//Resending.. I think I played around with the 5D "Uplinks" part too much.//
Ah, could that explain why all your posts of the 30th were in
triplicate :-)
...and here is what I *think* was the beginning of the problem:
[Note the "Bad address". Maybe that was the result of the incomplete *new* Uplink config.]
30.03.19 22:43:48 BNUL TIME Sun, 31 Mar 2019 04:43:45 +0300
30.03.19 22:43:48 RVER binkd/1.1a-99/OS2 binkp/1.1
30.03.19 22:43:48 RAKA 2:221/0 - Nothing to send
30.03.19 22:43:48 RAKA 2:221/1 - Sending 5697 bytes in 1 files
30.03.19 22:43:48 RAKA 2:221/360 - Nothing to send
30.03.19 22:43:48 BERR BinkP Error: Bad address
30.03.19 22:43:48 DISG Disconnecting
This is how it goes here...
===
[1464] remote passed bad address: `2:221/1.58@fidonet 0:0/0@'
[1464] done (from 2:221/1.58@fidonet, failed, S/R: 0/0 (0/0 bytes))
31 Mar 04:43:45 [1464] session closed, quitting...
===
Looks like even if I did have an actual 4D number + some text for the 5D part, Winpoint sends all the othernet addresses and your system couldbalk
at that.
all FTN mailers present all configured addresses... they're supposed
to... for one thing, it is how you can pickup mail for more than one of your addresses in the same connection instead of having to make multiple connections with address switching...
all FTN mailers present all configured addresses... they're supposed
to... for one thing, it is how you can pickup mail for more than one
of your addresses in the same connection instead of having to make
multiple connections with address switching...
Thank you for being patient with me.
This Bink-stuff is quite new to me.
This Bink-stuff is quite new to me.
it isn't a bink thing... all FTN mailers do this ;)
//Resending.. I think I played around with the 5D "Uplinks" part too
much.//
Ah, could that explain why all your posts of the 30th were in
triplicate :-)
Could be.
But I'm *not* going to mess around with Uplinks anymore.
Sorry about the panic.
This Bink-stuff is quite new to me.
it isn't a bink thing... all FTN mailers do this ;)
The last time I did any of this was dial-up, and it was just one feed. Never used tcp/ip.
it is still the same, though... the only thing is that instead of using a dedicated copper pipe from one end to the other, we now use a packet switched TCP/IP pipe... everything else is still the same ;)
it is still the same, though... the only thing is that instead of using
a dedicated copper pipe from one end to the other, we now use a packet
switched TCP/IP pipe... everything else is still the same ;)
Did I ever tell you about the time I worked in a network where we ran ARCnet between floors by tapping into 2 water pipes?
mark lewis wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
i don't think i've heard about that one but i do know that POTS used a positive ground and you could stick on lead of a buttset into the
ground and one on a tip terminal in a pedestal, get dialtone, and make
a call... it might be a ring terminal, though... i forget which one was ground...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 83:55:23 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,894 |