What is the problem? Open a company operating on communist principles. And make your workers happy. Does not work? Maybe because communism ends when other people's money ends?
1: Kibbutz (Israel)
2: Monasteries (many religions)
3: Amish people (PA, USA)
Commies are so predictable. They really believe that social security was invented by the communists. Don't embarrass yourself here.
What aspects of communism in the US are you referring to, then, if the criteria is limited to things "invented by the communists?"
What is the problem? Open a company operating on communist principles. And make your workers happy. Does not work? Maybe because communism ends when other people's money ends?
If you knew the true definition of communism, then you would surely realize that "Open[ing] a company operating on communist principles" makes no sense whatsoever. As it is, though, you are putting your ignorance on full display.
What is the problem? Open a company operating on communist principles. A make your workers happy. Does not work? Maybe because communism ends whe other people's money ends?When state communism leads to authoritarianism, as it always will, people who think communism is a good thing will tell you that "it wasn't really communism" or "they didn't do it right and we can do it better."
The problem is that most people don't want everything to belong to the collective or the state because they realize they will never get as much out of it as they are putting in it.
The ones who think it is good are
the ones who won't be putting anything into it, which a true communist system will not put up with.
All three of his examples involve voluntary participation. The first1: Kibbutz (Israel)
2: Monasteries (many religions)
3: Amish people (PA, USA)
two, you agree to the rules before joining, and the third one you can leave if you don't like it. None of them are state communism.
He mentioned cultural communists. Social security is a government institution, not a cultural one. I am guessing that is the difference?Commies are so predictable. They really believe that social securit invented by the communists. Don't embarrass yourself here.What aspects of communism in the US are you referring to, then, if the criteria is limited to things "invented by the communists?"
It is not impossible. Starting a company where all your workers live onWhat is the problem? Open a company operating on communist principl And make your workers happy. Does not work? Maybe because communism when other people's money ends?If you knew the true definition of communism, then you would surely real that "Open[ing] a company operating on communist principles" makes no se whatsoever. As it is, though, you are putting your ignorance on full dis
a collective and use the profits from whatever goods or services are
sold for upkeep of the collective would fit that definition, wouldn't
it? Or one where you sell nothing and all goods/services are produced
for the members only?
Either one sounds like what communes do.
What are "cultural communists?" The fact that SS is a government
institution
should put it even closer to communism than distance it.
What is the problem? Open a company operating on communist principles. make your workers happy. Does not work? Maybe because communism ends whWhen state communism leads to authoritarianism, as it always will, people
other people's money ends?
who think communism is a good thing will tell you that "it wasn't really communism" or "they didn't do it right and we can do it better."
State communism need not always lead to authoritarianism, just as democratic capitalism need not always lead to authoritarianism, as has been the case in numerous instances.
The problem is that most people don't want everything to belong to the collective or the state because they realize they will never get as much out of it as they are putting in it.
They'll never get as much out of it as they're putting into it under capitalism, either. (And here we've switched from political systems to economic systems, just so you're aware). If workers got paid the true value of their labor, there would be no profits for the shareholders. Profit doesn't just appear from thin air.
The ones who think it is good are
the ones who won't be putting anything into it, which a true communist system will not put up with.
Or the people who have realized that capitalism doesn't pay them their tryue worth.
All three of his examples involve voluntary participation. The first two, you agree to the rules before joining, and the third one you can leave if you don't like it. None of them are state communism.1: Kibbutz (Israel)
2: Monasteries (many religions)
3: Amish people (PA, USA)
People can enter into communism voluntarily.
He mentioned cultural communists. Social security is a government institution, not a cultural one. I am guessing that is the difference?Commies are so predictable. They really believe that social securiWhat aspects of communism in the US are you referring to, then, if the criteria is limited to things "invented by the communists?"
invented by the communists. Don't embarrass yourself here.
What are "cultural communists?" The fact that SS is a government institution should put it even closer to communism than distance it.
If you knew the true definition of communism, then you would surely reaIt is not impossible. Starting a company where all your workers live on a collective and use the profits from whatever goods or services are sold for upkeep of the collective would fit that definition, wouldn't it? Or one where you sell nothing and all goods/services are produced for the members only?
that "Open[ing] a company operating on communist principles" makes no s
whatsoever. As it is, though, you are putting your ignorance on full di
Communism is both an economic and political system. There can't be one without the other.
Either one sounds like what communes do.
Communes aren't necessarily Communist.
What is SS? Part of the National Socialist Party of Germany. Essentially the
What is SS? Part of the National Socialist Party of Germany. Essentially the same communism, only for one nation. Nazis, the same communists as cultural Marxists. The disease of communism is pseudo-intellectual graphomania, as a form of psychosis.
After the next massacre, the Marxists always answer - "it was done a 'wrong orthodox communists' " Nothing has changed in almost 200 years.
But yet it always has as most humans don't like the idea of giving up all of their freedom or beliefs. So those people eventually have to be dealt with in order for state communism to be a "success."When state communism leads to authoritarianism, as it always will, peopleState communism need not always lead to authoritarianism, just as democr capitalism need not always lead to authoritarianism, as has been the cas numerous instances.
who think communism is a good thing will tell you that "it wasn't r communism" or "they didn't do it right and we can do it better."
Most of us are getting more out of it then we would a collective system. Not all that you get out of something is monetary (see above).The problem is that most people don't want everything to belong to collective or the state because they realize they will never get as out of it as they are putting in it.They'll never get as much out of it as they're putting into it under capitalism, either. (And here we've switched from political systems to economic systems, just so you're aware). If workers got paid the true va of their labor, there would be no profits for the shareholders. Profit doesn't just appear from thin air.
Nothing ever will, especially if you are one that values your (lack of) input over what it is really worth.The ones who think it is good areOr the people who have realized that capitalism doesn't pay them their t worth.
the ones who won't be putting anything into it, which a true commun system will not put up with.
People can enter into communism voluntarily.That is what I said? If they can enter it voluntarily on those levels, why try to force it on everyone, i.e. why would it ever be necessary at a national level?
Companies have internal politics. If people are willing to join the company and be part of the collective atmosphere, allowing the company leader (s) to provide for and make most of their decisions for them...
Not saying it is likely, but it is not impossible.
There have been companies that have been close to theocracies, too.
Communes aren't necessarily Communist.But they can be, and that does sound like what a communist commune would do.
What is SS? Part of the National Socialist Party of Germany. Essentially the
same communism, only for one nation. Nazis, the same communists as cultural
Marxists. The disease of communism is pseudo-intellectual graphomania, as a
form of psychosis.
After the next massacre, the Marxists always answer - "it was done a 'wrong
orthodox communists' " Nothing has changed in almost 200 years.
What are "cultural communists?" The fact that SS is a government
institution should put it even closer to communism than distance it.
I can watch a 6 hour documentary on Communism, but it only takes 5
seconds for a real human (who has experienced it) to tell me the real deal.
Imagine Democrats with unlimited power under a new socialist America. They will do evil stuff! Forced vaccinations, forced labor, ethnic cleansing, it's all gonna be on our menu real soon unless people like you learn how to
forgive that Republican scout master who made you this way.
I can watch a 6 hour documentary on Communism, but it only takes 5 seconds for a real human (who has experienced it) to tell me the real deal.
WOW! You are a true treasure for someone who wants to brainwash you.
So you are so good at judging one single person, that you dismiss the basic facts, over such a person's opinion? And where has this person "experienced" it? In what monastery did he live? Or maybe he's Amish?
It takes only five seconds to Google the *definition* of communism.
For starters.
Imagine Democrats with unlimited power under a new socialist America. will do evil stuff! Forced vaccinations, forced labor, ethnic cleansi it's all gonna be on our menu real soon unless people like you learn to
forgive that Republican scout master who made you this way.
And your source of this information? Another real human that has experienced it and told you the real deal in five seconds?
And your source of this information? Another real human that has experienced it and told you the real deal in five seconds?Time magazine is my source for this one actually..
Where did you experience it?
It takes only five seconds to Google the *definition* of
communism. For starters.
Why should I trust Google?
Because they told me it was gonna rain today and it rained?
Time magazine is my source for this one actually..
https://tinyurl.com/23ak5v2p
And your source of this information? Another real human that experienced it and told you the real deal in five seconds?Time magazine is my source for this one actually..
Aka, "the media?" Are you actually being serious?
Aaron Thomas wrote to Roman Petrovich <=-
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, and
a few other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing that "drone bees" do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
Yea, leftists don't trust anything else. A link to some crappy website that nobody ever heard of is where leftists get the majority of their "facts" from.Aka, "the media?" Are you actually being serious?And your source of this information? Another real human experienced it and told you the real deal in five seconds?Time magazine is my source for this one actually..
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, an a few other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing th "drone bees" do for their colony is reproduce offspring.I think that's a bad analogy. No female would reproduce with them.
Where did you experience it?
I've told y'all several times, but you stubbornly refuse to take in
ROTFL! I was waiting for it. Google is yet another leftist, fake news conspiracy, yes? Tin foil hat on.
Of course Google is in favor of Democrats/leftists/globalists. They only allow
free speech in their SERPs and apps for the powerful/wealthy/elite, that way the task of subjugating free speech is delegated to a select group of globalists (working smarter, not harder) so that way Google can do more "important" deeds like lie about covid vaccines.
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, an a few other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing th "drone bees" do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
I think that's a bad analogy. No female would reproduce with them.
Yea, leftists don't trust anything else. A link to some crappy websit that nobody ever heard of is where leftists get the majority of their "facts" from.
Well, it's better than psychics or our @$$.
You're the one claiming that bee hives contain an entire class of subversives. But, as usual, I don't suspect you have any evidence for that.
Dude, project much? There's an entire movement comprised of mysogynistic conservatives that can't get laid.
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, and a few other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing that "drone bees"
do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
Most people pay for their access to the media, only so it can lie toYea, leftists don't trust anything else. A link to some crappy w that nobody ever heard of is where leftists get the majority of "facts" from.Well, it's better than psychics or our @$$.
them. I got all my psychic advice about covid and the vaccine for free, shortly before the pandemic started.
You're the one claiming that bee hives contain an entire class of subversives. But, as usual, I don't suspect you have any evidence for thActually he said in this case meaning in this echo, not a real beehive.
Dude, project much? There's an entire movement comprised of mysogynistic conservatives that can't get laid.I am not certain they all are politically conservative, but they are definately mysogynists. From what I can tell, most of them are young and not too bright.
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, and a other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing that "drone bees"A better analogy would be the fable of the Ant and the Grasshopper.
do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
for thYou're the one claiming that bee hives contain an entire class of
subversives. But, as usual, I don't suspect you have any evidence
Actually he said in this case meaning in this echo, not a realbeehive.
He portrayed drone bees as apathetic to the health of the hive.
The media serves a vital role in this country, and runs the gamut from ultra-conservative to ultra-liberal. One must be careful what one believes from the media, sure, but for the most part the neutral or only slightly biased outlets are not out to deceive.
They are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff, and a other insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing that "drone bees"
do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
A better analogy would be the fable of the Ant and the Grasshopper.
You're the one claiming that bee hives contain an entire class of subversives. But, as usual, I don't suspect you have any evidence for tActually he said in this case meaning in this echo, not a real beehive.
He portrayed drone bees as apathetic to the health of the hive.
Conservativism seeks to "conserve" the existing hierarchical structure of society, or that of some time in the past. Our society has, in the past, been quite mysogynistic. These people embracy mysogyny as a hierarchical structure, and therefore are conservative.
He portrayed drone bees as apathetic to the health of the hive.Yes, in the case of this echo.
Unlike other bees, drones may be somewhat apathetic. They are only bred by the workers for mating with the queen. I have never had any
impression that they contribute anything else to the hive and, once one
is chosen to mate, the others are killed and, IIRC, the one that mates
is also killed once that is over.
I doubt they have much time for caring about the health of the hive.
Conservativism seeks to "conserve" the existing hierarchical structure o society, or that of some time in the past. Our society has, in the past, quite mysogynistic. These people embracy mysogyny as a hierarchical structure, and therefore are conservative.So, you are saying one cannot find any non-conservative, or even liberal, mysogynists? That is most certainly not correct.
Conservativism seeks to "conserve" the existing hierarchical structure o society, or that of some time in the past. Our society has, in the past, quite mysogynistic. These people embracy mysogyny as a hierarchical structure, and therefore are conservative.So, you are saying one cannot find any non-conservative, or even liberal, mysogynists? That is most certainly not correct.
and aThey are like bees; the media is the "queen bee," and Bjorn, Jeff,
"droneother insane people are the "drone bees," and the only thing that
bees"
do for their colony is reproduce offspring.
A better analogy would be the fable of the Ant and the Grasshopper.
Yes, that would have been better. Leftists are grasshoppers and conservatives
are the ants.
evidence for tYou're the one claiming that bee hives contain an entire class of
subversives. But, as usual, I don't suspect you have any
Actually he said in this case meaning in this echo, not a real
beehive.
He portrayed drone bees as apathetic to the health of the hive.
Yes, in the case of this echo.
Unlike other bees, drones may be somewhat apathetic. They are only
bred by the workers for mating with the queen.
I have never had any impression that they contribute anything else to thehive and, once one is chosen to mate, the others are killed and, IIRC, the one that mates is also killed once that is over.
I doubt they have much time for caring about the health of the hive.
Unlike other bees, drones may be somewhat apathetic. They are only bred by the workers for mating with the queen. I have never had any
impression that they contribute anything else to the hive and, once one
is chosen to mate, the others are killed and, IIRC, the one that mates
is also killed once that is over.
Most white members of the "Incel" movement are white supremacists, and strongly oppose inter-racial marriages involving white women due to those women now being unavailable to white men. A significant portion of the movement is comprised of people of color and the two groups are united by their hatred of women.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
A better analogy would be the fable of the Ant and the Grasshopper.
Yes, that would have been better. Leftists are grasshoppers and conservatives are the ants.
Unlike other bees, drones may be somewhat apathetic. They are only b by the workers for mating with the queen. I have never had any impression that they contribute anything else to the hive and, once o is chosen to mate, the others are killed and, IIRC, the one that mate is also killed once that is over.Hold on now Mike, you can't tell a professional beekeeper (Jeff) stuff about bees! He already knows better than you do! ;)
Most white members of the "Incel" movement are white supremacists, an strongly oppose inter-racial marriages involving white women due to t women now being unavailable to white men. A significant portion of th movement is comprised of people of color and the two groups are unite their hatred of women.You spend a lot of time reading about racial stuff, especially white supremacy.
Were you attacked by a white supremacist?
That would totally
explain it.
I'd research it a lot tooi if it happened to me.
How true. But we need to be more like the ants and turn our backs on the grass-smokers... er.. grasshoppers and let them lie in their own beds.
At the end, the ants, instead of turning their backs on the grasshopper, instead helped him and the grasshopper in turn played songs for them and fed them good memories of warm times (i.e. he contributed little and
took much).
The Elitists have been working for a long time to destroy our culture.
The social nature of bees is well-documented, for those who choose to
look for it. You clearly have not.
You spend a lot of time reading about racial stuff, especially white supremacy.
I am capable of empathizing with people who are different from me. You,
on the other hand, spend a lot of time trying to minimize the threat
posed by white supremacy, or pretend that it doesn't exist.
But presumably not until then? Trying to justify your ignorance by accusing me of knowing too much because I actually take the time to
learn a bit about things before spewing BS about them is not going to work.
The social nature of bees is well-documented, for those who choose to look for it. You clearly have not.Do they ever sting through your bee suit?
If you admit that "white supremacy exists," which you just haveYou spend a lot of time reading about racial stuff, especially w supremacy.I am capable of empathizing with people who are different from me. Yo on the other hand, spend a lot of time trying to minimize the threat posed by white supremacy, or pretend that it doesn't exist.
admitted, then you are saying that whites are supreme. What's so supreme about them?
But presumably not until then? Trying to justify your ignorance by accusing me of knowing too much because I actually take the time to learn a bit about things before spewing BS about them is not going to work.I'm glad that you learn a bit about things before spewing your BS about them, but you should consider the credibility of eye witnesses to be of higher value than that of propagandists on TV.
You spend a lot of time reading about racial stuff, especially white supremacy. Were you attacked by a white supremacist? That would totally explai
it. I'd research it a lot tooi if it happened to me.
The social nature of bees is well-documented, for those who choose to look for it. You clearly have not.
You spend a lot of time reading about racial stuff, especially white supremacy. Were you attacked by a white supremacist? That would totally explaiI am waiting for him to tell us about how the mysogynist Harvey Weinstein was really a conservative. Epstein, too.
it. I'd research it a lot tooi if it happened to me.
He has given a lot of free publicity lately to Kanye, too. If it were
not for Jeff, I would know nothing about what all Kanye had said until Jeff repeated it here.
The social nature of bees is well-documented, for those who choose to lo for it. You clearly have not.I still say you are wrong about the drones. Only one of them contributes anything to the hive. The others all just free load off of the workers until they kill them.
I am waiting for him to tell us about how the mysogynist Harvey Weinstein
was really a conservative. Epstein, too.
Weinstein and Epstein were definitely not part of the "incel" movement. They may have taken advantage of women, but they did not exhibit the sheer hatred for women that the "incels" do.
He has given a lot of free publicity lately to Kanye, too. If it were not for Jeff, I would know nothing about what all Kanye had said until Jeff repeated it here.
Try reading the news sometime. It's a great way to keep up on current events.
Weinstein and Epstein were definitely not part of the "incel" movement. may have taken advantage of women, but they did not exhibit the sheer ha for women that the "incels" do.We were talking about mysogynists. Someone else brought up incels and conservatives. They also brought up that not all of them are white,
which I think goes against an earlier point about them being white supremacists.
If I was reading the news, I am pretty sure I would be skipping over stories about what Kanye said and reading ones about our currentHe has given a lot of free publicity lately to Kanye, too. If it w not for Jeff, I would know nothing about what all Kanye had said un Jeff repeated it here.Try reading the news sometime. It's a great way to keep up on current ev
inflation problem and other things that actually affect me and most
other Americans.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 120:30:08 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,424 |