At https://www.cbsnews.com/world/ I read:
-----Beginning of the citation-----
Lawyer in Moscow, family of retired Marine Paul Whelan and U.S.
government sources all say he is no spy, as his dual nationality is revealed
----- The end of the citation -----
So we can change "not a" for "no"?
-----Beginning of the citation-----
Lawyer in Moscow, family of retired Marine Paul Whelan and U.S.
government sources all say he is no spy, as his dual nationality
is revealed
----- The end of the citation -----
So we can change "not a" for "no"?
you could and it wouldn't change the meaning... at least not as i read it...
That could be my fault as we are exposed to a lot of USofA news &entertainmen
here. So much so that I am currently enjoying a "cowboys's breakfast" of bacon, beans, eggs, brown bread & coffee. Yee-ha!
-----Beginning of the citation-----
Lawyer in Moscow, family of retired Marine Paul Whelan and U.S.
government sources all say he is no spy, as his dual nationality is revealed
----- The end of the citation -----
So we can change "not a" for "no"?
-----Beginning of the citation-----
Lawyer in Moscow, family of retired Marine Paul Whelan
and U.S. government sources all say he is no spy, as
his dual nationality is revealed
----- The end of the citation -----
So we can change "not a" for "no"?
you could and it wouldn't change the meaning... at
least not as i read it...
I agree with Mark, though I would prefer it as the "no"
version looks like it implies a North American jingoism.
That could be my fault as we are exposed to a lot of
USofA news & entertainment here. So much so that I am
currently enjoying a "cowboys's breakfast" of bacon,
beans, eggs, brown bread & coffee. Yee-ha!
Ardith? What say you...?
Q. Who was that lady I saw you with last night?
A. That was no lady, that was my wife.
-- a joke I heard from my father, when I was a kid and "lady" was not synonymous with "woman"
WRT connotation, Anton summarized neatly what I had in mind there: the "no" version comes aross as stronger & more emotional to me
as well.
If the "no" version rubs you the wrong way, I think that's because you see some exaggeration... as I do in what I quoted above.
Feelings may be running high WRT the situation Alexander referred to,
and I have noticed that when people are reacting emotionally they tend
to think in terms of good guys vs. bad guys, us vs. them, and so forth.
In the last two examples I cited, a person who knows the accused quite well is challenging the accuser(s) to look more closely at the situation
& draw conclusions on an individual basis. :-)
Q. Who was that lady I saw you with last night?-- a joke I heard from my father, when I was a
A. That was no lady, that was my wife.
Same with me. In support of my point I'm thinking that
that was from Groucho Marx film.
WRT connotation, Anton summarized neatly what I had in
mind there: the "no" version comes aross as stronger &
more emotional to me as well.
Not for me. But language is very much a personal
interpretation and expression of worldly things.
If the "no" version rubs you the wrong way, I think
that's because you see some exaggeration... as I do
in what I quoted above.
No, I simply see it as an error in personal choice.
When it comes time to pull such a 'standard' response
I would opt for "not a".
In the last two examples I cited, a person who knows
the accused quite well is challenging the accuser(s)
to look more closely at the situation & draw conclusions
on an individual basis. :-)
My oh my. I knew you would have fun with this thought
teaser of Alexander's. ;)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 40:01:08 |
Calls: | 6,648 |
Files: | 12,193 |
Messages: | 5,329,410 |