OpenXP 5.0.37 has been released
OpenXP 5.0.37 has been released
I updated my install.
And it still has a hufe bug here.
I initiated a call it worked fine, it "tossed" the packets, then it shows a black screen and nothing happened. I remember now that the previous version did the same here. I had to downgrade to a previous version to
get it to run :(
OpenXP 5.0.37 has been released
OpenXP 5.0.37 has been released
I'm here.
OpenXP 5.0.37 has been released and is available for download from the following URLs .....
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openxp5/
https://openxp.uk/
Shortly after release, a major bug was discovered relating to the
sending of file attachments. A new *Windows* version(5.0.38) has been released and is available for download from either of the above URL's.
The Linux packages will be released ASAP.
Apologies for any inconvenience caused.
Can I accomplish the "update" by just taking the new versions of these from the package:
openxp.exe
ssleay32.dll
openxp-e.res
openxp-e.hlp
libeay32.dll
????
I was experimenting with an attachment since v5.0.37, and it never left the queue:
þ F 22 08.04 August Abolins@2:221/360 2:221/1
H:\DOWNLOADS\somefile
..is v.37 the reason why this is not going out?
The best(and easiest) way to update an existing install is to
extract(with paths) the complete archive over the top of your existing install. Something may have changed in some of the sub-directories, particularly the "doc" directory. This method will *not* overwrite any
of your existing configuration.
I was experimenting with an attachment since v5.0.37, and it never left AA>> the queue:
þ F 22 08.04 August Abolins@2:221/360 2:221/1
H:\DOWNLOADS\somefile
..is v.37 the reason why this is not going out?
Not sure about that, I'll check it out later ;)
I was experimenting with an attachment since v5.0.37, and it never left
the queue:
þ F 22 08.04 August Abolins@2:221/360 2:221/1
H:\DOWNLOADS\somefile
..is v.37 the reason why this is not going out?
Not sure about that, I'll check it out later ;)
I deleted it. Not knowing what the " F" character meant was bothering me. They don't seem to be talked about in the Helps.
But now, I can't seem to add a file attach anymore. :( No matter.
It's not an expected feature of fidonet/netmail anyway.
Just curious, are file attaches popular in the othernets with OpenXP?
But now, I can't seem to add a file attach anymore. :( No matter.
It's not an expected feature of fidonet/netmail anyway.
 AA> But now, I can't seem to add a file attach anymore. :(  Nomatter.
 AA> It's not an expected feature of fidonet/netmail anyway.
it should be expected... file attachments are a feature of FTN netmail...
But now, I can't seem to add a file attach anymore. :( No matter.
It's not an expected feature of fidonet/netmail anyway.
OK but I need to have a good look at Fido file attaches because it's
not a feature I use these days and I don't think any work has been
done on the feature since binkP was implemented.
Just curious, are file attaches popular in the othernets with OpenXP?
If you mean OpenXP's email client then yes, and this was the major bug
in 5.0.37
However, if you mean FTN "othernets" then I haven't a clue as I'm not
on any "othernets" :)
revisit AA> But now, I can't seem to add a file attach anymore. :(  Nomatter.
 AA> It's not an expected feature of fidonet/netmail anyway.
it should be expected... file attachments are a feature of FTN netmail...
Oh, I thought it was a prohibited or a discourage practice. I will
the option when I am sitting in front of my OpenXP point.
But attachments are certainly not an allowed feature originating from nntp-netmail to my uplink.
Yes.. I meant FTN. Now, I can't remember how I did it! :(
Oh, I thought it was a prohibited or a discourage practice. Iwill revisit the option when I am sitting in front of my OpenXP
point.
yeah, not... FA generally need to be sent directly to the other
system... some systems do allow for routing file attaches but there
are many that still do not... i used to allow routed FA through my
old system but i don't think my new one does...
Thanks for that. Direct makes better sense. My FA test from the
point (to my own address at 221/360 is still not going out. No
matter, email is a better option for attachments anyway.
Hello August!
On 14.04.19 at 02:14, August Abolins wrote to mark lewis:
[snip]
Thanks for that. Direct makes better sense. My FA test from the
point (to my own address at 221/360 is still not going out. No
matter, email is a better option for attachments anyway.
Have a look in /Fido/Crash - it may be "stuck" in there.
[snip]
Thanks for that. Direct makes better sense. My FA test from the
point (to my own address at 221/360 is still not going out. No
matter, email is a better option for attachments anyway.
Have a look in /Fido/Crash - it may be "stuck" in there.
I don't have a Crash folder.
I don't know how I did it, but now I have an >>Unsent area in the list:
OpenXP Re-Org Message Netcall Fido Edit Config Tools ? All Write Text Bin Special Seek Show: all ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ¯ /¯Netcall /¯Unsent /August Abolins/2:221/1.58 /Martin Foster/2:221/1.58 /FIDO/AFTERSHOCK /FIDO/COFFEE_KLATSCH [snip]
[1] Where's the setting for that?
I'd like to turn it off.
..because, I find that that folder does not seem to work properly. When
I *do* have unsent messages, they never appear in the folder above. Could that be a bug?.
Instead, I still have to go through the top menu commands:
Message/Unsent/Show, then Message/Unsent/Edit.
The "¯Unsent" folder is where all your parked(held) messages are stored. Now why it's called "¯Unsent" has always been a mystery to me. A more appropriate name would have been either "¯Parked" or "¯Held".
..as far as OpenXP is concerned, parked(held)
messages are not the same as unsent messages. Confusing or what? 8-]
The "¯Unsent" folder is where all your parked(held) messages are stored.
Now why it's called "¯Unsent" has always been a mystery to me. A more
appropriate name would have been either "¯Parked" or "¯Held".
..as far as OpenXP is concerned, parked(held)
messages are not the same as unsent messages. Confusing or what? 8-]
VERY confusing. Why not send that up the chain to have that
folder renamed?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 219:50:47 |
Calls: | 6,622 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,171 |
Messages: | 5,317,875 |