• Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this hierarchy?

    From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 5 20:49:21 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this hierarchy?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yY74z87s/taskbarmenu06.jpg> My standard hierarchy
    archiver
    browser
    cleaner
    database
    editor
    finance
    game
    hardware
    network
    os
    telecom

    My {programs,installers,menu} folders have been the same for decades.
    Ever since Windows 95 & XP days, I've used those dozen folders alone.

    They are so exactly the same, a menu folder copied from XP works on Win10. Literally. I'm not joking. Copy the start menu from XP & it works on Win10.

    Certainly a menu works from Windows 7 to Windows 10 if you're organized.
    And, of course, any Win10 menu works out of the box in another Win10.(*1)

    Everything I have installed fits into one of those dozen folders.
    Organized by what they do (not by their silly marketing branding).

    Obviously there are sub folders, so, for example, my Irfanview is:
    Software: c:\software\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files are needed}
    Menu: c:\menu\editor\pic\irfanview.lnk
    Programs: c:\app\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files it installed}

    My question?

    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this hierarchy?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/D0J1tgDZ/windows-tweak.jpg> A standard hierarchy
    --
    (1) Sometimes there are minor changes in execuable names so links may
    need slight adjustments to fit those minor changes over the decades.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Barnett@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 5 15:46:59 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    T24gNC81LzIwMjMgMTo0OSBQTSwgQW5keSBCdXJuZWxsaSB3cm90ZToNCj4gSXMgdGhlcmUg YW55IGFwcCB5b3UgbG92ZSAmIHVzZSB0aGF0IGRvZXNuJ3QgZml0IGludG8gdGhpcyBoaWVy YXJjaHk/DQo+IDxodHRwczovL2kucG9zdGltZy5jYy95WTc0ejg3cy90YXNrYmFybWVudTA2 LmpwZz4gTXkgc3RhbmRhcmQgaGllcmFyY2h5DQo+ICDCoGFyY2hpdmVyDQo+ICDCoGJyb3dz ZXINCj4gIMKgY2xlYW5lcg0KPiAgwqBkYXRhYmFzZQ0KPiAgwqBlZGl0b3INCj4gIMKgZmlu YW5jZQ0KPiAgwqBnYW1lDQo+ICDCoGhhcmR3YXJlDQo+ICDCoG5ldHdvcmsNCj4gIMKgb3MN Cj4gIMKgdGVsZWNvbQ0KDQpXaHkgaXMgdGhhdCBhIGhpZXJhcmNoeT8gQnV5IHdoYXQgbWVh c3VyZSBvciBzdGFuZGFyZCBkbyB5b3UgZGV0ZXJtaW5lIA0KImluY2x1c2lvbiI/IEp1c3Qg Y3VyaW91cy4NCg0KPFNOSVAgc3R1ZmYgbm90IHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIG15IHF1ZXN0aW9uPg0K LS0gDQpKZWZmIEJhcm5ldHQNCg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jeff Barnett on Thu Apr 6 03:39:05 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Jeff Barnett wrote:

    Why is that a hierarchy? Buy what measure or standard do you determine "inclusion"? Just curious.

    Good question.

    Every one of us has "helped" a technically clueless Windows user, and I wouldn't be the first to notice that I've seen people download an installer
    and then spend five minutes finding where they downloaded it, and then, perhaps, running the installer and then spending another ten minutes
    finding where it put the executables, or, in not being able to do even
    that, they just let the desktop get cluttered from side to side, top to
    bottom, with icons of the previous installed programs, in LIFO order.

    To me... that's the biggest problem people have with Microsoft Windows.
    *ORGANIZATION*

    To succeed, there is a place for everything; & everything is in its place.
    If you ever need to "run a search" for something - you have already failed.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/j5K0RL7H/taskbarmenu01.jpg> to search is to fail

    The bane of computers, for a typical consumer, is organization (IMHO).
    Yet every consumer knows how to organize their tools, don't they?

    For example, knives and forks and spoons have their place in a kitchen.
    So it should be, IMHO, with computers.

    Yet what organizational tree would one rightly use for their applications?
    I propose an organizational tree which has worked for me for decades.

    There's no magic _how_ you organize your kitchen implements.
    The magic is that you organize them.

    Usually you organize them in a way that makes perfect sense, to you.
    And, let's be clear, if needed, it makes immediate sense to anyone else.

    That... is... how ... computers... should... be... organized... after all.

    Every program installed has to fit in a hierarchy, where what Microsoft provides, by example, is a purely alphabetical hierarchy by brand name.

    That's ridiculous.
    C:\Program Files\{hierarchy by purely brand name characteristics}

    Taking just browsers as an example, how would _you_ organize your browers?

    One example of a browser organization I've tried in the past is by type:
    <https://i.postimg.cc/PrcV1pXF/browser06.jpg> Browsers by type
    Other examples of organizational trees I've tried for browser is by name
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Mpwvz1pF/browser09.jpg> Browsers by name
    Yet other examples are to organize browsers by level of privacy
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hjjVXkq5/taskbarmenu07.jpg> Browsers by privacy

    Always keeping in mind the limitation of Microsoft Windows that most
    things are listed, no matter how you plan it, alphabetically by a sorting
    order defined by Microsoft (which, let's agree, doesn't always make sense).

    That last screenshot shows how our organizational tree has to fit within
    how Microsoft shows things, much as a kitchen implement draw has holders
    of the shape suitable for forks, spoons and knives in a given order.

    Every program installed has (generally) three fundamental components:
    software (i.e.., where do you download & store the installers)
    installation (i.e., where do you install that software program)
    menu (i.e., where/how do you _access_ those software programs)

    While I'm aware most people have no organization whatsoever, most people
    sort their kitchen spoons in a location next to their kitchen forks, right?

    Same concept here.

    You start with a top level (the kitchen top drawer) and then you put
    everything in a hierarchy below that top level.

    Bear in mind "suites" compound the problem set, as you could argue that the Adobe suites, Microsoft Office suites, Nirsoft & Sysinternals suites could
    be broken up or kept together - where I've tried both but gave up in the
    end, and I keep them as a "suite" level within the respective hierarchy:
    c:\app\editor\document\office\{word,excel,ppt}

    However, to answer your question, in more detail, every program fits
    somewhere in your computer archival location, your computer installation location, and in your computer menu location... just as every kitchen tool fits somewhere in your kitchen counters, drawers, cabinets and shelves.

    You only have so many ways to organize things inside of Microsoft Windows.

    As an example of the next level of hierarchy, using only a sample of three items below the first level of hierarchy for the dozen canonical folders...
    c:\app\archiver\{7zip,izarc,winrar}
    c:\app\browser\{aloha,brave,firefox}
    c:\app\cleaner\{duplicate,uninstall,vaccine}\{hijackthis,norton,spybot}
    c:\app\database\{calendar,passwd,tts}\{balaboka,espeak,spelltest}
    c:\app\editor\{audio,image,video}\{avconv,mediasplitter,shotcut}
    c:\app\finance\{quicken,taxcut,turbotax}
    c:\app\game\{cod,minecraft,sims}
    c:\app\hardware\{bsod,cpu,video}\{furmark,gpu-z,rivatuner}
    c:\app\network\{ftpuse,openssl,stunnel}
    c:\app\os\{netframework,visualc++,winmerge}
    c:\app\telecom\{email,news,zoom}

    Note: Once you have the installation menu, the rest follow suite.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yY74z87s/taskbarmenu06.jpg> All locations match

    Note: My actual organization tree is a bit simplified in that plurals
    are not allowed (e.g., app vs apps) except when required (e.g., news).

    Note: I try to avoid catchall categories such as "misc" & "util", but
    in some cases they're virtually unavoidable (e.g., "os").

    In summary, the goal of organizing your tools, such as your screwdrivers, pliers and wrenches is more that you organize them in a way that fits your garage, just as you organize your kitchen implements in a way that fits
    your kitchen.

    The actual organization doesn't matter as individual preferences will
    prevail, e.g., my wife organizes the "silver" implements in a different
    drawer in a hierarchy below the steel forks and spoons of the hoi polloi.

    But what does matter, is that most people can't find their stuff.
    I, for one, have never needed a Windows Cortana search ever.
    Not in decades, have I needed to search for anything I ever needed.

    Why not?
    Because there is a place for everything; and everything is in its place.
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully try to propose a usable organization.

    --
    このメールは、アバスト アンチウイルス ソフトウェアでウイルス チェックされています。
    www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jeff Barnett on Thu Apr 6 06:55:21 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Jeff Barnett wrote:

    Neat and tidy is often a good idea; so is "because that's the way I
    remember things". On the other hand hierarchies are an organizational
    concept that has technical definitions: in language, in many sciences,
    in philosophy, in data structures, etc.

    You don't see that the hierarchy is ordered by function?

    Take a look at my Android homescreen - hierarchy ordered also by function.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3r0yNRcT/network02.jpg> network tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/BZwR6gXc/buy02.jpg> shopping tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/CMmSsgtN/maps01.jpg> map tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/CxTxzsfC/sys01.jpg> system tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/FFYqg9Dv/maps05.jpg> map tools apk archive
    <https://i.postimg.cc/fRNg5hn0/audio01.jpg> audio tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/fTFcQ5d4/dock.jpg> dock tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pLFpXfMP/maps07.jpg> maps offline/online sections
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rmvDBN8Q/files01.jpg> file management tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vTQ13DcK/apk01.jpg> installation tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vZmTvPZx/maps02.jpg> map folder traffic section
    <https://i.postimg.cc/WpM4FM5t/web01.jpg> web tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/XvN1Scvj/video01.jpg> video tools folder
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Zn73yqm1/network03.jpg> network tools server section

    Doesn't it make sense to you to order applications by what they do?
    You're only limited by the constraints that the operating system adds.

    Android, for example, is a two-story building in terms of the hierarchy.

    Windows, luckily, is a multi-story building, but even as I can put editors
    on one level and picture editors on another, it's still alphabetical.

    We have to live within the constraints of the operating system display.

    All of these uses have a theory
    about why things are arranged in their hierarchy, i.e., what sort of
    relation exists between and item and its parent that doesn't exist
    between that object and any other thing except ancestors of the parent. Typically the relation is something like "is an example of" and the realization of the relation is a tree.

    The relationship is clearly, and obviously, and openly, functionality.
    archivers, browsers, cleaners, database managers, editors, etc.

    At some point, I might need to say that everyone complains about the
    weather but nobody does a thing about it, as I get that you don't think
    that the hierarchy I came up with for myself is organized by functionality.

    Every one of probably thousands of apps I've installed, fit in that
    multi-level structure and hence, they are always easy to logically find.

    How would you organize all Windows apps on your PC that you love & use?

    What you describe isn't a hierarchy; it's a forest of short trees.

    That's a fair enough assessment where it's organized within the limitations
    of the Microsoft operating system which, unfortunately, mostly alphabetizes
    the menus, and the directory tree, whether I like that fact or not.

    Same with Android, which limits the levels of hierarchy to one lower level.

    That's okay if it helps you organize stuff it's a good thing for you
    whether it's technically a hierarchy or not. Most people who are careful
    pick some organization that feels natural to them. As long as it helps
    you it's good. Thanks for sharing.

    You're quite welcome. I am the first one to say that the most important
    thing is to organize your tools. It's a secondary concern how you do that.

    I can fit _every_ app (more or less) into that structure of only a dozen
    top level hierarchies - where the operating system constrains the display
    to something around a dozen or two dozen (max) to be of any real use.

    As Paul knows, I've valiantly tried to get the binary tile menus to behave
    but I finally gave up, just as I did with the alphabetical menus.

    I also never use "Program Files" or any of its variants because it's a mess
    and it is too much work to move errant programs into where they belong.

    In summary, most people organize their kitchen utensils but for some
    reason, on Windows, they have trouble organizing their applications.

    My suggestion is simply a starting point "template", much like the kinds of plastic forms you buy to put in kitchen drawers to organize forks & spoons.
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully agree with most of those comments.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Barnett@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 5 23:22:04 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    T24gNC81LzIwMjMgODozOSBQTSwgQW5keSBCdXJuZWxsaSB3cm90ZToNCj4gSmVmZiBCYXJu ZXR0IHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4+IFdoeSBpcyB0aGF0IGEgaGllcmFyY2h5PyBCdXkgd2hhdCBt ZWFzdXJlIG9yIHN0YW5kYXJkIGRvIHlvdSBkZXRlcm1pbmUgDQo+PiAiaW5jbHVzaW9uIj8g SnVzdCBjdXJpb3VzLg0KPiANCj4gR29vZCBxdWVzdGlvbi4NCj4gRXZlcnkgb25lIG9mIHVz IGhhcyAiaGVscGVkIiBhIHRlY2huaWNhbGx5IGNsdWVsZXNzIFdpbmRvd3MgdXNlciwgYW5k IEkNCj4gd291bGRuJ3QgYmUgdGhlIGZpcnN0IHRvIG5vdGljZSB0aGF0IEkndmUgc2VlbiBw ZW9wbGUgZG93bmxvYWQgYW4gaW5zdGFsbGVyDQo+IGFuZCB0aGVuIHNwZW5kIGZpdmUgbWlu dXRlcyBmaW5kaW5nIHdoZXJlIHRoZXkgZG93bmxvYWRlZCBpdCwgYW5kIHRoZW4sDQo+IHBl cmhhcHMsIHJ1bm5pbmcgdGhlIGluc3RhbGxlciBhbmQgdGhlbiBzcGVuZGluZyBhbm90aGVy IHRlbiBtaW51dGVzDQo+IGZpbmRpbmcgd2hlcmUgaXQgcHV0IHRoZSBleGVjdXRhYmxlcywg b3IsIGluIG5vdCBiZWluZyBhYmxlIHRvIGRvIGV2ZW4NCj4gdGhhdCwgdGhleSBqdXN0IGxl dCB0aGUgZGVza3RvcCBnZXQgY2x1dHRlcmVkIGZyb20gc2lkZSB0byBzaWRlLCB0b3AgdG8N Cj4gYm90dG9tLCB3aXRoIGljb25zIG9mIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyBpbnN0YWxsZWQgcHJvZ3Jh bXMsIGluIExJRk8gb3JkZXIuDQo+IA0KPiBUbyBtZS4uLiB0aGF0J3MgdGhlIGJpZ2dlc3Qg cHJvYmxlbSBwZW9wbGUgaGF2ZSB3aXRoIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBXaW5kb3dzLg0KPiAgwqAgKk9S R0FOSVpBVElPTioNCj4gDQo+IFRvIHN1Y2NlZWQsIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgcGxhY2UgZm9yIGV2 ZXJ5dGhpbmc7ICYgZXZlcnl0aGluZyBpcyBpbiBpdHMgcGxhY2UuDQo+IElmIHlvdSBldmVy IG5lZWQgdG8gInJ1biBhIHNlYXJjaCIgZm9yIHNvbWV0aGluZyAtIHlvdSBoYXZlIGFscmVh ZHkgZmFpbGVkLg0KPiANCj4gPGh0dHBzOi8vaS5wb3N0aW1nLmNjL2o1SzBSTDdIL3Rhc2ti YXJtZW51MDEuanBnPiB0byBzZWFyY2ggaXMgdG8gZmFpbA0KPiANCj4gVGhlIGJhbmUgb2Yg Y29tcHV0ZXJzLCBmb3IgYSB0eXBpY2FsIGNvbnN1bWVyLCBpcyBvcmdhbml6YXRpb24gKElN SE8pLg0KPiBZZXQgZXZlcnkgY29uc3VtZXIga25vd3MgaG93IHRvIG9yZ2FuaXplIHRoZWly IHRvb2xzLCBkb24ndCB0aGV5Pw0KPiANCj4gRm9yIGV4YW1wbGUsIGtuaXZlcyBhbmQgZm9y a3MgYW5kIHNwb29ucyBoYXZlIHRoZWlyIHBsYWNlIGluIGEga2l0Y2hlbi4NCj4gU28gaXQg c2hvdWxkIGJlLCBJTUhPLCB3aXRoIGNvbXB1dGVycy4NCj4gDQo+IFlldCB3aGF0IG9yZ2Fu aXphdGlvbmFsIHRyZWUgd291bGQgb25lIHJpZ2h0bHkgdXNlIGZvciB0aGVpciBhcHBsaWNh dGlvbnM/DQo+IEkgcHJvcG9zZSBhbiBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCB0cmVlIHdoaWNoIGhhcyB3 b3JrZWQgZm9yIG1lIGZvciBkZWNhZGVzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhlcmUncyBubyBtYWdpYyBfaG93 XyB5b3Ugb3JnYW5pemUgeW91ciBraXRjaGVuIGltcGxlbWVudHMuDQo+IFRoZSBtYWdpYyBp cyB0aGF0IHlvdSBvcmdhbml6ZSB0aGVtLg0KPiANCj4gVXN1YWxseSB5b3Ugb3JnYW5pemUg dGhlbSBpbiBhIHdheSB0aGF0IG1ha2VzIHBlcmZlY3Qgc2Vuc2UsIHRvIHlvdS4NCj4gQW5k LCBsZXQncyBiZSBjbGVhciwgaWYgbmVlZGVkLCBpdCBtYWtlcyBpbW1lZGlhdGUgc2Vuc2Ug dG8gYW55b25lIGVsc2UuDQo+IA0KPiBUaGF0Li4uIGlzLi4uIGhvdyAuLi4gY29tcHV0ZXJz Li4uIHNob3VsZC4uLiBiZS4uLiBvcmdhbml6ZWQuLi4gYWZ0ZXIgYWxsLg0KPiANCj4gRXZl cnkgcHJvZ3JhbSBpbnN0YWxsZWQgaGFzIHRvIGZpdCBpbiBhIGhpZXJhcmNoeSwgd2hlcmUg d2hhdCBNaWNyb3NvZnQNCj4gcHJvdmlkZXMsIGJ5IGV4YW1wbGUsIGlzIGEgcHVyZWx5IGFs cGhhYmV0aWNhbCBoaWVyYXJjaHkgYnkgYnJhbmQgbmFtZS4NCj4gDQo+IFRoYXQncyByaWRp Y3Vsb3VzLg0KPiBDOlxQcm9ncmFtIEZpbGVzXHtoaWVyYXJjaHkgYnkgcHVyZWx5IGJyYW5k IG5hbWUgY2hhcmFjdGVyaXN0aWNzfQ0KPiANCj4gVGFraW5nIGp1c3QgYnJvd3NlcnMgYXMg YW4gZXhhbXBsZSwgaG93IHdvdWxkIF95b3VfIG9yZ2FuaXplIHlvdXIgYnJvd2Vycz8NCj4g DQo+IE9uZSBleGFtcGxlIG9mIGEgYnJvd3NlciBvcmdhbml6YXRpb24gSSd2ZSB0cmllZCBp biB0aGUgcGFzdCBpcyBieSB0eXBlOg0KPiA8aHR0cHM6Ly9pLnBvc3RpbWcuY2MvUHJjVjFw WEYvYnJvd3NlcjA2LmpwZz4gQnJvd3NlcnMgYnkgdHlwZQ0KPiBPdGhlciBleGFtcGxlcyBv ZiBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCB0cmVlcyBJJ3ZlIHRyaWVkIGZvciBicm93c2VyIGlzIGJ5IG5h bWUNCj4gPGh0dHBzOi8vaS5wb3N0aW1nLmNjL01wd3Z6MXBGL2Jyb3dzZXIwOS5qcGc+IEJy b3dzZXJzIGJ5IG5hbWUNCj4gWWV0IG90aGVyIGV4YW1wbGVzIGFyZSB0byBvcmdhbml6ZSBi cm93c2VycyBieSBsZXZlbCBvZiBwcml2YWN5DQo+IDxodHRwczovL2kucG9zdGltZy5jYy9o ampWWGtxNS90YXNrYmFybWVudTA3LmpwZz4gQnJvd3NlcnMgYnkgcHJpdmFjeQ0KPiANCj4g QWx3YXlzIGtlZXBpbmcgaW4gbWluZCB0aGUgbGltaXRhdGlvbiBvZiBNaWNyb3NvZnQgV2lu ZG93cyB0aGF0IG1vc3QNCj4gdGhpbmdzIGFyZSBsaXN0ZWQsIG5vIG1hdHRlciBob3cgeW91 IHBsYW4gaXQsIGFscGhhYmV0aWNhbGx5IGJ5IGEgc29ydGluZw0KPiBvcmRlciBkZWZpbmVk IGJ5IE1pY3Jvc29mdCAod2hpY2gsIGxldCdzIGFncmVlLCBkb2Vzbid0IGFsd2F5cyBtYWtl IHNlbnNlKS4NCj4gDQo+IFRoYXQgbGFzdCBzY3JlZW5zaG90IHNob3dzIGhvdyBvdXIgb3Jn YW5pemF0aW9uYWwgdHJlZSBoYXMgdG8gZml0IHdpdGhpbg0KPiBob3cgTWljcm9zb2Z0IHNo b3dzIHRoaW5ncywgbXVjaCBhcyBhIGtpdGNoZW4gaW1wbGVtZW50IGRyYXcgaGFzIGhvbGRl cnMNCj4gb2YgdGhlIHNoYXBlIHN1aXRhYmxlIGZvciBmb3Jrcywgc3Bvb25zIGFuZCBrbml2 ZXMgaW4gYSBnaXZlbiBvcmRlci4NCj4gDQo+IEV2ZXJ5IHByb2dyYW0gaW5zdGFsbGVkIGhh cyAoZ2VuZXJhbGx5KSB0aHJlZSBmdW5kYW1lbnRhbCBjb21wb25lbnRzOg0KPiBzb2Z0d2Fy ZSAoaS5lLi4sIHdoZXJlIGRvIHlvdSBkb3dubG9hZCAmIHN0b3JlIHRoZSBpbnN0YWxsZXJz KQ0KPiBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb24gKGkuZS4sIHdoZXJlIGRvIHlvdSBpbnN0YWxsIHRoYXQgc29m dHdhcmUgcHJvZ3JhbSkNCj4gbWVudSAoaS5lLiwgd2hlcmUvaG93IGRvIHlvdSBfYWNjZXNz XyB0aG9zZSBzb2Z0d2FyZSBwcm9ncmFtcykNCj4gDQo+IFdoaWxlIEknbSBhd2FyZSBtb3N0 IHBlb3BsZSBoYXZlIG5vIG9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbiB3aGF0c29ldmVyLCBtb3N0IHBlb3BsZQ0K PiBzb3J0IHRoZWlyIGtpdGNoZW4gc3Bvb25zIGluIGEgbG9jYXRpb24gbmV4dCB0byB0aGVp ciBraXRjaGVuIGZvcmtzLCByaWdodD8NCj4gDQo+IFNhbWUgY29uY2VwdCBoZXJlLg0KPiAN Cj4gWW91IHN0YXJ0IHdpdGggYSB0b3AgbGV2ZWwgKHRoZSBraXRjaGVuIHRvcCBkcmF3ZXIp IGFuZCB0aGVuIHlvdSBwdXQNCj4gZXZlcnl0aGluZyBpbiBhIGhpZXJhcmNoeSBiZWxvdyB0 aGF0IHRvcCBsZXZlbC4NCj4gDQo+IEJlYXIgaW4gbWluZCAic3VpdGVzIiBjb21wb3VuZCB0 aGUgcHJvYmxlbSBzZXQsIGFzIHlvdSBjb3VsZCBhcmd1ZSB0aGF0IHRoZQ0KPiBBZG9iZSBz dWl0ZXMsIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBPZmZpY2Ugc3VpdGVzLCBOaXJzb2Z0ICYgU3lzaW50ZXJuYWxz IHN1aXRlcyBjb3VsZA0KPiBiZSBicm9rZW4gdXAgb3Iga2VwdCB0b2dldGhlciAtIHdoZXJl IEkndmUgdHJpZWQgYm90aCBidXQgZ2F2ZSB1cCBpbiB0aGUNCj4gZW5kLCBhbmQgSSBrZWVw IHRoZW0gYXMgYSAic3VpdGUiIGxldmVsIHdpdGhpbiB0aGUgcmVzcGVjdGl2ZSBoaWVyYXJj aHk6DQo+IGM6XGFwcFxlZGl0b3JcZG9jdW1lbnRcb2ZmaWNlXHt3b3JkLGV4Y2VsLHBwdH0N Cj4gDQo+IEhvd2V2ZXIsIHRvIGFuc3dlciB5b3VyIHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBpbiBtb3JlIGRldGFp bCwgZXZlcnkgcHJvZ3JhbSBmaXRzDQo+IHNvbWV3aGVyZSBpbiB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyIGFy Y2hpdmFsIGxvY2F0aW9uLCB5b3VyIGNvbXB1dGVyIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbg0KPiBsb2NhdGlv biwgYW5kIGluIHlvdXIgY29tcHV0ZXIgbWVudSBsb2NhdGlvbi4uLsKgIGp1c3QgYXMgZXZl cnkga2l0Y2hlbiB0b29sDQo+IGZpdHMgc29tZXdoZXJlIGluIHlvdXIga2l0Y2hlbiBjb3Vu dGVycywgZHJhd2VycywgY2FiaW5ldHMgYW5kIHNoZWx2ZXMuDQo+IA0KPiBZb3Ugb25seSBo YXZlIHNvIG1hbnkgd2F5cyB0byBvcmdhbml6ZSB0aGluZ3MgaW5zaWRlIG9mIE1pY3Jvc29m dCBXaW5kb3dzLg0KPiANCj4gQXMgYW4gZXhhbXBsZSBvZiB0aGUgbmV4dCBsZXZlbCBvZiBo aWVyYXJjaHksIHVzaW5nIG9ubHkgYSBzYW1wbGUgb2YgdGhyZWUNCj4gaXRlbXMgYmVsb3cg dGhlIGZpcnN0IGxldmVsIG9mIGhpZXJhcmNoeSBmb3IgdGhlIGRvemVuIGNhbm9uaWNhbCBm b2xkZXJzLi4uDQo+IGM6XGFwcFxhcmNoaXZlclx7N3ppcCxpemFyYyx3aW5yYXJ9DQo+IGM6 XGFwcFxicm93c2VyXHthbG9oYSxicmF2ZSxmaXJlZm94fQ0KPiBjOlxhcHBcY2xlYW5lclx7 ZHVwbGljYXRlLHVuaW5zdGFsbCx2YWNjaW5lfVx7aGlqYWNrdGhpcyxub3J0b24sc3B5Ym90 fQ0KPiBjOlxhcHBcZGF0YWJhc2Vce2NhbGVuZGFyLHBhc3N3ZCx0dHN9XHtiYWxhYm9rYSxl c3BlYWssc3BlbGx0ZXN0fQ0KPiBjOlxhcHBcZWRpdG9yXHthdWRpbyxpbWFnZSx2aWRlb31c e2F2Y29udixtZWRpYXNwbGl0dGVyLHNob3RjdXR9DQo+IGM6XGFwcFxmaW5hbmNlXHtxdWlj a2VuLHRheGN1dCx0dXJib3RheH0NCj4gYzpcYXBwXGdhbWVce2NvZCxtaW5lY3JhZnQsc2lt c30NCj4gYzpcYXBwXGhhcmR3YXJlXHtic29kLGNwdSx2aWRlb31ce2Z1cm1hcmssZ3B1LXos cml2YXR1bmVyfQ0KPiBjOlxhcHBcbmV0d29ya1x7ZnRwdXNlLG9wZW5zc2wsc3R1bm5lbH0N Cj4gYzpcYXBwXG9zXHtuZXRmcmFtZXdvcmssdmlzdWFsYysrLHdpbm1lcmdlfQ0KPiBjOlxh cHBcdGVsZWNvbVx7ZW1haWwsbmV3cyx6b29tfQ0KPiANCj4gTm90ZTogT25jZSB5b3UgaGF2 ZSB0aGUgaW5zdGFsbGF0aW9uIG1lbnUsIHRoZSByZXN0IGZvbGxvdyBzdWl0ZS4NCj4gPGh0 dHBzOi8vaS5wb3N0aW1nLmNjL3lZNzR6ODdzL3Rhc2tiYXJtZW51MDYuanBnPiBBbGwgbG9j YXRpb25zIG1hdGNoDQo+IA0KPiBOb3RlOiBNeSBhY3R1YWwgb3JnYW5pemF0aW9uIHRyZWUg aXMgYSBiaXQgc2ltcGxpZmllZCBpbiB0aGF0IHBsdXJhbHMNCj4gYXJlIG5vdCBhbGxvd2Vk wqAgKGUuZy4sIGFwcCB2cyBhcHBzKSBleGNlcHQgd2hlbiByZXF1aXJlZCAoZS5nLiwgbmV3 cykuDQo+IA0KPiBOb3RlOiBJIHRyeSB0byBhdm9pZCBjYXRjaGFsbCBjYXRlZ29yaWVzIHN1 Y2ggYXMgIm1pc2MiICYgInV0aWwiLCBidXQNCj4gaW4gc29tZSBjYXNlcyB0aGV5J3JlIHZp cnR1YWxseSB1bmF2b2lkYWJsZSAoZS5nLiwgIm9zIikuDQo+IA0KPiBJbiBzdW1tYXJ5LCB0 aGUgZ29hbCBvZiBvcmdhbml6aW5nIHlvdXIgdG9vbHMsIHN1Y2ggYXMgeW91ciBzY3Jld2Ry aXZlcnMsDQo+IHBsaWVycyBhbmQgd3JlbmNoZXMgaXMgbW9yZSB0aGF0IHlvdSBvcmdhbml6 ZSB0aGVtIGluIGEgd2F5IHRoYXQgZml0cyB5b3VyDQo+IGdhcmFnZSwganVzdCBhcyB5b3Ug b3JnYW5pemUgeW91ciBraXRjaGVuIGltcGxlbWVudHMgaW4gYSB3YXkgdGhhdCBmaXRzDQo+ IHlvdXIga2l0Y2hlbi4NCj4gVGhlIGFjdHVhbCBvcmdhbml6YXRpb24gZG9lc24ndCBtYXR0 ZXIgYXMgaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBwcmVmZXJlbmNlcyB3aWxsDQo+IHByZXZhaWwsIGUuZy4sIG15 IHdpZmUgb3JnYW5pemVzIHRoZSAic2lsdmVyIiBpbXBsZW1lbnRzIGluIGEgZGlmZmVyZW50 DQo+IGRyYXdlciBpbiBhIGhpZXJhcmNoeSBiZWxvdyB0aGUgc3RlZWwgZm9ya3MgYW5kIHNw b29ucyBvZiB0aGUgaG9pIHBvbGxvaS4NCj4gDQo+IEJ1dCB3aGF0IGRvZXMgbWF0dGVyLCBp cyB0aGF0IG1vc3QgcGVvcGxlIGNhbid0IGZpbmQgdGhlaXIgc3R1ZmYuDQo+IEksIGZvciBv bmUsIGhhdmUgbmV2ZXIgbmVlZGVkIGEgV2luZG93cyBDb3J0YW5hIHNlYXJjaCBldmVyLg0K PiBOb3QgaW4gZGVjYWRlcywgaGF2ZSBJIG5lZWRlZCB0byBzZWFyY2ggZm9yIGFueXRoaW5n IEkgZXZlciBuZWVkZWQuDQo+IA0KPiBXaHkgbm90Pw0KPiBCZWNhdXNlIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEg cGxhY2UgZm9yIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmc7IGFuZCBldmVyeXRoaW5nIGlzIGluIGl0cyBwbGFjZS4N Cg0KTmVhdCBhbmQgdGlkeSBpcyBvZnRlbiBhIGdvb2QgaWRlYTsgc28gaXMgImJlY2F1c2Ug dGhhdCdzIHRoZSB3YXkgSSANCnJlbWVtYmVyIHRoaW5ncyIuIE9uIHRoZSBvdGhlciBoYW5k IGhpZXJhcmNoaWVzIGFyZSBhbiBvcmdhbml6YXRpb25hbCANCmNvbmNlcHQgdGhhdCBoYXMg dGVjaG5pY2FsIGRlZmluaXRpb25zOiBpbiBsYW5ndWFnZSwgaW4gbWFueSBzY2llbmNlcywg DQppbiBwaGlsb3NvcGh5LCBpbiBkYXRhIHN0cnVjdHVyZXMsIGV0Yy4gQWxsIG9mIHRoZXNl IHVzZXMgaGF2ZSBhIHRoZW9yeSANCmFib3V0IHdoeSB0aGluZ3MgYXJlIGFycmFuZ2VkIGlu IHRoZWlyIGhpZXJhcmNoeSwgaS5lLiwgd2hhdCBzb3J0IG9mIA0KcmVsYXRpb24gZXhpc3Rz IGJldHdlZW4gYW5kIGl0ZW0gYW5kIGl0cyBwYXJlbnQgdGhhdCBkb2Vzbid0IGV4aXN0IA0K YmV0d2VlbiB0aGF0IG9iamVjdCBhbmQgYW55IG90aGVyIHRoaW5nIGV4Y2VwdCBhbmNlc3Rv cnMgb2YgdGhlIHBhcmVudC4gDQpUeXBpY2FsbHkgdGhlIHJlbGF0aW9uIGlzIHNvbWV0aGlu ZyBsaWtlICJpcyBhbiBleGFtcGxlIG9mIiBhbmQgdGhlIA0KcmVhbGl6YXRpb24gb2YgdGhl IHJlbGF0aW9uIGlzIGEgdHJlZS4NCg0KV2hhdCB5b3UgZGVzY3JpYmUgaXNuJ3QgYSBoaWVy YXJjaHk7IGl0J3MgYSBmb3Jlc3Qgb2Ygc2hvcnQgdHJlZXMuIA0KVGhhdCdzIG9rYXkgaWYg aXQgaGVscHMgeW91IG9yZ2FuaXplIHN0dWZmIGl0J3MgYSBnb29kIHRoaW5nIGZvciB5b3Ug DQp3aGV0aGVyIGl0J3MgdGVjaG5pY2FsbHkgYSBoaWVyYXJjaHkgb3Igbm90LiBNb3N0IHBl b3BsZSB3aG8gYXJlIGNhcmVmdWwgDQpwaWNrIHNvbWUgb3JnYW5pemF0aW9uIHRoYXQgZmVl bHMgbmF0dXJhbCB0byB0aGVtLiBBcyBsb25nIGFzIGl0IGhlbHBzIA0KeW91IGl0J3MgZ29v ZC4gVGhhbmtzIGZvciBzaGFyaW5nLg0KLS0gDQpKZWZmIEJhcm5ldHQNCg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Big Al@21:1/5 to this is what Andy Burnelli on Thu Apr 6 06:52:25 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 4/5/23 22:39, this is what Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Every one of us has "helped" a technically clueless Windows user, and I wouldn't be the first to notice that I've seen people download an installer and then spend five minutes finding where they downloaded it, and then, perhaps, running the installer and then spending another ten minutes
    finding where it put the executables, or, in not being able to do even
    that, they just let the desktop get cluttered from side to side, top to bottom, with icons of the previous installed programs, in LIFO order.

    To me, this is more a matter of education. My wife is no computer genius, she leans on me for a lot of things. One
    thing she can do, is download something and know "because it's the way", that it's in the Downloads folder. And when it
    is installed, it's on the menu, a simple alphabetized list of programs. And the installer might add an icon to the
    desktop, which can be deleted if it's rarely used. And she knows to hit the search icon and type "turbo" to find the
    tax program. She also knows she can right-click a program in the menu and add it to the taskbar, desktop, or tiles menu.

    All this because I didn't screw with the design of windows and I taught her the basic, very basic concepts. I leave
    running the programs Word, Quicken, Browser etc to her.

    Education IMHO. And users do not need to know where the program.exe is.

    What you seem to do is make it harder for the user to find a program, trying to decide what pigeon hole they put the
    program in. I know a lot of times I've classified a program as one thing only to reclassify it as another, so which
    one did I put it in? Hmmmm?
    --
    Al

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Big Al on Thu Apr 6 18:41:16 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Big Al wrote:

    To me, this is more a matter of education.

    Hi Big Al,

    This is a philosophical discussion, which I summarize succinctly as:
    "You can pay me now... or you can pay me later"
    To which it means, in PC terms of thinking where things will end up:
    "You can thing about it now... or you can think about it later"

    Where, perhaps I go to greater lengths than most people, as exemplified
    by this simple setup diagram for how I set up mirroring Android on Win10.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/tTmdgKTB/scrcpy02.jpg> An efficient program setup

    It's an example of "thinking ahead of time" where all the work is in the preparation because after it's set up once, it lasts that way for decades.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Vvrq0K0m/scrcpy03.jpg> The efficient setup explained

    It even moves exactly to any other PC on the planet, that I've set up, of course, which is why my Windows XP menus work out of the box on Win10.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y00vx4yp/scrcpy04.jpg> Extraneous cmd window (&)

    Once all the up-front thinking is done, it's as simple as drag and drop.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvsbcNBz/scrcpy05.jpg> Drag APK from Windows

    Given that's _my_ philosophy, I appreciate that you provided your
    philosophy, which took into account many of the things I did, but which
    also provided an alternative view of how people wish to organize things.

    Hence, I thank you for adding value to the philosophical topic because it's
    the bane of millions of PC users that they can't find their programs,
    mainly because they let the programs decide where to put stuff.

    An example is how do you organize all your browsers for heaven's sake!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/fT2J40RD/windows-cascade-menu.jpg>

    Maybe that's overkill, but isn't it at least better than searching
    for Brave under "B" and "Aloha" under "A" and firefox under "M"?

    Think of the problem being you're moving all your stuff from one home to another, and you let the movers determine where everything goes.

    How the heck are you going to find anything when the movers decided, not
    you, where each and ever application will go on your computer system?

    Worse, you used movers from a hundred different companies, so the Adobe
    mover wants to put "his stuff" in your living room - so it's in your face.

    That's fine, but the Google movers wants to put "their stuff" in your face
    too, which means it goes into the living room (aka Desktop) also.

    Hell, the Mozilla mover wants "his stuff" to be tops in the menu, and he triples the number of shortcuts, just to make sure it's "in your face".

    Who would do that?

    Only on computers do people let many (many!) others organize their stuff.

    My wife is no computer genius, she leans on me for a lot of things.

    Lucky you. If I organize my wife's phone, she says she can't find anything because she's _remembered_ where everything is even as it was put there
    LIFO.

    Same with Windows - I could barely get her to use the cascade menu because
    she likes having all her icons splattered halfway across her Desktop view.

    Meanwhile, if I put a fork backward in the utensil drawer, she's livid.
    (The moral of that story? Sometimes wives don't make all that much sense.)

    One
    thing she can do, is download something and know "because it's the way",
    that it's in the Downloads folder.

    Yes! Yes! Arms high in the air! Lighters out! Waving wildly! Yes.
    *YOU GET IT*(

    You understand. Oh my! Someone who gets it! I love you!
    Here's what happened, in a nutshell:

    1. At the dawn of PCs, Microsoft/Google/Mozilla did things willy nilly.
    2. A hundred developers and a hundred different places things went.
    3. People got confused... so what did Microsoft/Google/Mozilla do?
    a. They "simplified" that willynilly stuff
    b. They didn't _fix_ the willynilly
    c. They just gave you a single downloads folder for everything

    And people, like your wife, and, let's publicly admit my flaws,
    my wife also, "thinks" the "right way" to find stuff is to look
    in the "downloads" folder (which itself is in a crazy location).

    All the willynilly stuff is assembled into that one downloads folder.
    And these people "think" that's the way it should be.

    And when it
    is installed, it's on the menu, a simple alphabetized list of programs.

    You are a genius! I'm serious. Very few people show that comprehension!
    They _think_ that's the way it should be!

    It's really just what I said above:
    1. A hundred developers working for a hundred companies using a hundred
    strategies to get stuff "in your face" put them willy nilly.
    2. Then, Microsoft, in its infinite wisdom, tried to 'simplify things'
    3. What Microsoft created - oh my - was the "alphabetical menu"

    You get it that organizing stuff alphabetically is about as dumb as
    can be, particularly since "PhotoShop" is under "Adobe" for example.

    In my suggested style of "functional" organization, Photoshop is under
    editors and even then under image editors, and _then_ under photoshop
    (unless it actually installs as "Adobe Photoshop" as there comes a point
    where you just have to let the hallway closet be a mess when the door is
    opened (as long as when the door is closed, it doesn't look like a mess).

    And the installer might add an icon to the
    desktop, which can be deleted if it's rarely used.

    Yup. You must have seen many PCs with the desktop filled with icons.
    My wife thinks that's where icons belong. On the desktop.

    But woe is anyone who leaves their dirty shoes in the hallway.
    Or even more woe befalls those who put forks in the place for the spoons.

    Funnily enough, my wife organizes her stuff rather well.
    But on a PC, she lets a hundred different developers put stuff willy nilly,
    and then she let's Microsoft, in its infinite wisdom, "simplify things" for her.

    Hence, she has a desktop filled with shortcuts.
    A Downloads folder that must be hundreds of items long.
    And when she can't find anything, she uses that idiotic alphabetical menu
    where Adobe comes before PhotoShop (for example) and neither is under
    "image editors" where they rightfully (functionally) belong (IMHO).

    And she knows to hit the search icon and type "turbo" to find the
    tax program.

    Oh man. I love you. You are speaking my language! You understand.
    You understand that the system is, by default, so fucked up, that
    a normal person has to search just to find anything.

    You get it.
    I didn't need to author this thread.

    You already understood the problem set.
    My point of view is if you have to search even once, you've already lost.

    For example, turbotax is under C:\app\finance\turbotax (where it belongs).

    Note: As a nod to Jeff Barnett, you determine "where it belongs" just as my wife determined where the spoons and forks belong. As long as there is a
    place for everything and everything in its place, where it belongs is up to personal preference.

    As an example, TurboTax could just as well belong here:
    c:\taxes\turbotax

    What only matters is when you get a brand new PC, one of the first things
    you do (after removing all the spyware) is set it up with an app hierarchy.
    c:\app\{archivers,browsers,calendars,databases,editors,finance,etc.}

    NOTE: I use shorter names, and I never use plurals unless I must
    (e.g., newsreaders can't be abbreviated as new so I use news).

    She also knows she can right-click a program in the menu and
    add it to the taskbar, desktop, or tiles menu.

    Again, this is a classic example of what really happened to PCs.
    1. A hundred developers did things a hundred ways
    2. People, necessarily, were confused as all hell
    3. Microsoft, in its infinite wisdom, "simplified" things for them

    The problem with the Microsoft tiled menus is that it's an abomination
    to manage, and unless you've truly tried to manage it (as Paul and I
    have valiantly tried years ago when it first came out), you won't know
    how much of an atrocity it is (in terms of hidden binary gotchas).

    Luckily that alphabetical menu is far easier to manage, as it's just
    an alphabetical hierarchy - but - and this is important - it's constantly crapped upon by every program that ever installed on your system.

    An example is you might put the Adobe Acrobat Reader in the menu under
    menu > editors > pdf > acroread
    And that works for a few weeks or months but suddenly you get this
    brand new bright red Adobe Acrobat Reader shortcut on your desktop
    and your menus now have an added component you didn't ever want of
    menu > Adobe > Adobe Acrobat Reader
    And if you're lucky, it won't come with a few more links just to
    ensure that they're "in your face" enough.

    My point is that I am forced to ditch the tiled menu (mine is empty)
    because it's an abomination to manage with its binary file system.

    And I also completely ditch the alphabetical menu, not because it can't be managed but because every program shits into that menu w/o asking you.

    Hence, what I do is pin a taskbar menu which no program craps into
    because they're not set up to crap into your custom menus.

    Then I drag the adobe acrobat reader icon into that custom menu. <https://i.postimg.cc/qvJDMQcq/taskbarmenu02.jpg> Menus are just folders

    A VERY IMPORTANT POINT to be made is the organization is EXACTLY
    (within reason as duplication is allowed in menus when needed)
    the same for the saving of the installers as for the installed
    programs, as for the menus).

    An example is:
    INSTALLER: c:\app\editor\pspdf\Acrobat Reader DC\{all their stuff}
    INSTALLED: c:\software\editor\pspdf\acrobat_reader\{exe,msi,zip}
    TASKBAR MENU: c:\menu\editor\pspdf\Acrobat Reader DC.lnk

    Note the hallway closet example where you can keep things organized
    only until you open the "adobe" closet door and then you let them
    make a mess of the closet at that "Adobe Acrobat DC" level.

    At some point, way down in the hierarchy, you let the movers put
    things where the movers want them - but only way down in the hierarchy.

    All this because I didn't screw with the design of windows
    and I taught her the basic, very basic concepts. I leave
    running the programs Word, Quicken, Browser etc to her.

    I have to agree with you if I set up her PC or phone like I
    set up mine, she would kill me because she cant' find anything.

    And yet, paradoxically, she organizes her scissors like you can't believe, where there are at least a dozen types of scissors and woe be anyone who doesn't put the shears where they belong next to the fruit snips.

    Education IMHO.

    I think it's all about "attitude".
    My point is there are very few wives who don't organize the kitchen.
    Right?

    Am I wrong?
    Don't most of the wives of the posters here have a very good idea where the things she uses in the kitchen go? Mine certainly does.

    And woe be the poor soul who puts the measuring cups in the wrong order!

    My point is people DO know how to organize.
    It's just that with Microsoft PCs, they let Microsoft & Adobe do it for
    them.

    It's like letting the movers decide where things go.
    They'll just dump everything onto your Desktop (into your Program Files).

    And users do not need to know where the program.exe is.

    Bear in mind you can also modify the _comments_ of any shortcut
    which helps in instantly letting you know EXACTLY where anything is.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cCwdrZsQ/taskbarmenu03.jpg> Menu comments displayed

    So you can just remember the dozen FUNCTIONAL THINGS YOU DO, and then if
    you really need to find the location of any item, you just hover over it.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9FHWs4p1/taskbarmenu04.jpg> Comments can be changed

    However, I agree with you that even so, I can't count the number of times
    in my life that I needed to know where the executable is - for example when
    I create a shortcut or a scheduled task or if I'm stringing them along in a batch file, etc.

    Sometimes you just do.

    But I would think "most people" only need to find the shortcut.
    And, guess what.

    It's on the desktop!
    (Along with everything else.)

    What you seem to do is make it harder for the user to find a program,
    trying to decide what pigeon hole they put the program in.

    I understand where you're coming from which is that you shouldn't have
    to THINK before you install something.

    You shouldn't have to THINK where it will go.
    It should just GO SOMEWHERE (who cares where). Right?

    I get that philosophy.
    But then you have to THINK LATER where the hell it went.

    How many times have you seen someone download a document, and then, not
    five seconds later, spend five minutes just trying to find where it went?

    Me?
    My browsers are ALL set up to ask where something goes.

    So, um, yeah. You have to THINK first before you download or install stuff.

    But guess what? Remember the old motor oil advertisements?
    *You can pay me now... or you can pay me later*

    Well, in terms of thinking ahead, I can change that to:
    *You can think about it now... or you can think about it later*

    But here's the beauty of thinking ahead:
    *You only have to think once*

    Because after that, everything has a place.
    And everything is in its place.

    Remember the analogy of the kitchen utensil draw?
    a. Your wife decide where the forks and spoons go.
    b. She decided that when you first moved into that house.
    c. She thought once - and that organization lasted for decades.

    So it should be (IMHO) with PC organizational structure.

    I know a lot of times I've classified a program as one thing
    only to reclassify it as another, so which
    one did I put it in?

    You are a genius. I don't disagree even one bit.
    For example, in the olden days I had the ubiquitous Eudora MUA under
    c:\app\mail\eudora
    But then I added a newsreader, so I put it in the same folder
    c:\app\mail\tin
    But then, I added a torrenting app, so I put it also in that folder
    c:\app\mail\bittorrent

    At some point that made no sense, so I changed it to:
    c:\app\telecom\thunderbird,pan,deluge

    Funny thing, I use torrents so rarely I had _forgotten_ which torrent app I use, where in the Microsoft alphabetical menus I'd be dead. Right?

    Luckily "Deluge" would be near the top, but I'd be stuck looking for a
    brand name that I don't even remember and which has, let's face it,
    NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE FUNCTIONALITY.

    Right?
    I mean, "Deluge"?
    WTF does that mean?

    Luckily, I went to my taskbar menu. I clicked on "telecom", and there, functionally so, was "deluge.lnk", which is how I remembered what it was.

    See?
    I don't have to "remember" anything but what I want to do.

    Hmmmm?

    I understand that you have to "remember" what it is that you're trying to
    do, but as you can see from the example above, you KNOW what you want to
    do.

    You just don't know the name of the app that does it.

    Instead of looking for the shortcut using the idiotic name of the app,
    you just have to know which of the dozen things you want to do.

    When you want to run thunderbird, for example, you won't look under
    menu > archivers >
    Because it's not (functionally) an archiver. Duh.

    Likewise, you won't waste any time looking under
    menu > browsers >
    Because it's not a browser (although Mozilla may beg to differ).

    Similarly, you won't bother to look under
    menu > cleaners >
    Because, duh, it's not functionally a cleaner either.

    You only have to keep in mind one dozen functionalities.
    For the rest of your natural life.

    One dozen things that you do on a computer.
    Every computer.
    For the rest of your life.

    So when you forget what the name of your MUA is, all you need to do is
    remember what it is that you're trying, functionally, to do.

    menu > telecom > thunderbird.lnk

    My point is that I agree with you on all counts.
    Adults always agree on facts (facts are funny that way).
    But we may disagree slightly on opinions (opinions are funny that way).

    Only a fool disagrees with facts (that's why they're fools).
    I agree with ALL your facts.

    We only disagree on WHEN to expend energy.
    I harken back to the "you can pay me now... or you can pay me later".

    I think BEFORE I install something.
    Most people think AFTER.

    One question though, is whether or not you can fit EVERY APP YOU HAVE
    into only a dozen (or so) functional hierarchies.

    I can.
    Just like my wife fits all our kitchen utensils into a set number of
    drawers, shelves, and cubbards - you have to limit it to a small number.

    I think a dozen functional locations works both for the phone & PC.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/N0G1TXcZ/scrcpy01.jpg> One dozen functionalities
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully respond to Big Al's observations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Big Al@21:1/5 to this is what Andy Burnelli on Thu Apr 6 15:33:53 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 4/6/23 13:41, this is what Andy Burnelli wrote:

    An example is how do you organize all your browsers for heaven's sake! <https://i.postimg.cc/fT2J40RD/windows-cascade-menu.jpg>

    Way too many browsers. LOL Nice list though. If you really wanted to test a web site on a lot of platforms, that
    would be helpful. I had issues like 20 years ago when no two browsers seemed to render a my web page right. Now they
    all seem to be pretty good.

    Thanks for you ideas.
    --
    Al

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Big Al on Thu Apr 6 22:25:18 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Big Al wrote:

    Way too many browsers.

    Well, I have a philosophy, based on privacy concerns, where I don't use any plugins or extensions (with that many browsers, it would be prohibitive
    anyway, but that's not the reason for not using extensions).

    What I do is I use _one_ browser per web site activity.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hjjVXkq5/taskbarmenu07.jpg> One web browser per task

    For example, for "googling", it's _one_ browser.
    For buying stuff on Amazon, it's a _different_ one browser.
    For logging into a web forum, it's a different _one_ browser.

    And so on.

    Each browser only needs to be set up optimally for a _single_ task.
    For example, javascript can be turned off and if needed, then it's
    turned on for that _one_ web site used with that _one_ browser.

    Obviously it takes more up-front thinking to implement the
    one-browser-per-task philosophy - but as I had mentioned.

    You can pay me now... or you can pay me later.

    I usually opt for the up-front organization.
    Rather than the back-end scramble.

    LOL Nice list though.

    Notice I had to numerically label each browser shortcut.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/fT2J40RD/windows-cascade-menu.jpg> Windows browsers

    That was my point to Jeff Barnett that you don't have full freedom
    of choice. In the case of pinned taskbar cascade pull out accordion
    menus, you're stuck with alphabetical no matter how you order them.

    SO I added numbers in terms of tasks, where task 1 === browser 1,
    task 2 === browser 2, task 3 === browser 3, and so on.

    It's all well thought out - but most people just throw everything
    into the living room and then they organize it from that big mess.

    If you really wanted to test a web site on a lot of platforms, that
    would be helpful. I had issues like 20 years ago when no two browsers seemed to render a my web page right. Now they
    all seem to be pretty good.

    I agree with you that most browsers seem pretty good.
    I think that's more due to "standardization" on Chromium & Mozilla though.
    And, I guess, on WebKit although that's highly insecure, for iOS/macOS.

    Me? I care about privacy.
    So you won't see "Chrome" on my systems.

    On Android, for example, my web browsers are "ungoogled" as much as
    possible, which, for example, means these three "chromium" variants.

    Even on Android, you plan ahead.
    You can pay me now. Or you can pay me later.

    For example, the first thing you do on unrooted Android is delete
    the Google browsers, which anyone can do with adb or with ladb.
    adb shell pm list packages | findstr /i com.google.android
    adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.google.android.chrome
    adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.google.android.youtube
    adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.google.android.gm
    adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.google.android.apps.maps
    adb shell pm uninstall --user 0 com.android.vending
    adb shell pm list packages | findstr /i com.google.android

    Now that Google is gone from those apps, you install FOSS replacements.
    1. A far better YouTube FOSS replacement is *NewPipe* by Schabi
    <https://newpipe.net/>
    2. Chrome replacements are *Bromite*, *Chromium* or *Ungoogled Chromium*
    <https://github.com/bromite/bromite/releases>
    <https://www.bromite.org/chromium>
    <https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-android>
    3. A Google Maps offline FOSS adjunct might be OSMAnd+ (aka OSMAND~)
    <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/>
    4. A GMail FOSS MUA replacement might be FairEmail or Mozilla K-9 Mail
    <https://email.faircode.eu/>
    <https://k9mail.app/>
    5. A far better Google Play Store FOSS replacement client is Aurora
    <https://auroraoss.com/>
    etc.

    It's all well thought out, and, the beauty is it works on all Android
    phones so the menus from my Motorola work perfectly on my Galaxy.

    Of course, I choose an app launcher (Nova free) which allows you to
    export the homescreen and to import it back onto any phone.

    This is important in terms of economy because you can keep the same
    menu system for a decade on Android, where if you make minor tweaks
    (or major tweaks for that matter), you leverage them to the next phone.

    Same with the WindowsXP menu which I've moved to Windows 7 and then
    to Vista and to Windows 8 and then to Windows 10. Same menu.

    It's all designed to do some upfront work (you can pay me now) so that
    you don't have to waste time finding things on any device even ten years
    from now.

    The main question is whether there is any app you love & use that can't fit into a dozen folders, organized by whatever functionality you use on
    Windows.

    Everyone uses browsers (like Firefox, for example), and telecom programs
    (like Zoom) and financial programs (like turbotax for example), so I don't think many of us are all that unique in terms of WHAT WE DO on computers.

    If Microsoft had hired me back when they were organizing Windows XP (when I authored articles on this subject in the local press), Windows would be completely different today (in my humble prediction of the future).

    I would have made Windows so that no program is allowed to mess with the structure and I would have provided a structure that the user decides on.

    Sigh. Their loss. And yours. :) (just kidding you)
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully try to help the original poster.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MikeS@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Apr 7 20:24:19 2023
    On 05/04/2023 20:49, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this hierarchy? <https://i.postimg.cc/yY74z87s/taskbarmenu06.jpg> My standard hierarchy
     archiver
     browser
     cleaner
     database
     editor
     finance
     game
     hardware
     network
     os
     telecom

    My {programs,installers,menu} folders have been the same for decades.
    Ever since Windows 95 & XP days, I've used those dozen folders alone.

    They are so exactly the same, a menu folder copied from XP works on
    Win10. Literally. I'm not joking. Copy the start menu from XP & it works
    on Win10.

    Certainly a menu works from Windows 7 to Windows 10 if you're organized.
    And, of course, any Win10 menu works out of the box in another Win10.(*1)

    Everything I have installed fits into one of those dozen folders.
    Organized by what they do (not by their silly marketing branding).

    Obviously there are sub folders, so, for example, my Irfanview is:
    Software: c:\software\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files are needed}
    Menu: c:\menu\editor\pic\irfanview.lnk
    Programs: c:\app\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files it installed}

    My question?

    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this hierarchy? <https://i.postimg.cc/D0J1tgDZ/windows-tweak.jpg> A standard hierarchy

    Your system is pointless and confusing unless you have so many apps in
    each category that you cannot remember them. My simple system is to
    separate apps which require installation (into the standard Windows C:
    drive locations) and those that don't (into their own folders in
    C:\Programs).

    Far more useful to devise a logical structure in which to store data, ie
    the files produced and edited by the apps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to MikeS on Fri Apr 7 21:59:18 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    MikeS wrote:

    Your system is pointless and confusing unless you have so many apps in
    each category that you cannot remember them.

    Hi MikeS,

    It's wonderful that you provided input as we all benefit from interaction.

    Thanks for your assessment, where I'm not sure of a "number" at which any
    one function becomes "so many apps" but you already saw the browser number.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/26F7CZ7V/microsoft-browsers02.jpg> Shortcuts gotcha!

    Is that number of browsers at the point you would consider "too many" yet?

    How about the number of editors I often use just for editing my images?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/HLfTjC63/picture-editors.jpg> c:\app\editor\pic\.

    That's not even the exif editors... nor the 3D editors, by the way.
    Nor the myriad audio nor video editors.
    Just the non-raster non-vector image editors.
    The vector editors and raster editors are kept in another folder.

    Given there are, oh, about two dozen image editors alone, we need to assess whether or not an organizational system would be beneficial to the user.

    At what point does it become "pointless and confusing" to try to organize
    your system so that _everything_ has a place & everything is in its place?

    My simple system is to
    separate apps which require installation (into the standard Windows C:
    drive locations) and those that don't (into their own folders in C:\Programs).

    The problem I have with _any_ Microsoft default folder (that other
    companies' lazy developers know about such as Adobe, Mozilla, Microsoft,
    etc., is that *they pollute the crap out of those folders over time*.

    Hence, my rule is *_never_ use any folder Microsoft provides by default*.
    In a cleverly paradoxical way, that's one of the best decisions of my life.

    Far more useful to devise a logical structure in which to store data, ie
    the files produced and edited by the apps.

    Thank you for that astute observation that DATA is the bane of most
    computer organizational systems. Trust me, I'm well aware of that too!

    Here for example is just _one_ subfolder of my c:\data\sys hierarchy:
    <https://i.postimg.cc/tCcKJsmx/c-data-sys.jpg> System Data c:\data\sys

    In summary, whatever organizational system you use, you can pay for it now,
    or you can pay for it later, but if you have to search even once, you lost.
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully respond to MikeS' astute points.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DanS@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 10 15:08:20 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Andy Burnelli <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in news:u0kjbf$6das$1@paganini.bofh.team:

    <TOP-POSTED for brevity>

    I've looked over your screenshots, and sure, when you've installed that many redundant apps, it's probably a must for you. I mean...I saw like 5 or 6 differnt VPN
    icons. A sh*t load of browsers installed, etc. That's the most obvious reason you need
    to setup this system of yours.

    Very few people NEED 6 or 7 different browsers. How many different "archivers" do
    you need? I mean, I get away using 7-ZIP. The only thing *I've* run across it doesn't
    support in my everyday usage, are ACE files.

    One thing I always recommed to people, is that when you install something, NEVER
    just click on 'Default Install', and ALWAYS go to custom install. There may not be a lot
    of options, but one thing that almost always changeable, is default install path and start
    menu hierarchy. I recommend to simply remove the publishers name from the path or
    start menu hierarchy. We don't open programs by remembering the publishers name,
    then the s/w title. I don't want to start Dassault Systems, Solidworks. I want to start
    Solidworks.

    Also, I've stopped storing install packages of s/w I've downloaded.You can almost
    always just d/l the next (or many times updated) version. Why do I need this ISO of
    Kubuntu 19.04? Some exceptions, like an icon editor named IcoFX. I've saved a certain
    version of that, because initially it was a free, as in free beer, program, but at some
    point, went to a pay model.

    And not that I think Windows UAC is awesome, and will 100% protect you from anything you may encounter, but I don't *think* it functions on non 'Program Files'
    install paths. I'd reckon any apps installed elsewhere could be compromised, and UAC
    wouldn't even know.

    I too, used to have a directory and start menu structure I always followed. It just
    became to bothersome to follow it.

    YMMV


    DanS




    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this
    hierarchy?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yY74z87s/taskbarmenu06.jpg> My
    standard hierarchy
    archiver
    browser
    cleaner
    database
    editor
    finance
    game
    hardware
    network
    os
    telecom

    My {programs,installers,menu} folders have been the same
    for decades. Ever since Windows 95 & XP days, I've used
    those dozen folders alone.

    They are so exactly the same, a menu folder copied from XP
    works on Win10. Literally. I'm not joking. Copy the start
    menu from XP & it works on Win10.

    Certainly a menu works from Windows 7 to Windows 10 if
    you're organized. And, of course, any Win10 menu works out
    of the box in another Win10.(*1)

    Everything I have installed fits into one of those dozen
    folders. Organized by what they do (not by their silly
    marketing branding).

    Obviously there are sub folders, so, for example, my
    Irfanview is:
    Software: c:\software\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files
    are needed} Menu: c:\menu\editor\pic\irfanview.lnk
    Programs: c:\app\editor\pic\irfanview\{whatever files it
    installed}

    My question?

    Is there any app you love & use that doesn't fit into this
    hierarchy?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/D0J1tgDZ/windows-tweak.jpg> A
    standard hierarchy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sven12@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 15 10:07:31 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.microsoft.windows, alt.comp.freeware

    Nero to write CD & DVD. Daemon tools, Virtual CD for optical disks images. Light alloy, AIMP 2.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)