Look! Up in the sky! Is it a planet? Nope, just a star

Date:
March 15, 2022
Source:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Summary:
Among thousands of known exoplanets,astronomers have flagged three
that are actually stars.



FULL STORY ==========================================================================
The first worlds beyond our solar system were discovered three decades
ago.

Since then, close to 5,000 exoplanets have been confirmed in our galaxy.

Astronomers have detected another 5,000 planetary candidates -- objects
that might be planets but have yet to be confirmed. Now, the list of
planets has shrunk by at least three.


==========================================================================
In a study appearing in the Astronomical Journal, MIT astronomers report
that three, and potentially four, planets that were originally discovered
by NASA's Kepler Space Telescope are in fact misclassified. Instead,
these suspected planets are likely small stars.

The team used updated measurements of planet-hosting stars to double-check
the size of the planets, and identified three that are simply too big
to be planets. With new and better estimates of stellar properties, the researchers found that the three objects, which are known as Kepler-854b, Kepler-840b, and Kepler-699b, are now estimated to be between two and
four times the size of Jupiter.

"Most exoplanets are Jupiter-sized or much smaller. Twice [the size of]
Jupiter is already suspicious. Larger than that cannot be a planet,
which is what we found," says the study's first author Prajwal Niraula,
a graduate student in MIT's Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and
Planetary Sciences.

A fourth planet, Kepler-747b, is about 1.8 times Jupiter's size, which
is comparable to the very largest confirmed planets. But Kepler-747b is relatively far from its star, and the amount of light it receives is too
small to sustain a planet of its size. Kepler-747b's planetary status,
the team concludes, is suspect but not entirely implausible.

"Overall, this study makes the current list of planets more complete,"
says study author Avi Shporer, a research scientist at MIT's Kavli
Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research. "People rely on this list
to study the population of planets as a whole. If you use a sample with
a few interlopers, your results may be inaccurate. So, it's important
that the list of planets is not contaminated." The study's co-authors
also include Ian Wong, NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow at NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center, and MIT Assistant Professor Julien de Wit.



========================================================================== Stellar updates Rooting out planetary imposters was not the team's
initial goal. Niraula originally intended to look for systems with signs
of tidal distortion.

"If you have two objects close to each other, the gravitational pull of
one will cause the other to be egg-shaped, or ellipsoidal, which gives
you an idea of how massive the companion is," Niraula explains. "So you
could determine whether it's a star-star or star-planet system, just
based on that tidal pull." When combing through the Kepler catalog,
he came upon a signal from Kepler-854b that appeared too large to be true.

"Suddenly we had a system where we saw this ellipsoidal signal which was
huge, and pretty immediately we knew this could not be from a planet,"
Shporer says.

"Then we thought, something doesn't add up." The team then took a second
look at both the star and the planetary candidate.

As with all Kepler-detected planets, Kepler-854b was spotted through a
transit detection -- a periodic dip in starlight that signals a possible
planet passing in front of its star. The depth of that dip represents the
ratio between the size of the planet and that of its star. Astronomers
can calculate the planet's size based on what they know of the star's
size. But as Kepler-854b was discovered in 2016, its size was based on
stellar estimates that were less precise than they are today.



========================================================================== Currently, the most accurate measurements of stars comes from the European Space Agency's Gaia mission, a space-based observatory that is designed
to precisely measure and map the properties and paths of stars in the
Milky Way.

In 2016, Gaia's measurements of Kepler-854 were not yet available. Given
the stellar information that was available, the object seemed to be a plausible- sized planet. But Niraula found that with Gaia's improved
estimates, Kepler- 854b turned out to be much larger, at three times
the size of Jupiter.

"There's no way the universe can make a planet of that size," Shporer
says. "It just doesn't exist." Tiny corrections The team confirmed that Kepler-854b was a planetary "false positive" -- not a planet at all, but instead, a small star orbiting a larger host star. Then they wondered:
Could there be more? Niraula searched through the Kepler catalog's
more than 2,000 planets, this time for significant updates to the size
of stars provided by Gaia. He ultimately discovered three stars whose
sizes significantly changed based on Gaia's improved measurements. From
these estimates, the team recalculated the size of the planets orbiting
each star, and found them to be about two to four times Jupiter's size.

"That was a very big flag," Niraula says. "We now have three objects
that are now not planets, and the fourth is likely not a planet."
Going forward, the team anticipates that there won't be many more such corrections to existing exoplanet catalogs.

"This is a tiny correction," Shporer says. "It comes from the better understanding of stars, which is only improving all the time. So, the
chances of a star's radius being so incorrect are much smaller. These misclassifications are not going to happen many times more."
This research was supported in part by NASA.


========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
Massachusetts_Institute_of_Technology. Original written by Jennifer
Chu. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Prajwal Niraula, Avi Shporer, Ian Wong, Julien de Wit. Revisiting
Kepler
Transiting Systems: Unvetting Planets and Constraining Relationships
among Harmonics in Phase Curves. The Astronomical Journal, 2022;
163 (4): 172 DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4f64 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220315150113.htm

--- up 2 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 51 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)