• Future release process suggested !

    From Vincent Coen@2:250/1 to All on Sun Dec 31 16:30:43 2023
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of the latest
    version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five years in parallel
    with what ever the current rolling version. This way users including
    myself would not have to delay upgrades until the last possible moment and
    even then have to spend WEEKS if not months getting their system fully operational.

    Many of us use the distro on productions systems even if these are at home
    and I really have better things to do with my time than having to fix a new broken system that was working perfectly fine before the so called update.

    Enough is enough !!

    I am getting real close to move away from Mageia to one of the other
    distros that does support the LTS processes. This will also apply to all
    other systems that use Mageia having converted one test system over and
    no, I would prefer not to do this but having broken system because of a
    upgrade is just a waste of every ones time and time is money. Even more so
    when you are getting on a bit (76).



    Vincent


    SEEN-BY: 25/0 21 250/0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 13 14 263/0 362/6 467/4 712/1321
  • From Bobbie Sellers@2:250/1 to All on Sun Dec 31 18:08:32 2023
    Reply-To: blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com

    On 12/31/23 08:30, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of the latest
    version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five years in parallel
    with what ever the current rolling version. This way users including
    myself would not have to delay upgrades until the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not months getting their system fully operational.

    Many of us use the distro on productions systems even if these are at home and I really have better things to do with my time than having to fix a new broken system that was working perfectly fine before the so called update.

    Enough is enough !!

    I am getting real close to move away from Mageia to one of the other
    distros that does support the LTS processes. This will also apply to all other systems that use Mageia having converted one test system over and
    no, I would prefer not to do this but having broken system because of a upgrade is just a waste of every ones time and time is money. Even more so when you are getting on a bit (76).



    Vincent

    It may sound good to have LTS and if people must use a 'buntu or derivative but when that LTS comes to an end you may have the sort of
    problems that you do when Mageia or its predecessor Mandriva presented
    for all the time that it lasted. You may think that it would solve
    problems but it may not instead presenting you with uncomfortable
    choices. A Rolling Release that is competently curated as is the
    one I use is a better choice and Mageia would be advised to go that
    way instead of trying to reinvent the wheel or might better be to
    say reinvent the clockwork every year or so or even every 5 years
    or so. Frequently people who upgrade on the LTS find that it does
    not work properly. I know that is a problem that 'buntu users
    seem to have quite often. Mandriva 2011 would not run on my
    hardware and I could get no competent assistance having paid
    for my copy.

    Just my opinion after 30 years or so of computer use and
    18 years of GNU/Linux use.

    Don't neglect doing backups of OS and of data frequently and if you
    decide to put the backups on USB Flash Drives here is a article
    evaluating the choices: <https://www.tomshardware.com/best-picks/best-flash-drives>

    bliss- Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2023.11- Linux 6.5.13- Plasma 5.27.10
    Wishing all who use any GNU/Linux a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New
    Year in 2024!


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: nil (2:250/1@fidonet)
  • From Vincent Coen@2:250/1 to Bobbie Sellers on Sun Dec 31 21:50:02 2023
    Hello Bobbie!

    Sunday December 31 2023 18:08, Bobbie Sellers wrote to All:

    All well and good saying do a backup but I have had issues in the past with this :

    On my main system Mga v8 and now v9 I run two rsync processes, one for the
    boot drive nd the other for the /home area (it is on a different
    drive / partition).

    How ever a few years back I had a need to do a restore and on rebooting it failed.

    For your and any others interest this is the back up scripts for each one
    and if you can spot the problem please let me know :

    Boot drive script :-

    #!/bin/bash
    time rsync -avvuhh --stats --delete --exclude=/dev --exclude=/proc --exclude=/mnt --exclude=/run --exclude=/tmp --exclude=/home
    --exclude=/media --exclude=/sys / /home/vince/Music2/Backups/SSD-Mageia-v9
    rsync-root.log 2>rsync-root.err
    exit 0


    Home partition script :-

    #!/bin/bash
    time rsync -avvuhh --stats --delete --exclude=/home/vince/Music2 /home /home/vince/Music2/Backups > rsync-home.log 2>rsync-home.err
    exit 0


    Out of interest here is my attempt to do a restore :

    #!/bin/bash
    time rsync -avvuhh --stats --delete --exclude=/dev --exclude=/proc --exclude=/mnt --exclude=/run --exclude=/tmp --exclude=/home
    --exclude=/media --exclude=/sys
    /home/vince/Music2/Backups/SSD-Mageia-v9/ /mnt/disk1 >
    rsync-restore-root.log 2 > rsync-restore-root.err
    exit 0

    Note that although the restore has been changed to reflect the new MGA v9 distro (SSD-Mageia-v9-HDD) I have not run it.

    In the past I have attempted to do it using other tools but without
    success.

    Just to let you know - I have been in computing (Operator, Analyst / Programmer, Program Leader, Tester, Test Leader, Manager, IT Manager, IT Director since 1963+ starting on IBM 1401, 7094, ICL 1900's, 29 & 39
    series, IBM 360,370 and later, as well as other kit from Burroughs,
    Honeywell, CDC and many others including mini's and starting with micros
    around 1974/5 running my own company dealing with micros starting with
    CPM, MPM, OS/2 and on and upwards. These days I am well retired working on
    one of my old Accounting applications written in Cobol that I have made available as open source. I suffer from being now the only person doing the work of a (small) team so it is slow allowing for writing / updating the
    many documentation / manuals etc, as well.

    Reply-To: blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com

    On 12/31/23 08:30, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other
    distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of
    the latest version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five
    years in parallel with what ever the current rolling version. This
    way users including myself would not have to delay upgrades until
    the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not
    months getting their system fully operational.

    Many of us use the distro on productions systems even if these are
    at home and I really have better things to do with my time than
    having to fix a new broken system that was working perfectly fine
    before the so called update.

    Enough is enough !!

    I am getting real close to move away from Mageia to one of the other
    distros that does support the LTS processes. This will also apply to
    all other systems that use Mageia having converted one test system
    over and no, I would prefer not to do this but having broken system
    because of a upgrade is just a waste of every ones time and time is
    money. Even more so when you are getting on a bit (76).



    Vincent

    It may sound good to have LTS and if people must use a 'buntu or derivative but when that LTS comes to an end you may have the sort of problems that you do when Mageia or its predecessor Mandriva presented
    for all the time that it lasted. You may think that it would solve problems but it may not instead presenting you with uncomfortable
    choices. A Rolling Release that is competently curated as is the
    one I use is a better choice and Mageia would be advised to go that
    way instead of trying to reinvent the wheel or might better be to
    say reinvent the clockwork every year or so or even every 5 years
    or so. Frequently people who upgrade on the LTS find that it does
    not work properly. I know that is a problem that 'buntu users
    seem to have quite often. Mandriva 2011 would not run on my
    hardware and I could get no competent assistance having paid
    for my copy.

    Just my opinion after 30 years or so of computer use and
    18 years of GNU/Linux use.

    Don't neglect doing backups of OS and of data frequently and if you
    decide to put the backups on USB Flash Drives here is a article
    evaluating the choices: <https://www.tomshardware.com/best-picks/best-flash-drives>

    bliss- Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2023.11- Linux 6.5.13- Plasma
    5.27.10 Wishing all who use any GNU/Linux a Happy, Healthy and
    Prosperous New Year in 2024!




    Vincent


    SEEN-BY: 25/0 21 250/0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 13 14 263/0 362/6 467/4 712/1321
  • From David W. Hodgins@2:250/1 to All on Sun Dec 31 19:11:31 2023
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:30:43 -0500, Vincent Coen <VBCoen@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of the latest
    version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five years in parallel
    with what ever the current rolling version. This way users including
    myself would not have to delay upgrades until the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not months getting their system fully operational.

    It's a choice that has been reviewed many times in the past.

    The problem with an LTS system is that any update may break things. For that reason, it's not safe for less technical users, as it man require config changes that require root permission.

    With a rolling release, updates that break things are not allowed, except during upgrades from one release to the next where there is plenty of warning about what configuration changes need to be applied. That makes it safer for regular users to install security updates as soon as possible.

    Because Mageia has chosen to keep things as stable as possible, the rolling release model was chosen.

    Mageia does not have the resources (man power and hardware) to maintain both
    a rolling release and a long term support release.

    Regards, Dave Hodgins

    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:250/1@fidonet)
  • From faeychild@2:250/1 to All on Sun Dec 31 22:02:46 2023
    On 1/1/24 03:30, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of the latest
    version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five years in parallel
    with what ever the current rolling version. This way users including
    myself would not have to delay upgrades until the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not months getting their system fully operational.


    I was mulling over the same thing. Then I realized I had a spare
    partition along with MGA6-8. MGA6 is still there because that's the only
    disto where dvdstyler still works and I do author the very occasional disk.
    I have spare backup MGA8 partition, never used.
    I could install MGA9 there and "modify" it at leisure while still having access to current MGA8.
    The new year is looking up


    --
    Running KDE on x86_64 5.15.126-desktop-1.mga8
    Mageia release 8


    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:250/1@fidonet)
  • From Vincent Coen@2:250/1 to faeychild on Mon Jan 1 17:14:53 2024
    Hello faeychild!

    Sunday December 31 2023 22:02, faeychild wrote to All:

    On 1/1/24 03:30, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other
    distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of
    the latest version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five
    years in parallel with what ever the current rolling version. This
    way users including myself would not have to delay upgrades until
    the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not
    months getting their system fully operational.


    I was mulling over the same thing. Then I realized I had a spare
    partition along with MGA6-8. MGA6 is still there because that's the
    only disto where dvdstyler still works and I do author the very
    occasional disk. I have spare backup MGA8 partition, never used. I
    could install MGA9 there and "modify" it at leisure while still having
    access to current MGA8. The new year is looking up


    After the upgrade from v8 to v9 I have noticed that a large number of
    packages including Perl one's were removed instead of upgrading or leaving
    in place with zero warnings of such action and this has caused many issues
    that some applications stop working (with non helpful messages if at all).

    I am still trying to locate these despite running rpmlist.sh on both the
    old v8 system pre-upgrade and that current v9 comparing the content. Here I have managed to do all the perl, PHP, Ruby products but have had to skip
    most of the lib and lib64 one's (although adding back in the missing
    packages has repopulated the lib/lib64 areas to some extent re-comparing
    the old and updated new v9 list still shows gaps so that I will try and
    ignore these unless another issue appears.

    Currently I notice that using Webmins mysql/mariadb back procedure on
    a nightly process fails as the scheduler is disabled and cannot find out
    where this occurs and how to fix it. Gioing through the Webmin process
    it does not such an option oce the back process has been set up or for that matter trying to do a one off back up.

    For the moment that is the only failure at this time that I have spotted
    other than thunderbird no longer reading my mail (as via mail) stored in /usr/spool/mail - just complains that this folder is invalid woutout
    letting me change it - assuming I knew how and what to :(

    I dislike using the mail command from a terminal program as it is very
    clunky but it does go back to year dot.

    Vincent


    SEEN-BY: 25/0 21 250/0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 13 14 263/0 362/6 467/4 712/1321
  • From TJ@2:250/1 to All on Mon Jan 1 14:05:08 2024
    On 2023-12-31 11:30, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello All!

    Is it not about time that Mageia fell in to line with some other distros by offering a five year LTS (Long Term Supported) version of the latest
    version then fully supporting it for a minimum of five years in parallel
    with what ever the current rolling version. This way users including
    myself would not have to delay upgrades until the last possible moment and even then have to spend WEEKS if not months getting their system fully operational.

    Many of us use the distro on productions systems even if these are at home and I really have better things to do with my time than having to fix a new broken system that was working perfectly fine before the so called update.

    Enough is enough !!

    I am getting real close to move away from Mageia to one of the other
    distros that does support the LTS processes. This will also apply to all other systems that use Mageia having converted one test system over and
    no, I would prefer not to do this but having broken system because of a upgrade is just a waste of every ones time and time is money. Even more so when you are getting on a bit (76).



    Vincent


    I'm very sorry that your upgrade experience has not been what you would
    like. Would that we had the resources to do what you would like, but we
    simply do not.

    I'm a farmer by trade, and I too use Mageia on my production systems,
    mostly one desktop and two laptops, though I do have other systems that
    could step in if need be. I use older hardware because it's what I can
    afford, and my production needs are probably modest by most of today's standards. I actually upgraded my production systems to Cauldron (then
    Mageia 9) over a year ago, to give them some real-world testing before release.

    Yes, it's been a while now, but other than changes to Plasma introduced
    by the Friendly Folks at KDE (NOT Mageia) I don't recall any serious
    problems getting things up and going. No more than a couple of hours, including the upgrade itself. There were minor troubles from time to
    time afterward, but that's just the nature of Cauldron, as development proceeds. Mageia is never to be considered stable while in Cauldron.

    I kept some Mageia 8 systems around for the purpose of testing updates
    while Mageia 8 was still supported. Now that Mageia 8 is officially EOL,
    I've been upgrading them one by one. So far, zero issues with the
    upgrades. Once they finish, the systems are ready to go.

    Last week I did a major hardware upgrade of my production desktop,
    different motherboard, processor 5 generations newer, tripling RAM, my
    first experience with NVME SSDs, and a Nvidia video card. With such a
    large hardware difference, I realized that using the old system might
    work but might not, so I backed up /home and my other data by copying it
    onto one of the new SSDs, but NOT the / partition. That I installed new,
    using the netinstall iso so that I got all the updates in the process.

    Afterward, the new system booted quickly, with no problems whatsoever.
    This upgrade did take more time, as I had to re-install things that
    weren't part of the basic install, like my HP printers and the software
    tools I use as part of the Mageia QA team. Most of one afternoon, but definitely not WEEKS.

    I hope you've stayed with me this far, because here is where I tell you
    that every system is different, and comparing my experience with yours
    is not particularly valid. But my experience is the only one I can go
    on, the only one I can use as I do my volunteer duties with QA.

    It's the same with all the rest of us at Mageia, all volunteers who do
    this in our spare time, with a limited variety of hardware and
    configurations. It is impossible for us to anticipate all possible
    situations, so we do the best we can with what we have. It would be even
    more difficult to maintain a LTS release, as problems creep in during
    its life.

    BTW, my time is valuable too, as I am still farming full time, even
    though I too "am getting on a bit." (74)

    TJ



    --- MBSE BBS v1.0.8.4 (Linux-x86_64)
    * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:250/1@fidonet)
  • From Vincent Coen@2:250/1 to TJ on Tue Jan 2 15:52:46 2024
    Hello TJ!

    Monday January 01 2024 14:05, TJ wrote to All:

    I'm very sorry that your upgrade experience has not been what you
    would like. Would that we had the resources to do what you would like,
    but we simply do not.

    I'm a farmer by trade, and I too use Mageia on my production systems,
    mostly one desktop and two laptops, though I do have other systems
    that could step in if need be. I use older hardware because it's what
    I can afford, and my production needs are probably modest by most of
    today's standards. I actually upgraded my production systems to
    Cauldron (then Mageia 9) over a year ago, to give them some real-world testing before release.

    Yes, it's been a while now, but other than changes to Plasma
    introduced by the Friendly Folks at KDE (NOT Mageia) I don't recall
    any serious problems getting things up and going. No more than a
    couple of hours, including the upgrade itself. There were minor
    troubles from time to time afterward, but that's just the nature of Cauldron, as development proceeds. Mageia is never to be considered
    stable while in Cauldron.

    I kept some Mageia 8 systems around for the purpose of testing updates
    while Mageia 8 was still supported. Now that Mageia 8 is officially
    EOL, I've been upgrading them one by one. So far, zero issues with the
    upgrades. Once they finish, the systems are ready to go.

    Last week I did a major hardware upgrade of my production desktop,
    different motherboard, processor 5 generations newer, tripling RAM, my
    first experience with NVME SSDs, and a Nvidia video card. With such a
    large hardware difference, I realized that using the old system might
    work but might not, so I backed up /home and my other data by copying
    it onto one of the new SSDs, but NOT the / partition. That I installed
    new, using the netinstall iso so that I got all the updates in the
    process.

    Afterward, the new system booted quickly, with no problems whatsoever.
    This upgrade did take more time, as I had to re-install things that
    weren't part of the basic install, like my HP printers and the
    software tools I use as part of the Mageia QA team. Most of one
    afternoon, but definitely not WEEKS.

    I hope you've stayed with me this far, because here is where I tell
    you that every system is different, and comparing my experience with
    yours is not particularly valid. But my experience is the only one I
    can go on, the only one I can use as I do my volunteer duties with QA.

    It's the same with all the rest of us at Mageia, all volunteers who do
    this in our spare time, with a limited variety of hardware and
    configurations. It is impossible for us to anticipate all possible
    situations, so we do the best we can with what we have. It would be
    even more difficult to maintain a LTS release, as problems creep in
    during its life.

    BTW, my time is valuable too, as I am still farming full time, even
    though I too "am getting on a bit." (74)


    The biggest issue as far as I can see is that the upgrade did NOT update
    ALL of the installed packages, most noticeable was the one's relating to
    Perl modules and some PHP. The Ruby one's was also excluded but my use of
    them as far as I "know" is very limited to put it mildly and like all three used with packages that are used.

    On my system that is at least 10 years old now running a Amd fx8350 cpu
    that is recorded as a 8 core (Although when a program starts up in a odd numbered core (such as 1) but then processes it in an even core (such as 2)
    so the practical is a 4 core as far as I can tell.

    Now The system also runs in the background a BBS and mailer that acts as a major Host and Hub for mail and files to over 40+ other systems around the world, with Apache as a web server, FTP via proftp (did try and use
    pure-ftp but with very limited success), Mysql (OK mariadb - which is NOT
    the same in some aspects and here you cannot remove mariadb and swap it out with mysql as there are too many packages that require it and would have to
    be removed - more later). Various programming tools including compilers
    such as gcc, clang (when gcc produces excess error when compiling a
    program), GnuCobol for development and testing of my Accounting s/w - ACAS available via sourceforge), Mainframe s/w directly and indirectly available mostly for my own use but was so I can work from home as a Freelance programmer, and senior tester etc although that mostly has ended due to my
    age.

    For the web server (Apache) it uses a lot of Perl modules that have been installed in order to run correctly and securely and here was the major rub that the upgrade to v9 did not process them NOR provide warning that it
    could not for what ever the reason was and this would have helped possibly
    spot the issues before getting failure during various elements of the
    software failing without direct warnings (like only in the log files and
    not on the screen).

    It does not help that many of such warnings goes to local mail (which can
    be picked up by using the mail program but as I use Thunderbird, I had it
    grab those every morning along with all my emails every 30 minutes.

    Now since the upgrade along with a later version of Thunderbird this
    function no longer works and I cannot find what is wrong and therefore how
    to fix it. IT is these sort of funnies that are a right pain and even more
    so as this is my production system.

    These are the issues as of now that I have found and does not mean that
    there are not others that I have not so far seen but no doubt will rear
    their ugly head over time while still doing development, testing and
    document writing of my accounting system which does date back to the 70 -
    80's. This was a commercial product that was sold as a one off price or a subscription model up to the late 90's / early 2000's but when I
    technically retired decided to make it available to every one as a FOC so
    that the work over many years was not wasted - OK, a lot of my effort :).

    I should point out that having a very extensive background to working on a large range of mainframes since the 60's I have come to be very slow in
    doing any upgrades from one version to the next as I prefer to wait while
    the bugs are found and fixed. Mainframe updates such as the O/S (Operating System) which also includes all of the products also installed such as compilers and in this case will involve testing all suites (applications) currently in use or about the be so) to ensure nothing is now broken. This takes up a lot of time by a team of anything from 5 to 20+ people over some months and as I have only me that can not really happen so I let all the
    other users of Mageia run and hopefully test and report bugs it it that are show stoppers in a real world environment that basic testing would not show
    up.

    I like at least 6 months or better and even up to 12, subject to pucker
    factor.

    I do use LTS O/S distro's for my media recorder / player computer and
    another that runs on a not now so often Raspberry Pi for off loading some
    work from my main system as a JIC (Just In Case) basis.

    Also in the mix is a Apple MAC Pro 2008 running twin 4 core Xeon CPU's that
    is rarely used almost from day one and I must get around to selling it on
    eBay as it was a major expenditure that is just not used. Hopefully this or next month !

    There is other kit such as a laptop (Win 11), notebook (baby laptop for
    when I used to travel around running Win 10) and my wife's desktop, an 20
    year old system running Win 10 (can't run 11 ditto with the notebook) and
    my own system can also only Win 10 on the very odd event that I load it.


    Vincent


    SEEN-BY: 25/0 21 250/0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 13 14 263/0 362/6 467/4 712/1321