• Another Test from ProBoard

    From Jason Bock@1:267/311 to All on Sun Feb 7 06:28:16 2106
    Test from ProBoard testbed...

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311)
  • From Jason Bock@1:267/311 to Jason Bock on Sun Feb 7 06:28:16 2106
    On <01 Jan, 00:00>, Jason Bock wrote to All :

    Test from ProBoard testbed...

    --- ProBoard v2.22c [Reg]
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311)
    Got it from and to myself....



































    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Jason Bock on Wed Nov 3 21:58:10 2021

    *** Answering a msg posted in area ECHOMAIL002 (FMail Bad Echomail Board).

    Hello Jason,

    On Thursday January 01 1970 00:00, you wrote to All:

    AREA:FIDOTEST
    @FMAIL BAD: Message too old (2021-11-03 21:55:31)
    @FMAIL SRC: 2:221/6
    @FMAIL DEST: 2:280/5555
    @PID: ProBoard 2.22c J
    @TID: FastEcho 1.46 43281
    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Test from ProBoard testbed...

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com
    (1:267/311)

    @PATH: 267/311 266/512 261/38 5020/1042 221/6

    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: ZC1 certified techno-dick (2:280/5555)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Michiel van der Vlist on Wed Nov 3 22:22:54 2021
    Hi Michiel,

    On 2021-11-03 21:58:10, you wrote to Jason Bock:

    @FMAIL BAD: Message too old (2021-11-03 21:55:31)
    @FMAIL SRC: 2:221/6
    @FMAIL DEST: 2:280/5555
    @PID: ProBoard 2.22c J
    @TID: FastEcho 1.46 43281
    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    MvdV> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was set to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD area...

    If I look in the pkt files I see the same date as you are showing above...?

    How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message (days) 62"

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Wilfred van Velzen on Wed Nov 3 23:48:58 2021
    Hello Wilfred,

    On Wednesday November 03 2021 22:22, you wrote to me:

    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    MvdV>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was set
    to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD area...

    Odd. I did not see dates im 2070.

    If I look in the pkt files I see the same date as you are showing above...?

    How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message
    (days) 62"

    Set to 30 days here.


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: ZC1 certified techno-dick (2:280/5555)
  • From Jason Bock@1:267/311 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sun Feb 7 06:28:16 2106
    lol! I bought the rights to ProBoard and the source code is swiss cheese. The date code is a mess. We are currenly fixing a ton of code. again lol and nice catch.

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to Jason Bock on Wed Nov 3 20:00:28 2021
    Hello Jason,

    lol! I bought the rights to ProBoard and the source code is swiss
    cheese. The date code is a mess. We are currenly fixing a ton of
    code. again lol and nice catch.

    Well that is rather awesome. Does that mean there will be updates to ProBoard for those running ProBoard?

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... Backup? I've never had troub**&{[} 3$$ERROR
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Carlos Navarro@2:341/234 to Wilfred van Velzen on Thu Nov 4 08:30:21 2021
    03 Nov 2021 23:48, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to you:

    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    MvdV>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was
    set
    to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD
    area...

    Odd. I did not see dates im 2070.

    Same here, they ended up in my BAD echo.

    Different behaviour in Windows and Linux?

    How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message
    (days) 62"

    Set to 30 days here.

    93 days here currently.

    Carlos

    --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: Costa Blanca, Spain (2:341/234)
  • From Stas Mishchenkov@2:460/5858 to Jason Bock on Thu Nov 4 10:39:20 2021
    Hi, Jason!

    01 янв 70 00:00, Jason Bock -> All:

    @PID: ProBoard 2.22c J
    @TID: FastEcho 1.46 43281
    Test from ProBoard testbed...

    No @MSGID, no date. Bad mail.

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311) SEEN-BY: 15/0 19/36 50/109 106/201 116/18 120/302 331 124/5009 129/12 102 125
    SEEN-BY: 129/160 165 153/757 7715 218/700 221/1 6 360 222/2 230/150 152 SEEN-BY: 240/1120 250/1 261/1 38 100 220 1466 266/32 75 420 512 618 267/152
    SEEN-BY: 267/154 155 311 275/100 280/464 5555 282/1056 1060 291/100 111 301/1
    SEEN-BY: 320/119 219 335/364 340/400 341/66 396/45 460/58 256 1124 5858 463/68
    SEEN-BY: 467/888 640/1321 712/848 801/161 189 3634/12 4500/1 4600/140 5000/111
    SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5019/40 5020/846 1042 2047 2140 4441 5054/30 SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5064/56 5080/102 5083/444
    @PATH: 267/311 266/512 261/38 5020/1042 221/6 460/58

    Have nice nights.
    Stas Mishchenkov.

    --- Экономия - это искусство тратить деньги, не получая никакого удовольствия.
    * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Michiel van der Vlist on Thu Nov 4 10:50:29 2021
    Hi Michiel,

    On 2021-11-03 23:48:58, you wrote to me:

    MvdV> On Wednesday November 03 2021 22:22, you wrote to me:

    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    MvdV>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was set
    to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD area...

    MvdV> Odd. I did not see dates im 2070.

    Maybe it's a difference between the linux 64 bit version and the windows 32 version you are using? But I will have to "study" the source code for this...

    If I look in the pkt files I see the same date as you are showing
    above...?

    How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message
    (days) 62"

    MvdV> Set to 30 days here.

    I don't think that can explain the difference in behaviour we see...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Jason Bock on Thu Nov 4 10:52:41 2021
    Hi Jason,

    On 2070-01-01 00:00:00, you wrote to me:

    @PID: ProBoard 2.22c J
    @TID: FastEcho 1.46 43281
    lol! I bought the rights to ProBoard and the source code is swiss cheese. The date code is a mess. We are currenly fixing a ton of code. again lol and nice catch.

    I have no clue which message you are replying to! There are no quotes, and there is no REPLY kludge. :-(

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311) SEEN-BY: 15/0 19/36 102/127 103/705 106/201 116/18 120/302 331 124/5009 SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/12 102 125 160 165 134/100 153/105 135 757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 222/2 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/1 38 100 220 1466 266/32 75 420 512 618 267/67 152 SEEN-BY: 267/154 155 311 275/100 280/464 5003 5555 282/1056 1060 291/100 SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/119 219 340/400 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 423/120 460/58 640/1321 712/848 770/1 801/161 SEEN-BY: 801/189 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042
    @PATH: 267/311 266/512 261/38 153/757 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Jason Bock on Thu Nov 4 10:57:04 2021
    Hi Jason,

    On 2021-11-03 22:00:53, you wrote to me:

    @PID: ProBoard 2.22c J
    @TID: FastEcho 1.46 43281
    lol! I bought the rights to ProBoard and the source code is swiss cheese. The date code is a mess. We are currenly fixing a ton of code. again lol and nice catch.

    This is the second time I receive this message (besides the detected dupes). Which doesn't mean you sent it twice. It could be some system along the way "fixed" the broken date, and so misled dupe checkers... :-(

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311) SEEN-BY: 15/0 19/25 36 103/705 106/201 633 987 116/18 120/302 331 124/5009 SEEN-BY: 124/5014 5016 129/12 102 125 160 165 130/230 803 153/757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 222/2 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/1 38 100 220 1466 266/32 75 420 512 618 267/152 154 SEEN-BY: 267/155 311 275/100 280/464 5003 5555 282/1056 1060 291/100 SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/119 219 340/400 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 387/21 25 26 396/45 423/120 460/58 640/1321 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 801/161 189 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042
    @PATH: 267/311 266/512 261/38 396/45 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Wilfred van Velzen on Thu Nov 4 12:29:19 2021
    Hello Wilfred,

    On Thursday November 04 2021 10:50, you wrote to me:

    @DATE: 01 Jan 70 00:00:00
    MvdV>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    On some of his test messages the date in my JAM message base was
    set
    to: "2070-01-01 00:00:00". So they didn't end up in my BAD
    area...

    MvdV>> Odd. I did not see dates im 2070.

    Coming to think of it, Fidonet did not exist in 1970, so 1970 on a idonet message is defintely wrong. It does make sense to interprate two digit years < 84 as 20xx. But then dates in the future do not make sense either for Fidonet messages. Perhaps Fmail should treat messages with dates in the future as BAD too. With a bit of leeway for time zone differences and klock abreations. Let's say 48 hours in the future.

    Then again 1 jan 1970 00:00:00 is the Unix date set to zero, so that is an error different from "too old" or "in the future".

    Maybe it's a difference between the linux 64 bit version and the
    windows 32 version you are using? But I will have to "study" the
    source code for this...

    I can't rule it out...

    How is your FMail configured regarding this? Mine: "Old message
    (days) 62"

    MvdV>> Set to 30 days here.

    I don't think that can explain the difference in behaviour we see...

    I agree, that is unlikely.


    Cheers, Michiel

    --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
    * Origin: ZC1 certified techno-dick (2:280/5555)
  • From Jason Bock@1:267/311 to Alan Ianson on Sun Feb 7 06:28:16 2106
    Well that is rather awesome. Does that mean there will be updates to ProBoard for those running ProBoard?

    I sure hope so!! Gotta get bugs fixed first. ;)

    -Jason

    ---
    * Origin: SiliconUnderground - Rochester, NY - siliconu.com (1:267/311)
  • From Jason Bock@1:266/512 to Jason Bock on Tue Jun 27 16:20:00 2023
    Reply from another system

    --- QScan/PCB v1.20a / 01-0462
    * Origin: Christian Fellowship | cfbbs.no-ip.com 856-933-7096 (1:266/512)
  • From Rick Smith@1:105/11.1 to Jason Bock on Tue Jun 27 21:03:36 2023

    Reply from another system


    Got it here

    Regards,

    Rick
    --- AfterShock/Android 1.7.4
    * Origin: The WORMHOLE II SYSOP POINT ON AFTERSHOCK (1:105/11.1)
  • From IB Joe@1:342/200 to Jason Bock on Wed Jun 28 10:07:04 2023
    On 27 Jun 2023, Jason Bock said the following...

    @MSGID: 1:266/512@fidonet.org f11bc6a8
    @SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 123/131 124/5009 129/12 102 @SEEN-BY: 129/125 160 165 153/7715 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 @SEEN-BY: 229/113 200 206 275 307 317 400 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 @SEEN-BY: 261/1 220 266/75 512 618 267/152 154 311 282/1038 291/111 @SEEN-BY: 292/854 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 @SEEN-BY: 712/848 5075/35
    @PATH: 266/512 229/426
    Reply from another system

    got it

    IB Joe, Pronouns (FJB/LGB)
    AKA Joe Schweier
    SysOp of 4A 6F 65 73 42 42 53
    -=JoesBBS.com=-

    ... Press any key to continue or any other key to quit...

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/200)