• Beyond the Pale

    From David Drummond@3:640/305 to Lee Lofaso on Mon Apr 1 12:59:19 2019
    On 1/04/2019 02:49, Lee Lofaso -> David Drummond wrote:

    Suggesting a 63-year-old madman who is "happy as a clam" having
    shot four people, including the President of the United States,
    should do the same thing to another POTUS, is beyond the pale.

    I don't recall recommending anyone to actually do the job, other than "...
    someone who really cares about the peoples of the USA."

    "Or be assassinated" is a receommendation.

    Oh? Not a guess at what could happen?

    It might rain here today. Am I recommending that it rain?


    A very sick recommendation.

    That is your opinion. I suspect that the Hillary lovers wouldn't be too upset with that outcome.

    On a very specific person. On the 38th anniversary of a nutcase who actually attempted, and almost succeeded, to do so to a different POTUS.

    It may surprise you to know that in this country the actual dates of the US assassinations are not ingrained into the average person's memory.

    Do you think John Hinckley Jr "really cares about the peoples of
    the USA"?

    I do not know - other than his name and one publicised act in life I know very little about this person.

    I care even less.

    Do you think he cared about the peoples of the USA when
    he shot President Ronald Reagan and three others? Do you think
    any assassin wannabe "really cares about the peoples of the USA"?

    Why do YOU think they do it? Could it not be that they think things might be better without their victims?

    If so, you have a very sick mind.

    According to my doctor I am really good health at the moment.
    [...]
    I guess that makes them all sane.

    Lee Harvey Oswald was sane. But his actions were evil.
    How does that make what John Hinckley Jr did any less evil?

    Define evil.....

    Good and evil are a matter of opinion.

    Was Cardinal Pell an evil person?

    --

    Gang warily
    David

    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
    * Origin: Bucca, Qld, Australia (3:640/305)
  • From Lee Lofaso@2:203/2 to David Drummond on Wed Apr 3 17:49:17 2019
    Hello David,

    Suggesting a 63-year-old madman who is "happy as a clam" having
    shot four people, including the President of the United States,
    should do the same thing to another POTUS, is beyond the pale.

    I don't recall recommending anyone to actually do the job, other than
    "...
    someone who really cares about the peoples of the USA."

    "Or be assassinated" is a receommendation.

    Oh? Not a guess at what could happen?

    A bloody mess?

    It might rain here today. Am I recommending that it rain?

    As long as it is not raining blood.

    A very sick recommendation.

    That is your opinion. I suspect that the Hillary lovers wouldn't be too upset with that outcome.

    Why should they? Many of them might feel he got what he deserved.
    Not that I think anybody should die. Even if they are total shits.

    On a very specific person. On the 38th anniversary of a nutcase LL>who
    actually attempted, and almost succeeded, to do so to a LL>different
    POTUS.

    It may surprise you to know that in this country the actual dates of the
    US
    assassinations are not ingrained into the average person's memory.

    November 22, 1963 is a day that most Americans alive at that
    time remember as if it was yesterday.

    Do you think John Hinckley Jr "really cares about the peoples of
    the USA"?

    I do not know - other than his name and one publicised act in life I know very little about this person.

    Did you cheer when you learned he had shot the POTUS and three
    other people? Most people were horrified.

    I care even less.

    How can you not care? Four people, including the POTUS, could
    have been killed. And you would have cared less?

    Do you think he cared about the peoples of the USA when
    he shot President Ronald Reagan and three others? Do you think
    any assassin wannabe "really cares about the peoples of the USA"?

    Why do YOU think they do it?

    John Hinckley Jr did it to impress a 15-year-old actress who
    he was stalking. He would call her, on the phone, at odd hours.
    Thought shooting the POTUS would impress her. Really bigly.

    Indira Ghandi was killed by one of her own bodyguards.
    Her son was blown up by an unknown assailant. Maybe another
    bodyguard. Nobody knows why, as the assailants did not live
    long enough to tell the tale. But that's India.

    Do it in the USA and the assailant is set free after serving
    time in a mental institution.

    Lee Harvey Oswald was never charged with offing JFK, and
    was never convicted as a result.

    Could it not be that they think things might be better without their victims?

    John Hinckley Jr was contemplating his new life with a 15-year-old
    movie star ...

    If so, you have a very sick mind.

    According to my doctor I am really good health at the moment.

    John Hinckley Jr's doctor says the same about him.

    [...]

    I guess that makes them all sane.

    Lee Harvey Oswald was sane. But his actions were evil.
    How does that make what John Hinckley Jr did any less evil?

    Define evil.....

    The opposite of good ...

    Good and evil are a matter of opinion.

    Angelina Jolie is Evil. And wants to run for POTUS.

    Was Cardinal Pell an evil person?

    Not as evil as Maleficant.

    --Lee

    --
    Laying Pipe Since '88

    --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
    * Origin: news://eljaco.se (2:203/2)