• GOOD for you, BAD for me

    From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sat Jan 11 19:12:27 2020
    On 11/01/2020 5:31 a.m., Wilfred van Velzen : August Abolins wrote:

    What made it report BAD for me? It was exactly the same pub key
    pair between us. The exact time and date proved that.

    So if the keys weren't the problem. Something must have changed
    in the plain text that was signed, before it reached you, that
    made it fail the verify...

    So, when it says "BAD signature", it's talking about the signature of
    the message?

    Hmmm. A single char difference (maybe the odd =20 char) gets
    introduced) and messes up the "signature" of the message.

    I see that happening when I need to copy/paste the contents of a PGP
    block and paste it into my BlackBerry's pgp decryptor window. It always
    seem to return an error and never decrypts.

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sat Jan 11 18:24:15 2020
    Hi August,

    On 2020-01-11 19:12:27, you wrote to me:

    What made it report BAD for me? It was exactly the same pub key
    pair between us. The exact time and date proved that.

    So if the keys weren't the problem. Something must have changed
    in the plain text that was signed, before it reached you, that
    made it fail the verify...

    So, when it says "BAD signature", it's talking about the signature of
    the message?

    Yes.

    Hmmm. A single char difference (maybe the odd =20 char) gets
    introduced) and messes up the "signature" of the message.

    Yes.

    I see that happening when I need to copy/paste the contents of a PGP
    block and paste it into my BlackBerry's pgp decryptor window. It always seem to return an error and never decrypts.

    Ok...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)