't do even the simple things like messaging and installing apps.

    Sheesh you're a repetitive idiot.


    Certainly ios can't do the complicated things you like about it either
    without logging into the apple account (in that way it's a dumb terminal).

    Far from it. Only those things that use the Apple integration (aka: eco-system) need it. And that is fine - because that integration is
    head and shoulders above anything in the Android universe.

    Done with you.

    And with that, Arlen's nym hoard & weak followers lose yet again. What a
    bunch of twerps. Imagine spending literal hours every single day
    trolling. These douche bags literally have *nothing* better to do with
    their dismal lives than troll. And their weak trolls are based on
    outright lies that are easily disproved. It's just plain sad.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Oct 11 17:12:25 2023
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    VanguardLH wrote:

    Long ago, cell phones were called mobile phones.

    As far as I know, the "where" matters more than the "when".

    In the UK, they're mobile phones, cell phones is an American thing, in Germany they're called a handy.

    Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing. Here (NL) they're also called 'mobile phone' ('mobiele telefoon') or just 'mobile' ('mobiel'). In the
    old days they were called 'GSM', because that was the only technology at
    the time.

    I like the German term 'handy', but it shouldn't be taking too
    literally! :-(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Ant on Wed Oct 11 17:12:25 2023
    Ant <ant@zimage.comant> wrote:
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    ...
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Sigh!

    Needing a Microsoft Account *and* Bluetooth!? How on earth does
    Microsoft come up with such nonsense!?

    WhatsApp does these things - tying phone to computer - just fine,
    without any additional hoops to jump through. Just scan a QR code on
    your computer with your phone and you're done.

    I hardly ever - if ever - send 'texts' (SMS), so it's no skin off my
    nose, but for USAsians it's just unneccessary claptrap.

    Anyway, there are many other 'screen mirroring' tools to accomplish
    these kinds of tasks, it's just a pity that the user has to waste hir
    time, trying to find one, because the Microsoft one is broken-by-design.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Big Al@21:1/5 to this is what Ant on Wed Oct 11 13:28:25 2023
    On 10/10/23 03:38 PM, this is what Ant wrote:
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    ...
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as
    companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.
    What do you do with a desktop and no wi-fi? Besides, usb wi-fi & bluetooth dongles are a dime a dozen. I picked up a
    $10 wi-fi dual wi-fi
    --
    Linux Mint 21.2 Cinnamon
    Al

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Oct 11 15:30:10 2023
    Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Ant <ant@zimage.comant> wrote:
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    ...
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as
    companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC. >>
    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Sigh!

    Needing a Microsoft Account *and* Bluetooth!? How on earth does
    Microsoft come up with such nonsense!?


    BT is an Anroid and Apple iOs requirement for the Windows Phone Link app.



    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to wasbit on Wed Oct 11 22:03:03 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    wasbit <wasbit@nowhere.com> wrote

    How much does an account with Pulse cost?

    "Pick your plan to set up an account. The subscription option will
    provide you with a free 7-day trial, through the Play Store."

    Good question... I never pay for anything... nor do I create an account.
    But most people do both... so it's a perfectly valid question to ask.

    Last I had written up a tutorial on Android messengers, it was $20/year.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qd21dwVw/pulsesms01.jpg> PulseSMS was the best
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3RdsFtgX/pulsesms02.jpg> Klinker sold to MapleMedia
    <https://i.postimg.cc/1tjcm7KJ/pulsesms03.jpg> 5.4.6.2816 last known good version
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nL8052Vj/pulsesms04.jpg> PulseSMS Max Image Size
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR4jYqdJ/pulsesms05.jpg> PulseSMS last good version

    In addition to testing _every_ Android:Windows sharing solution ever
    mentioned on these newsgroups over the years, I also tested messaging apps.

    I tested _every_ free ad-free SMS/MMS messenger on Android years ago, and
    after writing up my results for review on Usenet, I chose PulseSMS as the
    best (although there was a close second at the time I ran those tests).

    Subsequently PulseSMS has gone over to the dark side, but rest assured I
    still use the last known good version of "Klinker" PulseSMS (before they
    sold out to Maple Media) which is version 5.4.6.2816 (as far as I know).

    The reason I bring up the account on the server is that all the "good
    stuff" that the OP "probably" wants with "Link to Windows" _also_ requires
    that Microsoft Account (as proven by Andy Burns in his last post above).

    It turns out you don't get "all that good stuff" of using any device to
    text without connecting to the Internet (which is how Apple does it).

    Me?

    I use the FOSS screen copy tools which put Android onto Windows for me.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mrz6gJpC/scrcpy23.jpg> Android SMS/MMS on Windows
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Wed Oct 11 22:10:30 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    Yes, alternative applications are available...but the question presented
    was specific - Testing via the Windows 10 Phone app.
    - The Windows 10/11 Phone app's requirements need to be met to do so.

    Agreed. Both Andy Burns and I tested Link to Windows briefly today for the
    OP and we both concluded one of those requirements is a Microsoft Account.

    These are Andy Burns' screenshots, for example.
    <http://andyburns.uk/misc/phonelink1.png>
    <http://andyburns.uk/misc/phonelink2.png>

    The help pages for what is needed don't seem to make it clear though that
    the MSA is required, but I only skimmed them - the OP can look deeper.
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>

    I am still on Windows 10, but if the OP is on Windows 11, maybe the need
    for that MSA isn't so onerous as he would already have created it, right?
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Patrick@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Thu Oct 12 10:28:24 2023
    On 11 Oct 2023 17:12:25 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Anyway, there are many other 'screen mirroring' tools to accomplish
    these kinds of tasks, it's just a pity that the user has to waste hir
    time, trying to find one, because the Microsoft one is broken-by-design.

    Does the KDE Connect tool do what the original poster needs it to do? https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.kde.kdeconnect_tp

    KDE Connect provides a set of features to integrate your workflow across devices:
    WiFi connection: no USB wire or bluetooth needed.
    Transfer files between your devices.
    Access files on your phone from your computer, without wires.
    Shared clipboard: copy and paste between your devices.
    Get notifications for incoming calls and messages on your computer.
    Virtual touchpad: Use your phone screen as your computer's touchpad. Notifications sync: Access your phone notifications from your computer
    and reply to messages.
    Multimedia remote control: Use your phone as a remote for Linux media
    players.
    End-to-end TLS encryption: your information is safe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Big Al on Wed Oct 11 22:34:35 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.microsoft.windows, comp.mobile.android

    Big Al <Bears@invalid.com> wrote

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.
    What do you do with a desktop and no wi-fi?
    Besides, usb wi-fi & bluetooth dongles are a dime a dozen.
    I picked up a
    $10 wi-fi dual wi-fi

    Personally, I found those USB Wi-Fi dongles to be utter garbage in terms
    of range compared to any old router that you already have lying around. <https://i.postimg.cc/XJChDCPr/spare-access-points.jpg> My home Wi-Fi APs <https://i.postimg.cc/Gh22Sb2N/desktop.jpg> Desktop MikroTik pseudobridge

    Such "range extenders" can go for miles, and they're all free (for me).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/D0vfqM3p/horns.jpg> Horns extend laptop Wi-Fi range
    <https://i.postimg.cc/25NdBZ7f/horn-to-router.jpg> Laptop horn to router
    <https://i.postimg.cc/JhyCRT69/horn-to-switch.jpg> Laptop horn to switch
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Hs0NWSKr/laptopnanobeam.jpg> Laptop to dish antenna
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vT0Krpfc/laptop-nanobeam-horn.jpg> Laptop to horn
    <https://i.postimg.cc/905nFgxX/nanobeamnanobridge.jpg> NanoBeam & NanoBridge

    When I tried USB Wi-Fi dongles, I returned them for lack of range.
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Ant on Wed Oct 11 22:18:31 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops.
    Not even wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Hi Ant,
    One simple trick to put Wi-Fi onto any desktop that has Ethernet
    is to plug any old router into that port and configure that old
    router as your Wi-Fi gateway (mine use a client/bridge setup).

    Since I live on top of a mountain that has no utilities whatsoever
    except for electricity (and landline, if people still use it),
    we get our Internet from a few miles away over the air to an
    antenna on another hilltop.

    Given that situtaion, we always have spare antennas lying around where,
    since they can go miles, they make great range extenders inside the house!

    <https://i.postimg.cc/MHK8gCFL/wirelessbridge01.jpg> dd-wrt client bridge
    <https://i.postimg.cc/k5Hfvmfh/wirelessbridge02.jpg> dd-wrt bridge repeater
    <https://i.postimg.cc/65xbPBwk/wirelessbridge03.jpg> run site survey & join
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L5KDGVdt/wirelessbridge04.jpg> both SSIDs now work
    <https://i.postimg.cc/SKvK2ccJ/wirelessbridge05.jpg> Windows elegant finesse
    <https://i.postimg.cc/XJChDCPr/spare-access-points.jpg> Spare powerful APs

    All you do is the following:
    a. You usually flash the old router with dd-wrt (or equivalent).
    b. You usually set up the router as a client bridge (or similar).
    c. You usually connect to your home router (or AP hanging off of it).

    That's it. It works beautifully to add Wi-Fi to a PC that doesn't have it.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Gh22Sb2N/desktop.jpg> Desktop MikroTik pseudobridge
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Bv0wZbDh/pbe-m2-400-802-11-wifi-setting.jpg> AP
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6QJqK6Cj/desktop02.jpg> Desktop MikroTik WISP radios
    <https://i.postimg.cc/DfQJq437/mikrotikrouter.jpg> WISP router transceiver
    <https://i.postimg.cc/s2c2L8Wd/mikrotik-router.jpg> Parts cost ~$150 new
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yx4CgWYt/mikrotik-router-config.jpg> MikroTik -40dBm
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Dzq9Bsjs/pb-m2-400-nanobeam.jpg> PowerBeam M2-400
    <https://i.postimg.cc/kg5LKkz9/pbe-m2-400-airmax-setting.jpg> AirMax TDMA
    <https://i.postimg.cc/htQ469sQ/pbe-m2-400-ap-station.jpg> AP or Repeater
    <https://i.postimg.cc/gcBWpxnV/pbe-m2-400-bridge-router.jpg> Bridge
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pLXCzFxC/powerbeam-nanobeam.jpg> Magnetic dishalt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.mobile.android,alt.comp.microsoft.windows
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Patrick@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Thu Oct 12 10:21:17 2023
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:39:44 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:
    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.

    Easier and cheaper and more powerful to plug an old router into the RJ45
    as the others said they do all the time to add Wi-Fi to a desktop w/o it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Wally J on Thu Oct 12 02:10:03 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    Yes, alternative applications are available...but the question presented
    was specific - Testing via the Windows 10 Phone app.
    - The Windows 10/11 Phone app's requirements need to be met to do so.

    Agreed. Both Andy Burns and I tested Link to Windows briefly today for the
    OP and we both concluded one of those requirements is a Microsoft Account.

    These are Andy Burns' screenshots, for example.
    <http://andyburns.uk/misc/phonelink1.png>
    <http://andyburns.uk/misc/phonelink2.png>

    The help pages for what is needed don't seem to make it clear though that
    the MSA is required, but I only skimmed them - the OP can look deeper.
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>

    I am still on Windows 10, but if the OP is on Windows 11, maybe the need
    for that MSA isn't so onerous as he would already have created it, right?


    The docs on the app could have been written better.

    For the most part(for Win10) if the app requires an MSA to download from
    the MSFT store or a feature included app in Windows, there's a good
    chance an MSA is required for use.

    For Win11, which is more closely designed(and expected) to be used with
    an MSA, it seems reasonably logical that the MSA logon used for Windows
    11 having already signed on - meets the Phone Link's MSA requirement.



    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Patrick on Thu Oct 12 02:11:56 2023
    Patrick wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:39:44 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:
    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.

    Easier and cheaper and more powerful to plug an old router into the RJ45
    as the others said they do all the time to add Wi-Fi to a desktop w/o it.

    RJ45 is an option.
    . but have also noticed more laptops/tablets without an RJ45 Lan port,
    only wifi.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Wally J on Thu Oct 12 07:22:22 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:

    Andy Burns and I tested Link to Windows briefly today for the OP and we
    both concluded one of those requirements is a Microsoft Account.

    I stopped at that point.

    Also I don't think any of this helps the O/P's brother since he only has
    a landline, no mobile.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Thu Oct 12 05:44:19 2023
    On 10/10/2023 4:39 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.


    I keep a small collection of USB toys like that.

    TPLink TL-WN722N USB to 802.11N

    Asus USB-BT400 Bluetooth 4 (I have a BT 5 as well, but no extra features evident)

    ASIX USB3 to GbE Ethernet adapter you can add to a desktop

    PCIe Wifi 6 It's in the junk room :-) Not as easy to install
    as the USB one.

    *******

    For Bluetooth, buy one unit per desktop and keep the
    dongle with the desktop, even if unplugged. You have to be
    careful to not move them between machines, as Windows will
    get "confused" and ruin your BT experiments :-) There are
    also certain things you should not do with them, like make
    audio come out of your second PC, from your first PC. That
    can make a mess of the registry (hard to remove/undo).

    *******

    Wifi is a veritable "hype-wagon", where the advertising claims
    vastly exceed results. The price for the super-mega-ultra version
    keeps going up, and as I understand it, we've now left $500
    behind and are headed for the stratosphere. That's for a
    "thingy with extra legs sticking up, like a dead bug"

    https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20210601PD206.html

    I think the Wifi 7 has 4096 QAM, but the question there
    would be, whether the error rate allows such a mode
    to be used productively. That's a huge constellation,
    with tiny noise margins.

    Bluetooth has kinda run out of "hype-steam". Soon,
    we won't need to buy any more of their dongles :-) Soon.

    I did manage to get BT PAN working recently. Imagine
    file sharing over BT, at BT rates. My movie download
    should be finished by next week.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to ...winston on Thu Oct 12 14:18:20 2023
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Ant <ant@zimage.comant> wrote:
    ...winston <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:
    ...
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/sync-across-your-devices

    Will MS be adding iPhone support into its old W10 in the future?

    No. Win10 is/was too far along in the product lifecycle.
    Windows 11 was the only o/s considered for iOS.

    Phone Link should be seen, going forward, for both Android and iOS as
    companion tool to Windows. For iOS, since recently new(May 2023) it's
    still a work in progress.

    Bluetooth connection/pairing is also required. Messaging feature is
    limited by iOS, Image/video sharing and group messages not supported,
    and Messages are session based(available when the phone is connected to PC.

    Ah, BT req. Don't have those on my old custom built desktops. Not even
    wifi. I guess expensive Macs will here.

    Sigh!

    Needing a Microsoft Account *and* Bluetooth!? How on earth does Microsoft come up with such nonsense!?


    BT is an Anroid and Apple iOs requirement for the Windows Phone Link app.

    Thanks for the clarification. I thought as much, but wasn't sure.

    Anyway, my (snipped) comment on the bogus need for a Microsoft Account
    still stands.

    What about business et al (i.e. IT dept managed systems) users, are
    they supposed to have/use Microsoft Accounts, just to be able to link
    their phone to their computer!?

    [Unsnip of previous context:]

    WhatsApp does these things - tying phone to computer - just fine,
    without any additional hoops to jump through. Just scan a QR code on
    your computer with your phone and you're done.

    I hardly ever - if ever - send 'texts' (SMS), so it's no skin off my
    nose, but for USAsians it's just unneccessary claptrap.

    Anyway, there are many other 'screen mirroring' tools to accomplish
    these kinds of tasks, it's just a pity that the user has to waste hir
    time, trying to find one, because the Microsoft one is broken-by-design.

    [End unsnip.]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 08:56:25 2023
    On 11 Oct 2023 17:12:25 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    VanguardLH wrote:

    Long ago, cell phones were called mobile phones.

    As far as I know, the "where" matters more than the "when".

    In the UK, they're mobile phones, cell phones is an American thing, in
    Germany they're called a handy.

    Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing. Here (NL) they're also called
    'mobile phone' ('mobiele telefoon') or just 'mobile' ('mobiel'). In the
    old days they were called 'GSM', because that was the only technology at
    the time.

    I like the German term 'handy', but it shouldn't be taking too
    literally! :-(


    In Italian, it's called a "telefonino." I like that term because it
    literally means "small telephone."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to ...winston on Thu Oct 12 09:01:36 2023
    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 02:11:56 -0400, ...winston wrote:
    Patrick wrote:
    [quoted text muted]
    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.

    Easier and cheaper and more powerful to plug an old router into the RJ45
    as the others said they do all the time to add Wi-Fi to a desktop w/o it.

    RJ45 is an option.
    . but have also noticed more laptops/tablets without an RJ45 Lan port,
    only wifi.


    Some laptops come with an Ethernet-to-USB dongle on
    about a 3-inch cable. But for those who don't, there
    are these (among, I'm sure, a few zillion others):

    <https://www.amazon.com/s?
    k=usb+to+ethernet+adapter&crid= 3DVEXILNBTKCO&sprefix=usb+to+ethernet%2Caps%2C140>

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Thu Oct 12 13:02:42 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    The help pages for what is needed don't seem to make it clear though that
    the MSA is required, but I only skimmed them - the OP can look deeper.
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>

    I am still on Windows 10, but if the OP is on Windows 11, maybe the need
    for that MSA isn't so onerous as he would already have created it, right?


    The docs on the app could have been written better.

    For the most part(for Win10) if the app requires an MSA to download from
    the MSFT store or a feature included app in Windows, there's a good
    chance an MSA is required for use.

    For Win11, which is more closely designed(and expected) to be used with
    an MSA, it seems reasonably logical that the MSA logon used for Windows
    11 having already signed on - meets the Phone Link's MSA requirement.

    I think we agree (you, me and Andy Burns at least) that the MSA is a requirement, even it's not explicitly spelled out at the "beginning".

    Now... what about Ant's objection that Bluetooth is also required?

    When I grep for bluetooth in the document, the word "bluetooth" shows up 14 times, but tellingly, first only under the "setup for Instant Hotspot"...
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>
    How to setup Instant Hotspot?
    ... stuff ...
    What are the requirements for using this feature?
    ... stuff ...
    A PC with Bluetooth support and Wi-Fi adapter
    ... stuff ...

    But then "bluetooth" shows up 13 more times after that, where I'm not sure
    if BT is needed or not for the typical normal Link to Windows requirements.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Oct 12 13:34:29 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote

    Andy Burns and I tested Link to Windows briefly today for the OP and we
    both concluded one of those requirements is a Microsoft Account.

    I stopped at that point.

    I did also as I have tested every free and account free and ad free
    solution for linking the PC and Android together in the past.

    For most, I would think the link-to-windows alternative is KDE-Connect. <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.kde.kdeconnect_tp>

    Here are my screenshots from when I had tested KDE Connect with Windows.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/qqcHvN6T/kdeconnect01.jpg> KDEConnect setup
    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZYHf4PCq/kdeconnect02.jpg> KDEConnect pairing
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cJ39SVnq/kdeconnect03.jpg> KDEConnect sharing

    But personally, I mostly mirror my phone onto the PC over Wi-Fi and act on
    it using the PC keyboard, mouse, monitor, speakers and clipboard(s).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pr8NPNKs/scrcpy33.jpg>
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Char Jackson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 12 12:55:26 2023
    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:01:36 -0700, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:

    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 02:11:56 -0400, ...winston wrote:
    Patrick wrote:
    [quoted text muted]
    Use USB dongles to add Bluetooth and/or wifi.

    Easier and cheaper and more powerful to plug an old router into the RJ45 >> > as the others said they do all the time to add Wi-Fi to a desktop w/o it. >>
    RJ45 is an option.
    . but have also noticed more laptops/tablets without an RJ45 Lan port,
    only wifi.


    Some laptops come with an Ethernet-to-USB dongle on
    about a 3-inch cable. But for those who don't, there
    are these (among, I'm sure, a few zillion others):

    <https://www.amazon.com/s?k=usb+to+ethernet+adapter&crid=3DVEXILNBTKCO&sprefix=usb+to+ethernet%2Caps%2C140>

    My first thought was, do they really call it that? No, it's USB-to-Ethernet, as I expected. Ethernet-to-USB would be a weird device. :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Thu Oct 12 16:07:34 2023
    On 10/11/2023 1:12 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:

    Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.

    Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew.

    That's why it is a cell phone.

    There were also Iridium phones, based on... Iridium.

    And "sat phones" based on flavor of the week satellite company.

    Because it is not a walkie-talkie. Which is a mobile
    point-to-point radio.

    The taxonomy names the technology, so the listener will
    have some idea what the tech is. A cell phone won't work
    in the middle of Baffin Bay. A sat phone just might.
    So if you say "I'm taking a sat phone with me", I can relax,
    knowing if you're in an emergency situation, you'll be
    able to reach out for help. Telling people you "took a mobile
    with you", I assume you're using it as a flashlight :-)
    There's no assurance of coverage.

    What is a Stingray then, in Dutch ? Do you have Stingrays
    where you are ? We have two in town (detected by a local
    expert on the topic), and the government claims the Stingrays
    do not belong to them. The police claim the same thing.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker

    "When operating in active mode, the device mimics a
    wireless carrier cell tower in order to force all nearby
    mobile phones and other cellular data devices to connect to it."

    A Stingray is a base station emulator, for tapping into
    the cell network. Spy grade stuff. Police do use those.
    Just not here. Presumably the physical location of the
    devices is changed often enough, they're not going to get
    caught. It's assumed these are foreign, rather than
    organized crime.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Oct 12 17:12:54 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:36:45 -0700, Alan wrote:

    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    Are you playing dumb? Or are you really so dumb as not know why it matters?

    I notice you can't explain.

    If you don't know why locking all apps (even free ones!) to your appleid
    alone and then tagging forever with your applid alone is something only
    apple does, then explaining to you why app tracking is bad is a lost cause.

    And you lied about the app store not needing the apple account.

    I never claimed that. What I said and showed was that you need an
    account to access the Google Play store.

    Something you keep refusing to acknowledge is true.

    Everyone knows you do not need to create a google account to search for, download and install apps directly from the google play store repository.

    Except you.

    You lied about the app store apple id.

    False

    You lied.

    You say you don't know why it matters that apple inserts your id into apps.

    False. What I asked you was why YOU think it matters.

    If you don't know why inserting your unique identifier into every app you download is a bad idea (which only apple does - nobody else) then nothing anyone says will ever knock any sense into your head.

    Suffice to repeat that only apple does that. Nobody else would dare.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Oct 12 17:35:22 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:20:02 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Everyone knows you do not need to create a google account to search for,
    download and install apps directly from the google play store repository.

    Except you.

    I showed you a screenshot that proves you wrong.

    Like I said, everyone knows two things you do not know.

    The first is that apple inserts a unique tracking identifier into every app that you download which not only locks that app (even free apps!) to your appleid but also allows apple to sell any information they gain from it.

    Only apple inserts your unique identification into every app you install.

    For you say you don't know this by now means you're lying because everyone knows it and therefore it's easy to find out with a simple google search.

    The second is that only you are unaware that anyone can install apps
    directly from the google play store repository using any number of foss
    skins much like how a web browser can access any file made available.

    Since you've had ample opportunity to look up what auroraoss does, I will
    be forced to assume you're lying since everyone knows that this is so.

    The reason that everything you've said has to be a lie is everyone knows
    this and for you to say that only you don't know it must then be a lie.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Oct 12 17:42:40 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11 Oct 2023 15:28:30 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
    The reason Apple ties every app installed to the person who installed it
    is that Apple is logging every mouse click he does with every app he uses. >>
    It's all tied to his AppleID which is why Apple wants him logging in.

    Apple is probably selling his data to the developers and to advertisers.

    Everything in this post is false.

    Except that it's all correct and only apple modifies every app to insert a unique tracking it that is strictly locked to your appleid into every app.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Oct 12 17:49:03 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11 Oct 2023 15:29:34 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Both, and a weak troll to boot.

    You call it a troll because you refuse to believe that only apple inserts a unique tracking identifier tied to your appleid into every app you install.

    And you refuse to believe you do not need to create a google account to download and install any free app directly from the google play repository.

    Try this test and watch it work on android and fail on ios.

    Without ever creating an apple account, download an app from the apple app store and install it and then use the saved ipa on a phone you don't own.

    Compare the results with......

    Without ever creating a google account, download an app from the google
    play store and install it & then use the saved apk on any other phone.

    The proof that you're lying is both will work on any android phone.
    Neither will work on any iphone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Thu Oct 12 14:20:02 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-12 14:12, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:36:45 -0700, Alan wrote:

    What does it matter if an ID is put into a free app?

    Are you playing dumb? Or are you really so dumb as not know why it matters? >>
    I notice you can't explain.

    If you don't know why locking all apps (even free ones!) to your appleid alone and then tagging forever with your applid alone is something only
    apple does, then explaining to you why app tracking is bad is a lost cause.

    Still can't explain.

    Got it.


    And you lied about the app store not needing the apple account.

    I never claimed that. What I said and showed was that you need an
    account to access the Google Play store.

    Something you keep refusing to acknowledge is true.

    Everyone knows you do not need to create a google account to search for, download and install apps directly from the google play store repository.

    Except you.

    I showed you a screenshot that proves you wrong.



    You lied about the app store apple id.

    False

    You lied.

    False.


    You say you don't know why it matters that apple inserts your id into apps. >>
    False. What I asked you was why YOU think it matters.

    If you don't know why inserting your unique identifier into every app you download is a bad idea (which only apple does - nobody else) then nothing anyone says will ever knock any sense into your head.

    Suffice to repeat that only apple does that. Nobody else would dare.

    And you STILL can't explain.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wolf Greenblatt@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Oct 12 17:51:21 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:09:59 -0700, Alan wrote:

    You're saying you are installing apple app store apps without an account?

    You're a liar.

    How is not being able to do that one thing the same as "almost everything"?

    Try this test and watch it work on android and fail on ios.

    Without ever creating an apple account, download an app from the apple app store and install it and then use the saved ipa on a phone you don't own.

    Compare the results with......

    Without ever creating a google account, download an app from the google
    play store and install it & then use the saved apk on any other phone.

    The proof that you're lying is both will work on any android phone.
    Neither will work on any iphone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Wally J on Thu Oct 12 18:03:08 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    The help pages for what is needed don't seem to make it clear though that >>> the MSA is required, but I only skimmed them - the OP can look deeper.
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>

    I am still on Windows 10, but if the OP is on Windows 11, maybe the need >>> for that MSA isn't so onerous as he would already have created it, right? >>>

    The docs on the app could have been written better.

    For the most part(for Win10) if the app requires an MSA to download from
    the MSFT store or a feature included app in Windows, there's a good
    chance an MSA is required for use.

    For Win11, which is more closely designed(and expected) to be used with
    an MSA, it seems reasonably logical that the MSA logon used for Windows
    11 having already signed on - meets the Phone Link's MSA requirement.

    I think we agree (you, me and Andy Burns at least) that the MSA is a requirement, even it's not explicitly spelled out at the "beginning".

    Now... what about Ant's objection that Bluetooth is also required?

    When I grep for bluetooth in the document, the word "bluetooth" shows up 14 times, but tellingly, first only under the "setup for Instant Hotspot"...
    <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/phone-link-app-requirements-and-setup-cd2a1ee7-75a7-66a6-9d4e-bf22e735f9e3>
    How to setup Instant Hotspot?
    ... stuff ...
    What are the requirements for using this feature?
    ... stuff ...
    A PC with Bluetooth support and Wi-Fi adapter
    ... stuff ...

    But then "bluetooth" shows up 13 more times after that, where I'm not sure
    if BT is needed or not for the typical normal Link to Windows requirements.


    At this end, not actually agreeing. Just stating what I know is true(required).
    - MSA required

    Bluetooth
    - requirement is Android and iOS based for their smartphones.
    i.e. not a MSFT or Windows requirment per se. It's the connectivity
    required by Android and iOS to sync the phone for the Windows app.


    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Thu Oct 12 18:30:49 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    At this end, not actually agreeing. Just stating what I know is true(required).
    - MSA required

    Bluetooth
    - requirement is Android and iOS based for their smartphones.
    i.e. not a MSFT or Windows requirment per se. It's the connectivity required by Android and iOS to sync the phone for the Windows app.

    Leave it to Microsoft to be so sneaky as to not be explicit that the MSA is required for things that it should NOT need to have an MSA to do.

    An example is I just tried to install this "To Do" app from Microsoft.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.microsoft.todos>

    Nowhere does it say (that I could find) that you need an MSA account.
    So I install it.

    Guess what the first thing is that it requires just to open up the app.....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Thu Oct 12 15:55:09 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-12 14:42, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On 11 Oct 2023 15:28:30 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:
    The reason Apple ties every app installed to the person who installed it >>> is that Apple is logging every mouse click he does with every app he uses. >>>
    It's all tied to his AppleID which is why Apple wants him logging in.

    Apple is probably selling his data to the developers and to advertisers.

    Everything in this post is false.

    Except that it's all correct and only apple modifies every app to insert a unique tracking it that is strictly locked to your appleid into every app.

    And yet you've snipped so much of his post...

    ...so you are obviously (tacitly) admitting he was correct about
    everything else.

    And since no one denies that Apple inserts the AppleID into app
    downloads, you're left arguing a straw man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Thu Oct 12 15:57:30 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-12 14:51, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:09:59 -0700, Alan wrote:

    You're saying you are installing apple app store apps without an account? >>>
    You're a liar.

    How is not being able to do that one thing the same as "almost everything"?

    Try this test and watch it work on android and fail on ios.

    Will that answer the question regarding you claiming you wouldn't be
    able to do "almost everything"?


    Without ever creating an apple account, download an app from the apple app store and install it and then use the saved ipa on a phone you don't own.

    Compare the results with......

    Without ever creating a google account, download an app from the google
    play store and install it & then use the saved apk on any other phone.

    Sorry, but the Google Play store requires an account.

    That is completely settled.

    You've tacitly admitted as much my suggesting you can work around that
    fact by using Aurora OSS (or something similar)...

    ...when in fact Aurora OSS says you need an account as well.


    The proof that you're lying is both will work on any android phone.
    Neither will work on any iphone.

    So you (tacitly) agree this is the only thing that actually can't be done.

    Got it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Thu Oct 12 15:53:52 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-12 14:35, Wolf Greenblatt wrote:
    On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:20:02 -0700, Alan wrote:

    Everyone knows you do not need to create a google account to search for, >>> download and install apps directly from the google play store repository. >>>
    Except you.

    I showed you a screenshot that proves you wrong.

    Like I said, everyone knows two things you do not know.

    The first is that apple inserts a unique tracking identifier into every app that you download which not only locks that app (even free apps!) to your appleid but also allows apple to sell any information they gain from it.

    Only apple inserts your unique identification into every app you install.

    For you say you don't know this by now means you're lying because everyone knows it and therefore it's easy to find out with a simple google search.


    None of that addresses the fact that I showed you a screenshot of the
    Google Play store telling me I needed an account.


    The second is that only you are unaware that anyone can install apps
    directly from the google play store repository using any number of foss
    skins much like how a web browser can access any file made available.

    Since you've had ample opportunity to look up what auroraoss does, I will
    be forced to assume you're lying since everyone knows that this is so.

    The reason that everything you've said has to be a lie is everyone knows
    this and for you to say that only you don't know it must then be a lie.

    I dealt with that.

    Direct from the URL YOU gave me:

    'Account login: You can login with either personal or an anonymous account'

    Which therefore explicitly shows you need a Google account to use Aurora
    OSS.

    You lose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Paul on Thu Oct 12 19:58:16 2023
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew.
    |

    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone". And I've noticed that increasingly
    people assume my phone number is cell phone, which
    it isn't. People get suspicious, like I'm not giving them
    my "real" number.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wolf Greenblatt on Fri Oct 13 01:39:25 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2023-10-12, Wolf Greenblatt <wolf@greenblatt.net> wrote:
    On 11 Oct 2023 15:29:34 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    Both, and a weak troll to boot.

    You call it a troll because you refuse to believe that only apple inserts a unique tracking identifier tied to your appleid into every app you install.

    I've known that since the App Store first opened, dumbass. 🤣 It's
    common knowledge. You're just latching onto this straw man and trying to
    weasel your way out of the actual topic of this thread out of
    desperation, and that's crystal clear for all to see. You're a mental
    weakling, Arlen. Just pathetic.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Wally J on Fri Oct 13 02:50:49 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    At this end, not actually agreeing. Just stating what I know is
    true(required).
    - MSA required

    Bluetooth
    - requirement is Android and iOS based for their smartphones.
    i.e. not a MSFT or Windows requirment per se. It's the connectivity
    required by Android and iOS to sync the phone for the Windows app.

    Leave it to Microsoft to be so sneaky as to not be explicit that the MSA is required for things that it should NOT need to have an MSA to do.

    An example is I just tried to install this "To Do" app from Microsoft.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.microsoft.todos>

    Nowhere does it say (that I could find) that you need an MSA account.
    So I install it.

    Guess what the first thing is that it requires just to open up the app.....

    :)
    I believe I mentioned(earlier)...
    - if it's an app from MSFT, good chance in every instance an MSA is
    required. While some included apps can be run without an MSA(or a notice
    to sign on with an MSA), the design intent since Windows 8.0 has been to
    use an MSA.
    - pretty much strengthened further since Win10 was released

    Lol...its not much different when design intent using a Microsoft
    Account(fka as Live account) in 2008 first appeared with the release of
    the Windows Essentials suite(Windows Live Mail, Photo Gallery, Movie Maker)
    - while not necessary the design intent was to use these programs with
    an MSA(Live Account - Outlook/Hotmail/Live/Msn.com, Passport.net or any
    third party email registered as an MSA/Microsoft account).

    Sneaky? No...an MSA use has been the norm for years with the initial
    direction over 15 yrs ago.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Fri Oct 13 08:30:16 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    I believe I mentioned(earlier)...

    Ah. You did. My bad. I'm just slowly coming to that realization.
    Empirically.

    - if it's an app from MSFT, good chance in every instance an MSA is required. While some included apps can be run without an MSA(or a notice
    to sign on with an MSA), the design intent since Windows 8.0 has been to
    use an MSA.

    You have a better handle on Microsoft's MSA-lockin strategy than I do.

    There is no doubt the always-logged-into-the-mothership-servers model has worked beautifully for Apple where I'd wager 98% of Apple users don't even realize they're sheep kept in the slaughterhouse surrounded by the garden.

    But I thought Windows users were smarter than that in that we've all
    rebelled against, oh, say, Windows 10 S which at first "seemed to" require
    a MSA but in reality, it was very easily worked around (turning Windows 10
    S into Windows 10 Home rather easily).

    The requirement for the MS Store account also was easily circumvented
    simply by not getting anything from the MS Store (which, to my knowledge, doesn't contain anything of any worth). Even Paint.NET (my favorite free PhotoShop editor on Windows) is obtained outside of the MS Store (although inside the MS Store they charge people dumb enough to pay for it there).

    - pretty much strengthened further since Win10 was released

    You're ahead of me on understanding Microsoft's MSA strategy as I have no account still - and yet - I've tried to remove my Apple account from my
    iPads and everything stops working.

    While temporarily creating a MSA account for my first Windows 10 S
    conversion was "fixed" by requesting a deletion from MS (which they did
    some time later), I hear that only in Windows 11 is the damn thing
    required.

    If that's true, then it took Microsoft from Windows 8 to now to make it a reality. Luckily there's nothing Windows 11 does that all the other
    Windows versions don't (or won't) do, so I'm safe for another few years.
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to ...winston on Fri Oct 13 09:35:06 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 10/13/2023 2:50 AM, ...winston wrote:
    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    At this end, not actually agreeing.  Just stating what I know is
    true(required).
       - MSA required

    Bluetooth
       - requirement is Android and iOS based for their smartphones.
       i.e. not a MSFT or Windows requirment per se. It's the connectivity >>> required by Android and iOS to sync the phone for the Windows app.

    Leave it to Microsoft to be so sneaky as to not be explicit that the MSA is >> required for things that it should NOT need to have an MSA to do.

    An example is I just tried to install this "To Do" app from Microsoft.
      <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.microsoft.todos>

    Nowhere does it say (that I could find) that you need an MSA account.
    So I install it.

    Guess what the first thing is that it requires just to open up the app..... >>
    :)
    I believe I mentioned(earlier)...
     - if it's an app from MSFT, good chance in every instance an MSA is required. While some included apps can be run without an MSA(or a notice to sign on with an MSA), the design intent since Windows 8.0 has been to use an MSA.
     - pretty much strengthened further since Win10 was released

    Lol...its not much different when design intent using a Microsoft Account(fka as Live account) in 2008 first appeared with the release of the Windows Essentials suite(Windows Live Mail, Photo Gallery, Movie Maker)
     - while not necessary the design intent was to use these programs with an MSA(Live Account - Outlook/Hotmail/Live/Msn.com, Passport.net or any third party email registered as an MSA/Microsoft account).

    Sneaky?  No...an MSA use has been the norm for years with the initial direction over 15 yrs ago.


    A way to install a Metro App, might be to use "winget".
    I don't know what dependencies that has.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/package-manager/winget/

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Graham J on Fri Oct 13 14:36:16 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Graham J wrote:

    It is possible to install Windows 11 Pro without a MSA.  Not sure about Windows 11 Home

    I used shift-F10 then
    taskkill /F /IM oobenetworkconnectionflow.exe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Wally J on Fri Oct 13 14:19:39 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:

    [snip]

    While temporarily creating a MSA account for my first Windows 10 S
    conversion was "fixed" by requesting a deletion from MS (which they did
    some time later), I hear that only in Windows 11 is the damn thing
    required.

    It's not required. It is possible to install Windows 11 Pro without a
    MSA. Not sure about Windows 11 Home.

    This is for a Dell Vostro 5620 with W11Pro pre-installed.

    Power up
    Agree language and keyboard settings
    It wants a network connection

    Key Shift + Fn + F10 to get a command window.

    (The Fn key is becasye it's a small keyboard, so the Function keys are
    shared with the number keys alon the top row.)

    Then type:
    oobe\bypassnro
    machine restarts

    Then repeat steps until given the option:

    ... I don't have internet ...

    Continue limited setup, which allows you to create a Local Administrator account.










    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Wally J on Fri Oct 13 13:53:09 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Wally J wrote:
    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    I believe I mentioned(earlier)...

    Ah. You did. My bad. I'm just slowly coming to that realization.
    Empirically.

    - if it's an app from MSFT, good chance in every instance an MSA is
    required. While some included apps can be run without an MSA(or a notice
    to sign on with an MSA), the design intent since Windows 8.0 has been to
    use an MSA.

    You have a better handle on Microsoft's MSA-lockin strategy than I do.

    There is no doubt the always-logged-into-the-mothership-servers model has worked beautifully for Apple where I'd wager 98% of Apple users don't even realize they're sheep kept in the slaughterhouse surrounded by the garden.

    But I thought Windows users were smarter than that in that we've all
    rebelled against, oh, say, Windows 10 S which at first "seemed to" require
    a MSA but in reality, it was very easily worked around (turning Windows 10
    S into Windows 10 Home rather easily).

    That doesn't change much. The Windows apps in Win10/11 S are the same
    apps in Windows 10/11 Home/Pro.
    S mode is a Windows Store app only mode requiring Edge for browsing
    - i.e. not able to install programs from other sources(e.g.3rd party)

    The requirement for the MS Store account also was easily circumvented
    simply by not getting anything from the MS Store (which, to my knowledge, doesn't contain anything of any worth). Even Paint.NET (my favorite free PhotoShop editor on Windows) is obtained outside of the MS Store (although inside the MS Store they charge people dumb enough to pay for it there).

    There are two releases of Paint.net - one free, one paid
    iirc, the Store version has auto version updating

    Paint.net does appreciate donations for using the free version, the paid version meets that intent.


    - pretty much strengthened further since Win10 was released

    You're ahead of me on understanding Microsoft's MSA strategy as I have no account still - and yet - I've tried to remove my Apple account from my
    iPads and everything stops working.

    Design intent. That been the same for years, even before iPads, iPods
    and iTouch devices used iTunes and an Apple ID to sync.


    While temporarily creating a MSA account for my first Windows 10 S
    conversion was "fixed" by requesting a deletion from MS (which they did
    some time later), I hear that only in Windows 11 is the damn thing
    required.

    Not necessarily true. A Local account can still be created in Windows 11
    If upgraded to Win11 from Win10, all Windows logon accounts(MSA and
    Local) by default/design will be retained.


    If that's true, then it took Microsoft from Windows 8 to now to make it a reality. Luckily there's nothing Windows 11 does that all the other
    Windows versions don't (or won't) do, so I'm safe for another few years.

    See above, not entirely true.
    Nothing wrong with staying on Windows 10 at least until EOL in 2025

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to ...winston on Fri Oct 13 15:17:43 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote

    But I thought Windows users were smarter than that in that we've all
    rebelled against, oh, say, Windows 10 S which at first "seemed to" require >> a MSA but in reality, it was very easily worked around (turning Windows 10 >> S into Windows 10 Home rather easily).

    That doesn't change much. The Windows apps in Win10/11 S are the same
    apps in Windows 10/11 Home/Pro.

    The power of any operating system, particularly Windows, isn't in the
    programs that come with it - but in the programs you can add to it later.

    To that end, Windows S, to me, is no different than iOS or Chrome as a locked-down operating system, where I grew up in the freedom of the fifties
    and sixties and seventies and eighties and nineties - so I rebelled against
    the attempts in the past decade to lock me into a walled garden in Redmond.

    S mode is a Windows Store app only mode requiring Edge for browsing
    - i.e. not able to install programs from other sources(e.g.3rd party)

    My first (of three) Windows S to Windows 10 Home conversions required the
    MSA (as I recall - but only because I allowed it to go too far at first, as
    I recall). The other two did NOT require me to make an MSA and then ask for deletion of the MSA (which Microsoft did, after a lengthy span of time).

    While my wife unthinkingly moved her laptop to Windows 11, none of my
    desktops have the requisite hardware so I'm stuck on Windows 10 for now.

    If/when I do migrate to Windows 11, it will likely be on a laptop that
    already has it installed where I saw the posts from Andy Burns & Graham J
    that Windows 11 doesn't necessarily require teh MSA account.

    I should probably try it first on my wife's migrated laptop - but she'll
    kill me if something goes wrong. :)

    The requirement for the MS Store account also was easily circumvented
    simply by not getting anything from the MS Store (which, to my knowledge,
    doesn't contain anything of any worth). Even Paint.NET (my favorite free
    PhotoShop editor on Windows) is obtained outside of the MS Store (although >> inside the MS Store they charge people dumb enough to pay for it there).

    There are two releases of Paint.net - one free, one paid
    iirc, the Store version has auto version updating

    Funny thing is that FOSS Pinta is supposed to replace the FOSS Paint.NET,
    but I tested them both over the years (albeit not recently) and it had not.

    Maybe it's time to test the two of them again for the 3 things I do most.


    Another funny thing is if you act innocent and just google for how to
    install Paint.NET for free, it's not easy to find the correct URLs for it.
    <https://duckduckgo.com/?&q=download+paint.net+freeware>

    To help others, these are the "correct" URLs if anyone here wants them.
    <https://www.dotpdn.com/downloads/pdn.html>
    <https://github.com/paintdotnet/release/releases/tag/v5.0.11>

    Paint.net does appreciate donations for using the free version, the paid version meets that intent.

    I'm helping a very small number of developers on XDA improve their apps,
    where the way I "donate" is I test their software for them, in detail.

    I suggest to every one of them to add a button to ask for donations.

    An example is this free app which is the best engine for what it does. <https://xdaforums.com/t/app-6-0-app-finder-the-most-advanced-search-engine-for-android-apps.4578809/page-10#post-89024201>

    - pretty much strengthened further since Win10 was released

    You're ahead of me on understanding Microsoft's MSA strategy as I have no
    account still - and yet - I've tried to remove my Apple account from my
    iPads and everything stops working.

    Design intent. That been the same for years, even before iPads, iPods
    and iTouch devices used iTunes and an Apple ID to sync.

    I see the inherent advantage to the mothership of having everyone do all
    that neat 'garden' stuff on mothership servers, but I rebel against it.

    Currently I have no MSA and I can do whatever I need to do.
    Likewise I have no Google Account on my Androids & I do just fine w/o it.
    It's on the iPads that removing the mothership account caused all to fail.

    I don't blame Microsoft for wanting to get everyone on their servers.
    I'm happy that on Windows 11 Home, we can avoid it when I get there.

    I'm of the opinion that nothing changes but the paint when Microsoft shifts
    to a new operating system, although the bugfix support is a necessary item.

    While temporarily creating a MSA account for my first Windows 10 S
    conversion was "fixed" by requesting a deletion from MS (which they did
    some time later), I hear that only in Windows 11 is the damn thing
    required.

    Not necessarily true. A Local account can still be created in Windows 11
    If upgraded to Win11 from Win10, all Windows logon accounts(MSA and
    Local) by default/design will be retained.

    Hmmmm.... oh... wow... that may be how my wife upgraded her laptop as she punched the buttons without even telling me (as I don't open her laptop
    unless it's the only laptop around & I need to do a search or whatever).

    I was actually surprised she was on Windows 11, so I had simply _assumed_
    she had created the MSA. I didn't even ask her as I assumed it was needed.

    Since I set up her laptop (years ago) when I had bought it for her, and
    since it came as S, I know she had only a local account on Windows 10 Home.

    How would I run a test on her laptop to see if she has an MSA?

    (She probably wouldn't even know herself as I assigned the local laptop username and password, although none of my computers or phones have them).


    If that's true, then it took Microsoft from Windows 8 to now to make it a
    reality. Luckily there's nothing Windows 11 does that all the other
    Windows versions don't (or won't) do, so I'm safe for another few years.

    See above, not entirely true.
    Nothing wrong with staying on Windows 10 at least until EOL in 2025

    I have asked, in the past, what we can do on Windows 10 that we couldn't do
    on the previous versions and the answer is pretty much nothing is new.

    Having been on Windows since the 95/XP days, I'm willing to bet the trend
    is similar with Windows 11, although as you're well aware, I had to pull my WinXP 1/2 GB RAM Dell laptop off the net which still runs my USB printer.

    About the only issue is the loss of hotfix support for Windows 10.

    I'm hoping by then they will have workarounds for my older circa 2009 (but powerful at the time) 16 GB RAM Windows Pro desktops.

    In summary, thank you for your insight, which exceeds that of mine.
    --
    The whole point of Usenet is to find people who know more than you do.
    And to add tribal knowledge to the newsgroup archives for others to find.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Newyana2@invalid.nospam on Sat Oct 14 12:40:24 2023
    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew.

    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone".

    Well, first of all, it's not a "smart phone", but a "smartphone'. The
    former leads to biased assumptions like yours.

    But indeed, if it's about the normal voice calling and SMS/MMS
    functions, calling it a "mobile phone" or "phone" is appropriate/
    enough.

    Only if the additional functions of a smartphone are being discussed,
    it's better to say "smartphone", unless that's evident from the context
    (for example a post in comp.mobile.android).

    And I've noticed that increasingly
    people assume my phone number is cell phone, which
    it isn't. People get suspicious, like I'm not giving them
    my "real" number.

    Well, that's what you get for living in that weird country! No such
    problem in the real world! :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 14 08:19:03 2023
    On 14 Oct 2023 12:40:24 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew.

    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone".

    Well, first of all, it's not a "smart phone", but a "smartphone'. The
    former leads to biased assumptions like yours.


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to
    distinguish them from those.

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.

    By the way, the spell checker here in Agent doesn't like "smartphone"
    and wants to change it to "smart phone." Personally I think either
    spelling is OK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Sat Oct 14 17:32:37 2023
    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On 14 Oct 2023 12:40:24 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew. >>
    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone".

    Well, first of all, it's not a "smart phone", but a "smartphone'. The
    former leads to biased assumptions like yours.


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to distinguish them from those.

    Yes, but the digital - i.e. GSM and later - 'dumb' phones already had
    quite a bit of other stuff, like calendar, note taking, games :-),
    predictive text, etc., etc. (I could fire up my old Nokia to check
    :-)), that's why they were often called 'feature phones'. Some even had
    e-mail, web-browser, modem (to connect to a computer (*laptop*! :-)) for Internet connectivity), etc..

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.

    Our Prime Minister ('Minister President') used one (a 'dumb' Nokia)
    until not too long ago. He was forced to switch to a smartphone,
    because the Nokia couldn't store enough messages, so he was deleting old
    ones, which violated the archiving laws. :-) He also drives a very old
    Saab.

    By the way, the spell checker here in Agent doesn't like "smartphone"
    and wants to change it to "smart phone." Personally I think either
    spelling is OK.

    Before posting, I checked. Wikipedia, Samsung and 'my' major
    electronics webshop. All say "smartphone", that's enough proof for me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ...winston@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Sat Oct 14 21:27:18 2023
    Ken Blake wrote:
    On 14 Oct 2023 12:40:24 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew. >>>
    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone".

    Well, first of all, it's not a "smart phone", but a "smartphone'. The
    former leads to biased assumptions like yours.


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to distinguish them from those.

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.

    By the way, the spell checker here in Agent doesn't like "smartphone"
    and wants to change it to "smart phone." Personally I think either
    spelling is OK.


    I think your dating yourself<g> or never had one of the later flip type
    phones.
    My last flip phone(before switching to an iPhone[made sense since all my
    music was already in iTunes having used iPods since original release and
    an iPod touch) had the expected(call/recieve phone calls) but it also
    had a calendar, sms txt, apps, create notes and the ability to access
    the internet via cellular(aka LTE, no wifi) using the included browser
    and upload/backup contacts to the Verizon server.
    Never used the flip phone for those other features because my iPod touch(wifi/BT capable) synced my Outlook contacts and calendar, Safari
    web browser, send/received mail and all my music.


    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to winstonmvp@gmail.com on Sun Oct 15 07:44:39 2023
    On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 21:27:18 -0400, "...winston"
    <winstonmvp@gmail.com> wrote:

    Ken Blake wrote:
    On 14 Oct 2023 12:40:24 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    "Paul" <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote

    | > Yes, "cell phones" is an American thing.
    |
    | Because it's based on "cellular radio" with roaming/handoff. Who knew. >>>>
    Anything but "smart phone" is fine with me. That's
    just marketing. Though I've noticed that increasingly people
    just say "phone".

    Well, first of all, it's not a "smart phone", but a "smartphone'. The
    former leads to biased assumptions like yours.


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to
    distinguish them from those.

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.

    By the way, the spell checker here in Agent doesn't like "smartphone"
    and wants to change it to "smart phone." Personally I think either
    spelling is OK.


    I think your dating yourself<g>

    Perhaps. I do it all the time. <g>


    or never had one of the later flip type
    phones.


    No, I never did. the only I ever had was an early one.

    But my point remains. The reason the adjective "smart" isn't needed
    before "phone" is that these days, all (almost all?) cell phones are
    smart..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oscar Mayer@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Oct 15 17:40:17 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:35:06 -0400, Paul wrote:

    A way to install a Metro App, might be to use "winget".
    I don't know what dependencies that has.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/package-manager/winget/

    This app says it fives SMS/MMS directly to the Windows PC.

    Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS on Windows Pc https://appsonwindows.com/apk/2426789/ https://download.appsonwindows.com/download/hazar.studio.privatecontacts-v1.2.9-appsonwindows.com.apk

    About this app
    On this page you can download Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS and
    install on Windows PC. Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS is free Communication app, developed by Hazar Studio. Latest version of Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS is 1.2.9, was released on 2018-08-01 (updated
    on 2019-07-06).

    Technical details
    File Name: hazar.studio.privatecontacts-v1.2.9-appsonwindows.com.apk
    Version: 1.2.9 (Release Date August 01, 2018)
    File Size: 11.5 MB
    File MD5: 284522C8C0F9D8445AD5FD14C8324488
    Developed By: Hazar Studio

    Step By Step Guide To Install Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS using BlueStacks

    Download and Install BlueStacks at: https://www.bluestacks.com. The installation procedure is quite simple. After successful installation, open
    the Bluestacks emulator. It may take some time to load the Bluestacks app initially. Once it is opened, you should be able to see the Home screen of Bluestacks.
    Open the APK/XAPK file: Double-click the APK/XAPK file to launch BlueStacks
    and install the application. If your APK/XAPK file doesn't automatically
    open BlueStacks, right-click on it and select Open with... Browse to the BlueStacks. You can also drag-and-drop the APK/XAPK file onto the
    BlueStacks home screen
    Once installed, click "Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS" icon on the
    home screen to start using, it'll work like a charm :D
    [Note 1] For better performance and compatibility, choose BlueStacks 5
    Nougat 64-bit read more
    [Note 2] about Bluetooth: At the moment, support for Bluetooth is not
    available on BlueStacks. Hence, apps that require control of Bluetooth may
    not work on BlueStacks.

    How to install Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS on Windows PC using NoxPlayer

    Download & Install NoxPlayer at: https://www.bignox.com. The installation
    is easy to carry out.
    Drag the APK/XAPK file to the NoxPlayer interface and drop it to install
    The installation process will take place quickly. After successful installation, you can find "Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS" on the
    home screen of NoxPlayer, just click to open it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Sun Oct 15 19:07:19 2023
    "Ken Blake" <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to
    distinguish them from those.

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.


    Actually they're making a comeback. I visited two brothers
    this weekend. Both now have a fliphpone. Why? They don't
    want to text and the flip-phone is cheap. Though my fully
    computerized Tracfone only cost me $0 + $20 every 3 months.
    It has Firefox installed and has no problem going online. I
    could text... if I wanted to give anyone the phone number. :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Sun Oct 15 19:14:36 2023
    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:

    But my point remains. The reason the adjective "smart" isn't needed
    before "phone" is that these days, all (almost all?) cell phones are
    smart..

    But "phone" by itself still refers to hard line phones (POTS), or even
    phones that are VOIP, or like Comcast's telco service "Voice" which is a channel on the cable modem. Those are still landline *phones*.

    Also, there are still dumb cell phones being sold. Example:

    https://www.newegg.com/p/23B-00FM-00012?Item=9SIAP7MEVY2767 https://www.newegg.com/p/23B-00E1-00018?Item=9SIAGREK2R7914 https://www.walgreens.com/store/c/great-call-jitterbug-flip2-phone-for-seniors/ID=300407958-product

    And they are NOT smartphones. Of course, the marketers don't want
    "dumb" part of the product description, so they're just called cell
    phones. Adding "smart" differentiates the type of phone, so "smart" is
    still required.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Oscar Mayer on Sun Oct 15 19:04:10 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Oscar Mayer <nobody@oscarmayer.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:35:06 -0400, Paul wrote:

    A way to install a Metro App, might be to use "winget".
    I don't know what dependencies that has.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/package-manager/winget/

    This app says it fives SMS/MMS directly to the Windows PC.
    ^^^^^___ fives?

    Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS on Windows Pc https://appsonwindows.com/apk/2426789/ https://download.appsonwindows.com/download/hazar.studio.privatecontacts-v1.2.9-appsonwindows.com.apk

    Step By Step Guide To Install Private Contacts - Private Call & SMS using BlueStacks

    Download and Install BlueStacks ...

    That use the Bluestacks emulator for Android on a Windows host. Lots of Android apps can run under Bluestacks, including:

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.abwesend.privatecontacts

    Looks the same as the one you mention. However, your software download
    site says the app owner is Hazar Studio, but the one on the Play Store
    says its owner is 2Gusoft. There is no info on the author at the appsonwindows.com site. The 2Gusoft one has the Github project and
    contact e-mail for the author. The Play Store will require you have a
    Google account. No idea from where the other came from.

    I wanted more info on the Hazar Studio. So I did a search:

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/dev?id=5877175006043432224&hl=en_US&gl=US

    That lists a web site for Hazar at:

    https://www.hazarsoft.net/

    That doesn't list specific apps. Just mentions they do app coding per contract. While the Play Store hit is for Hazar, it doesn't list any
    apps by that author at the Play Store.

    Still no idea where the app at appsonwindows.com came from. In
    addition, the instructions say to get the .apk from somewhere else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oscar Mayer@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sun Oct 15 20:28:44 2023
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 19:04:10 -0500, VanguardLH wrote:

    The Play Store will require you have a Google account.

    Just a minor correction, you only need that Google account to download from
    the Google Play Store repository if you don't know about the FOSS skins.

    All the FOSS skins already have an anonymous Google account which is what
    they automatically use to download apps directly off the Google Play repo.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Newyana2@invalid.nospam on Sun Oct 15 19:26:25 2023
    Newyana2 <Newyana2@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    "Ken Blake" <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote


    I'll add that in the early days of "smartphones," there were still a
    lot of fliptop cellular phones around that did almost nothing but make
    and receive calls. So using the term "smartphone" was a good way to distinguish them from those.

    Now that those "dumb" phones are largely gone, the term "smartphone"
    is really no longer needed.


    Actually they're making a comeback. I visited two brothers
    this weekend. Both now have a fliphpone. Why? They don't
    want to text and the flip-phone is cheap. Though my fully
    computerized Tracfone only cost me $0 + $20 every 3 months.
    It has Firefox installed and has no problem going online. I
    could text... if I wanted to give anyone the phone number. :)

    Dumb flip phones still have their use. I don't want a $600-$800
    smartphone in my pocket or in a belt holster when doing construction
    work, like siding a house or reroofing. I want a dumb and cheap cell
    phone that is just a phone when doing construction, yard work, or other physical labor, or even while at the gym. I'm not stopping everything
    to answer a text or e-mail, but I might pull out of my pocket a dumb
    flip phone if I'm expecting an important call, or it's one of my
    contacts. If I need more, I go to my car to grab my smartphone, but
    that rarely happens. That would be more like work is over, and I need
    to check something online.

    My grandpa wore Timex watches. He worked on car engines as a mechanic.
    His advice was if you feel you must wear a watch, wear one that is cheap
    to replace. I didn't listen, had on a pricey watch. When using a
    crowbar to lever the tensioner for the fan belt, I lost my grip on the
    crowbar, it snapped back, and hit the watch on my other hand. All I
    found of the watch was its case and wrist strap. Time for a new watch.
    I think it was a Casio, but rather cheap. Only remember it had a tuning
    fork, but it might've been Bulova.

    There are valid reasons for using a cheap dumb cell phone. Luckily the
    last time I forgot to take the phone out of my swim shorts when going
    into the resort's hot tub was for a cheap dumb cell phone. Useless for
    the rest of the vacation, but no qualms in tossing into the trash.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From micky@21:1/5 to jaugustine@verizon.net on Mon Jan 29 19:48:40 2024
    In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:

    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he

    AFAIC, apps are for phones. Mainfraims have "application programs"
    Computers have programs. -- Because every time you said app, I
    thought you were talking about a phone.

    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    No, but other people solved it.

    First learn the name of
    what is cellular provider for this number

    So the answer to my own qustion is:

    https://www.ipqualityscore.com/free-carrier-lookup
    https://www.hlrlookup.com/
    And probably, but I haven't tried it
    https://freecarrierlookup.com/

    When you know the provider, you can go to this page and find how to
    email a text to the phone:

    https://www.notepage.net/smtp.htm
    For example, to text a Verizon phone, send an eamail to 10digitphonenumber@vtext.com
    unfortunately, Verizon has two other choices,
    @myvzw.com and @vswpix.com
    But 99% of the others only have one.

    Even though I use Mint Mobile, the email address is tmobile.
    OTOH a friend who uses Cricket has a cricket email address.

    No more lifting that heavy phone to make a text when you are already at
    your keyboard.




    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Karen@21:1/5 to micky on Wed Feb 28 14:29:36 2024
    On 1/29/2024 7:48 PM, micky wrote:
    In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Sun, 08 Oct 2023 15:14:49 -0400, jaugustine@verizon.net wrote:

    Hi,

    My brother has a Windows 10 laptop. I have a Windows 7 laptop.
    Note: My Windows 10 laptop has issues.

    He asked me if there is an app for Win10 he can use so he

    AFAIC, apps are for phones. Mainfraims have "application programs"
    Computers have programs. -- Because every time you said app, I
    thought you were talking about a phone.

    can send a Text message to someone's Cell Phone. Note: My brother
    has a land line (NO cell phone).

    I did a google search and at microsoft's web site for Windows 10,
    the information I saw had to do with using a Phone App, then select
    Message, etc.

    My brother lives far from me. I would like to send him an email
    with the information.

    Did Windows 10 come with a Phone app with the ability to Text?

    No, but other people solved it.

    First learn the name of
    what is cellular provider for this number

    So the answer to my own qustion is:

    https://www.ipqualityscore.com/free-carrier-lookup
    https://www.hlrlookup.com/
    And probably, but I haven't tried it
    https://freecarrierlookup.com/

    When you know the provider, you can go to this page and find how to
    email a text to the phone:

    https://www.notepage.net/smtp.htm
    For example, to text a Verizon phone, send an eamail to 10digitphonenumber@vtext.com
    unfortunately, Verizon has two other choices,
    @myvzw.com and @vswpix.com
    But 99% of the others only have one.

    Even though I use Mint Mobile, the email address is tmobile.
    OTOH a friend who uses Cricket has a cricket email address.

    No more lifting that heavy phone to make a text when you are already at
    your keyboard.




    Thank You in advance, John
    ,

    Check out SIGNAL messaging app for phone AND desktop
    Also CHATOX

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Karen on Thu Feb 29 12:24:44 2024
    Karen wrote:

    Check out SIGNAL messaging app for phone AND desktop
    Also CHATOX

    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)