• I have Windows 10 - to move to Windows 11 - do I need to establish a Mi

    From Minoru Osaka@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 27 01:33:33 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 18:10:21 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    No, Google has many links to how ...



    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 19:25:38 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or more, for
    the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a few posts.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Minoru Osaka@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Mar 27 04:03:32 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:25:38 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or more, for
    the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a few posts.

    All I want is a yes or no if you've done it as I do not want to create an account and then delete it or to have to do any strange things at all.

    As long as it will let me switch from Windows 10 to 11 without creating any account and without having to do strange unfamiliar things other than to
    hit the "no I do not want to create an account" button, I'm OK with that.

    Is it as easy as you intimate in that there is an obivous "SKIP" button?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 14:09:39 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 04:03:32 +0900
    Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:25:38 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to
    Windows 11. I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under
    any circumstances. If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must
    I establish a M$ Account?

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or
    more, for the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a
    few posts.

    All I want is a yes or no if you've done it as I do not want to
    create an account and then delete it or to have to do any strange
    things at all.

    As long as it will let me switch from Windows 10 to 11 without
    creating any account and without having to do strange unfamiliar
    things other than to hit the "no I do not want to create an account"
    button, I'm OK with that.

    Is it as easy as you intimate in that there is an obivous "SKIP"
    button?

    Your answer is here:

    https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-11-without-microsoft-account

    I don't use Windows. I think it's disgusting to just look at.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sun Mar 26 20:06:11 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    If you search on this group (windows-11)

    Given many usenet nntp servers automatically expire articles quickly,
    and given most newsgroups are archived by Google but not this one,
    what web search engine do you suggest for archives of this newsgroup?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sun Mar 26 15:31:38 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 3/26/2023 3:09 PM, Johnny wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 04:03:32 +0900
    Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:

    On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:25:38 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to
    Windows 11. I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under
    any circumstances. If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must
    I establish a M$ Account?

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or
    more, for the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a
    few posts.

    All I want is a yes or no if you've done it as I do not want to
    create an account and then delete it or to have to do any strange
    things at all.

    As long as it will let me switch from Windows 10 to 11 without
    creating any account and without having to do strange unfamiliar
    things other than to hit the "no I do not want to create an account"
    button, I'm OK with that.

    Is it as easy as you intimate in that there is an obivous "SKIP"
    button?

    Your answer is here:

    https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-11-without-microsoft-account

    I don't use Windows. I think it's disgusting to just look at.


    Do not use Rufus and click the four boxes.

    The modification that Rufus makes to the installation,
    puts maintenance items which are similar to Windows 10
    items on the C: drive. This prevents proper maintenance
    of the OS later.

    It's OK to put the media on a USB stick, but do not
    "modify" the content, unless you have a thorough understanding
    of what the changes to the media are doing.

    I only noticed the issues with a Rufus install,
    over time. You may not notice if using Rufus based
    installation, on the first day, that it isn't
    really Windows 11 that you have installed.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 15:23:31 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 3/26/2023 12:33 PM, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Prepare installation media.

    Do not use the Windows Update method.

    Make a backup of the disk drive, before installing.

    If the install process does anything you do not like,
    stop the process, and restore from your backup disk image.

    *******

    To run an "install-in-place upgrade", you can insert media
    and run Setup.exe on that media.

    If you download Windows 11 as an ISO, you can right-click the
    ISO file, select "Mount", and the ISO will be mounted as if it
    is a virtual DVD drive. Now, you can run Setup.exe, without
    burning physical media like a DVD or a USB stick.

    Windows 10 will be running, when you run Setup.exe and attempt
    to install-over-top of it.

    *******

    One reason for requesting a Microsoft Account, is for Windows 11 Home,
    when it encrypts the C: drive without you asking. The Microsoft web site
    then contains the recovery key, for removal of encryption and so on.

    However, the circumstances where this arises (Lenovo Win11 Home laptop
    or such), means that this hardly ever arises for a person who is
    in your situation right now. Consequently, there should be no
    apprehension on your part, about "needing" an MSA. Your disk will not
    be encrypted. Very few computer setups, end up encrypted because
    of this particular quirk.

    The reason for making the backup of your hard drive (the one you
    are installing on), is so that, for anything we forgot to tell
    you, you have an "escape plan" :-)

    Summary: The only real question you have to ask, is whether
    there is any benefit whatsoever, from Windows 11 for a user.
    They keep breaking stuff via Windows Update, and that makes
    the experience a negative one. This OS is just a toy,
    for their development team.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Li4ud8Khw7HCp8KxwqTDsSA=?@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 13:46:13 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Minoru Osaka wrote on 3/26/2023 9:33 AM:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    If you've a Win10 Local Admin account it will be retained after upgrading
    to Win11.

    You may be required to create a MSA login for Win11, but that MSA logon
    can be removed using the Win11 Local admin post upgrade.

    If your Local is not an admin logon, then it should be changed to an
    admin account prior to upgrading.

    Also note.. the notice for Win11 can be deffered by clicking the option
    to 'stay on Windows 10'.
    Later if desiring Win11, one can update a variety of different methods
    - Online Win11 22H2 update assistant
    - using media(USB or DVD) created with the Media Creation Tool(run
    setup.exe on the media within Windows 10)
    - using a Win11 mounted iso

    - Also, if Win10 Pro, one can use GPO to change the Windows Update for Business setting to Window 11 22H2. Doing so, will force Windows Update
    to start the Win11 22H2 Enablement Package download and install
    process(and automatically upgrade to the latest 22H2 cumulative update
    and security update).
    => Once the download starts(and it will happen almost immediately),
    the GPO setting can/should be turned off to its original default
    value(Not Configured) - doing so will not impact the already initiated download/install of W11 22H2.

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Peter on Sun Mar 26 22:14:20 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 21:06, Peter wrote:
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    If you search on this group (windows-11)

    Given many usenet nntp servers automatically expire articles quickly,
    and given most newsgroups are archived by Google but not this one,
    what web search engine do you suggest for archives of this newsgroup?

    Fair point. I have my own collection.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Sun Mar 26 22:15:57 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 21:03, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:25:38 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows
    11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$
    Account?

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or more,
    for the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a few posts.

    All I want is a yes or no if you've done it as I do not want to create an account and then delete it or to have to do any strange things at all.

    As long as it will let me switch from Windows 10 to 11 without creating any account and without having to do strange unfamiliar things other than to
    hit the "no I do not want to create an account" button, I'm OK with that.

    Is it as easy as you intimate in that there is an obivous "SKIP" button?

    No, there is no button to say "no, I do not want to create/use an MS
    account". The official install will insist it is impossible. You do have
    to use tricks that people have collected over time.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Peter on Sun Mar 26 16:41:22 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 3/26/2023 3:06 PM, Peter wrote:
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    If you search on this group (windows-11)

    Given many usenet nntp servers automatically expire articles quickly,
    and given most newsgroups are archived by Google but not this one,
    what web search engine do you suggest for archives of this newsgroup?


    Let's test.

    This is as far back as I can go right now, on Eternal-September.

    15 May 2022

    <t5rtfn$b70c$1@news.mixmin.net>

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Ct5rtfn%24b70c%241%40news.mixmin.net%3E

    This is still on E-S at the moment.

    If I switch Thunderbird to offline mode, I can download
    this group onto a local mbox file. Since HDR mode (or whatever is its
    slow equivalent) is used, the transfer could take an hour or two,
    if you want the ten months worth.

    I keep more headers than that, so I can look back a bit further,
    but then the message cannot be fetched from E-S if I do. If I have
    five years worth of headers, the server still only has ten months
    of message bodies on it, to go with the headers.

    Once you have the ten months of messages in the MBOX (via offline dowbload), then you can come up with a way of searching the archive. Thunderbird has
    GLODA for example, which is what indexes boxes for search purposes.
    Or, it's supposed to. The searches I do, all seem to be brute force,
    rather than pre-baked.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From FromTheRafters@21:1/5 to Paul used his or her keyboard to on Sun Mar 26 15:53:28 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Paul used his or her keyboard to write :

    Summary: The only real question you have to ask, is whether
    there is any benefit whatsoever, from Windows 11 for a user.
    They keep breaking stuff via Windows Update, and that makes
    the experience a negative one. This OS is just a toy,
    for their development team.

    Long ago I saw a thread asking if there was anything we can do in
    Windows 10 that we couldn't do in most Windows versions prior to 10.

    The answer came back almost nothing except maybe in some cases there
    are apps which have decided they don't want to support older Windows.

    I think each Windows version is just a way to drop support for older
    versions since they all do about the same thing for the past 20 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Li4ud8Khw7HCp8KxwqTDsSA=?@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 26 13:48:07 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Do not use Rufus and click the four boxes.

       Paul

    +1 +

    --
    ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sun Mar 26 22:34:15 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    which was also posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10, so it will be in Google Groups.

    Hi Carlos,
    When you say it will be "in Google Groups", did you check it first?

    Try these three URLs please... in what you term "google groups" please...
    alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Specifically:
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-11>
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-10>
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    If _that_ is what you mean by being "in google groups", it's not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Mar 26 23:14:06 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 22:41, Paul wrote:
    On 3/26/2023 3:06 PM, Peter wrote:
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    If you search on this group (windows-11)

    Given many usenet nntp servers automatically expire articles quickly,
    and given most newsgroups are archived by Google but not this one,
    what web search engine do you suggest for archives of this newsgroup?


    Let's test.

    This is as far back as I can go right now, on Eternal-September.

       15 May 2022

    <t5rtfn$b70c$1@news.mixmin.net>

    I have, locally, posts going back to Jan 2022 in the Windows 11 group.

    I see one long thread named:

    Windows 11 Pro will soon require a Microsoft Account

    which was also posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10, so it will be in Google Groups.


    Another one on this group, named:

    Windows 11 Home without a MSF account?

    You proposed using <https://www.thewindowsclub.com/how-to-install-windows-11-home-without-microsoft-account>

    Later it was suggested that M$ blocked this method.

    Dell Laptop Unboxing and Initial Setup No MS Account


    Another thread, started by the same user (Boris):

    Successful Install of Windows 11 Without a Microsoft Account

    He used this method:

    <https://www.tomshardware.com/how-to/install-windows-11-without-microsoft-account>

    «2) I thought I'd try method 2, which it tries to confuse the MSFT
    server by if entering "no@thankyou.com", when asked to sign in with a
    MSFT account. This worked. MSFT returned the expected, "Oops,
    something went wrong", band asked me to create a local account,
    bypassing the MSFT account request. Nice.»

    Frank Slootweg used a different method, based on method #1 above.

    +++......................
    I think the point is that you have to switch the network off, not
    *when* the install procedure asks for a Microsoft Account, but *before*
    it gets the chance to do so.

    FWIW, on July 27, I used the following method to install my new laptop without a Microsoft account:

    - Follow normal procedure, including connecting to the network, upto

    "Please review the Licence Agreement"

    I stopped at this point, because I knew from web research that the
    next part would ask for a Microsoft Account.

    - Switched off Wi-Fi (Flight mode on).

    -> [Accept] ->

    "Who is going to use this device?

    You'll use this name to sign in to your device."

    So the installation procedure now accepts a local account ('Frank')
    instead of only a Microsoft Account, because the network (Wi-Fi) has
    been switched off.

    - This was confirmed by the rest of the text:

    "Is this account for a child or a teenager?

    If so, consider signing in with a Microsoft account.
    ...
    For more information, use another device and visit
    aka.ms/accounttype."

    "Enter your name" -> Frank -> [Next] ->

    "Create a really memorable password"

    - Just to be on the safe side, I proceeded through the "Security
    question"s, location permission (no), 'Find my device' (no), 'Send
    diagnostic data' (no) and then:

    Switched on Wi-Fi (Flight mode off).

    - Performed the rest of the installation.

    So all in all, despite 'reports' to the contrary, I think that
    switching off the network *before* the installation procedure asks for a Microsoft Account, *still* works.

    N.B. I switched off Wi-Fi (Flight mode on), because that was the
    easiest on a/this laptop, just a key-press. On a non-laptop, the
    "ipconfig /release" trick might work, but IMO it's better to be safe
    than sorry and just pull the LAN cable if the computer has a hardwired connection.
    ......................++-

    I pasted it complete because it is the post I have saved in my archive.


    HTH

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Mon Mar 27 02:46:02 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 23:34, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    which was also posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10, so it will be in
    Google Groups.

    Hi Carlos,
    When you say it will be "in Google Groups", did you check it first?

    Try these three URLs please... in what you term "google groups"
    please... alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Specifically:
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-11> <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-10> <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    If _that_ is what you mean by being "in google groups", it's not.

    It is not my fault that google groups is broken. And it was not me who
    said that alt.comp.os.windows-10 is in google groups but
    alt.comp.os.windows-11 is not.

    Of course I did not check.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Mon Mar 27 01:33:12 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)
    --
    "...while we wait for the blessed hope--the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good." --
    Titus 2:13-14. Slammy weekend including a hour nap today. Is winter over yet? Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
    | |o o| |
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Sun Mar 26 22:03:38 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 3/26/2023 8:46 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2023-03-26 23:34, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    which was also posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10, so it will be in Google Groups.

    Hi Carlos,
    When you say it will be "in Google Groups", did you check it first?

    Try these three URLs please... in what you term "google groups" please... alt.comp.os.windows-11,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Specifically:
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-11>
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.os.windows-10>
    <http://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    If _that_ is what you mean by being "in google groups", it's not.

    It is not my fault that google groups is broken. And it was not me who said that alt.comp.os.windows-10 is in google groups but alt.comp.os.windows-11 is not.

    Of course I did not check.


    Google Groups stopped adding groups, some time ago.

    It has added a ton of its own private groups.
    Which nobody cares about.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Mar 27 04:46:51 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Paul wrote:

    Google Groups stopped adding groups, some time ago.

    It has added a ton of its own private groups.
    Which nobody cares about.

    Hi Paul,

    I often run a search before asking questions, and when researching
    issues to help answer others, so I've been involved in this for years.

    I think your assumption is not quite accurate, as I have been using Google Groups archival links for many years, but I didn't do any explicit research
    so it's just my "experienced assumption" that Google _does_ add groups.

    They're just extremely selective about which groups they bother to add. :)

    In fact, on this very newsgroup we _created_ the tinyurl links of the past:
    <alt.comp.microsoft.windows>
    <microsoft.public.windowsxp.general>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-11>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-10>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-8>
    <alt.windows7.general>
    <alt.msdos.batch>
    <alt.os.linux>
    <comp.mobile.android>
    <comp.mobile.ipad>
    <misc.phone.mobile.iphone>
    <alt.comp.freeware>
    etc.

    Which was well before Google changed their archival links to something easy
    to remember, but when the "N" archives used exactly those monikers, namely:
    <https://alt.comp.microsoft.windows.narchive.com>
    <https://microsoft.public.windowsxp.general.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.comp.os.windows-11.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.comp.os.windows-8.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.windows7.general.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.msdos.batch.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.os.linux.narchive.com>
    <https://comp.mobile.android.narchive.com>
    <https://comp.mobile.ipad.narchive.com>
    <https://misc.phone.mobile.iphone.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.comp.freeware.narchive.com>
    etc.

    What I had created were tinyurl links which were the best I could do then:
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-microsoft-windows>
    <https://tinyurl.com/microsoft-public-windowsxp-gen> (30-character limit)
    I also had created an easier URL:<https://tinyurl.com/windowsxp-general>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-11> At the time this didn't exist for me to set up
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-8>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-7>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-windows7-general>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-msdos-batch>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux>
    <https://tinyurl.com/comp-mobile-android>
    <https://tinyurl.com/comp-mobile-ipad>
    <https://tinyurl.com/misc-phone-mobile-iphone>
    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-freeware>
    etc.

    Note these are all so old they link to the now-deprecated Google Groups:
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-11> At the time this didn't exist for me to set up
    <http://www.pcbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=52> for Windows 10
    <http://www.pcbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=50> for Windows-8
    <http://www.pcbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=48> for Windows-7
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.msdos.batch>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.os.linux>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/comp.mobile.android>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/comp.mobile.ipad>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/misc.phone.mobile.iphone>
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/alt.comp.freeware>
    etc.

    Which, after the great reshuffling, currently boil down to the following
    much easier to remember and logically derived Google Groups search links:
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-11>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-10>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-8>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.msdos.batch>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.ipad>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware>
    etc.

    In summary, I "think" Google _does_ add groups when _they_ see fit.
    They just do NOT see fit to add Windows variants as archived groups.
    --
    Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information
    which, in this case, is to faithfully elucidate group search archival URLs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mr. Man-wai Chang@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Mon Mar 27 16:19:49 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 27/3/2023 12:33 am, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Disable all internet connections during the upgrade! You might want to
    turn off the wifi router connecting your PC. This way the installation
    process would be forced to go local account.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Mon Mar 27 11:59:55 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-27 05:46, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Paul wrote:

    Google Groups stopped adding groups, some time ago.

    It has added a ton of its own private groups.
    Which nobody cares about.


    ...

    Which was well before Google changed their archival links to something easy to remember, but when the "N" archives used exactly those monikers, namely: <https://alt.comp.microsoft.windows.narchive.com> <https://microsoft.public.windowsxp.general.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-11.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-8.narchive.com>

    Site not found.


    What I had created were tinyurl links which were the best I could do then:

    One more reason not to use tiny URLs.
    Albeit they work in this case.

    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-microsoft-windows> <https://tinyurl.com/microsoft-public-windowsxp-gen> (30-character limit)
    I also had created an easier URL:<https://tinyurl.com/windowsxp-general> <alt.comp.os.windows-11> At the time this didn't exist for me to set up <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10>

    Redirects to <http://www.pcbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=52>

    ...

    Which, after the great reshuffling, currently boil down to the following
    much easier to remember and logically derived Google Groups search links: <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    This one works.

    <https://groups.google.com/g/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general> <alt.comp.os.windows-11>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-10>
    <alt.comp.os.windows-8>
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.msdos.batch> <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.ipad> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone> <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware>
    etc.

    In summary, I "think" Google _does_ add groups when _they_ see fit.
    They just do NOT see fit to add Windows variants as archived groups.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From wasbit@21:1/5 to Minoru Osaka on Mon Mar 27 10:51:30 2023
    On 26/03/2023 20:03, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:25:38 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    On 2023-03-26 18:33, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows
    11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$
    Account?


    No. I don't have a Microsoft account in Windows 8, 10 or 11

    If you search on this group (windows-11), going back a year or more,
    for the word "account" in the Subject line you will find a few posts.

    All I want is a yes or no if you've done it as I do not want to create an account and then delete it or to have to do any strange things at all.


    Therein lies the problem.
    There are ways of achieving what you want but not (as far as I know) a
    one click solution.

    As long as it will let me switch from Windows 10 to 11 without creating any account and without having to do strange unfamiliar things other than to
    hit the "no I do not want to create an account" button, I'm OK with that.

    Is it as easy as you intimate in that there is an obivous "SKIP" button?

    --
    Regards
    wasbit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Mar 27 13:24:09 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-26 23:14, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2023-03-26 22:41, Paul wrote:
    On 3/26/2023 3:06 PM, Peter wrote:
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    If you search on this group (windows-11)

    Given many usenet nntp servers automatically expire articles quickly,
    and given most newsgroups are archived by Google but not this one,
    what web search engine do you suggest for archives of this newsgroup?


    Let's test.

    This is as far back as I can go right now, on Eternal-September.

        15 May 2022

    <t5rtfn$b70c$1@news.mixmin.net>

    I have, locally, posts going back to Jan 2022 in the Windows 11 group.

    I missed other threads. For example, from last October:

    Current best way to set up a local account

    There is also a discussion on using on MSA, then deleting it (and
    telling M$ to close it).

    And beware if the disk is encrypted.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Mar 27 13:51:15 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    It is not my fault that google groups is broken. And it was not me who
    said that alt.comp.os.windows-10 is in google groups but alt.comp.os.windows-11 is not.

    neither a.c.o.w10 or a.c.o.w11 exist in google groups, but a.c.m.w does
    exist

    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Mon Mar 27 14:03:50 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Andy Burnelli wrote:

    when the "N" archives used exactly those monikers, namely: <https://alt.comp.microsoft.windows.narchive.com> <https://microsoft.public.windowsxp.general.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-11.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.os.windows-8.narchive.com> <https://alt.windows7.general.narchive.com> <https://alt.msdos.batch.narchive.com>
    <https://alt.os.linux.narchive.com> <https://comp.mobile.android.narchive.com> <https://comp.mobile.ipad.narchive.com> <https://misc.phone.mobile.iphone.narchive.com> <https://alt.comp.freeware.narchive.com>
    etc.

    I presume you mean narkive.com rather than narchive.com in all those
    URLs? unfortunately narkive seems to have thinned-down to under 20
    groups,not including any of the above, can that be right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 27 15:42:26 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 2023-03-27 14:51, Andy Burns wrote:
    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    It is not my fault that google groups is broken. And it was not me who
    said that alt.comp.os.windows-10 is in google groups but
    alt.comp.os.windows-11 is not.

    neither a.c.o.w10 or a.c.o.w11 exist in google groups, but a.c.m.w does
    exist

    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>


    I'll try to remember.

    However, my upstream doesn't have alt.comp.microsoft.windows. In fact,
    nothing "alt.comp.microsoft"

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to Ant on Mon Mar 27 07:59:30 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost
    always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Mar 27 16:44:32 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    my upstream doesn't have alt.comp.microsoft.windows. In fact, nothing "alt.comp.microsoft"

    My main server NIN doesn't, I have a secondary account on giganews which
    does

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Mar 27 08:56:27 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    <https://alt.comp.os.windows-8.narchive.com>

    Site not found.

    Thanks for checking that where the "N" archives have never been reliable.
    I use them only when I can't use the "G" archives (mostly for Windows).

    What I had created were tinyurl links which were the best I could do then:

    One more reason not to use tiny URLs.
    Albeit they work in this case.

    The main reason for using the tinyurls is that Google DejaNews archives
    used hard-to-remember links with "/forum/#!forum/" inside of them.

    Years after I painstakingly created all the tinyurls, Google simplified
    the web-search URL to just "g", which basically retired the tinyurls.

    <https://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10>

    Redirects to <http://www.pcbanter.net/forumdisplay.php?f=52>

    Yup. Frank Slootweg and I made the decision, years ago, to link it
    to that since the Windows-10 newsgroup isn't on the "G" archives.

    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows>

    This one works.

    Yup. That's why I recommended all significant threads (e.g., tutorials)
    be cross posted to alt.comp.microsoft.windows (for archival & search use).

    In summary, I "think" Google _does_ add groups when _they_ see fit.
    They just do NOT see fit to add Windows variants as archived groups.

    Andy Burns & Grant Taylor know more about it than I do, as shown here.
    *Grant Taylor*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware/c/SInASENSXmg/m/bqz2rD6wAgAJ>
    *Andy Burns*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows/c/UEmWBLlelto/m/P2jJpv8pBwAJ>

    Bear in mind the intent of these web-searchable URLs is to search but
    not necessarily to post (which I'm sure you can do, but I don't do that).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 27 09:10:44 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Andy Burns wrote:

    I presume you mean narkive.com rather than narchive.com in all those
    URLs? unfortunately narkive seems to have thinned-down to under 20 groups,not including any of the above, can that be right?

    Darn. My mistake. Yes. Narkive.
    (I thought I had tested them, but errors crept in somehow.)

    I use narkive as the search engine of last resort as it's unreliable.

    Google groups is my first web-archives search engine for most newsgroups
    (but it doesn't work for Windows-10 and Windows-11 as you are well aware).

    Then comes pc-banter.
    Last is the google normal search engine.

    In almost all cases, you have to already know what exists to find it.

    I mostly use the search engine to search before asking a question, or, on technical groups, to search for a detailed answer that I need to brush up
    upon.
    --
    Sometimes I use it to prove iKooks wrong since they never remember anything we've discussed (iKooks are moronic revanchists in the most shocking ways).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Mon Mar 27 17:55:59 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote: >>> I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11. >>> I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account? >>
    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost
    always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong. And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine.

    Excessive virtualization and foolery, is how you get in a mess like that.

    Not publishing a detailed block diagram model of your OS, is how
    you get in a mess like that. There is no security through obscurity.
    None whatsoever.

    There comes a point, where if you put enough crap into an OS,
    it becomes a liability for everyone. Company and users.

    Reporting incidents through the Feedback Hub, is a piss poor
    mode of alerting someone to what has happened. There is no guarantee
    every report has been read by a human.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 27 16:45:00 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:55:59 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote: >>>> I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11. >>>> I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances. >>>> If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account? >>>
    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost
    always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong.


    OK, we all have different opinions and different preferences. See
    below for a couple of comments.

    And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine.

    I don't use the Windows task manager. Instead I use the third-party
    Task Manager Deluxe, which I think is much better.

    I don't think everything built into Windows 11 is great, nor did I
    think everything in any prior version was great. So I use third-party
    utilities and application programs whenever I think they are better
    than what comes with Windows or what Microsoft offers separately. I
    won't bother to list them all, but there are a bunch besides Task
    Manager Deluxe, starting with Start11, Winaero Tweaker, and Firefox.

    But I do think it's best to stay up-to-date with Windows versions,
    primarily because sooner or later some hardware or program or an
    updated version of a program you run is released and you want or need
    it. And when that happens, you may find that it won't run with an
    older Windows version.

    Another reason is that if you let a version or two go by before you
    upgrade to the latest version, most people will find it harder to
    adapt to all the changes in the new version. Getting changes a little
    at a time is easier.

    Reporting incidents through the Feedback Hub, is a piss poor
    mode of alerting someone to what has happened. There is no guarantee
    every report has been read by a human.


    Yes, I agree.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Wed Mar 29 12:33:29 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:55:59 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances. >>>> If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost
    always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong.


    OK, we all have different opinions and different preferences. See
    below for a couple of comments.

    And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine.

    I don't use the Windows task manager. Instead I use the third-party
    Task Manager Deluxe, which I think is much better.

    I don't think everything built into Windows 11 is great, nor did I
    think everything in any prior version was great. So I use third-party utilities and application programs whenever I think they are better
    than what comes with Windows or what Microsoft offers separately. I
    won't bother to list them all, but there are a bunch besides Task
    Manager Deluxe, starting with Start11, Winaero Tweaker, and Firefox.

    So basically you're saying you need third-party utilities/programs to un-break stuff in the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the
    earlier version(s)! :-( I think you just made Paul's point.

    But I do think it's best to stay up-to-date with Windows versions,
    primarily because sooner or later some hardware or program or an
    updated version of a program you run is released and you want or need
    it. And when that happens, you may find that it won't run with an
    older Windows version.

    And *if* such a thing happens, which isn't all that likely, it's early
    enough to consider 'upgrading' to a newer Windows version. BTW, "an
    updated version of a program you run" is even less important/common,
    because in most cases you can just continue to use the 'old' working
    version.

    Another reason is that if you let a version or two go by before you
    upgrade to the latest version, most people will find it harder to
    adapt to all the changes in the new version. Getting changes a little
    at a time is easier.

    'True', but it's probably better to have a week of horror instead of
    many years of constant annoyance from changing/breaking stuff.

    But yes, I have 'upgraded' too, but only because 1) a new machine came
    with Windows 11 (and most likely could not be 'downgraded' to 8.1) and
    2) the wife's 8.1 machine ran out of (Extended) support , so I 'had' to 'upgrade' it to 10).

    Reporting incidents through the Feedback Hub, is a piss poor
    mode of alerting someone to what has happened. There is no guarantee
    every report has been read by a human.

    Yes, I agree.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 29 13:04:28 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 29 Mar 2023 12:33:29 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:55:59 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances. >> >>>> If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost
    always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong.


    OK, we all have different opinions and different preferences. See
    below for a couple of comments.

    And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine. >>
    I don't use the Windows task manager. Instead I use the third-party
    Task Manager Deluxe, which I think is much better.

    I don't think everything built into Windows 11 is great, nor did I
    think everything in any prior version was great. So I use third-party
    utilities and application programs whenever I think they are better
    than what comes with Windows or what Microsoft offers separately. I
    won't bother to list them all, but there are a bunch besides Task
    Manager Deluxe, starting with Start11, Winaero Tweaker, and Firefox.

    So basically you're saying you need third-party utilities/programs to
    un-break stuff in the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the >earlier version(s)! :-( I think you just made Paul's point.


    No, that's not at all what I'm saying.

    I wasn't talking about broken stuff. Yes, occasionally something
    doesn't work the way it's supposed to, but in my experience that's
    been rare.

    What I was talking about was stuff that doesn't work the way *I* would
    like it to. Note the stress on "I." Just because I don't like the way
    something works doesn't mean everybody doesn't. Some people like
    changes that I dislike. As an example, I know several people who like
    and use Edge, even though I think it's the worst of all browsers.

    So whenever I can make things more to my liking with third-party utilities/programs (continuing my example above, I use Firefox instead
    of Edge) that's what I do.

    And there's nothing special about Windows in this regard. The same is
    often true of new version of most software. I don't like all changes
    and when I can set things more to my liking with third-party utilities/programs, that's what I do. As an example, I use many
    Firefox extensions.

    There's not a single program I have ever used, by Microsoft or anyone
    else, in which everything is completely the way I would like it to be.
    If I were in change of designing them, I would make a number of
    changes,

    And note that there would certainly be some people who wouldn't like
    the changes I would make. We're all different, work in different ways,
    and have different likes and dislikes. That's why options in programs
    are good; in a sense, using a third party utility/program is
    exercising an option that just wasn't built in.

    You said "need" above. No I don't "need" to do that. I do it because I
    want to and prefer the result if I do.



    But I do think it's best to stay up-to-date with Windows versions,
    primarily because sooner or later some hardware or program or an
    updated version of a program you run is released and you want or need
    it. And when that happens, you may find that it won't run with an
    older Windows version.

    And *if* such a thing happens, which isn't all that likely,

    On the contrary, I think it's virtually guaranteed for most people.
    The only questions are what hardware, what software, and when does it
    happen.


    it's early
    enough to consider 'upgrading' to a newer Windows version. BTW, "an
    updated version of a program you run" is even less important/common,
    because in most cases you can just continue to use the 'old' working
    version.

    True of many programs, but far from all.


    Another reason is that if you let a version or two go by before you
    upgrade to the latest version, most people will find it harder to
    adapt to all the changes in the new version. Getting changes a little
    at a time is easier.

    'True', but it's probably better to have a week of horror

    What you might find "a week of horror," for many other people might be
    many weeks of continuous problems trying to figure out to how to do
    things.


    instead of
    many years of constant annoyance from changing/breaking stuff.


    I've been running Windows 11 since it was first released--about a year
    and a half now.. I have had *no* constant annoyance. Almost no
    annoyances at all. don't remember having any problems with something
    breaking and the things that were changed that I wanted back the way
    they were, I adjusted by choosing options and using third-party
    software almost from day 1.

    Yes, it would have been better if those options were built into
    Windows; an example is the inability to have a vertical task bar
    without using a third-party program. Perhaps that could be called an
    annoyance, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a very minor annoyance
    since it can be fixed so easily and so quickly.

    Yes, I know there are some people who refuse to use third-party
    programs and are therefore stuck with whatever is built into Windows.
    Sometimes they can't use a third-party program because their employee
    forbids, so yes, those thing that I consider minor can be very major
    for them. But for home users of Windows 11, refusal to use a
    third-party program is just foolishness as far as I'm concerned.
    Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on producing quality software and in
    many cases they are way behind the competition in my opinion.

    Is Windows 11 perfect? No. Far from it. Yes, I wish it had been
    designed more to my liking, but it's been easy to adjust it more to my
    liking and I'm generally happy with it.

    But yes, I have 'upgraded' too, but only because 1) a new machine came
    with Windows 11 (and most likely could not be 'downgraded' to 8.1) and

    Couldn't you clean install 8.1?


    2) the wife's 8.1 machine ran out of (Extended) support , so I 'had' to >'upgrade' it to 10).


    Had to? Not as far as I'm concerned.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Thu Mar 30 14:16:43 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On 29 Mar 2023 12:33:29 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:55:59 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost >> >> always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong.


    OK, we all have different opinions and different preferences. See
    below for a couple of comments.

    And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine. >>
    I don't use the Windows task manager. Instead I use the third-party
    Task Manager Deluxe, which I think is much better.

    I don't think everything built into Windows 11 is great, nor did I
    think everything in any prior version was great. So I use third-party
    utilities and application programs whenever I think they are better
    than what comes with Windows or what Microsoft offers separately. I
    won't bother to list them all, but there are a bunch besides Task
    Manager Deluxe, starting with Start11, Winaero Tweaker, and Firefox.

    So basically you're saying you need third-party utilities/programs to
    un-break stuff in the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the >earlier version(s)! :-( I think you just made Paul's point.

    No, that's not at all what I'm saying.

    I wasn't talking about broken stuff. Yes, occasionally something
    doesn't work the way it's supposed to, but in my experience that's
    been rare.

    What I was talking about was stuff that doesn't work the way *I* would
    like it to. Note the stress on "I." Just because I don't like the way something works doesn't mean everybody doesn't. Some people like
    changes that I dislike. As an example, I know several people who like
    and use Edge, even though I think it's the worst of all browsers.

    So whenever I can make things more to my liking with third-party utilities/programs (continuing my example above, I use Firefox instead
    of Edge) that's what I do.

    And there's nothing special about Windows in this regard. The same is
    often true of new version of most software. I don't like all changes
    and when I can set things more to my liking with third-party utilities/programs, that's what I do. As an example, I use many
    Firefox extensions.

    "I don't like all changes" is what I meant by "to un-break stuff in
    the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the earlier
    version(s)!". Many and even most changes are for no good reason and - as
    also you've said - they *change* things, instead of offering new
    functionality and leaving the old functionality in tact.

    There's not a single program I have ever used, by Microsoft or anyone
    else, in which everything is completely the way I would like it to be.
    If I were in change of designing them, I would make a number of
    changes,

    And note that there would certainly be some people who wouldn't like
    the changes I would make. We're all different, work in different ways,
    and have different likes and dislikes. That's why options in programs
    are good; in a sense, using a third party utility/program is
    exercising an option that just wasn't built in.

    You said "need" above. No I don't "need" to do that. I do it because I
    want to and prefer the result if I do.

    Effectively, people *do* need to do that or be forced to live with the changed and often decreased/worse functionality. The change is forced on
    us, whether we like it or not.

    But I do think it's best to stay up-to-date with Windows versions,
    primarily because sooner or later some hardware or program or an
    updated version of a program you run is released and you want or need
    it. And when that happens, you may find that it won't run with an
    older Windows version.

    And *if* such a thing happens, which isn't all that likely,

    On the contrary, I think it's virtually guaranteed for most people.
    The only questions are what hardware, what software, and when does it
    happen.

    I don't think it's all that likely. People often 'upgrade' because
    they think they have to or/and they throw their hands in the air at the
    first minor hurdle.

    Anyway, I haven't had any real compatibility problems yet in two
    decades. But yes, that's anecdotal (non-)evidence and so is yours, so we
    better leave it at YMMV.

    it's early
    enough to consider 'upgrading' to a newer Windows version. BTW, "an
    updated version of a program you run" is even less important/common, >because in most cases you can just continue to use the 'old' working >version.

    True of many programs, but far from all.

    I'll settle for "most"! :-)

    Another reason is that if you let a version or two go by before you
    upgrade to the latest version, most people will find it harder to
    adapt to all the changes in the new version. Getting changes a little
    at a time is easier.

    'True', but it's probably better to have a week of horror

    What you might find "a week of horror," for many other people might be
    many weeks of continuous problems trying to figure out to how to do
    things.

    Well, the new version is supposed to be "better", "improved", etc.,
    isn't it? So it should be a piece of cake! :-) Just kidding.

    FWIW, I jumped from 8.1. to 11, so a *BIG* jump and it only took about
    a week.

    instead of
    many years of constant annoyance from changing/breaking stuff.


    I've been running Windows 11 since it was first released--about a year
    and a half now.. I have had *no* constant annoyance. Almost no
    annoyances at all. don't remember having any problems with something breaking and the things that were changed that I wanted back the way
    they were, I adjusted by choosing options and using third-party
    software almost from day 1.

    I wasn't referring to just Windows 11, but to the whole Windows
    lifecycle, i.e. from XP on. For me that's 20 years. From 8.1, it's 8
    years.

    As to breaking things, I lost track on how many things Windows 11
    broke in my five months of (real) use. Most things broke in the last
    month (granted, I delayed 22H2 because of extended (3 month) absence).
    And by broken I also mean (substantially) changed functionality which
    needs fixing or working around.

    This month list from the top of my head:

    - Broken Command Prompt windows (Windows Terminal instead of Windows
    Console Host).
    - Totally changed Notepad,
    - Icons stuck (can not be moved) on Taskbar.
    - Windows Update restarting the system without warning (on the Taskbar).
    - Internet access broken by new driver (installed by Windows Update)
    or/and 'something' changing an advanced driver property.

    Yes, it would have been better if those options were built into
    Windows; an example is the inability to have a vertical task bar
    without using a third-party program. Perhaps that could be called an annoyance, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a very minor annoyance
    since it can be fixed so easily and so quickly.

    Yes, I know there are some people who refuse to use third-party
    programs and are therefore stuck with whatever is built into Windows. Sometimes they can't use a third-party program because their employee forbids, so yes, those thing that I consider minor can be very major
    for them. But for home users of Windows 11, refusal to use a
    third-party program is just foolishness as far as I'm concerned.
    Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on producing quality software and in
    many cases they are way behind the competition in my opinion.

    Yes, I also use third-party software. For this new Windows 11 system,
    I started again from scratch and only installed my 'must have' add ons
    and will install others as the need (re-)arises.

    My point is that whether we like it or not, we *have* to adjust, there
    is no other choice. Do we get anything in return? AFAIC, no. For me,
    Windows 11 offers no functionality over 8.1 (or even Vista and XP (never
    used 7)).

    Bottom line: Let's agree to 'disagree'.

    Is Windows 11 perfect? No. Far from it. Yes, I wish it had been
    designed more to my liking, but it's been easy to adjust it more to my
    liking and I'm generally happy with it.

    But yes, I have 'upgraded' too, but only because 1) a new machine came
    with Windows 11 (and most likely could not be 'downgraded' to 8.1) and

    Couldn't you clean install 8.1?

    8.1 was an OEM license, i.e. no install media and not allowed to be
    used on another computer. And it's unlikely that it would work_on/
    support the new system.

    2) the wife's 8.1 machine ran out of (Extended) support , so I 'had' to >'upgrade' it to 10).

    Had to? Not as far as I'm concerned.

    Agreed, that's why I wrote "had" in scare quotes.

    Thanks for your response and sharing your view(s).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken Blake@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 30 08:45:33 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    On 30 Mar 2023 14:16:43 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On 29 Mar 2023 12:33:29 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:55:59 -0400, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 3/27/2023 10:59 AM, Ken Blake wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:33:12 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.microsoft.windows Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:
    I have Windows 10 Home & Pro - which is nagging me to move to Windows 11.
    I do NOT wish to establish a Microsoft Account under any circumstances.
    If I move to Windows 11 (on Pro or Home) - must I establish a M$ Account?

    Or better. Don't upgrade. :)


    I completely disagree. In my opinion, for almost everyone, it's almost >> >> >> always the best choice to run on the latest version of Windows.


    I think you're dead wrong.


    OK, we all have different opinions and different preferences. See
    below for a couple of comments.

    And this is why.

    This is what happens when reach exceeds grasp.

    http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3CXnsAFD496534B6Fnilch1%40wheedledeedle.moc%3E

    Windows 7 would not do that, because it does not
    have the technical capability to do that.

    The Task Manager is no longer sufficient to keep control of your machine.

    I don't use the Windows task manager. Instead I use the third-party
    Task Manager Deluxe, which I think is much better.

    I don't think everything built into Windows 11 is great, nor did I
    think everything in any prior version was great. So I use third-party
    utilities and application programs whenever I think they are better
    than what comes with Windows or what Microsoft offers separately. I
    won't bother to list them all, but there are a bunch besides Task
    Manager Deluxe, starting with Start11, Winaero Tweaker, and Firefox.

    So basically you're saying you need third-party utilities/programs to
    un-break stuff in the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the
    earlier version(s)! :-( I think you just made Paul's point.

    No, that's not at all what I'm saying.

    I wasn't talking about broken stuff. Yes, occasionally something
    doesn't work the way it's supposed to, but in my experience that's
    been rare.

    What I was talking about was stuff that doesn't work the way *I* would
    like it to. Note the stress on "I." Just because I don't like the way
    something works doesn't mean everybody doesn't. Some people like
    changes that I dislike. As an example, I know several people who like
    and use Edge, even though I think it's the worst of all browsers.

    So whenever I can make things more to my liking with third-party
    utilities/programs (continuing my example above, I use Firefox instead
    of Edge) that's what I do.

    And there's nothing special about Windows in this regard. The same is
    often true of new version of most software. I don't like all changes
    and when I can set things more to my liking with third-party
    utilities/programs, that's what I do. As an example, I use many
    Firefox extensions.

    "I don't like all changes" is what I meant by "to un-break stuff in
    the newer Windows version, which wasn't broken in the earlier
    version(s)!".


    OK. I didn't take it that way,


    Many and even most changes are for no good reason

    We completely agree on that. They need to have a substantial number of
    changes, or else nobody will upgrade, Almost nobody wants to upgrade
    to something that's essentially the same as what they are running.

    One other point: I think Microsoft wanted to make Windows more like
    smart phones and tablets, because if it continued being very
    different, many young people would never use it.

    and - as
    also you've said - they *change* things, instead of offering new >functionality and leaving the old functionality in tact.


    Yes, yes, yes! Offer new functionality as an option, or even make it
    the default and keep the old functionality as an option. *Never*
    remove old functionality, since if you do, it will undoubtedly piss
    off many people. That goes for Microsoft and all other software
    companies.

    There's not a single program I have ever used, by Microsoft or anyone
    else, in which everything is completely the way I would like it to be.
    If I were in change of designing them, I would make a number of
    changes,

    And note that there would certainly be some people who wouldn't like
    the changes I would make. We're all different, work in different ways,
    and have different likes and dislikes. That's why options in programs
    are good; in a sense, using a third party utility/program is
    exercising an option that just wasn't built in.

    You said "need" above. No I don't "need" to do that. I do it because I
    want to and prefer the result if I do.

    Effectively, people *do* need to do that or be forced to live with the
    changed and often decreased/worse functionality. The change is forced on
    us, whether we like it or not.

    We disagree. Many people continue to use older versions of Windows.


    But I do think it's best to stay up-to-date with Windows versions,
    primarily because sooner or later some hardware or program or an
    updated version of a program you run is released and you want or need
    it. And when that happens, you may find that it won't run with an
    older Windows version.

    And *if* such a thing happens, which isn't all that likely,

    On the contrary, I think it's virtually guaranteed for most people.
    The only questions are what hardware, what software, and when does it
    happen.

    I don't think it's all that likely. People often 'upgrade' because
    they think they have to

    Alas, yes. That's true of *many* people. They think they do but they
    seldom have to.


    or/and they throw their hands in the air at the
    first minor hurdle.



    Alas, yes. Instead of finding out how to fix it.

    .
    Anyway, I haven't had any real compatibility problems yet in two
    decades.

    I haven't either, but I stay up-to-date with all my software, and even
    replace things like older printers and scanners periodically.

    But not everyone does what I (and you?) do, and sooner or later, they
    run into compatibility problems. As an example, I've often seen
    questions in the newsgroups and forums like "I Just upgraded to the
    new version of Windows and now my (old) XXXX printer doesn't work.
    What can I do?" The answer, of course, is "buy a new printer that's
    supported in the new version of Windows."

    But yes, that's anecdotal (non-)evidence and so is yours, so we
    better leave it at YMMV.

    it's early
    enough to consider 'upgrading' to a newer Windows version. BTW, "an
    updated version of a program you run" is even less important/common,
    because in most cases you can just continue to use the 'old' working
    version.

    True of many programs, but far from all.

    I'll settle for "most"! :-)

    Depends of how old the program version is. If it's a recent version,
    but not the current one, yes, most. If it's a lot older, few.


    Another reason is that if you let a version or two go by before you
    upgrade to the latest version, most people will find it harder to
    adapt to all the changes in the new version. Getting changes a little
    at a time is easier.

    'True', but it's probably better to have a week of horror

    What you might find "a week of horror," for many other people might be
    many weeks of continuous problems trying to figure out to how to do
    things.

    Well, the new version is supposed to be "better", "improved", etc.,
    isn't it? So it should be a piece of cake! :-) Just kidding.

    Yes, I understand your joke, and I agree with you. It *should* be a
    piece of cake, but it often isn't.

    For people who are technically proficient, like most of us here in the newsgroup, it usually isn't very hard, but for the average home user,
    it often is.


    FWIW, I jumped from 8.1. to 11, so a *BIG* jump and it only took about
    a week.

    instead of
    many years of constant annoyance from changing/breaking stuff.


    I've been running Windows 11 since it was first released--about a year
    and a half now.. I have had *no* constant annoyance. Almost no
    annoyances at all. don't remember having any problems with something
    breaking and the things that were changed that I wanted back the way
    they were, I adjusted by choosing options and using third-party
    software almost from day 1.

    I wasn't referring to just Windows 11, but to the whole Windows
    lifecycle, i.e. from XP on. For me that's 20 years. From 8.1, it's 8
    years.

    I started with Windows 2.0 and have run every version since then,
    except for the NT versions (an aside: I even ran Windows 3.11, and not
    just WFWG 3.11). For me if's 30+ years. My comment applies to all
    those versions.


    As to breaking things, I lost track on how many things Windows 11
    broke in my five months of (real) use. Most things broke in the last
    month (granted, I delayed 22H2 because of extended (3 month) absence).
    And by broken I also mean (substantially) changed functionality which
    needs fixing or working around.


    OK, but your definition is very different from mine and I think that
    of most people. As far as I'm concerned, "broken" mean failing to
    work, crashing.

    What you call "broken" doesn't bother me much because the fixes and work-arounds are usually easy to find and implement.



    This month list from the top of my head:

    - Broken Command Prompt windows (Windows Terminal instead of Windows
    Console Host).
    - Totally changed Notepad,
    - Icons stuck (can not be moved) on Taskbar.
    - Windows Update restarting the system without warning (on the Taskbar).
    - Internet access broken by new driver (installed by Windows Update)
    or/and 'something' changing an advanced driver property.

    Yes, it would have been better if those options were built into
    Windows; an example is the inability to have a vertical task bar
    without using a third-party program. Perhaps that could be called an
    annoyance, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a very minor annoyance
    since it can be fixed so easily and so quickly.

    Yes, I know there are some people who refuse to use third-party
    programs and are therefore stuck with whatever is built into Windows.
    Sometimes they can't use a third-party program because their employee
    forbids, so yes, those thing that I consider minor can be very major
    for them. But for home users of Windows 11, refusal to use a
    third-party program is just foolishness as far as I'm concerned.
    Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on producing quality software and in
    many cases they are way behind the competition in my opinion.

    Yes, I also use third-party software. For this new Windows 11 system,
    I started again from scratch and only installed my 'must have' add ons
    and will install others as the need (re-)arises.

    I copied 10 from my old computer to my new one last October, then
    upgraded to 11. A few weeks ago, to fix a few problems I was having, I
    did a clean reinstallation of 10. It was a lot of work (about a week),
    but my problems are gone.


    My point is that whether we like it or not, we *have* to adjust, there
    is no other choice.

    Understood, but that bothers me less than it bothers you



    Do we get anything in return? AFAIC, no. For me,
    Windows 11 offers no functionality over 8.1 (or even Vista and XP (never
    used 7)).

    No new functionality (or at least very little), but at least in some
    respects, some improved functionality (don't ask me for details; as
    usual, when I move to a new version, I put the previous one out of my
    head and forget its details).


    Bottom line: Let's agree to 'disagree'.


    OK.


    Is Windows 11 perfect? No. Far from it. Yes, I wish it had been
    designed more to my liking, but it's been easy to adjust it more to my
    liking and I'm generally happy with it.

    But yes, I have 'upgraded' too, but only because 1) a new machine came
    with Windows 11 (and most likely could not be 'downgraded' to 8.1) and

    Couldn't you clean install 8.1?

    8.1 was an OEM license, i.e. no install media and not allowed to be
    used on another computer. And it's unlikely that it would work_on/
    support the new system.

    2) the wife's 8.1 machine ran out of (Extended) support , so I 'had' to
    'upgrade' it to 10).

    Had to? Not as far as I'm concerned.

    Agreed, that's why I wrote "had" in scare quotes.

    OK.


    Thanks for your response and sharing your view(s).


    You're welcome and thanks for sharing yours. I think we don't really
    disagree as much as it seemed at first. It's more that we say much the
    same things in different ways, and that some things that we both don't
    like bother you more than they bother me..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Manuram@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Thu Mar 30 18:00:00 2023
    On 30/03/2023 15:16, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    I don't think it's all that likely. People often 'upgrade' because
    they think they have to or/and they throw their hands in the air at the
    first minor hurdle.
    People are not quite as stupid as you think they are. People keep buying
    new stuff and invariably they get new things installed in it.

    General users don't go out of their way to upgrade their machine. They
    have better things to do than to spend an hour or two upgrading their
    machine. They might have somebody in the house who is keeping track of
    the systems but upgrading normally takes place when the machine goes to
    the technician for repair. The technician might say that there is a new
    Windows Operating system so I have decided to upgrade your machine
    because it is free.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Ken Blake on Thu Mar 30 18:13:42 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    On 30 Mar 2023 14:16:43 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
    wrote:
    Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote:
    [...]

    We indeed agree more than we disagree and if/when we 'disagree' we do
    so amably! :-)

    Just to clarify one minor, but important, point:

    I've been running Windows 11 since it was first released--about a year
    and a half now.. I have had *no* constant annoyance. Almost no
    annoyances at all. don't remember having any problems with something
    breaking and the things that were changed that I wanted back the way
    they were, I adjusted by choosing options and using third-party
    software almost from day 1.

    I wasn't referring to just Windows 11, but to the whole Windows
    lifecycle, i.e. from XP on. For me that's 20 years. From 8.1, it's 8
    years.

    I started with Windows 2.0 and have run every version since then,
    except for the NT versions (an aside: I even ran Windows 3.11, and not
    just WFWG 3.11). For me if's 30+ years. My comment applies to all
    those versions.

    With "from XP on", I meant the real Windows versions, based on the NT architecture, not the 'toys' which came before that.

    FYI, I used Windows from Windows 1.0 (aka Windows 286 or 386), so
    that's also 30++ years (Wikipedia says that it was released on November
    20, 1985). Touched some of the 9X etc. versions and used the NT
    versions.

    And before (and after) the Microsoft Windows versions, I used
    windowing [1] software on UNIX systems.

    [1] It also had "Windows" in the name, but Microsoft extorted 'us' and
    others to give up use of the term Windows, so that they (MS) could
    trademark it.

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Manuram on Thu Mar 30 18:49:10 2023
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.microsoft.windows

    [Newsgroups restored. Don't strip newsgroups without (very good) reason.]

    Manuram <MR@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/03/2023 15:16, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    I don't think it's all that likely. People often 'upgrade' because
    they think they have to or/and they throw their hands in the air at the first minor hurdle.

    People are not quite as stupid as you think they are.

    Easy does it! You might want to get that mindreader of yours fixed. I
    never said they are stupid.

    People keep buying
    new stuff and invariably they get new things installed in it.

    True, but I fail to see how that's relevant to my point(s).

    General users don't go out of their way to upgrade their machine. They
    have better things to do than to spend an hour or two upgrading their machine. They might have somebody in the house who is keeping track of
    the systems but upgrading normally takes place when the machine goes to
    the technician for repair. The technician might say that there is a new Windows Operating system so I have decided to upgrade your machine
    because it is free.

    I don't think we were talking about "General users", at least I wasn't
    and I don't think Ken was either.

    We're mainly talking about somewhat savy users, i.e. the kind of users
    who do search, do visit forums, subscribe to Usenet? :-), etc., but even
    those users often 'upgrade' for no good reason.

    Also note that 'upgrade' includes replacing a system by a new one - especially laptops, etc. - which has a newer Windows version. (As I
    mentioned, guilty as charged.)

    Other than that, welcome to the group(s)!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)