I don't remember that one, but every time a reporter interviews a Democrat, the
always forget to ask "Why are we changing the demographic?" and "Was it worth
t for 2000 people to die along the border?"

(We know the answers to those questions, but I want them to ask them anyway!)

Someone does need to be asked some hardball questions about the border.
One of those people who need to be asked such questions rarely seems to
give interviews anymore. That'd be Biden's appointed border czar, Kamala Harris.

The answers I know to such questions would be to either lie ("there is no problem"), deflect, or accuse the interviewer of something for asking a
legit question.


* SLMR 2.1a * If you trade freedom for security, you get neither.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Someone does need to be asked some hardball questions about the border. One of those people who need to be asked such questions rarely seems to give interviews anymore. That'd be Biden's appointed border czar, Kamala Harris.

She's well protected from questions.

She would have no choice but to either lie or to say "We're replacing whites with browns because we think we can manipulate them the same way that we do with the blacks."

To lie, and say something like "This administration is committed to border security," would be too hard for her to say without cackling. (I wouldn't be able to say it without laughing either.)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)

She's well protected from questions.

She would have no choice but to either lie or to say "We're replacing whites w
h browns because we think we can manipulate them the same way that we do with e blacks."

You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner
as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.

Instead, you'd want to cite numbers and other facts, and also probably
include some questions regarding issues that NYC Mayor Adams has brought
up. You'd not likely get straight answers there, either, but you'd at
least force them to choose some answer instead of attacking the nature of
the question.

To lie, and say something like "This administration is committed to border sec
ity," would be too hard for her to say without cackling. (I wouldn't be able t
say it without laughing either.)

Agreed. If they are committed to it, they've been doing it wrong.


* SLMR 2.1a * We're lost, yes.....but we're making good time.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

She would have no choice but to either lie or to say "We're replacing wh w
h browns because we think we can manipulate them the same way that we do e blacks."

You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.

Right! But my angle is to get the Democrat to admit to how despicable their actions are with this "replacement theory" of theirs.

The reporters need to ask the questions the way you described, but regular people like me need to just rip into them any chance we get, and heckle the crap out of them. I don't want them to think for a second that they're going to get away with this.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)

Mike Powell wrote to AARON THOMAS <=-

You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.

It won't make any difference. They will label you a "racist" as soon as they see that they are losing the argument.

Instead, you'd want to cite numbers and other facts, and also probably include some questions regarding issues that NYC Mayor Adams has
brought up.

"... and what makes them [Lefties] tremendously dangerous is that facts that contradict what they believe are simply ignored or evaded." -- Thomas Sowell


... I'm spending a year dead for tax purposes.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-

Right! But my angle is to get the Democrat to admit to how despicable their actions are with this "replacement theory" of theirs.

That's not possible.

These people will never admit that they are wrong and will always double down on their bad choices.


... Don't marry for money; you can borrow it cheaper.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

You would have to ask direct but tactful questions. Asking a question that might result in that answer would instead result in labeling the questioner as racist, something that you'd want to avoid.

It won't make any difference. They will label you a "racist" as soon as they see that they are losing the argument.

Instead, you'd want to cite numbers and other facts, and also probably include some questions regarding issues that NYC Mayor Adams has
brought up.

"... and what makes them [Lefties] tremendously dangerous is that facts that contradict what they believe are simply ignored or evaded." -- Thomas Sowell

If you stick to direct tactful questions and facts, the person being questioned can do whatever they want and you are in the right. Their most ardent followers will accept whatever they throw back at you, but most people will realize that they are dodging the questions and wonder why.


* SLMR 2.1a * It ain't over, but the fat lady is clearing her throat.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)