• Forget mammoths: These researchers are e

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Wed Mar 9 21:30:48 2022
    Forget mammoths: These researchers are exploring bringing back the
    extinct Christmas Island rat

    Date:
    March 9, 2022
    Source:
    Cell Press
    Summary:
    Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, mammoths 4,000
    years ago, and the Christmas Island Rat 119 years ago. Since
    becoming a popular concept in the 1990s, de-extinction efforts have
    focused on grand animals with mythical stature, but now a team of
    paleogeneticists has turned their attention to Rattus macleari,
    and their findings provide insights into the limitations of
    de-extinction across all species.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, mammoths 4,000 years ago,
    and the Christmas Island Rat 119 years ago. Since becoming a popular
    concept in the 1990s, de-extinction efforts have focused on grand animals
    with mythical stature, but in a paper published March 9 in the journal
    Current Biology, a team of paleogeneticists turn their attention to
    Rattus macleari,and their findings provide insights into the limitations
    of de-extinction across all species.


    ========================================================================== De-extinction work is defined by what is unknown. When sequencing the
    genome of an extinct species, scientists face the challenge of working
    with degraded DNA, which doesn't yield all the genetic information
    required to reconstruct a full genome of the extinct animal. With the
    Christmas Island rat, which is believed to have gone extinct because of diseases brought over on European ships, evolutionary geneticist Tom
    Gilbert (@Evohologen) at University of Copenhagen and his colleagues
    lucked out.

    Not only was the team able to obtain almost all of the rodent's genome,
    but since it diverged from other Rattusspecies relatively recently,
    it shares about 95% of its genome with a living rat, the Norway brown
    rat. "It was a quite a nice test model," says Gilbert. "It's the perfect
    case because when you sequence the genome, you have to compare it to a
    really good modern reference." After the DNA has been sequenced as well
    as possible and the genome is matched up against the reference genome
    of the living species, the scientists identify the parts of the genomes
    that don't match up and, in theory, would then use CRISPR technology to
    gene edit the DNA of the living species to match that of the extinct
    one. The brown-rat-to-Christmas-Island-rat scenario is a particularly
    good test case because the evolutionary divergence is similar to that
    of the elephant and the mammoth.

    Though the sequencing of the Christmas Island rat was mostly successful,
    a few key genes were missing. These genes were related to olfaction,
    meaning that a resurrected Christmas Island Rat would likely be unable
    to process smells in the way as it would have originally. "With current technology, it may be completely impossible to ever recover the full
    sequence, and therefore it is impossible to ever generate a perfect
    replica of the Christmas Island rat," says Gilbert.

    "It is very, very clear that we are never going to be able to get all the information to create a perfect recovered form of an extinct species,"
    he says.

    "There will always be some kind of hybrid." Though a replica will never
    be perfect, the key is that scientists are able to edit for the DNA that
    makes the extinct animal functionally different from the living one.

    Gilbert says that in order to make an ecologically functional mammoth,
    for example, it might be enough to edit elephant DNA to make the animal
    hairy and able to live in the cold. "If you're making a weird fuzzy
    elephant to live in a zoo, it probably doesn't matter if it is missing
    some behavioral genes," he says. "But that brings up a whole lot of
    ethical questions." Gilbert plans to try doing the actual gene editing
    on rats but would like to start with species that are still living. He
    intends to begin by doing CRISPR edits on a black rat genome to change it
    to a Norway brown rat before attempting to resurrect the Christmas Island
    rat. Though he is excited about his future research, the whole process
    still gives him pause. "I think it's a fascinating idea in technology,
    but one has to wonder if that's the best use of money as opposed to
    keeping the things alive that are still here," he says.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Cell_Press. Note: Content may be
    edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Jianqing Lin, David Duche^ne, Christian Caro/e, Oliver Smith,
    Marta Maria
    Ciucani, Jonas Niemann, Douglas Richmond, Alex D. Greenwood, Ross
    MacPhee, Guojie Zhang, Shyam Gopalakrishnan, M. Thomas P. Gilbert.

    Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas
    Island rat.

    Current Biology, 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.027 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/03/220309111050.htm

    --- up 1 week, 2 days, 10 hours, 51 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)