• Global warming begets more warming, new

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Wed Aug 11 21:30:44 2021
    Global warming begets more warming, new paleoclimate study finds

    Date:
    August 11, 2021
    Source:
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Summary:
    Global warming begets more, extreme warming, new paleoclimate
    study finds. Researchers observe a 'warming bias' over the past
    66 million years that may return if ice sheets disappear.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    It is increasingly clear that the prolonged drought conditions,
    record-breaking heat, sustained wildfires, and frequent, more extreme
    storms experienced in recent years are a direct result of rising global temperatures brought on by humans' addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. And a new MIT study on extreme climate events in Earth's
    ancient history suggests that today's planet may become more volatile
    as it continues to warm.


    ==========================================================================
    The study, appearing today in Science Advances, examines the paleoclimate record of the last 66 million years, during the Cenozoic era, which began shortly after the extinction of the dinosaurs. The scientists found that
    during this period, fluctuations in the Earth's climate experienced a surprising "warming bias." In other words, there were far more warming
    events -- periods of prolonged global warming, lasting thousands to tens
    of thousands of years - - than cooling events. What's more, warming
    events tended to be more extreme, with greater shifts in temperature,
    than cooling events.

    The researchers say a possible explanation for this warming bias may
    lie in a "multiplier effect," whereby a modest degree of warming -- for instance from volcanoes releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere
    -- naturally speeds up certain biological and chemical processes that
    enhance these fluctuations, leading, on average, to still more warming.

    Interestingly, the team observed that this warming bias disappeared about
    5 million years ago, around the time when ice sheets started forming in
    the Northern Hemisphere. It's unclear what effect the ice has had on the Earth's response to climate shifts. But as today's Arctic ice recedes,
    the new study suggests that a multiplier effect may kick back in, and
    the result may be a further amplification of human-induced global warming.

    "The Northern Hemisphere's ice sheets are shrinking, and could potentially disappear as a long-term consequence of human actions" says the study's
    lead author Constantin Arnscheidt, a graduate student in MIT's Department
    of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences. "Our research suggests
    that this may make the Earth's climate fundamentally more susceptible
    to extreme, long-term global warming events such as those seen in
    the geologic past." Arnscheidt's study co-author is Daniel Rothman,
    professor of geophysics at MIT, and co-founder and co-director of MIT's
    Lorenz Center.



    ==========================================================================
    A volatile push.

    For their analysis, the team consulted large databases of sediments
    containing deep-sea benthic foraminifera -- single-celled organisms that
    have been around for hundreds of millions of years and whose hard shells
    are preserved in sediments. The composition of these shells is affected by
    the ocean temperatures as organisms are growing; the shells are therefore considered a reliable proxy for the Earth's ancient temperatures.

    For decades, scientists have analyzed the composition of these shells, collected from all over the world and dated to various time periods, to
    track how the Earth's temperature has fluctuated over millions of years.

    "When using these data to study extreme climate events, most studies have focused on individual large spikes in temperature, typically of a few
    degrees Celsius warming," Arnscheidt says. "Instead, we tried to look at
    the overall statistics and consider all the fluctuations involved, rather
    than picking out the big ones." The team first carried out a statistical analysis of the data and observed that, over the last 66 million years,
    the distribution of global temperature fluctuations didn't resemble
    a standard bell curve, with symmetric tails representing an equal
    probability of extreme warm and extreme cool fluctuations. Instead,
    the curve was noticeably lopsided, skewed toward more warm than cool
    events. The curve also exhibited a noticeably longer tail, representing
    warm events that were more extreme, or of higher temperature, than the
    most extreme cold events.



    ========================================================================== "This indicates there's some sort of amplification relative to what you
    would otherwise have expected," Arnscheidt says. "Everything's pointing
    to something fundamental that's causing this push, or bias toward warming events." "It's fair to say that the Earth system becomes more volatile,
    in a warming sense," Rothman adds.

    A warming multiplier The team wondered whether this warming bias might
    have been a result of "multiplicative noise" in the climate-carbon
    cycle. Scientists have long understood that higher temperatures, up to a
    point, tend to speed up biological and chemical processes. Because the
    carbon cycle, which is a key driver of long-term climate fluctuations,
    is itself composed of such processes, increases in temperature may lead
    to larger fluctuations, biasing the system towards extreme warming events.

    In mathematics, there exists a set of equations that describes such
    general amplifying, or multiplicative effects. The researchers applied
    this multiplicative theory to their analysis to see whether the equations
    could predict the asymmetrical distribution, including the degree of
    its skew and the length of its tails.

    In the end, they found that the data, and the observed bias toward
    warming, could be explained by the multiplicative theory. In other words,
    it's very likely that, over the last 66 million years, periods of modest warming were on average further enhanced by multiplier effects, such as
    the response of biological and chemical processes that further warmed
    the planet.

    As part of the study, the researchers also looked at the correlation
    between past warming events and changes in Earth's orbit. Over hundreds
    of thousands of years, Earth's orbit around the sun regularly becomes
    more or less elliptical.

    But scientists have wondered why many past warming events appeared
    to coincide with these changes, and why these events feature outsized
    warming compared with what the change in Earth's orbit could have wrought
    on its own.

    So, Arnscheidt and Rothman incorporated the Earth's orbital changes
    into the multiplicative model and their analysis of Earth's temperature changes, and found that multiplier effects could predictably amplify,
    on average, the modest temperature rises due to changes in Earth's orbit.

    "Climate warms and cools in synchrony with orbital changes, but the
    orbital cycles themselves would predict only modest changes in climate," Rothman says.

    "But if we consider a multiplicative model, then modest warming, paired
    with this multiplier effect, can result in extreme events that tend to
    occur at the same time as these orbital changes." "Humans are forcing the system in a new way," Arnscheidt adds. "And this study is showing that,
    when we increase temperature, we're likely going to interact with these natural, amplifying effects." This research was supported, in part,
    by MIT's School of Science.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology. Original written by Jennifer
    Chu. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Constantin W. Arnscheidt, Daniel H. Rothman. Asymmetry of extreme
    Cenozoic climate-carbon cycle events. Science Advances, 2021; 7
    (33): eabg6864 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg6864 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210811162816.htm

    --- up 13 weeks, 5 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)