I have one single JAM area at the moment which contains lots of mail, so I
created an AREAS.BBS file for that one area and placed it in SemPoint's
directory and then went through the configuration steps. End result of
that was that SemPoint segfaulted!
I then created a GOLDED.CFG file for that one area and placed that in
SemPoint's directory and went through the configuration steps. End result
of that was that there are still no areas shown in the area list.
Ideas anyone?
AREAS.BBS various programs
GOLD*.CFG Golded 2.4x (Aka are not imported)
I have one single JAM area at the moment which contains lots of mail, so I
created an AREAS.BBS file..
I then created a GOLDED.CFG file for that one area..
Ideas anyone?
@MSGID: 3:640/1384 005436f4
@REPLY: 2:221/360 9227b191
@CHRS: LATIN-1 2
@PID: SemPoint 2.26
Hi! Tommi,
I'm just testing a hacked version of my old SemPoint. I detest
picking wings off of butterflies but I thought to give it a go at
least. Let's see what sparks & smoke despoil the horizon now...
Apparently sysop Paul Quinn (Australia) has recently used SemPoint and placed a couple of "test" messages in FIDOTEST.
It might be worth a try to drag him in here and pick his brain.
I have one single JAM area at the moment which contains lots of mail, so
I created an AREAS.BBS file for that one area and placed it in
SemPoint's directory and then went through the configuration steps. End
result of that was that SemPoint segfaulted!
I really wish I could help. I had a very nice Jam-based Sempoint operation many years ago.
Is that AREAS.BBS file in plain text, example:
SBBS SYNCHRONET 1:3615/50
SYNCDATA SYNCDATA 1:3615/50
SYNC_SYS SYNC_SYSOPS 1:3615/50
Ideas anyone?
Here's one.
If you are only needing one area (for test and evaluation purposes), why not Configure the area manually.
Copy the set of your Jam files (to preserve your originals) to the SEM subfolder of your choice, then proceed to:
C)onfiguration, A)reas, A)dd.. and proceed with the details.
When it comes to the "Path or Filename", you can navigate the config to where the jam files are. It is primarily looking for the .JHR file.
And NOTE that you need to manually select "Jam" in the Configuration Areas" panel, even *after* you seleted the .JHR file.
Hope this helps.
PS..
I have never been successful in creating messages from scratch (that is, from ones that don't have any messages in there already). I've use Apoint's version with modest success. But I don't remember how I did it many years ago when my messages were tossed with Fastecho.
[BTW.. I still haven't received my Fastecho reg key :( ]
I generated a new one with 'crashexport' this morning:
---------- 8< ----------
; Generated by CrashExport 1.0
; Sun May 26 09:17:29 2019
---------- 8< ----------
However, by pure chance, I noticed that the file had UNIX line
endings. Huh!?
I changed the line endings to DOS, popped the file in my SemPoint
directory and configured SemPoint to use the AREAS.BBS file but it
GPF'd on me again. I then removed everything from the file apart from
the last two lines and this time, SemPoint didn't GPF on me. However,
I still don't have an area list but I know something's changed because
AREE.CFG is a bit bigger than it was before and the date/time stamps
have changed.
-------- [Snip] ---------If you are only needing one area (for test and evaluation purposes), why
not Configure the area manually.
Hope this helps.
Yes it does thanks because I now have an area list containing the one
area and I can read the messages.
[BTW.. I still haven't received my Fastecho reg key :( ]Can't imagine why, perhaps you should give Tobias a gentle nudge?
Apparently sysop Paul Quinn (Australia) has recently used SemPoint and
placed a couple of "test" messages in FIDOTEST.
It might be worth a try to drag him in here and pick his brain.
I've dropped a gentle hint ;-))
Meanwhile, I found out the SAME thing happens with an jam area created with
SEM! I can enter/post a message fine. But as soon as I go back to C)hange th
message (to adjust the subject, for example) ..the program goes ballistic and
produces a 4GB+ .jhr file!
Since Crashmail only supports jam or msg, this is not looking good for SEM w/Jam + Crashmail combo.
I have one single JAM area at the moment which contains lots of mail,
Yes it does thanks because I now have an area list containing the one
area and I can read the messages.
I generated a new one with 'crashexport' this morning:
---------- 8< ----------
; Generated by CrashExport 1.0
; Sun May 26 09:17:29 2019
---------- 8< ----------
However, by pure chance, I noticed that the file had UNIX line
endings. Huh!?
That should be a big clue. You have to think "DOS" for this, especially the text files that you can edit manually.
[BTW.. I still haven't received my Fastecho reg key :( ]
Can't imagine why, perhaps you should give Tobias a gentle nudge?
I think it still "works" without the key, right?
No having much luck with my JAM message base:
I was able to list and read and even post my own messages to my sample FIDOTEST area, but today when I decided I'd like to delete a bunch of the old messages, Sempoint crashed and produced this:
05/25/2019 07:19 PM 162,203 FIDOTEST.JDT
05/26/2019 05:07 PM 1,520 FIDOTEST.JDX
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 4,294,967,371 FIDOTEST.JHR
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 32 FIDOTEST.JLR
The above problem does NOT happen with a Squish base.
If anyone can duplicate or verify this, that would be great.
Since Crashmail only supports jam or msg, this is not looking good for
SEM w/Jam + Crashmail combo.
Another option for a tosser with SEM might be the husky tools. Still maintained and updated when needed. HPT (the husky tosser) supports JAM, Squish and *.MSG message areas.
The configuration is all text and can be daunting but there is support
for husky in the FIDOSOFT.HUSKY message area.
 MF>> ---------- 8< ----------
 MF>> ; Generated by CrashExport 1.0
 MF>> ; Sun May 26 09:17:29 2019
 MF>> ---------- 8< ----------
...why is a Win32 application creating text files with UNIX line endings.
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 4,294,967,371 FIDOTEST.JHR
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 32 FIDOTEST.JLR
Yep, same thing happened with me after deleting a bunch of messages.
---------- 8< ----------
27/05/2019 09:52 4,294,967,371 points.jhr
---------- 8< ----------
Oh Joy! :-(
The above problem does NOT happen with a Squish base.
I've seen enough with the huge .jhr file, thanks.
If you still have Fido Package Deluxe installed..
...all the husky stuff
is in there. There's everything you want(and more) in \Binkley\hpt
including an already configured and working hpt config file. Just copy
it all over to your SemPoint setup and then change the paths in the
hpt config file accordingly. There may be other bits 'n bobs that need
editing too.
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 4,294,967,371 FIDOTEST.JHR
05/26/2019 05:13 PM 32 FIDOTEST.JLR
Yep, same thing happened with me after deleting a bunch of messages.
---------- 8< ----------
27/05/2019 09:52 4,294,967,371 points.jhr
---------- 8< ----------
Oh Joy! :-(
Looks like JAM is not doeable with SEM. Thank's for confirming the same problem.
The above problem does NOT happen with a Squish base.
I've seen enough with the huge .jhr file, thanks.
You're giving up because of broken of JAM support in SEM? Why not try Squish?
Meanwhile I found this little gem, but sadly it fails:
Do you know of any other messagebase converters out there?
If you still have Fido Package Deluxe installed..
I do.
...all the husky stuff
is in there. There's everything you want(and more) in \Binkley\hpt
including an already configured and working hpt config file. Just copy
it all over to your SemPoint setup and then change the paths in the
hpt config file accordingly. There may be other bits 'n bobs that need
editing too.
I don't think I have the stamina to patch SEM with husky stuff.
I looks like FPD creates the "config" based on the settings in the main program. I don't think I would want to re-edit that file each time there is a change to the echo list. :(
--^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--This should be on the end of the line above.
Fastecho seems more practical at this juncture.
Although I may have implied that I was giving up, that's not the case
at all. As soon as time permits, I'll be investigating the possibilty
of bolting on the husky stuff.
Do you know of any other messagebase converters out there?
Sorry but no I don't, as I've never needed one.
---------- 8< ----------
c:\Users\martin\Fido\Binkley\hpt>fconf2golded
fconf2golded/w32-wc 1.3.0-cur 05-02-03
SEM is supposed to be capable of using a golded areas file but we all
know what happened when I tried this with crashmail's similar utility.
However, I used that on a JAM message base, perhaps better results
would be achieved on a squish message base with fconf2golded.
Fastecho seems more practical at this juncture.
OK, fine.
Although I may have implied that I was giving up, that's not the
case at all. As soon as time permits, I'll be investigating the
possibilty of bolting on the husky stuff.
I'm impressed with your confidence to bolt on hpt.
BTW ..... my mouse scroll wheel doesn't work in SemPoint :(
Notice the mixture of UPPER and lower case filenames.
BTW ..... my mouse scroll wheel doesn't work in SemPoint :(
BTW ..... my mouse scroll wheel doesn't work in SemPoint :(
I see that OXP is mouse-scrollable in many of the views/lists. That
is probably what you are used to enjoying.
BTW ..... my mouse scroll wheel doesn't work in SemPoint :(
Does a right-click scroll down/up? If so, I think depends on
whatever part of a blank SemPoint window is poked at, roughly north
or south of an imaginary equator. Or, was it a right-click... I
forget.
Nope, scroll wheel doesn't work at all but it's no big deal as I much
prefer using a keyboard. Thanks for the suggestion anyway.
--- SemPoint 2.26+
--- SemPoint 2.26+
Nice. :)
My theory on the garbage chars is maybe some sort of side-effect of, or
reaction to your OS.[shrug]
I originally used SEM in OS/2 with its builtin Windows support. Very
smooth, no problems. So I wonder - SEM may not be the best choice in today's standalone 32/64bit Win OSes. But I'll see if the garbage chars duplicate in an XP w/Fastecho combination.
Nope, scroll wheel doesn't work at all but it's no big deal as I much
prefer using a keyboard. Thanks for the suggestion anyway.
It's the left-click.
My theory on the garbage chars is maybe some sort of side-effect of, or reaction to your OS.[shrug]
My theory on the garbage chars is maybe some sort of side-effect of, or
reaction to your OS.[shrug]
I originally used SEM in OS/2 with its builtin Windows support. Very smooth, no problems.
So I wonder - SEM may not be the best choice in today's
standalone 32/64bit Win OSes. But I'll see if the garbage chars
duplicate in an XP w/Fastecho combination.
Have fun with your FastEcho config & XP! I never trusted XP much with my Fido stuff. Just a couple of utils (two!). I was always looking over my shoulder since it has two command processors. I.e. double the chance of screwing up. ;)
Sadly, I will likely have to let go of Sempoint if/when I replace this
aging T60 and XP in favor of a different PC with Win7/32.
Sadly, I will likely have to let go of Sempoint if/when I replace this
aging T60 and XP in favor of a different PC with Win7/32.
It hurts a little but it is progress. (My configurations are way too convoluted to make SemPoint a worthwhile object of desire again.)
SemPoint should have had a bigger representation in Fidonet; it's a
shame. In the longer run NNTP or GoldEd (FPD) are the goto apps.
I originally used SEM in OS/2 with its builtin Windows support.
Very smooth, no problems.
Ah yes, good old OS/2 :)
So I wonder - SEM may not be the best choice in today's
standalone 32/64bit Win OSes. But I'll see if the garbage chars duplicate in an XP w/Fastecho combination.
I look forward to the results of your tests ;)
...I fired-up my
old node's vBox yesterday, and had a short play. SemPoint still
respected the GoldEd lastreads. It all still surprises me, since the ..msg/JAM messagebase is on my Linux server (remote PC).
...I fired-up my
old node's vBox yesterday, and had a short play. SemPoint still
respected the GoldEd lastreads. It all still surprises me, since the
..msg/JAM messagebase is on my Linux server (remote PC).
SemPoint was/is performing in point mode (that is using tossed pkts) OK
on your setup? What OS? and what did you use for tossing?
SemPoint was/is performing in point mode (that is using tossed pkts) OK
on your setup? What OS? and what did you use for tossing?
SemPoint performed well. The overall configuration is awkward to put it
mildly: SemPoint<->Win98SE<->LAN<->Linux<->.msg/JAM messagebase. FMail
provides the tosser function on the Linux server, and is a partial Linux
port (Beta test - the configuration requires a Win32 util still). I don't
intend to continue using SemPoint beyond simple tests.
experimented with the share attached to one of the WinXX pcs and made it avaiable for access from the Ubuntu pc. Worked great.
Martin and I concluded that Sempoint's JAM support is broken. Are you absolutely sure your test message bases are JAM? ..or did you just try
MSG for Sempoint testing?
I'm just wondering why JAM messagebases are cooperating for you, but not
for Martin and me.
Also, one of Martin's concerns was that it looks like Sempoint is adding "garbage characters" near the Origin line. You do not notice that in your set up?
But.. if you are using Fmail, that might explain many differences. You're
the only one who reports using Fmail. Maybe *that's* the difference?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 295 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 17:42:36 |
Calls: | 6,640 |
Files: | 12,187 |
Messages: | 5,325,086 |