• How would you disable the Windows key from bringing up the start me

    From Mr. Man-wai Chang@21:1/5 to Arlen Holder on Mon Aug 6 01:02:47 2018
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10

    On 7/27/2018 1:07 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:

    Is there a way to disable *only* the Win key from popping up the start
    menu?


    You can just disable the Left Window$ key via registry?

    --
    @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
    / v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
    /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
    ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
    不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援
    (CSSA):
    http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Mark Lloyd on Mon Aug 6 18:39:14 2018
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10

    Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On 08/06/2018 12:23 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
    On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:52:55 -0500, notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> wrote:

    On 08/05/2018 12:02 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    [snip]

    You can just disable the Left Window$ key via registry?

    I like what you did to the 's' (in the OS name). It makes it seem more
    appropriate, especially with Window$ 8+.

    Meh. In the US, the character becomes a dollar sign, which makes no
    sense.


    What was it supposed to be?


    Is the group devolving to this ? /-:

    https://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Cat-Using-Your-Keyboard

    Three Parts:

    Preparing to Make a Cat
    Making a Basic Cat Face
    Creating More Complex Cats

    Research ASCII art cat faces online (i.e. Google for =^_^=)

    Something seems to have gone off the rails while
    you were Preparing to Make a Cat. Perhaps you didn't
    clear a large enough space on the table. Or the
    cat wasn't cooperating (they get really scared
    when they see scissors and oven mitts).

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gregory@21:1/5 to Mark Lloyd on Tue Aug 7 02:32:01 2018
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10

    On 06/08/2018 22:41, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    On 08/06/2018 12:23 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
    On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:52:55 -0500, notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> wrote:

    On 08/05/2018 12:02 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

    [snip]

    You can just disable the Left Window$ key via registry?

    I like what you did to the 's' (in the OS name). It makes it seem more
    appropriate, especially with Window$ 8+.

    Meh. In the US, the character becomes a dollar sign, which makes no
    sense.


    What was it supposed to be?


    Uh?

    It's supposed to be a dollar sign because Mico$oft Window$ is expensive software to use and Microsoft just want your $$$s.
    Very old joke first seen maybe 20 years ago.
    Even more appropriate in the case of Micro$oft Office.

    But since whoever it was that said it didn't make sense is in my kill
    file I assume he was just trolling us by pretending not to get it.

    --

    Brian Gregory (in England).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Sjouke Burry on Wed Aug 8 20:29:59 2018
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10

    Sjouke Burry wrote:
    On 8-8-2018 8:48, Chris wrote:
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    Stan Brown wrote:
    On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 02:32:01 +0100, Brian Gregory wrote:
    It's supposed to be a dollar sign because Mico$oft Window$ is
    expensive
    software to use and Microsoft just want your $$$s.
    Very old joke first seen maybe 20 years ago.


    And it was puerile and unfunny even then.

    I hold no brief for Microsoft, and I would cheerfully see them fall
    into a deep dark pit, but they're no different from any other company
    in wanting to make money off of us.

    Well, they are different in one way -- through license agreements
    very favorable to manufacturers, they've made it extremely difficult
    to get a non-Apple computer without Windows. If you could readily buy
    a computer with Linux and drivers for that computer's hardware
    preinstalled, I imagine Windows' market share would be quite a bit
    less than it is now, and Microsoft might actually have to do a better
    job in software quality.


    This article is dated November 16, 2017.

    https://fossbytes.com/dell-precision-linux-laptop-machine-ubuntu/

    "It is a 27-inch AIO workstation which offers Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    as an option along with RHEL WS v7.0 and Windows 10."

    I guess with those prices, just about anything is possible
    The machines offered vary between $1.5K and $5K. They're
    not Dollar Store computers.

    The Wifi didn't work out of the box on that one. And
    required some fiddling. Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Maybe the
    machine received an update ten minutes after it
    started -- wiping out the Wifi ?

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-ultimate-linux-workstation-the-dell-5720-aio/


    The high price on that, is a reflection of a 27 inch screen
    with 4K res.

    I've never seen an article reporting sales or uptake
    rate, to say whether "real" customers out there,
    even know what that product is offering. Since the
    industry is quite price-sensitive, we know nothing
    will "catch fire" because of that offer. The price
    dampens the enthusiasm.

    It would be more fun to see a $100 tablet offered
    with Ubuntu 16.04 on it.

    Paul


    Dell still sells ubuntu laptops. The XPS is available ubuntu 18.04
    pre-installed.

    https://www.dell.com/en-uk/work/shop/laptops/new-xps-13-laptop/spd/xps-13-9370-laptop/configurations


    The fact it still exists means there's demand, although not much as dell
    aren't offering it wider.

    The bespoke nature of these products means there's no cost saving to the
    user; they're the same price with or without windows.

    So you are paying for windows, even if you get Ubunto ???????

    That's why I mentioned the $100 tablet.

    Below a certain screen size, Windows is free.

    (There may still be charges to the OEM, like
    maybe a one-time charge of some sort. The "free"
    implies the per-unit cost is zero, under some
    set of conditions. Maybe you have to move
    a million units to get that price or something.
    We cannot know the whiny details of the contract.)

    Other examples of shenanigans here.

    https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-may-have-price-increases-in-store-for-windows-10-pro-workstation-win-10-downgrade/

    This "free" policy is intended to make Windows competitive
    in the low end of the market. The gouging on the other
    end, is to inflict a little extra pain. Like we'd just
    entered the Win2K era, and the product was worth $300.

    How it works, is Chromebook makers might pay $15 for
    patents, in order to sell a Chromebook, and then if Windows
    is free for small screens, it means an OEM can price
    the product a little lower. This was intended to
    "elbow" entrants to the low-end market out of the way.

    So while Microsoft might have pretended there
    wouldn't be "patent warfare", the usual games
    apply. It's "orderly warfare" or "business as usual".

    If it seems someone is still paying for Windows,
    they probably are.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)