• oxp: glossary?

    From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Martin Foster on Wed Apr 17 21:51:00 2019
    Hello Martin!


    What are we supposed to make use of out of the glossary.cfg?

    It seems to contain short-codes that we can use and >OXP< makes
    substitutions at some point?

    Tying some of them below:


    Marker for beginning of included text
    s+<

    Marker for end of included text
    s-<

    General snip marker
    8-<

    Miscellaneous stuff

    XP<
    OXP<



    ---
    * Origin: /|ug's Point, ONT, CANADA (2:221/1.58)
  • From Martin Foster@2:310/31.3 to August Abolins on Thu Apr 18 13:24:00 2019
    Hello August!

    On 17.04.19 at 21:51, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster:

    What are we supposed to make use of out of the glossary.cfg?

    This is an example of a poor choice of words by the original OpenXP developers. In no way can it be described as a glossary, perhaps
    "library" would have been the better choice because it's a collection
    of snippets which can be quickly imported into a message.

    It seems to contain short-codes that we can use and >OXP< makes substitutions at some point?

    Yes, that's exactly what it is but it's something I never use these
    days. However, since you've brought the matter up, I can think of a
    number of uses to which it could be put, notably, "canned" responses
    to questions :-))

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- OpenXP 5.0.38
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:310/31.3)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Martin Foster on Thu Apr 18 22:03:00 2019
    Hello Martin!

    ** 18.04.19 - 13:24, Martin Foster wrote to August Abolins:


    It seems to contain short-codes that we can use and >OXP< makes
    substitutions at some point?

    Yes, that's exactly what it is but it's something I never use these
    days. However, since you've brought the matter up, I can think of a
    number of uses to which it could be put, notably, "canned" responses
    to questions :-))


    They don't seem to be working as short-codes/substitutions as the file suggests.

    Maybe they *are* just shorthand text for general use?

    But it would be very nice for example to just put >s+< in the body of the text have it autofill into:

    -------- [Snip] ---------


    The first two paragraphs in the glossary.cfg file intrigue me, they seem
    to imply that we can control the visibility of text with the ">" and "<" chars. That is, create an auto-snip for large parts of text.


    ../|ug

    ---
    * Origin: /|ug's Point, ONT, CANADA (2:221/1.58)
  • From Martin Foster@2:240/2188.31 to August Abolins on Sat Apr 20 10:36:00 2019
    Hello August!

    On 18.04.19 at 22:03, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster:

    It seems to contain short-codes that we can use and >OXP< makes
    substitutions at some point?

    Yes, that's exactly what it is but it's something I never use these
    days. However, since you've brought the matter up, I can think of a
    number of uses to which it could be put, notably, "canned" responses
    to questions :-))

    They don't seem to be working as short-codes/substitutions as the
    file suggests.

    Read the second paragraph of "glossary.cfg" again :)

    However, what it doesn't say is how to actually use the glossary
    function.

    Maybe they *are* just shorthand text for general use?

    But it would be very nice for example to just put >s+< in the body of the text have it autofill into:

    -------- [Snip] ---------

    Maybe it would but the glossary function doesn't work like that.

    Place the cursor at the start of a *blank line* in your message and
    press <Alt-G>. Cursor down the list to ">s+<" and press <Enter> and
    see what happens.

    The first two paragraphs in the glossary.cfg file intrigue me,
    they seem to imply that we can control the visibility of text
    with the ">" and "<" chars. That is, create an auto-snip for
    large parts of text.

    Nope, anything placed between the ">" and "<" characters is
    interpreted as a comment or to put it another way, it's interpreted as
    the title of the snippet.

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- OpenXP 5.0.38
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:240/2188.31)
  • From Martin Foster@2:310/31.3 to August Abolins on Sat May 18 11:46:00 2019
    Hello August!

    ## 21.04.19 at 01:24, August Abolins wrote to Martin Foster:

    Read the second paragraph of "glossary.cfg" again :)

    However, what it doesn't say is how to actually use the glossary
    function.

    Place the cursor at the start of a *blank line* in your message and
    press <Alt-G>. Cursor down the list to ">s+<" and press <Enter> and
    see what happens.

    OMG! The Alt-G was the revelation.

    This feature is SO badly worded in the glossary.cfg.

    Improved in the next release.

    Regards,
    Martin

    --- OpenXP 5.0.38
    * Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:310/31.3)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.59 to Martin Foster on Sat May 18 18:28:22 2019
    Hello Martin,

    On 18.05.19, you wrote to August Abolins:

    OMG! The Alt-G was the revelation.
    AA>> This feature is SO badly worded in the glossary.cfg.

    Improved in the next release.


    That's great news! Thanks.



    ../|ug

    --- WinPoint Beta 5 (359.1)
    * Origin: Please write your complaint in this box [ ] - Legibly (2:221/1.59)