Yup. I think it's already fairly common for people to do similar with
the persons (or 'a persons' <weg>) ashes, so they have somewhere nominal
to go if they want to talk to the person / pet ... and as you say it may
add some nutrients.
I'm less bothered about the people, many of whom were party to bringing
this upon themselves (by their lifestyle choices, ecological inaction or >apathy re what their governments say they should spend their tax dollars
on) and often have options re escape, be it by road, sea or air. Not the
same offered to millions of *innocent* animals (wildlife, livestock and
pets) who have burned to death or worse, suffer bad burns with little
hope of any medical treatment.
"You reap what you sow" ... and “The only thing necessary for the
triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:39:54 +0100, T i m <individual@spaced.me.uk>
wrote:
I'm less bothered about the people, many of whom were party to bringing >>this upon themselves (by their lifestyle choices, ecological inaction or >>apathy re what their governments say they should spend their tax dollars >>on) and often have options re escape, be it by road, sea or air. Not the >>same offered to millions of *innocent* animals (wildlife, livestock and >>pets) who have burned to death or worse, suffer bad burns with little
hope of any medical treatment.
"You reap what you sow" ... and “The only thing necessary for the
triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
Perhaps but why does it matter when the world allows China and India
to go on producing and exporting coal powered plants? Cutting those
would help the climate far more than my entire country (Canada) all committing suicide would - and while I appreciate the various climate
change conferences (Kyoto etc) I am highly skeptical than any
"solution" that doesn't involve almost total shuttering of coal fired
plants - including Chinese and Indian plants - has any hope of
rectifying the situation.
I'm not a "denier" but I do deny that any solution that doesn't
involve the Chinese and Indians changing their ways massively with
respect to coal has a hope in hell of being effective.
On Jan 8, 2024 at 6:09:43 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<r11nN.139023$Wp_8.125954@fx17.iad>:
On 2024-01-08, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:39:54 +0100, T i m <individual@spaced.me.uk>
wrote:
I'm less bothered about the people, many of whom were party to bringing >>>> this upon themselves (by their lifestyle choices, ecological inaction or >>>> apathy re what their governments say they should spend their tax dollars >>>> on) and often have options re escape, be it by road, sea or air. Not the >>>> same offered to millions of *innocent* animals (wildlife, livestock and >>>> pets) who have burned to death or worse, suffer bad burns with little
hope of any medical treatment.
"You reap what you sow" ... and “The only thing necessary for the
triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
Perhaps but why does it matter when the world allows China and India
to go on producing and exporting coal powered plants? Cutting those
would help the climate far more than my entire country (Canada) all
committing suicide would - and while I appreciate the various climate
change conferences (Kyoto etc) I am highly skeptical than any
"solution" that doesn't involve almost total shuttering of coal fired
plants - including Chinese and Indian plants - has any hope of
rectifying the situation.
I'm not a "denier" but I do deny that any solution that doesn't
involve the Chinese and Indians changing their ways massively with
respect to coal has a hope in hell of being effective.
China India and other countries are not buying into the green energy scam
because they realize that
military power and supremacy is based upon fossil fuels.
If we make the planet uninhabitable what are you going to have power over?
Ask the Germans what happened it in WW2.
So while the USA destroys itself going green, our adversaries are producing >> useful power plants as
fast as they can.
The USA are idiots.
We should be leaders in green energy.
I'm not a "denier" but I do deny that any solution that doesn'tChina and India consumes less (per capita) than Europeans and
involve the Chinese and Indians changing their ways massively with
respect to coal has a hope in hell of being effective.
On Jan 8, 2024 at 6:09:43â\u20ac¯PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote <r11nN.139023$Wp_8.125954@fx17.iad>:
China India and other countries are not buying into the green energy
scam because they realize that
military power and supremacy is based upon fossil fuels.
If we make the planet uninhabitable what are you going to have power
over?
Ask the Germans what happened it in WW2.
So while the USA destroys itself going green, our adversaries are
producing useful power plants as
fast as they can.
The USA are idiots.
We should be leaders in green energy.
China India and other countries are not buying into the green energy scam
On 2024-01-09, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
We should be leaders in green energy.
Why?
And sacrifice our military power ?
When our adversaries are not doing this, why should we?
You sound like a libby.
On 2024-01-08, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:39:54 +0100, T i m <individual@spaced.me.uk>
wrote:
I'm less bothered about the people, many of whom were party to bringing
this upon themselves (by their lifestyle choices, ecological inaction or >>> apathy re what their governments say they should spend their tax dollars >>> on) and often have options re escape, be it by road, sea or air. Not the >>> same offered to millions of *innocent* animals (wildlife, livestock and
pets) who have burned to death or worse, suffer bad burns with little
hope of any medical treatment.
"You reap what you sow" ... and “The only thing necessary for the
triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
Perhaps but why does it matter when the world allows China and India
to go on producing and exporting coal powered plants? Cutting those
would help the climate far more than my entire country (Canada) all
committing suicide would - and while I appreciate the various climate
change conferences (Kyoto etc) I am highly skeptical than any
"solution" that doesn't involve almost total shuttering of coal fired
plants - including Chinese and Indian plants - has any hope of
rectifying the situation.
I'm not a "denier" but I do deny that any solution that doesn't
involve the Chinese and Indians changing their ways massively with
respect to coal has a hope in hell of being effective.
China India and other countries are not buying into the green energy scam because they realize that
military power and supremacy is based upon fossil fuels. Ask the Germans what happened it in WW2.
So while the USA destroys itself going green, our adversaries are producing useful power plants as
fast as they can.
The USA are idiots.
Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:L81nN.136230$Ama9.105880@fx12.iad
Tue, 09 Jan 2024 01:17:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Jan 8, 2024 at 6:09:43â\u20acŻPM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<r11nN.139023$Wp_8.125954@fx17.iad>:
China India and other countries are not buying into the green energy
scam because they realize that
military power and supremacy is based upon fossil fuels.
If we make the planet uninhabitable what are you going to have power
over?
I suspect you're entirely missing his point...
You failed to answer my question.
Ask the Germans what happened it in WW2.
So while the USA destroys itself going green, our adversaries are
producing useful power plants as
fast as they can.
The USA are idiots.
We should be leaders in green energy.
I'm sure to regret this...
No doubt you have many regrets.
What do you think green energy is, Snit?
Common usage.
On Jan 10, 2024 at 10:04:53â\u20ac¯PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB0F6D3DD5E4HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
And you still refuse. You want to move forward without actually having a discussion. The question is clear:
If we make the planet uninhabitable what are you going to
have power over?
You have no answer.
Ask the Germans what happened it in WW2.
So while the USA destroys itself going green, our adversaries are
producing useful power plants as
fast as they can.
The USA are idiots.
We should be leaders in green energy.
What do you think green energy is, Snit?
Common usage.
Umm. That isn't an answer to my question.
I use the term in the common way. Nothing special.
So, i'll try again.
When someone discusses green energy, what specifically, do you
understand them to be discussing?
Again: common usage. Nothing special.
Not going down your rabbit hole.
Not interested in the slightest.
I get that will bother you.
but protecting your ego is not my job.
I am not attacking or mocking you, I am merely refusing to play your game.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 415 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 148:32:10 |
Calls: | 8,706 |
Files: | 13,267 |
Messages: | 5,950,503 |