• M2 mini ssd vs Nvme

    From philo@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 15 11:16:55 2022
    Without reading the specs, I purchased an M2 to SSD adapter which of
    course did not work with the Nvme I have, so I had to purchase an
    adapter specifically made for Nvme.


    Just curious as to why the M2 ssd and Nvme have the same physical form
    factor.

    For a guy who started out in the punch card days, I find it slightly challenging to keep up with all this :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 15 19:51:59 2022
    Am 15.11.2022 um 11:16:55 Uhr schrieb philo:

    Just curious as to why the M2 ssd and Nvme have the same physical
    form factor.

    For a guy who started out in the punch card days, I find it slightly challenging to keep up with all this :)

    They have different ports, see here:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to philo on Tue Nov 15 15:38:23 2022
    On 11/15/2022 12:16 PM, philo wrote:
    Without reading the specs, I purchased an M2 to SSD adapter which of course did not work with the Nvme I have, so I had to purchase an adapter specifically made for Nvme.


    Just curious as to why the M2 ssd and Nvme have the same physical form factor.

    For a guy who started out in the punch card days, I find it slightly challenging to keep up with all this :)

    A number of the low voltage differential signaling standards,
    share similar characteristics.

    This means, if you "join the wrong things", there is no magic smoke.
    The circuit may not work, may not perform a function, but it is not
    blown out. The items are "voltage compatible". The terminators
    might be 100 ohm differential in all cases. Even HDMI and DP
    could be similar in that regard (but not a topic of discussion for
    this post).

    Differential circuits have a "common mode voltage range". Perhaps
    any voltage between 0 volts and 3 volts is acceptable.

    When they made Wifi modules, Wifi has both USB2 and PCI Express.
    They put those signals on separate pins. The USB runs at 5V,
    the PCI Express has that lower range to work with.

    Well, when they made NVMe modules (M.2), someone figured out
    "we can put the SATA signals on the same pins as the PCI Express
    signals". Because they shared similar common mode ranges. The
    packets will look slightly different.

    To provide some control of "what mates to what", they included
    keying slots. The circuit board on a plugin module, could be
    B or M or B&M. My NVMe here is an "M", which means it is
    PCI Express x4 only. There is no SATA option on that Samsung controller.

    A Wifi module would have a keying arrangement, so the
    module would not plug into an NVMe slot.

    This means, when an engineer builds a PCB for a computer, the
    BOM (bill of materials) has different part numbers for the
    NVMe socket versus the Wifi socket (on high end desktops). The
    part numbers have different keys molded into the insulation.

    PCI cards had keys. AGP cards had keys. The keys back then prevented
    wrong voltages from being mixed. For example, my P4B motherboard,
    had a feature to check what voltage the AGP card wanted to use.
    If a certain mis-keyed SIS video card happened to be plugged
    into the AGP slot (the keys weren't able to protect),
    there was a transistor to sense that the voltage indicator
    on the vid card was wrong. And that's what happens, when somebody
    makes a bad mistake, and other engineers have to come up with
    adhoc means of protecting their products from damage.

    I'm not going to analyze the various pinout options, but will
    leave it at "keying prevents not-compatible things from being mixed". Considering at least some of the standards on there, a PCIe or
    a SATA could use the same wires, and chances are, not blow anything out.
    That's why the pinout table says that PCI x2 or SATA could be
    presented to the signal pins, and it would work.

    PCIe_0 TX+ SATA TX+ \
    TX- TX- \
    RX+ RX+ \
    RX- RX- \___ How two different things can
    PCIe_1 TX+ / share interconnect.
    TX- /
    RX+ / The SATA option is a lot slower.
    RX- /

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From philo@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Tue Nov 15 14:35:27 2022
    On 11/15/2022 12:51 PM, Marco Moock wrote:
    Am 15.11.2022 um 11:16:55 Uhr schrieb philo:

    Just curious as to why the M2 ssd and Nvme have the same physical
    form factor.

    For a guy who started out in the punch card days, I find it slightly
    challenging to keep up with all this :)

    They have different ports, see here:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.2



    the Nvme fit perfectly in the ssd adaptor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From philo@21:1/5 to Paul on Tue Nov 15 15:08:26 2022
    On 11/15/22 2:38 PM, Paul wrote:
    On 11/15/2022 12:16 PM, philo wrote:
    Without reading the specs, I purchased an M2 to SSD adapter which of
    course did not work with the Nvme I have, so I had to purchase an
    adapter specifically made for Nvme.


    Just curious as to why the M2 ssd and Nvme have the same physical form
    factor.

    For a guy who started out in the punch card days, I find it slightly
    challenging to keep up with all this :)

    A number of the low voltage differential signaling standards,
    share similar characteristics.

    This means, if you "join the wrong things", there is no magic smoke.
    The circuit may not work, may not perform a function, but it is not
    blown out. The items are "voltage compatible". The terminators
    might be 100 ohm differential in all cases. Even HDMI and DP
    could be similar in that regard (but not a topic of discussion for
    this post).

    Differential circuits have a "common mode voltage range". Perhaps
    any voltage between 0 volts and 3 volts is acceptable.

    When they made Wifi modules, Wifi has both USB2 and PCI Express.
    They put those signals on separate pins. The USB runs at 5V,
    the PCI Express has that lower range to work with.

    Well, when they made NVMe modules (M.2), someone figured out
    "we can put the SATA signals on the same pins as the PCI Express
    signals". Because they shared similar common mode ranges. The
    packets will look slightly different.

    To provide some control of "what mates to what", they included
    keying slots. The circuit board on a plugin module, could be
    B or M or B&M. My NVMe here is an "M", which means it is
    PCI Express x4 only. There is no SATA option on that Samsung controller.

    A Wifi module would have a keying arrangement, so the
    module would not plug into an NVMe slot.

    This means, when an engineer builds a PCB for a computer, the
    BOM (bill of materials) has different part numbers for the
    NVMe socket versus the Wifi socket (on high end desktops). The
    part numbers have different keys molded into the insulation.

    PCI cards had keys. AGP cards had keys. The keys back then prevented
    wrong voltages from being mixed. For example, my P4B motherboard,
    had a feature to check what voltage the AGP card wanted to use.
    If a certain mis-keyed SIS video card happened to be plugged
    into the AGP slot (the keys weren't able to protect),
    there was a transistor to sense that the voltage indicator
    on the vid card was wrong. And that's what happens, when somebody
    makes a bad mistake, and other engineers have to come up with
    adhoc means of protecting their products from damage.

    I'm not going to analyze the various pinout options, but will
    leave it at "keying prevents not-compatible things from being mixed". Considering at least some of the standards on there, a PCIe or
    a SATA could use the same wires, and chances are, not blow anything out. That's why the pinout table says that PCI x2 or SATA could be
    presented to the signal pins, and it would work.

      PCIe_0  TX+       SATA TX+   \
              TX-            TX-    \
              RX+            RX+     \
              RX-            RX-      \___ How two different things can
      PCIe_1  TX+                     /    share interconnect.
              TX-                    /
              RX+                   /      The SATA option is a lot slower.
              RX-                  /

       Paul





    As always, thanks for the great information.

    In the future, maybe I will read the data sheets better.


    anyway, I was able to do a data recovery for my friend

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)